Comparison of Rt-Lamp and Rt-Qpcr Assays for Detecting Sars-Cov-2 in the Extracted Rna and Direct Swab Samples

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Rapid detection of sever acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) in infected patients is critical for infection control. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has been demonstrated to be a rapid, simple, reliable, cost-effective and sensitive method to detect SARS-COV-2 in a variety of samples in a considerably less time than Real-Time PCR. In this study, we developed and optimized a rapid detection method for SARS-COV-2 based on RT-LAMP method utilizing a specific primer set targeting the ORF1a gene and then examined its sensitivity and efficiency using a serially diluted viral RNA sample. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the RT-LAMP to detect SARS-COV-2 in direct swap samples with varying Ct values were compared to a commercial molecular RT-qPCR based detection kit. According to our findings the optimal incubation time for RT-LAMP assay was 45 minutes. Furthermore, there was a complete agreement between RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR in diagnosing the viral genome in the diluted extracted RNA sample. However, it had a lower sensitivity (71 %) to detect the viral genome in direct swab samples compared to RT-qPCR. In conclusion, due to its simplicity, rapidness, sensitivity, and specificity, RT-LAMP has tremendous potential as a point-of-care tool; nevertheless, more research is needed to utilize it for detecting SARS-COV-2, particularly in direct swap samples.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00