Conclusions
and the reproducibility of findings are limited.
21
Nevertheless, similar findings have been reported in other
longitudinal studies. 22 However, at least two meta-analyses
focusing on different types of pain 23,24 clarified the limita-
tion of the methodological designs available thus far. Fur-
thermore, they raised a legitimate concern about the
significantly higher prevalence of the adverse effects on
the nervous system and psychiatric disorders associated
with THC use, 24 particularly including psychosis, depressive
episodes, and cognitive alterations commonly. More speci fi-
cally, regarding the treatment of endometriosis-associated
pain, two clinical trials registered on the clinicaltrials.gov
platform (NCT03875261 and NCT04527003) were retrospec -
tively proposed by researchers from Barcelona and Pennsyl-
vania to assess the effect of cannabinoids on hyperalgesia in
women with deep endometriosis, yet both are currently “not
yet recruiting. ” To the best of our knowledge, in Brazil, we
already have a clinical trial in progress and another that will
soon start recruiting and is under our responsibility.
Considering the popular saying that “not everything that
glitters is gold ” there has been a growing concern in the
specialized scientific community regarding the increasingly
frequent use ofcannabisor its derivatives for pain relief, despite
the potential adverse effects, the lack of robust evidence on
benefits and, consequently, the absence of clear recommenda-
tions on doses and/or composition to be used. In 2021 the
International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published
a statement position
25 recognizing the legitimacy of the life
experience of people who report an improvement in pain
following the use of cannabis and cannabinoids. Nevertheless,
the association made it explicit that it does not endorse the use
of cannabinoids until rigorous investigations and robust results
clearly show the benefits and harms of its use in humans. The
PAIN journal has even allocated an entire collection of 13
scientific articles representing the IASP ’s Presidential Task
Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia and calling for
high-quality clinical trials to be initiated. Some of the concerns
regarding the use of cannabinoids are potential reductions in
neurocognitive performance, macrostructural and microstruc -
tural brain development, and alterations in brain
function secondary to heavy use by adolescents,
26 who have
a higher risk of early onset psychosis,27 and addiction.28
In Brazil, cannabinoid-based medications are of ficially
approved for use only in patients with refractory epilepsy
with a THC concentration <0.2%. These drugs have a very
high cost and any use outside the approved indication is off-
label. In any case, we have seen a growing supply ofcannabis-
derived products on the market linked to the promise of pain
relief. Many serious groups and companies have devoted
efforts to drug development, but international quality stand-
ards are not followed by all, which poses a health risk as it is
impossible to guarantee a high level of quality, adequate
pharmacovigilance, and extensive monitoring of adverse
reactions. This can also lead to abusive and illegal use.
Nevertheless, the prospect of good results is an encour-
agement to women with persistent symptoms and profes-
sionals who assist them to use cannabinoids, but it is
necessary to be aware of the temptation of the premature
clinical use of medication. Unfortunately, from a strictly
medical and scientific point of view, it is currently impossible
to guarantee the ef ficacy, safety and tolerability of cannabis
or its derivatives in the treatment of pain symptoms in
women with endometriosis. Incentives have been made to
disseminate the need for large clinical trials in this domain.
To finish, I will restate a part of a text written by Michael
Eisenstein
29 which seems to me to be very lucid, sensible and
relevant for the situation that we are currently living in:
“Unfortunately, if studies such as these are not done —or not
done properly —then consumers will be left to fend for
themselves in a poorly monitored marketplace. In that
scenario, the signal of true clinical bene fit would almost
certainly be drowned out by the noise from personal anec -
dotes and the placebo effect, which could jeopardize the
future of a potentially valuable medicine. ”29
Conflicts to Interest
None to declare.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Coordination for the Improvement
of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for supporting our
post-graduate program. We would like to thank Editage
(www.editage.com) for English language editing.
References
1 Eisenberg VH, Weil C, Chodick G, Shalev V. Epidemiology of
endometriosis: a large population-based database study from a
healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG. 2018;125
(01):55–62. Doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14711
2 Janssen EB, Rijkers AC, Hoppenbrouwers K, Meuleman C,
D’Hooghe TM. Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by lapa-
roscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain:
a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(05):570 –582.
Doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt016
3 Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al; European Society of
Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: man-
agement of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29
(03):400–412. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457
4 Kuznetsov L, Dworzynski K, Davies M, Overton CGuideline Com-
mittee. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: summary
of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2017;358:j3935. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3935
5 Chaichian S, Kabir A, Mehdizadehkashi A, Rahmani K, Moghimi M,
Moazzami B. Comparing the ef ficacy of surgery and medical
therapy for pain management in endometriosis: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2017;20(03):185 –195
6 Vercellini P, Buggio L, Frattaruolo MP, Borghi A, Dridi D, Somigli-
ana E. Medical treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Best
Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:68 –91. Doi: 10.1016/j.
bpobgyn.2018.01.015
7 Surrey ES, Soliman AM, Johns B, Vora JB, Taylor HS, Agarwal SK.
Real-world characterization of women with diagnosed endome-
triosis initiating therapy with elagolix using a US Claims Database.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 44 No. 5/2022 © 2022. Federação Bra sileira de Ginecologia e Obste trícia. All rights reserved.
