Core Activation Program and Selective Regional Responsiveness of Microglia in Aging and Parabiosis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,031 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Aging is associated with immune dysregulation in brain and is the biggest risk factor for many neurodegenerative diseases whereas rejuvenation interventions can mediate beneficial effects. Microglia are considered as a major player in the development of neurodegenerative disease yet, the molecular changes underlying brain aging and rejuvenation remain poorly understood at the single cell level. We identified and benchmarked several reproducible microglial states and a core set of genes leading to microglia activation in the mice brain. We investigated microglial heterogeneity and studied the impact of aging and parabiosis-mediated exposure of young and old blood on microglia subpopulations across four different brain regions including cerebellum, cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. We revealed region-specific differences in microglia subpopulation composition and age-related changes, with cerebellum and striatum displaying the most distinctive profiles and dynamic shifts compared to other brain regions. We consistently observed cerebellum as the most responsive, while striatum appeared distinctive by its minimal responsiveness to these interventions. Our findings highlighted the role of microglia in brain regional vulnerability and provided a foundation for microglia-targeted treatment for modulating brain aging. Highlights Defined the composition of different microglial populations reproducible in aging and parabiosis, benchmarking a reference for the field. Uncovered an under-appreciated core activation gene signature of microglia shared in all reactive states and regions during normal aging and old blood-induced aging. Identified region-specific gene expression changes and associated biological processes in microglia during aging and parabiosis Discovered microglial regional selectivity in response to aging and parabiosis, showing cerebellum as the most sensitive region and the striatum as the least affected. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00