Strategies and factors to maximize cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery in benign gynecological disease

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Surgeon volume, complication rates, hospital stay, and instrumentation significantly impact robotic surgery costs for benign gynecological disease, with workflow and discharge processes also playing indirect roles.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Operating room procedures account for half of the gross hospital cost in the United States per annum. Hysterectomy is the eighth most common surgery nationally, with more than 300,000 cases every year. Since the introduction of robotic surgery in benign gynecology, concern has been raised regarding the increased cost without significant improvements in outcomes or practice. Surgeon volume, complication rates, length of hospital stay, and selected intraoperative instrumentation are all factors that have a direct effect on cost in robotic surgery. Cost is indirectly influenced by the OR team workflow, postoperative processes to expedite discharge, and converting surgery to the ambulatory setting. More research is needed to develop evidence-based practices for cost containment in robotic surgery.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Genital Diseases, Female Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:12:34.389221+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine