Simultaneous Confidence Regions for Image Excursion Sets: a Validation Study with Applications in fMRI

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,684 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is commonly used to localize brain regions activated during a task. Methods have been developed for constructing confidence regions of image excursion sets, allowing inference on brain regions exceeding non-zero activation thresholds. However, these methods have been limited to a single predefined threshold and brain volume data, overlooking more sensitive cortical surface analyses. We present an approach that constructs simultaneous confidence regions (SCRs) which are valid for all possible activation thresholds and are applicable to both volume and surface data. This approach is based on a recent method that constructs SCRs from simultaneous confidence bands (SCBs), obtained by using the bootstrap on 1D and 2D images. To extend this method to fMRI studies, we evaluate the validity of the bootstrap with fMRI data through extensive 2D simulations. Six bootstrap variants, including the nonparametric bootstrap and multiplier bootstrap are compared. The Rademacher multiplier bootstrap-t performs the best, achieving a coverage rate close to the nominal level with sample sizes as low as 20. We further validate our approach using realistic noise simulations obtained by resampling resting-state 3D fMRI data, a technique that has become the gold standard in the field. Moreover, our implementation handles data of any dimension and is equipped with interactive visualization tools designed for fMRI analysis. We apply our approach to task fMRI volume data and surface data from the Human Connectome Project, showcasing the method’s utility. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00