The ornamental stones of the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy): autoptic, geochemical and minero-petrographic multi-analytical characterisations

The ornamental stones of the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy): autoptic, geochemical and minero-petrographic multi-analytical characterisations | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The ornamental stones of the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy): autoptic, geochemical and minero-petrographic multi-analytical characterisations Arianna Casarin, Fabrizio Antonelli, Alessandro Cavallo, Maria Rita Cicconi, and 11 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 11 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Ancient Romans exploited aesthetic natural stones from many sites across their Empire around the Mediterranean, transporting them for thousands of kilometres, to decorate their buildings. Petrographically, these metamorphic, sedimentary and igneous rocks display considerable differences, ranging from simple white stones to vividly coloured lithotypes. The source Region of these coloured stones is typically reconstructed from autoptic (visual and comparative examination of macroscopic or hand-sample scale) determinations, also tacking advantage from the personal expertise of some specialists of the sector. Here, the ornamental stones of the 2nd-century A.D. thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Abruzzo region, Italy) are considered and investigated by different and complementary methods. According to their autoptic features or mesoscopic textures, the initial 56 samples were divided into three categories: polychrome stones, grey-striped and white crystalline marbles. These rocks were analysed via bulk autoptic, mineralogical (XRPD) and geochemical (XRF) methods; also, representative thin sections were used for transmission optical microscope (TOM) petrographic and micro-Raman determinations. The δ¹⁸O and δ¹³C isotopic signatures were also characterised for white and grey-striped marbles. The complementary and multi-analytical approach unveils that the grey-striped marble is Greco Scritto , the white marbles come from Carrara ( Marmor Lunense ) and Marmara Island ( Marmor Proconnesium ) sources, whilst the four polychrome stones correspond to Pavonazzetto Antico (Marmor Phrygium ), Cipollino Verde ( Marmor Carystium ), Portasanta ( Marmor Chium ) and Breccia di Settebasi ( Marmor Scyreticum ). The coupling of qualitative observations with quantitative measurements further constrains the provenance and features of aesthetic rocks employed in the ancient town by the Romans. Roman baths polychrome stones white marbles autoptic XRPD and XRF analyses Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Introduction Rocks and sediments have been exploited for millennia to decorate artefacts and obtain building materials. During Roman times, huge amounts of lithologies were quarried and transported to build and decorate the external and internal surfaces of baths, theatres, villas, streets and monuments in general, as well as for statuary, either from surrounding areas or from many and faraway sites (Pensabene 1993 , 2002 ). The importance of these activities and prices concerning ornamental stones is marked by the “ Edictum de Pretiis Rerum Venalium” (Diocletian, 301 A.D.) (Gnoli 1988 ). The Romans distinguished Marmora , i.e. stones susceptible to being polished (mirror-like surface), from lapides , which could not be polished. These raw materials include i) tenacious sedimentary limestones, conglomerates, travertines and alabasters, ii) metamorphic lithotypes (like breccias, marbles) and iii) igneous rocks (lavas, lithified pyroclasts, granitoids stones, etc.) (Lazzarini 2007 ; Taelman et al. 2023 ). Petrographically, marbles are metamorphic rocks subdivided into pure and impure marbles if the carbonate minerals are > 95 or > 50 plus < 95 vol.%, respectively (Fettes and Desmons 2007 ). In archaeology, marbles are instead frequently defined following the Latin mining and thus unrelated to mineralogical and petrographic criteria; consequently, marmora are lithotypes characterised by high aesthetic, cutting and polishing properties, often divided into white or stricto sensu ( s.s.) versus coloured or lato sensu ( l.s. ) (European Commission - Extra-Expo project 2015 ). Here, Roman white and polychrome marbles, along with a third grey-striped marble category, sampled from the ancient Teate Marrucinorum , the modern city of Chieti, (Abruzzo, Italy) (Figs. 1 a,b), are investigated through a multi-analytical approach. The identification and provenance of the polychromatic samples were first established across mesoscopic textural and structural attributes by i) analysing polished rock slabs through specific autoptic expertise or ii) using comparative criteria with well-known and previously catalogued samples and/or classical treatises (Corsi 1845 ; Gnoli 1988 ; Borghini 1989 ). By contrast, the provenances of marble s.s. samples require additional petrographic and stable δ¹³C‰ and δ¹⁸O‰ isotopic determinations, in line with the updated protocol for white marble and grey varieties (Lazzarini 2007 ; Antonelli et al. 2009a ; Yavuz et al. 2011 ; Antonelli and Lazzarini 2013 , 2015 ). In parallel, all three marble categories were also distinguished according to their microscopic textures and structures determined via TOM (transmission optical microscope) observations on representative thin sections. These results and conclusions were complemented with quantitative mineralogical (XRPD and Raman) and geochemical (XRF-EDS) determinations to gain further characteristics of these rocks. This study enriches the characterisation portfolio of Greco scritto , white marbles and some polychrome lithologies present in the Teate Marrucinorum thermae and other archaeological sites (Agostini and Rossi 2012 ). In general, it provides an extended and complementary quantitative approach to analyse Roman ornamental polychrome stones and to constrain their geochemical, mineralogical and petrographic attributes. Historical and archaeological context. The Roman Teate Marrucinorum , the former city of Chieti, developed on an italic settlement (Fig. 1 a) favoured by the geographical strategic context dominating the Aterno-Pescara valley and the Tiburtina Valeria Roman road (Agostini 2018 ). The Teate Marrucinorum settlement thrived upon the hill of the periadriatic belt of Abruzzo, made of Plio-Pleistocene permeable sandy association, overlaying poorly permeable clays (ISPRA 2012 ); this geological association favoured the emergence of some natural springs nodal for ancient urban sites. In fact, the archaeological remains of Teate Marrucinorum include many important monuments, such as the Roman theatre and the Civitella’s amphitheatre, the sacred area of the temples and thermal baths complex with the cisterns; the latter site was accurately decorated with aesthetic stony panels, pilasters and mosaic (Agostini et al. 2002 ). These thermal baths were built between the 1st and 2nd century AD on the eastern slope of the hill (Fig. 1 b) and associated with an extensive and nine-vaulted cistern system fed by waters tapped from a close spring (Fig. 1 c-d). Unfortunately, this part of the ancient city underwent landslides and erosion that led to the collapse of the eastern part of the complex (Agostini 2018 ). Nowadays, the thermal baths and cisterns are constituted of a few rooms accessible via a staircase from a transverse corridor ( vestibulum ) that led, through a colonnaded entrance, to a large room, paved with mosaic decoration (the probable apodyterium ) and connected by an aisle with the praefurnium to produce heat (Fig. 1 c-d) Three chambers used for hot baths, a tepidarium and two calidaria , are in the southern part, while the room for cold baths ( frigidarium) equipped with semicircular tubs is near the apodyterium , which was partially ruined after the landslide between the 2nd and 4th century AD (Adinolfi et al. 2019 ). The large rooms were decorated with polychrome marble slabs and mosaics of great value, large carved columns and refined sculptures, demonstrating the importance of the Teate Marrucinorum . Samples and Methods We first collected as many different types of stones as possible; they are single rectangular-shaped pieces and only a fraction of them has a precise original location (Tab. S1), i.e. the specimens from the tepidarium , apodyterium and frigidarium are respectively 1, 12 and 28, while those from unknown sites are 15 (Fig. 1 d). These 56 rock fragments were sampled and divided into 3 main categories: 6 white marbles, 5 grey-striped marbles and 45 polychrome stones (Tab. S1). The specimens of the latter category were visually compared with the most similar and known ornamental catalogued samples according to an expert-based judgement; moreover, available images in several databases were considered from references or by comparing samples to images of polychrome stones previously identified. Due to their mesoscopic