Editorial450
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:473 –479. Doi: 10.2147/
CEOR.S264905
8 Capraş RD, Urda-Cîmpean AE, Bolboac ă SD. Is scienti fic medical
literature related to endometriosis treatment evidence-based? A
systematic review on methodological quality of randomized
clinical trials. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(07):E372. Doi:
10.3390/medicina55070372
9 Brown J, Crawford TJ, Datta S, Prentice A. Oral contraceptives for
pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2018;5(05):CD001019. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd001019.pub3
10 Donnez J, Dolmans MM. endometriosis and medical therapy: from
progestogens to progesterone resistance to GnRH antagonists: a
review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(05):1085. Doi: 10.3390/jcm10051085
11 Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, et al; Working group of ESGE,
ESHRE, and WES. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of
endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open.
2020;2020(01):a002
12 As-Sanie S, Till SR, Schrepf AD, et al. Incidence and predictors of
persistent pelvic pain following hysterectomy in women with
chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(05):568.
e1–568.e11. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.038
13 Coxon L, Horne AW, Vincent K. Pathophysiology of endometriosis-
associated pain: A review of pelvic and central nervous system
mechanisms. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:53–67.
Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.014
14 Carey ET, Till SR, As-Sanie S. Pharmacological management of
chronic pelvic pain in women. Drugs. 2017;77(03):285 –301. Doi:
10.1007/s40265-016-0687-8
15 Romero-Sandoval EA, Fincham JE, Kolano AL, Sharpe BN, Alvarado-
Vázquez PA. Cannabis for chronic pain: challenges and consider-
ations. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38(06):651 –662. Doi: 10.1002/
phar.2115
16 Mackie K. Cannabinoid receptors: where they are and what they
do. J Neuroendocrinol. 2008;20(Suppl 1):10 –14. Doi: 10.1111/
j.1365-2826.2008.01671.x
17 Vučković S, Srebro D, Vujovi ć KS, Vu četićČ , Prostran M. Canna-
binoids and pain: new insights from old molecules. Front Phar-
macol. 2018;9:1259. Doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01259
18 Malvezzi H, Hernandes C, Piccinato CA, Podgaec S. Interleukin in
endometriosis-associated infertility-pelvic pain: systematic re-
view and meta-analysis. Reproduction. 2019;158(01):1 –12. Doi:
10.1530/REP-18-0618
19 Nichols JM, Kaplan BLF. Immune responses regulated by canna-
bidiol. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2020;5(01):12 –31. Doi:
10.1089/can.2018.0073
20 Crippa JA, Guimarães FS, Campos AC, Zuardi AW. Translational
investigation of the therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD):
toward a new age. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2009. Doi: 10.3389/
fimmu.2018.02009
21 Sinclair J, Smith CA, Abbott J, Chalmers KJ, Pate DW, Armour M.
Cannabis use, a self-management strategy among australian
women with endometriosis: results from a National Online
Survey. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(03):256 –261. Doi:
10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.033
22 Liang AL, Gingher EL, Coleman JS. Medical cannabis for gyneco-
logic pain conditions: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;
139(02):287–296. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004656
23 Chang Y, Zhu M, Vannabouathong C, Mundi R, Chou RS, Bhandari
M. Medical cannabis for chronic noncancer pain: a systematic
review of health care recommendations. Pain Res Manag. 2021;
2021:8857948. Doi: 10.1155/2021/8857948
24 Mücke M, Phillips T, Radbruch L, Petzke F, Häuser W. Cannabis-
based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD012182. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.
CD012182.pub2
25 IASP Presidential Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Anal-
gesia. International Association for the Study of Pain Presidential
Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia position
statement. Pain. 2021;162(Suppl 1):S1 –S2. Doi: 10.1097/j.
pain.0000000000002265
26 J a c o b u sJ ,T a p e r tS F .E f f e c t so fc a n n a b i so nt h ea d o l e s c e n t
brain. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(13):2186 –2193. Doi:
10.2174/13816128113199990426
27 Pardo M, Matalí JL, Sivoli J, et al. Early onset psychosis and
cannabis use: Prevalence, clinical presentation and in fluence of
daily use. Asian J Psychiatr. 2021;62:102714. Doi: 10.1016/j.
ajp.2021.102714
28 Rup J, Freeman TP, Perlman C, Hammond D. Cannabis and mental
health: Prevalence of use and modes of cannabis administration
by mental health status. Addict Behav. 2021;121:106991. Doi:
10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106991
29 Eisenstein M. The reality behind cannabidiol ’s medical hype.
Nature. 2019;572(7771):S2 –S4. Doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-
02524-5
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 44 No. 5/2022 © 2022. Federação Bras ileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. All rights reserved.
Editorial 451