The development and validation of long-read ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 nemabiome metabarcoding for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,798 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract ITS-2 rRNA nemabiome metabarcoding is increasingly used to characterize gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) communities. While powerful, current approaches have some limitations in their flexibility and applicability to smaller-scale studies and diagnostic use. The short read lengths provided by the Illumina platform may lack discriminatory power for some closely related species and also pose a challenge for new marker selection and primer design. To address these challenges, we have developed ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 rRNA Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read metabarcoding for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes. Samples from two previous field studies, from UK and western Canadian sheep farms were used. ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 long-read metabarcoding showed strong concordance with prior ITS-2 data for the major GIN species in both datasets, with minor discrepancies for some low abundance taxa mainly due to differences in reference sequence database representation. We also used the PrimerTC tool to design a new primer pair, EC1 and EC2, to minimize the amplification of off-target fungal sequences derived from fecal DNA and maximize the nematode sequence read depth when ONT ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 metabarcoding was applied directly to ovine fecal stool DNA. In summary, ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 ONT long-read nemabiome metabarcoding showed good agreement with ITS-2 metabarcoding and the use of primer pair EC1/EC2 should make the approach more tolerant of fecal contamination of parasite material, with the potential for direct application to ovine fecal DNA. Overall, these new developments should make nemabiome metabarcoding more accessible, discriminating, and flexible for both research and diagnostic applications. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00