heterogeneity, each sample was first photographed and then divided into two halves: i) one for further hand-specimen textural observations and Raman determinations and ii) the other for producing homogeneous powders for XRPD and XRF-EDS analyses, as well as representative thin sections using as small as possible specimen, on the order of 5 x 5 x 1 cm (Figs. 2 a,b). The microscopic textural (number, abundance, colour, size, shape and boundary of mineralogical phases) and structural (arrangement of phases in space) features were analysed using a polarised transmission optical microscope (TOM) Zeiss Axioskop 50 (Dept. INGEO, University “G. d’Annunzio”). The microscope is equipped with a Qimaging MicroPublisher 3.3 RTV digital camera linked to a computer with image analysis software Image-Pro Plus v.6.0 (Media Cybernetic Inc.) (Potere et al. 2023 ; Radica et al. 2024 ). Although the microscopic features are usually investigated only for white marble samples (marble s.s. ), here they are adopted and the Maximum Grain Size (MGS) was measured for every stone, thus expanding the number of quantitative parameters and implementing the existing databases. Bulk rock geochemistry of powdered samples, i.e. major and minor oxides, was quantified with a PANalytical Epsilon 3-XL X-ray fluorescence energy-dispersive spectrometer (XRF-EDS) (University of Milano-Bicocca). The X-ray source is a Rh anode operating at variable kV (4 to 50) and µA (1 to 3000) conditions. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by heating the samples at 1050°C for 5 hours. The collected data were preliminary analysed with the Malvern Panalytical Epsilon 3 software platform, using the Omnian-standardless model, which allows qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis of unknown materials without the construction of calibration curves. The quantitative analysis was then repeated in 6 different instrumental conditions, using the Panalytical WROXI® – synthetic, high-quality Certified Reference Materials for calibration. Stable isotope ratios of oxygen and carbon were assessed using a Gasbench II preparation system coupled with a ThermoFinnigan Five Plus mass spectrometer operating in continuous flow mode, following the protocol described by McCrea ( 1950 ). The analysed powders were reacted with pure phosphoric acid at 70° C. Isotopic ratios are reported as δ¹³C‰ and δ¹⁸O‰ values relative to the Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite (V-PDB) standard. These ratios were compared with the isotopic published dataset of white marbles and Greco scritto varieties (Antonelli et al. 2009a - b ; Yavuz et al. 2011 ; Antonelli and Lazzarini 2015 ; Perna et al. 2023 ). X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) was carried out with an X’Pert PRO PANalytical diffractometer in Bragg-Brentano geometry (University of Milano-Bicocca). Each pattern was recorded in the 3°-71° angular range of 2θ, with a step size of 0.02° and a counting time of 2 s/step; the Cu Kα1 = 1.5406 Å incident radiation was produced with 40 kV and 40 mA. Data elaboration was made with X’Pert Highscore v.2.1 software (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK), using the ICDD PDF2-2004 database, following the typical procedure of search-match reported in several other studies (Iezzi et al. 2003 ; Della Ventura et al. 2005 ). A semi-quantitative evaluation of the abundance of crystalline phases (wt.%) was assessed using the Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) method (Hubbard and Snyder 1998; Chipera and Bish 2013 ), through which the intensity scaling factor of each mineralogical phase (I) was compared with a “virtual” corundum crystalline phase (I cor .) not necessarily present in the XRPD patterns. Then, the semi-quantitative content (wt.%) of each crystalline phase is pursued by the ratio “I/I cor ” (Galderisi et al. 2022 ). The XRPD results were complemented by unpolarised Raman spectroscopy measurements carried out on a few µm 2 portions of the specimens, allowing the textural identification of the most prominent carbonate and silicate minerals. Spectra were collected in the frequency range of 30-1550 cm − 1 using a coherent sapphire single-frequency 488 nm laser as excitation source, and an iHR 320 Horiba spectrometer coupled with a Sincerity UV–Vis CCD camera (Institut für Glas und Keramik, Erlangen). The black crosses shown in the photos in Figs. 2 a,b represent the Raman spots. For each sample, between 8 and 12 different spots were investigated with an OptoSigma PAL-50-L NA 0.42 objective. Spectra were background-subtracted with a linear function and normalised to the total area. CaCO 3 (Sigma Aldrich) was measured as well under the same conditions and used as a reference. Results Autoptic determinations. The polychrome stones present different fabrics (textural and structural characteristics) (Fig. 2 a). PNORN-1 and PNORN-2A have a saccharoidal texture, whilst the remaining stones have a brecciated to slightly deformed appearance. PNORN-1 has large purple veins that run across the white areas; PNORN-2A presents cm-sized parallel to slightly curved bands with greenish to whitish tones (Fig. 2 a). PNORN-X1 shows a brecciated aspect made of centimetric white to dark red clasts in a pinkish matrix. PNORN-2C-1 and PNONR-2C-2 samples show similar characteristics, with many large, closely spaced white clasts (from a few to many cm) in a dark red to black matrix (Fig. 2 a). PNORN-2C-3 samples also show similar characteristics, plus yellowish to dark red clasts. Compared to all the other rock samples, PNORN-4 has much darker hues and the white clasts have limited size compared to the other polychrome samples (Fig. 2 a). Autoptic analysis indicates that stones of the thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum correspond to 4 well known lithotypes: Pavonazzetto antico ( Marmor Phrygium , PNORN-1), Cipollino Verde (Marmor Carystium , PNORN-2A), Portasanta (Marmor Chium , PNORN-X1) and Breccia di Settebasi ( Marmor Scyreticum , PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) (Tab. S2 and Fig. 2 a). These outcomes corroborate with previous determinations reported in Agostini et al. ( 2002 ). The grey striped marbles (PNORN-3 series, Tab. S2) exhibit a white background with numerous dark grey to light grey, thin, convoluted veins, typical of the Greco scritto marble varieties (Fig. 2 b). Instead, the third category of white marbles cannot be determined only by their mesoscopic appearance. PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c exhibit a white tone, tending towards pale grey or bluish tones, frequently with graphitic parallel foliation or crossed by linear grey veins, whereas PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b and PNORN-X2-d samples have a warmer white tone, often with ivory or milky hues; the former three samples have calcite crystals larger than the latter three ones (Fig. 2 b). TOM. TOM observations reflect the first qualitative autoptic observations (Tab. S2). Calcite crystals are by far the most abundant mineral in all samples. PNORN-1 ( Pavonazzetto antico ) shows a heteroblastic texture with embayed crystals up to an MGS of 2.7 mm, plus polysynthetic twinning with some bendings, mosaic microstructure and recrystallised fractures; tiny and sparsely distributed opaque to black/brown/reddish unidentifiable (by TOM) crystals also occur (Fig. S1 ). Calcite crystals in Cipollino verde (PNORN-2A) vary from hetero- to homeoblastic, with an MGS of 2.1 mm, a lineated microstructure and embayed crystal boundaries. Along the lineations, grey to green sheet silicates are located, visible also at the mesoscopic scale (Fig. 2 a). Additionally, some quartz crystals and again opaque black zones are present. All the other polychrome stones are brecciated, with micritic to cryptocrystalline calcitic clasts preventing observations of their crystal boundaries (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). Although the PNORN-X1 ( Portasanta ) is not a metamorphic rock, its sedimentary clasts in veins show MGS of 1.6 mm. Breccia di Settebasi samples (PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) display marble angular clasts having calcite crystals of small dimension (~ 0.06 to 0.2 mm). These clasts show some zones in which there are a few larger calcite crystals; according to Lazzarini ( 2007 ), the MGS for these samples can consider the recrystallisation in these portions; following this approach, the MGS are 0.8, 0.7, 1.7 and 2.4 mm for PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4, respectively (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). In addition, pre-kinematic larger calcite porphyroclasts are visible. These clasts are well separated by dark veins hosting unspecified reddish to black tiny crystals. Greco scritto sample PNORN-3 has a heteroblastic texture with embayed to sutured calcite crystals, polysynthetic twinning, a mosaic microstructure and a MGS of 2.7 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ); it shows few microcrystalline veins or bands of oriented impurities/opaque minerals, often associated with the grey carbonaceous veins visible to the naked eye (Fig. 2 b). PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c white marble samples have heteroblastic texture. PNORN-2B has a mortar microstructure with embayed to sutured calcite boundaries and a MGS of 3.7 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c have similar characteristics (mortar microstructure, embayed to sutured crystal boundaries); MGS is 2.6 mm and 2.9 mm, respectively (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). PNORN-X2-a has a texture from homo- to heteroblastic, mosaic microstructure and curved to straight crystal boundaries, with calcite crystals having a maximum size of 0.8 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). PNORN-X2-b and PNORN-X2-d are both homeoblastic, characterised by a mosaic microstructure with both straight and curved crystal boundaries (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). PNORN-X2-b tends to be polygonal, with triple joints and its MGS is 0.7 mm, whereas in PNORN-X2-d triple joints are rare, with the maximum size of calcite of 0.6 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ). XRF-EDS. Bulk oxide compositions of all the samples are plotted in Fig. 3 a and compiled in Tab. S3. The sum of CaO and LOI ( Loss On Ignition ) is invariably higher than 90 wt.% (CaO: 52.1 to 57.4 wt.%), while the other oxides sum up between 0.6 and 8.3 wt.%. CaO + LOI is the lowest and the highest for the Cipollino verde PNORN-2A and the Greco scritto PNORN-3-b, respectively (Fig. 3 a). Polychrome stones show higher values of SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 + Fe 2 O 3 + MgO (7.7 wt.% for Cipollino , 3.2 wt.% for Pavonazzetto , PNORN-1; PNORN-2A; 3.1 wt.% for Portasanta , PNORN-X1; from 1.8 wt.% to 5.8 wt.% for Breccia di Settebasi , PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) compared to Greco scritto (0.6–1.5 wt.%) and white marble varieties (0.8-1 wt.%) (Fig. 3 a). Bulk compositions of white marbles and Greco scritto marbles are similar to each other, with PNORN-3-d having the relatively highest MgO and lowest CaO contents (Fig. 3 a). The highest amount of SiO 2 is reached by Cipollino verde (PNORN-2A, SiO 2 : 4.8 wt.%) and in general, is higher for polychrome samples (from 0.4 wt. % to 1.5 wt.%) and lower for Greco scritto and white marbles (Fig. 3 a). Al 2 O 3 is relatively rich in Pavonazzetto and Cipollino (PNORN-1 and PNORN-2A); the highest Fe 2 O 3 and MgO amounts are in Breccia di Settebasi PNORN-4 and PNORN-2C-3, respectively (Fig. 3 a and Tab. S3). SnO 2 and MnO are invariably below the detection limit (LOD ~ 0.05 wt.%), except for Cipollino verde (MnO: 0.10 wt.%); TiO 2 is appreciable only for Cipollino verde , Pavonazzetto and PNORN-4 Breccia di Settebasi . Again, K 2 O and SrO are both detectable in Cipollino , while K 2 O and SrO are individually present in Portasanta and PNORN-3-b Greco scritto , respectively (Tab. S3). Stable isotopes of oxygen and carbon. The stable C and O isotope ratios of white marble samples are reported in Tab. S3 and plotted in Fig. 4 , in two plots corresponding to fine-grained (MGS ≤ 2.00 mm) and medium- to coarse-grained (MGS > 2.00 mm) white marbles. Isotopic δ 18 O and δ 13 C ratios of medium-grained samples are respectively − 1.54‰ and 2.18‰ for PNORN-2B, -2.03‰ and 2.75‰ for PNORN-X2, -2.31‰ and 3.50‰ for PNORN-X2-c (Fig. 4 ). Marble varieties having MGS ≤ 2.00 mm have stable isotope values of -1.83‰ and 2.25‰ (PNORN-X2-a), -2.19‰ and 2.34‰ (PNORN-X2-b), -1.95‰ and 2.24‰ (PNORN-X2-d) for δ 18 O and δ 13 C, respectively (Fig. 4 ). Greco scritto specimens (PNORN-3 series) have δ 18 O ranging from − 3.03‰ to -2.52‰ (PNORN-3-c and PNORN-3-d, respectively), while minimum and maximum values for δ 13 C are 2.26‰ (PNORN-3-d) and 4.22‰ (PNORN-3-b) (Fig. 4 ). XRPD. The XRPD patterns of the analysed stones are stacked in Figs. S2a,b, along with recognised minerals; the single XRPD patterns are reported in Fig. S4 to Fig. S21. The background is invariably flat and the Bragg reflections are extremely sharp and intense, indicating that all phases are highly crystalline and amorphous material is absent (Fig. S4 to Fig. S21). Calcite invariably shows the most intense Bragg peaks (Figs. S2a,b). The abundance of phases in wt.% per sample is tabulated in Tab. S4; the RIR quantification indicates that calcite ranges from 83.5 wt.% (PNORN-2A) to 99.0 wt.% (PNORN-X2-a and PNORN-X2-c) (Fig. 3 b), whereas dolomite is relatively significant only for PNORN-X1 ( Portasanta ) and Breccia di Settebasi PNORN-2C-3, the two samples with the highest amounts of MgO (Figs. 3 a,b). However, in other Breccia di Settebasi samples, dolomite is absent (Tab. S4). In Greco scritto , dolomite varies from 1 to 2 wt.%, while it is lacking in all white marble varieties (Tab. S4). The amount of quartz is low but present in all samples; it attains 0.5 wt.% in Pavonazzetto PNORN-1 and in Breccia di Settebasi samples, except for PNORN-2C-3, in which it arrives at 3 wt.% (Tab. S4). In Portasanta and Cipollino verde , the quartz content is 2.5 wt.% and 3.0 wt.%, respectively, while it is constant at 1 wt.% for white (less in PNORN-X2, qtz: 0.5 wt.%) and Greco scritto marbles (Tab. S4). Alkali-feldspars are also low but detectable for PNORN-1 (Tab. S4). Cipollino verde is also rich in muscovite and clinochlore in line with the highest SiO 2 ; similarly, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 samples have 3.0 wt.% clinochlore, while PNORN-4 hosts talc (Tab. S3 and Fig. 3 a). Illite is 3.0 wt.% in Greco scritto PNORN-3 and PNORN-3-d; it is also detectable in medium-grained marbles PNRON-2B and PNORN-X2; it attains 4.0 wt.% in PNORN-X2-d fine-grained white marble (Tab. S4). Finally, hematite is detected in the four Breccia di Settebasi , while rutile is present only in PNORN-X2-b. Raman spectroscopy. The micro-Raman data (Tab. S4 and Fig. S3) complement the XRPD results and enable the correlation of textural features with crystal–chemical attributes in the polychrome stones and the Greco scritto sample PNORN-3. The individual Raman spectra are displayed in Fig. S22 to Fig. S28. As expected, calcite displays the most intense Raman vibration centred at ∼1090 cm -1 (black spectra in Fig. S3), but some other faint vibration modes are also present (red spectra in Fig. S3). In agreement with XRPD results, the Pavonazzetto specimen PNORN-1 exhibits the presence of alkali-feldspars, whereas the spectra of Cipollino and Portasanta (PNORN-2A and PNORN-X1, respectively) reveal the presence of quartz (Fig. S3). Unexpectedly, aragonite was detectable exclusively by Raman in PNORN-4 ( Breccia di Settebasi specimen), which is also the only sample in which Fe oxides/hydroxides (attributable to hematite) could be identified (Fig. S3). Consistent with the XRPD data, in Greco scritto PNORN-3, dolomite was detected. Sheet-silicates are not determined by Raman, possibly due to their fine grain sizes and/or high localisation in domains. Discussion White and Greco scritto marbles. The isotopic comparisons of white and grey-striped marbles with those present in reference databases are reported in Fig. 4 , along with mineralogical (Figs. 3 b, Fig. S2 , S3) and especially petrographic (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ) parameters. They indicate that the white marbles analysed here have two different provenances: Carrara ( Marmor Lunense ) (PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-d) and Marmara Island ( Marmor Proconnesium ) (PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-c), corroborating the previous outcomes of Agostini et al. ( 2002 ). The provenance of the Greco scritto was instead undetermined in Agostini et al. ( 2002 ); our new isotopic results firmly hypothesise from the Asia Minor field (Fig. 4 ), considering provenance areas reported in Antonelli et al. ( 2009a ), Yavuz et al. ( 2011 ) and the Murecine samples of Perna et al. ( 2023 ). In Fig. 4 our Greco scritto samples (PNORN-3, PNORN-3-a, PNORN-3-b, PNORN-3-c, PNORN-3-d) plus one from Agostini et al. ( 2002 ) plot close to the isotopic field recorded for marble from the Microasiatic quarry of Hasançavuşlar (near Ephesus, Turkey); furthermore, also our new TOM determinations match with an Ephesian origin for the Greco scritto samples of Teate Marrucinorum . Importantly, these data coupled with those reported in Antonelli et al. ( 2009b ) and those recently published by Perna et al. ( 2023 ) suggest a possible enlargement of the Hasançavuşlar Greco scritto field towards higher δ 18 O and δ 13 C ratios (Fig. 4 ). Polychrome stones. The polychrome stones are typically recognised only via autoptic determinations. Here, we compare and complement this aspect (Fig. 2 ) with geochemical (Fig. 3 a and Tab. S3), mineralogical (Figs. 3 b, Fig. S2 , S3 and Tab. S4) and petrographic (Fig. S1 and Tab. S2) quantitative parameters. The Pavonazzetto polychrome PNORN-1 specimen is a marble s.s. (Tab. S2 and Fig. S1 ) due to its calcite > 95 wt.% with only minor alkali-feldspars and quartz (Figs. 3 b, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); its heteroblastic mosaic texture is made of calcite grains with embayed contours and a MGS of 2.7 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. S1 ). These features are corroborated by high CaO and LOI, coupled with SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 contents close to 1 wt.% (Fig. 3 a, Tab. S3). The opposite situation is presented by the impure (calcite < 95%) Cipollino verde PNORN-2A marble, the poorest in calcite (~ 84 wt.%) and the richest for the other remaining four minerals, i.e. dolomite, quartz, muscovite and clinochlore (Figs. 3 b, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); coherently, the amount of SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 + Fe 2 O 3 + MgO is the highest (Fig. 3 a, Tab. S3). This stone has calcite grains invariably with embayed boundaries, displaying a (prevalently) heteroblastic mosaic texture; it is the unique rock with a foliated fabric and attains an MGS close to 2.1 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. S1 ). The Portasanta PNORN-X1 has the largest content of dolomite (5.5 wt.%) and a low, but significant amount of quartz (Figs. 3 b, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); this paragenesis corroborates the relatively high contents of both SiO 2 and MgO > 1 wt.% (Fig. 2 a, Tab. S3). Petrographically, the PNORN-X1 is a calcitic tectonic breccia, characterised by a brecciated texture of micritic/cryptocrystalline calcite clasts, with a (sedimentary, see above) MGS up to 1.6 mm in its veins (Tab. S2, Fig. S1 ). The four Breccia di Settebasi (PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) samples are the same stone, although they appear different in hand-specimen at least for an unexpert eye (Fig. 2 a); in fact, they represent the different facies of the same lithotype. They have the same brecciated and textural attributes of the marbles’ clasts; nonetheless, their MGS measured ranging from 0.7 mm up to 2.4 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. S1 ). These similarities are further agreed by their mineral contents, since quartz and hematite occur in all these stones; in addition, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 host also clinochlore, plus only dolomite in PNORN-2C-3 and talc for PNORN-4 (Figs. 3 b, S2 and Tab. S4). These slight mineralogical differences are also reflected by SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 and MgO variations. These low but detectable geochemical, mineralogical and MGS differences are related to heterogeneities of the same original lithotype. Comparisons of mineralogical, geochemical and MGS data from the literature. The differentiation of several ornamental Roman stones could be challenging to an inexperienced researcher. Thereby, to complement and further corroborate autoptic determinations, we compare the mineralogical, geochemical and MGS salient attributes of the lithotypes from the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy) (Figs. 5 , 6 and 7 ). This approach could help integrate and enlarge the few existing databases to characterise these stones further. The mineralogy of white marbles and Greco scritto are mainly made of calcite (> 94 wt.%) plus minor amounts of dolomite (only Greco scritto , ≤ 2 wt.%) and quartz ± illite ± rutile, invariably ≤ 5 wt.% (Tab. S4); conversely, Pavonazzetto , Cipollino verde and Breccia di Settebasi polychrome stones host alkali-feldspar ( Pavonazzetto ), muscovite + clinochlore (≤ 13 wt.%), hematite ± talc clinochlore (≤ 6 wt.%), respectively, in addition to calcite, quartz and eventually dolomite (Tab. S4). In Fig. 5 , two coupled triangular diagrams and six binary plots of oxide ratios (SiO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 , SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 /MgO, Al 2 O 3 /Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 / MgO) are displayed, allowing a straightforward visualisation and discrimination of compositional clusters from isolated ones (Fig. 5 ). The polychrome Pavonazzetto sample (PNORN-1, black circle in Fig. 5 ) is invariably well separated in any of these eight plots, showing the highest value of Al 2 O 3 between the polychrome samples. The Cipollino verde (PNORN-2A, red triangle in Fig. 5 ) is also perfectly separated from any other stones, except in the triangular SiO 2 vs Fe 2 O 3 vs Al 2 O 3 and in the SiO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 vs SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 plots, where it overlaps with the Portasanta (PNORN-X1, dark red square in Fig. 5 ). This Portasanta (PNORN-X1, dark red square in Fig. 5 ) sample is the poorest in Fe 2 O 3 content between polychrome ornamental stones analysed here; it is poorly discriminable from other Roman stones, except in the plots SiO 2 /MgO vs SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 /MgO vs SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 (Fig. 5 ). The Breccia di Settebasi stones, i.e. PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 (yellow diamond, blue triangle, pink hexagon and grey triangle, respectively, in Fig. 5 ) are all clustered and isolated from other samples in the SiO 2 vs Fe 2 O 3 vs Al 2 O 3 triangular plot, plus the SiO 2 /MgO vs the SiO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 , Al 2 O 3 /MgO vs SiO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 and SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 vs SiO 2 /Fe 2 O 3 binary plots (Fig. 5 ). The other white varieties and Greco scritto stones have a primary geochemical distinction from the polychrome stones since they have invariably (very) lower amounts of Fe 2 O 3 (both triangular plots of Fig. 5 , Tab. S3 of the Online Resource 1); by contrast, they are wholly or poorly discriminable among themselves in both triangular and binary diagrams (Fig. 5 ). Below, these previous data are considered together with geochemical plus MGS (Figs. 6 and 7 ); such comparisons are limited in the literature for polychrome stones and force us to consider also decorative marbles from modern excavations. In Fig. 8 and Tab. S5, the provenance sites, ancient name, petrographic type and possible quarries of the ornamental stones of the thermal baths from Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy) are resumed. The whole chemistry compositions of white marble are similar between the different varieties considered for the comparison, with only minor discrepancies for the MgO and CaO (Fig. 5 ); the same situation is also valid for the various Greco scritto rocks (Fig. 6 ). Again, the major oxides of polychrome Pavonazzetto , Cipollino verde and Portasanta stones analysed here overlap with those from literature; in contrast, the Breccia di Settebasi is more variable than the oxide ranges measured in this study (Fig. 6 ), proposing that an enlarged bulk geochemical characterisation of these ornamental stones could be valuable. A similar comparison of the MGS values is presented in Fig. 7 , mainly for white marbles since only a few works exist on polychrome samples (Arnoldi et al. 1999 ; Badouna et al. 2016 , 2020 ; Bağci 2020 ; Carroll et al. 2008 ; Çelik and Sert 2020 ; Columbu et al. 2014 ; Lazzarini 2007 ). The MGS of our Pavonazzetto is just slightly larger than the average MGS of the white variety of the Docimium ( Pavonazzetto ) fine-grained marble, usually below 2 mm (Antonelli and Lazzarini 2015 ; Bağci 2020 ; Capedri and Venturelli 2004 ; Çelik and Sert 2020 ; Columbu et al. 2014 ). In addition, the MGS value of the PNORN-1 sample (Fig. 7 ) is well within the range of the Pavonazzetto stones (Al-Bashaireh 2022 ). Hence, the PNORN-1 sample corresponds to the Marmor phrigium extracted in the Afyon region in Turkey (Al-Bashaireh 2021 ; Attanasio et al. 2015 ) (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). The MGS of other Cipollino stone(s), even of modern time excavations, such as those from Badouna et al. ( 2016 , 2020 ) or Apuan Cipollino from Arnoldi et al. ( 1999 ), are invariably smaller than that of PNORN-2A, being around 0.3 mm; conversely, the MGS of PNORN-2A is indeed in the range of impure marble corresponding to the Cipollino verde anciently labelled Marmor carystium from the Euboea region in Greece (Al-Bashaireh 2022 ; Lazzarini 2007 , 2019 ) (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). The maximum grain-size in sedimentary veins (see above) of our PNORN-X1 Portasanta perfectly overlaps the measurements from literature by Lazzarini ( 2007 ) (Fig. 8 ). In addition, the presence of micritic clasts showing ooid shapes (Fig. S1 ) and the presence of quartz and dolomite (Figs. 3 b, S2, S3) in both PNORN-X1 and the Portasanta of Lazzarini ( 2007 ) and Carroll et al. ( 2008 ) further support this conclusion, i.e. our Portasanta correspond to the tectonic breccia called Marmor chium of Romans, quarried in the Greek island of Chios (Gnoli 1988 ; Lazzarini 2007 ) (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). The