Intrathecal Morphine Versus Four-Quadrant Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks in Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Objectives: An effective and harmless analgesic method for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery remains undefined. Although intrathecal morphine(ITM) and four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane blocks(four-quadrant TAPB) are frequently preferred for postoperative analgesia, their effectiveness is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 4 quadrant TAPB with ITM in postoperative analgesia in gynaecological cancer surgeries. Methods: In this study, we retrospectively compared the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine and four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing clossed or open major gynecologic cancer surgery. Results: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 65 patients operated on for gynecologic cancer. In terms of perioperative analgesic methods, 46% of these patients received ITM and 54% received four-quadrant TAPB. Demographic data, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) clinical classification, operation time and length of hospital stay were similar. Postoperative 1- and 24-hour numeric rating scale (NRS) scores and opioid consumption were lower in the ITM group (p< 0.05). When the patient population was evaluated laparotomically and laparoscopically, it was found that the postoperative 1- and 24-hour NRS values, postoperative 24-hour opioid consumption levels and opioid demand levels in laparoscopic cases were lower in the ITM group (p< 0.05). Postoperative adverse effects and complications were similar in both groups. Conclusion: It was found that in gynecologic cancer surgery, intrathecal morphine was more effective in postoperative pain management and reduced the need for postoperative opioids compared to four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane blocks.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:29:46.044917+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0