equivalent of our PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 Breccia di Settebasi samples have been primarily characterised by autoptic attributes (Taelman and Antonelli 2022 ); they show some analogies with the Italian Breccia Medicea , a metabreccia quarried at Serravezza and Stazzema villages, in the Apuan Alps (Lazzarini 2019 ; Taelmann et al. 2019). The MGS of our PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 and those of the Breccia di Settebasi from literature have the same minimum and maximum values (Lazzarini 2007 ; Karambinis and Lazzarini 2015 ; Fig. 7 ). It can be thus concluded that the four PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 stones from Chieti are the same metaconglomerate corresponding to the ancient Marmor scyreticum , also known as Breccia di Settebasi , from the Skyros Island of Sporades in Greece (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). As previously discussed, the MGS values of the white marbles from Teate Marrucinorum have been compared with those present in the literature. In particular, Fig. 7 shows 7 of the chief white marbles used in antiquity sourced from the database in Antonelli and Lazzarini ( 2015 ). The coupling of petrographic/textural and isotopic signatures, as formerly treated, pointed out that the fine-grained decorative marbles is Marmor lunense from Carrara in Italy (PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-d) and medium-grained specimens are Marmor proconnesium , excavated in Marmara Island, Turkey (PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-c) (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). Finally, the analysed grey-stripped Greco scritto from Chieti (PNORN-3, PNORN-3-a, PNORN-3-b, PNORN-3-c and PNORN-3-d) show chemical compositions that are close both to that of Ephesus (Turkey) or Cap de Garde (Annaba, Algeria provenance) (Columbu et al. 2014 ; Gallala et al. 2017 ) and MGS values comparable between these two stones (Fig. 7 ) (Antonelli et al. 2009a , b ; Yavuz et al. 2011 ; Antonelli and Lazzarini 2013 ; Columbu et al. 2014 ; Taelman et al. 2019 ; Perna et al. 2023 ); as previously assert, the more suitable provenance for these marbles s.s. is from Hasançavuslar in Turkey (Fig. 8 , Tab. S5). Conclusions The ornamental stones decorating the thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum are first divided into three polychrome, grey-striped and white marble categories (Fig. 2 ). The polychrome ones are then sub-grouped into four different stones corresponding to Pavonazzetto , Cipollino verde , Portasanta and Breccia di Settebasi , according to their autoptic discrimination, while the grey-striped type corresponds to the Greco scritto samples (Tab. S2). Instead, the white marbles require further geochemical (Figs. 3 a, 4 Tab. S3) and petrographic (Fig. S1 , Tab. S2) determinations. The two white marbles have isotopic (δ¹⁸O, δ¹³C) signatures (Fig. 4 ) plus MGS (Tab. S2) and microscopic features indicative of provenance from the ancient quarries of Ancient Prokonnesos in Turkey and Alpi Apuane in Italy (Tab. S5). In addition to these standard determinations, further mineralogical and geochemical analyses from this study and in previous studies provide further quantitative discriminations (Tab. S3,S4 and Figs. 5 , 6 and 7 ). All these data represent possible new datasets to extend and support available datasets to discriminate rocks used by the Romans and depict provenance from different sites in the Mediterranean (Fig. 8 ). The existing data on the thermal bath of Teate Marrucinorum indicate that the Pavonazzetto and Greco scritto were used to decorate two different parts of the apodyterium , while the same ambient of the cold tub of the frigidarium were covered with Cipollino verde , Proconnesian marble and Breccia di Settebasi , (PNORN-2A, PNORN-2B, PNORN-2C-1, 2C-2 and 2C-3); the different facies of the Breccia di Settebasi (PNORN-4) was used in the tepidarium (Fig. 1 ). Statements and Declarations Supplementary Information. Tables from Tab. S1 to Tab S.5 are given in the Supplementary Material1.xlxs. Supplementary figures from Fig. S1 to Fig. S28 are in the Supplementary Material2.pdf Acknowledgements. Most of this study was conducted during the Ph.D. of A. Casarin; it was funded by the “Fondi Ateneo of the University G. D'Annunzio” and PRIN (2017J277S9_003) project “Time Scales of Solidification in Magmas: Application to Volcanic Eruptions, Silicate Melts, Glasses, Glass-Ceramics” awarded to G. Iezzi and to the project “DPC-ReLUIS” awarded to G. Brando. Competing interest. The authors declare no competing interests. Data availability. The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Author contributions .Conceptualisation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A.; sampling: G.I., M.I.P., E.C., R.T., I.C., M.G.M., D.P., D.R.; methodology: A. Casarin, F.A., A. Cavallo, F.R., M.R.C.; data curation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A., A. Cavallo, F.R., M.R.C., D.d.L.; writing-original draft preparation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A.; writing-review and editing: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A., M.R.C., D.d.L., I.C., M.G.M., G.B., F.R., A. Cavallo, M.I.P., E.C., R.T., D.P., D.R.; resources: G.I., G.B., F.A., A. Cavallo, D.d.L.. All authors have read and agreed to this version of the manuscript. References Adinolfi G, Agostini S, Carmagnola R, di Carlo M, Mancini MC, Menozzi O, Palumbo D, Petraccia V (2019) Le Terme Romane di Chieti: un caso esemplificativo. https://eurotech.udanet.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/POSTER_TermeRomaneChieti-scaled.jpg Accessed June 2024 Agostini S (2018) The stratified growth of Chieti from roman times to tomorrow: a new, geology-based conscience in city planning and renewal. Alp Mediterr Quat 31(2):195-205. https://doi.org/10.26382/AMQ.2018.13 Agostini S, Rossi MA (2012) La presenza di marmi e pietre policrome in siti archeologici dell’Abruzzo. Quaderni Di Archeologia d’Abruzzo: Notiziario Della Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici Dell’Abruzzo: 4, 2012, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1400/250309 Agostini S, Mariottini M, Romano J, Rossi MA (2002) Polychrome stones from the Roman baths in Chieti (Abruzzo, Italy). In: Lazzarini L (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA VI, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity, Venice, 15–18 June 2000, pp 73–78 Akbulut ZF (2022) Experimental investigation of the surface properties of accidental stained carbonate natural stones. Case Stud Constr Mater 17: e01626. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01626 Al-Bashaireh K (2021) Ancient white marble trade and its provenance determination. J Archaeol Sci Rep 35: 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2020.102777 Al-Bashaireh K (2022) The white marbles and polychrome stones of the five-aisled basilica at Gadara (Umm Qais), Jordan: archaeometric characterization for provenance identification. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14(2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01470-6 Antonelli F, Lazzarini L (2013) White and coloured marbles of the roman town of Urbs salvia (Urbisaglia, Macerata, Marche, Italy). Oxf J Archaeol 32(3): 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12016 Antonelli F, Lazzarini L (2015) An updated petrographic and isotopic reference database for white marbles used in antiquity. Rendiconti Lincei 26(4): 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12210-015-0423-4/ Antonelli F, Nestola, F (2021). An innovative approach for provenancing ancient white marbles: the contribution of x-ray diffraction to disentangling the origins of Göktepe and Carrara marbles. Sci Rep 11(1): 22312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01800-7 Antonelli F, Lazzarini L, Cancelliere S, Dessandier D (2009a) Minero-Petrographic and Geochemical Characterization of ‘Greco Scritto’ marble from Cap De Garde, near Hippo Regius (Annaba, Algeria). Archaeometry, 51(3): 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4754.2008.00408.X Antonelli F, Lazzarini L, Cancelliere S, Dessandier D (2009b) Volubilis (Meknes, Morocco): Archaeometric study of the white and coloured marbles imported in the Roman age. J Cult Herit 10(1): 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2008.04.006 Arnoldi C, Azzaro E, Barbieri M, Tucci P (1999) Petrographic and geochemical features of the “Cipollino Verde” marble from the Apuan Alps (northern Tuscany, Italy) and archaeometric implications. Period Mineral 68: 145–162 Attanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2015) Analysis and Discrimination of Phrygian and other Pavonazzetto-like marbles. In: Pensabene P, Gasparini E (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA X, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble & Other Stones in Antiquity, Rome, 21-26 May 2012, pp 753-764 Badouna I, Koutsovitis P, Karkalis C, Laskaridis K, Koukouzas N, Tyrologou P, Patronis M, Papatrechas C, Petrounias P (2020) Petrological and Geochemical Properties of Greek Carbonate Stones, Associated with Their Physico-Mechanical and Aesthetic Characteristics. Minerals 10(6): 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/MIN10060507 Badouna I, Koutsovitis P, Laskaridis K, Patronis M, Papatrechas C (2016) Aesthetic characteristics of greek ornamental stones associated with mineral, geochemical and structural properties. Bull Geol Soc Greece 50(4): 1771–1780. https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.14104 Bağci M (2020) Mineralogical, petrographic, and geochemical characterization of colored İscehisarmarbles (Afyonkarahisar, W-Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 29(6): 946–975. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2001-20 Beltrame C, Percic T, Lazzarini L (2019) The archaeometric identification of the marbles of the Roman shipwrecks of Capo Granitola (TP), Isola delle Correnti and Marzamemi I (SR). J Archaeol Sci: Rep 23: 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2018.11.021 Borghini G (ed.) (1989) Marmi antichi, De Luca Edizioni D’Arte, Rome, Italy Capedri S, Venturelli G (2004) Accessory minerals as tracers in the provenancing of archaeological marbles, used in combination with isotopic and petrographic data. Archaeometry, 46(4): 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00171.x Carroll M, Montana G, Randazzo L, Giarrusso R (2008) Recovering evidence for the use of marble and coloured limestone in the first century AD in excavations at the sanctuary of Venus in Pompeii. Fasti On Line Documents & Research 119: 281-311 Çelik MY, Sert M (2020) The importance of “Pavonazzetto marble” (Docimium-Phrygia/Iscehisar-Turkey) since ancient times and its properties as a global heritage stone resource. Environ Earth Sci 79(9): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12665-020-08943-2/FIGURES/17 Chipera SJ, Bish DL (2013) Fitting Full X-Ray Diffraction Patterns for Quantitative Analysis: A Method for Readily Quantifying Crystalline and Disordered Phases. Adv Mater Phys Chem 03(01): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2013.31a007 Columbu S, Antonelli F, Lezzerini M, Miriello D, Adembri B, Blanco A (2014) Provenance of marbles used in the Heliocaminus Baths of Hadrian’s Villa (Tivoli, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 49(1): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAS.2014.05.026 Corsi F (1845) Delle Pietre Antiche. Dalla Tipografia Salviucci, Rome, Italy Della Ventura G, Iezzi G, Redhammer GJ, Hawthorne FC, Scaillet B, Novembre D (2005) Synthesis and crystal-chemistry of amphiboles along the magnesioriebeckite – magnesio-arfvedsonite series as a function of fO 2 . Am Mineral 90: 1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1682 European Commission - Extra-Expo project (2015) Marble, the divine stone. Its extraction, trade and use since the beginning of the humanity until the present Fettes D, Desmons J (2007) Metamorphic Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms. Cambridge University Press Galderisi A, Iezzi G, Bianchini G, Paris E, de Brito J (2022) Petrography of construction and demolition waste (CDW) from Abruzzo region (Central Italy). Waste Manag 137: 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2021.10.028 Gallala W, Younès A, Gaied ME, Hadjzobir S, Sparks K, Molli G (2017) A multi-analytical approach for determining the provenance of the marbles from Ruspina Roman baths (Monastir, Tunisia). Archaeol Anthropol Sci 9(6): 1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12520-016-0323-2/FIGURES/9 Gnoli R (1988) Marmora romana. Edizioni dell’Elefante, Rome, Italy Hubbard CR, Snyder RL (1988) RIR - Measurement and Use in Quantitative XRD. Powder Diffr 3(2): 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715600013257 Iezzi G, Della Ventura G, Cámara F, Pedrazzi G, Robert JL (2003) B Na– B Li solid-solution in A-site-vacant amphiboles: synthesis and cation ordering along the ferri-clinoferroholmquistite–riebeckite join. Am Mineral 88(7): 955-961. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-0702 ISPRA (2012) Carta Geologica d’Italia alla scala 1:50.000, Progetto CARG. Foglio n. 361 “Chieti”. Servizio Geologico d’Italia Karambinis M, Lazzarini L (2015) The Roman marble quarries of Aliko Bay and of the islets of Rinia and Koulouri (Skyros, Greece). In: Pensabene P, Gasparini E (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA X, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble & Other Stones in Antiquity, Rome, 21-26 May 2012, pp 791-804 Lazzarini L (2007) Poikiloi Lithoi, Versiculores Maculae: i marmi colorati della Grecia Antica: storia, uso, diffusione, cave, geologia, caratterizzazione scientifica, archeometria, deterioramento. Serra F (Ed) Lazzarini L (2019) Ancient Mediterranean polychrome stones. In: Artioli G, Oberti R (ed) The Contribution of Mineralogy to Cultural Heritage. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, Vol. 20, pp. 367–392. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1180/EMU-notes.20.10 McCrea JM (1950) On the Isotopic Chemistry of Carbonates and a Paleotemperature Scale. J Chem Phys 18(6): 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747785 Pensabene P (1993) Marmi antichi. Problemi d’impiego, di restauro e d’identificazione. L'Erma di Bretschneider, Rome, Italy Pensabene P (2002) Committenza edilizia a Ostia tra la fine del I e i primi decenni del III secolo. Lo studio dei marmi e della decorazione architettonica come strumento d’indagine. Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Antiquité, 114(1): 181–324. https://doi.org/10.3406/mefr.2002.10698 Perna S, Antonelli F, Lazzarini L (2023) Archaeometric analysis of the ‘greco scritto’ marble slabs from the Edificio dei Triclinii at Murecine (Pompeii, Italy). Archaeometry, 65(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12811 Potere D, Iezzi G, Scisciani V, Tangari AC, Nazzari M (2023) Provenance and deposition of a lithified volcanic-rich layer (VRL-5.5) at 5.5 Ma from Central Apennines (Italy). Sci Rep 13: 6880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33256-2 Radica F, Casarin A, Iezzi G, Bravo M, de Brito J, Galderisi A, Brando G, Nazzari M, Scarlato P (2024) Cement vs aggregates and textures of aggregates in a mortar: Comparative image analysis methods and analytical protocols. Constr Build Mater 453: 139033. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.139033 Russell B (2013) Gazetteer of Stone Quarries in the Roman World. Version 1.0. Data set/Database: http://oxrep.classics.ox.ac.uk/databases/stone_quarries_database/ Taelman D, Antonelli F (2022) Provenance of the white and polychrome marbles used for the architecture and sculpture of roman Sentinum (Sassoferrato, Marche, Italy). Archaeometry 64(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12690 Taelman D, Delpino C, Antonelli F (2019) Marble decoration of the Roman theatre of Urvinum Mataurense (Urbino, Marche region, Italy): An archaeological and archaeometric multi-method provenance study. J Cult Herit 39: 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.03.009 Taelman D, Mei O, Antonelli F (2023) On the Use of White Marbles in Roman Forum Sempronii (Fossombrone, Marche, Italy): An Overview of the Archaeometric Data on Architectural Elements. Heritage 6(3): 2942–2955. https://doi.org/10.3390/HERITAGE6030156 Tarquini S, Isola I, Favalli M, Battistini A, Dotta G (2023) TINITALY, a digital elevation model of Italy with a 10 meters cell size (Version 1.1). Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/tinitaly/1.1 Yavuz AB, Bruno M, Attanasio D (2011) An updated, multi-method database of Ephesos marbles, including White, Greco Scritto and Bigio varieties. Archaeometry 53(2): 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00542.x Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files Casarinetal2025Supplementary1TabS1S529102025.xlsx Casarinetal2025Supplementary2FigS1S2929102025.pdf Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 22 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 22 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 15 Dec, 2025 Reviews received at journal 03 Dec, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 10 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 07 Nov, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Oct, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 30 Oct, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 30 Oct, 2025 Submission checks completed at journal 30 Oct, 2025 First submitted to journal 29 Oct, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7979889","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":542649512,"identity":"c09d262c-60a1-42cc-8ad6-b7b9f0a53f29","order_by":0,"name":"Arianna Casarin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Arianna","middleName":"","lastName":"Casarin","suffix":""},{"id":542649513,"identity":"57f20853-e0d2-4be6-87aa-01ad1fb39efa","order_by":1,"name":"Fabrizio Antonelli","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Università Iuav di Venezia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fabrizio","middleName":"","lastName":"Antonelli","suffix":""},{"id":542649514,"identity":"af21f5ef-9ea8-428a-b01b-1c5ce483c988","order_by":2,"name":"Alessandro Cavallo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Milano-Bicocca","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alessandro","middleName":"","lastName":"Cavallo","suffix":""},{"id":542649515,"identity":"8135f52c-1b01-4a80-921e-2c13f0f7886a","order_by":3,"name":"Maria Rita Cicconi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Erlangen-Nuremberg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"Rita","lastName":"Cicconi","suffix":""},{"id":542649516,"identity":"bfc7830c-d306-46a0-aef3-c4170e7ec454","order_by":4,"name":"Maria Isabella Pierigè","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ministry of Culture","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"Isabella","lastName":"Pierigè","suffix":""},{"id":542649517,"identity":"1ac10e57-cd93-42db-873e-94078fc388d1","order_by":5,"name":"Emanuela Criber","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ministry of Culture","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emanuela","middleName":"","lastName":"Criber","suffix":""},{"id":542649518,"identity":"39ed1c05-b3ee-45e6-9870-1931736cd70b","order_by":6,"name":"Francesco Radica","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Francesco","middleName":"","lastName":"Radica","suffix":""},{"id":542649519,"identity":"6d160d16-5a77-461e-94a7-2b4facf887c0","order_by":7,"name":"Ilaria Capasso","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ilaria","middleName":"","lastName":"Capasso","suffix":""},{"id":542649520,"identity":"b8087d5b-b99a-4e52-9ccd-ff971cc7863c","order_by":8,"name":"Maria Giovanna Masciotta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Maria","middleName":"Giovanna","lastName":"Masciotta","suffix":""},{"id":542649521,"identity":"5a9dfc6a-9308-4dae-9394-5ac09b0d60a0","order_by":9,"name":"Davide Potere","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Davide","middleName":"","lastName":"Potere","suffix":""},{"id":542649522,"identity":"ddd73ef1-d64e-4d77-a31a-81f043692afb","order_by":10,"name":"Davide Rapone","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Davide","middleName":"","lastName":"Rapone","suffix":""},{"id":542649523,"identity":"c3a52e30-b5f0-4877-9028-6b5e8876ace2","order_by":11,"name":"Dominique de Ligny","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Erlangen-Nuremberg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dominique","middleName":"","lastName":"de Ligny","suffix":""},{"id":542649525,"identity":"50b57395-dacb-43bd-be25-2bdca78dc9f6","order_by":12,"name":"Rosanna Tuteri","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ministry of Culture","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rosanna","middleName":"","lastName":"Tuteri","suffix":""},{"id":542649527,"identity":"3e6a05b6-ad86-4f22-a014-2b00da1134b4","order_by":13,"name":"Giuseppe Brando","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Giuseppe","middleName":"","lastName":"Brando","suffix":""},{"id":542649529,"identity":"6d06bd27-05e9-4638-896b-f004c8d7442d","order_by":14,"name":"Gianluca Iezzi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chieti-Pescara","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Gianluca","middleName":"","lastName":"Iezzi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-10-29 12:38:20","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":95631303,"identity":"a5ebdd59-3f74-457b-a102-d70079a34cca","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:44","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":47911677,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AASCasarinetal202530102025.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/dea068d371f48186a4e518a6.docx"},{"id":95631271,"identity":"2d0e3d54-0e53-4079-9004-890d21771502","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:37","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":15212,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"746535833d3f45f4b8626806da05cb26.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/cc36f4d71310eb3e071505ad.json"},{"id":95656661,"identity":"3de5d485-8867-49ed-812b-158e52f1c022","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:19:16","extension":"xlsx","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":26346,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Casarinetal2025Supplementary1TabS1S529102025.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/f520944275e0047c21cbb5ed.xlsx"},{"id":95631278,"identity":"fabdab00-5524-4a85-80b9-98f443421237","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2034693,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Casarinetal2025Supplementary2FigS1S2929102025.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/74ce7b18dcd07b0936e3e68d.pdf"},{"id":95631282,"identity":"c8dbe2e5-9d51-4265-9133-bf1fe127af0e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"xml","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":137683,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"746535833d3f45f4b8626806da05cb261enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/202bff944e2ae10fcd777532.xml"},{"id":95631289,"identity":"cbf5b650-9425-473a-be82-8a3b334b1261","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2025173,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/222804a555423a4053361808.jpeg"},{"id":95631288,"identity":"2ef83cfd-cac7-4440-8cc2-c730b4d6e035","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":1871664,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/8c9a471863f730cb854c7ef8.jpeg"},{"id":95631294,"identity":"712201d3-b1ec-457b-910f-ac819b42d623","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":2064734,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/b160e06e3586935127740c4c.jpeg"},{"id":95657597,"identity":"cbe2821b-1cd5-4a1d-a28a-b03fd33974dc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:21:18","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":413786,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/cd947b878e8499a35d53e287.jpeg"},{"id":95656875,"identity":"2e2c435b-bfca-4f2e-85f0-c2cd0a7daadd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:19:39","extension":"jpeg","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":9205790,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/987e16457e43838e4358ad24.jpeg"},{"id":95657907,"identity":"52f638f9-62e2-4f9e-a5a0-6e6930230008","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:24","extension":"jpeg","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":532703,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/f3683c1d043a6fd3981cf5d9.jpeg"},{"id":95631280,"identity":"f63eed8d-3b75-4fc1-aa78-615eb64e42ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":810962,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/4ede4888f5d7ce02f58fbe4d.jpeg"},{"id":95631284,"identity":"5d8c82b3-816d-486c-8c0e-8d5b6ae19453","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":743477,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage8.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/f26513c2c516df3773705c90.jpeg"},{"id":95631285,"identity":"6a12090a-e792-49cf-a175-19593ff09db8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"jpeg","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":310621,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage9.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/57ade7f928b6ca18e02ea833.jpeg"},{"id":95631296,"identity":"a431f53a-87df-4b8a-8c07-b7344779f6ee","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":689265,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/e35fa68346e936ff5cd2d1b7.png"},{"id":95657593,"identity":"a47a1f9b-cd7d-4493-add6-a12af918211f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:21:18","extension":"png","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":593718,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/bea61fac3f718ea4a6d1c7a3.png"},{"id":95631297,"identity":"de3f43f1-0e4a-4fa7-853d-0bb70b5184b6","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":608467,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/3d931ebe43cd02ef2166e695.png"},{"id":95631292,"identity":"e93727c9-4e87-4597-9d43-c9018c61874c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":17,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":62602,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/f1570d64f26bc5558ee2f51b.png"},{"id":95631298,"identity":"be911192-48f8-4f54-a2c0-30a45f4d283a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":18,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":91405,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/42394af3c1e7bd303f6998aa.png"},{"id":95658182,"identity":"36058bbb-3250-4b20-beec-61fe40b566ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:23:33","extension":"png","order_by":19,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":106828,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/4914fbcdc029875f12a936d4.png"},{"id":95631295,"identity":"fcd1eaed-46e1-4f89-9e83-7658064c7d02","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":20,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":169378,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/aa689961eddb37969c699e59.png"},{"id":95631291,"identity":"c27b1b50-40b7-4185-8dac-809e42f5c22a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":21,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":147868,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/b20c2779c6adb486107a0286.png"},{"id":95631300,"identity":"af7bdc25-161a-4e23-be9b-77f233bccbcc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":22,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":72285,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/6a5a602691dd351f512c6aab.png"},{"id":95657141,"identity":"29d48a8d-2810-4c39-9dcc-d1873d0d618c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:20:10","extension":"xml","order_by":23,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":135859,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"746535833d3f45f4b8626806da05cb261structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/78b017a3c13171f3392a7496.xml"},{"id":95657544,"identity":"981b6744-f37e-4311-bec2-84b427164aca","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:21:09","extension":"html","order_by":24,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":146092,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/196d5b5a43112a39323df967.html"},{"id":95631268,"identity":"2389f71c-12f4-4b81-b4da-015b5ad5718e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:37","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":966086,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) Geographical position of the city of Chieti and the Abruzzo region in Italy. DEM from Tinitaly, Tarquini et al. (2023); (b) 3D-view of the city of Chieti with the position of the Roman thermal baths (Map data from Google Earth Pro ©); (c) photo of the archaeological Roman thermal bath site and (d) its schematic plant. The original location of PNORN-X1 and PNORN-X2 groups is unknown; PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2 and PNORN-2C-3 have the same location and are reported as PNORN-2C\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/023e26cdae10a008dbbde023.png"},{"id":95658149,"identity":"e98b1a39-d590-4d78-8a9e-a77bf1f70223","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:23:24","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1720236,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e Mesoscopic surfaces and related thin sections (by high-resolution scanner) of the polychrome PNORN-1, PNORN-2A, PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3, PNORN-4, PNORN-X1 specimens. The half part with black crosses was used to collect Raman data; some small flakes (on the order of 25 cm\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e) detached from the remaining half were exploited for obtaining the thin sections and powder for XRPD and XRF-EDS analyses\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;b\u003c/strong\u003e Mesoscopic surfaces and related thin sections (by high-resolution scanner) of the PNORN-3 grey-striped and PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-c, PNORN-X2-d white marble samples. The half part with black crosses was used to collect Raman data; some small flakes (on the order of 25 cm\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e) detached from the remaining half were exploited for obtaining the thin sections and powder for XRPD and XRF-EDS analyses\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/2a6d84c90d2f8475b9407e3e.png"},{"id":95657193,"identity":"1f4b001d-d2a8-4d3f-b615-bcb847db38d5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:20:16","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":94697,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) Oxide abundance determined by XRF-EDS plus LOI (see Tab. S3). (b) Abundance of crystalline phases determined by RIR (wt.%) in the four polychrome stones, \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e and white marble samples (see Tab. S4)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/56deab31ec97be37de4287f4.png"},{"id":95657879,"identity":"a7fe19aa-f239-434a-902b-0095d834be80","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:19","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":227562,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eIsotopic signature of analysed marbles (see Tab. S3). White marbles having (a) MGS \u0026gt; 2 mm (samples PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-c) and (b) MGS ≤ 2 mm (samples PNORN-X2a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-d) (Antonelli and Lazzarini 2015); (c) \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e samples (data after Antonelli et al. 2009a; and Yavuz et al. 2011). In the latter, \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e samples from Murecine (Perna et al. 2023) and Volubilis sites (Antonelli et al. 2009b) are also plotted. Isotopic determinations from Agostini et al. (2002) are shown as red stars\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/ffff6ca24b1437ae0fbfb020.png"},{"id":95631275,"identity":"4fa5bfae-e2af-4d51-bbf3-e223311fc9a9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:37","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":160774,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMajor oxides triangular (left) and binary ratios (right) plots for the ornamental stones of the thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e. See the text for a more detailed discussion\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/d78c5ce2e66bf1156fafae52.png"},{"id":95631277,"identity":"57468e95-0ac0-49a7-9771-16da17117899","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:37","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":244495,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eComparison of bulk chemical compositions of the lithotypes investigated here with those available in the literature (Akbulut 2022; Arnoldi et al. 1999; Badouna et al. 2016, 2020; Bağci 2020; Beltrame et al. 2019; Carroll et al. 2008; Çelik and Sert 2020; Columbu et al. 2014; Gallala et al. 2017; Lazzarini 2007)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/827a74be70d8ef6bb519bf3c.png"},{"id":95657647,"identity":"5ebd1c50-9dd1-4da4-990f-02937c5d4172","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:21:26","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":178187,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eComparison of MGS values (mm) of the lithotypes investigated here (various symbols, refer to the legend) with those present in the literature, shown as boxes representing the maximum and minimum values for MGS. For \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e, it refers to Çelik and Sert (2020) and Al-Bashaireh (2022). For \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e from Euboea, Lazzarini (2007, 2019); the black star represents the MGS value of 0.3 mm for \u003cem\u003eCipollino \u003c/em\u003efrom Apuan Alps (Arnoldi et al. 1999) and those in the study of Badouna et al. (2020). For \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e, it refers to Lazzarini (2007), while for \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e to the works ofLazzarini (2007) and Karambinis and Lazzarini (2012). \u003cem\u003eGreco Scritto \u003c/em\u003efrom Cap de Garde\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eMGS values refer to Antonelli et al. (2009a), while those of Ephesian provenance (Hasançavuslar) are from Antonelli and Lazzarini (2013) and Perna et al. (2023). MGS of \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e from Volubilis site are from Antonelli et al. (2009b). For 7 of the chief white marbles used in antiquity, the database from Antonelli and Lazzarini (2015) was used\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/5fd663941a26a637d27f280b.png"},{"id":95631290,"identity":"ca9ecbc7-1f51-426b-9564-414ee8cbe81e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 11:37:38","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":101169,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e(a) Provenance of the polychrome, grey-strippedand white marble stones used as ornament of the thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e (Chieti, Italy). Probable location of the quarries according to Russell (2013) for (b) Italy, (c) Greece and (d) Turkey\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/d7c8f4c8871d3e919bc30c4b.png"},{"id":95660688,"identity":"cf50ba6a-eb27-4293-9628-719dba2085dd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:32:34","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4730109,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/9d081acb-d8fc-4457-a3b9-34e149a2069a.pdf"},{"id":95658052,"identity":"2927f44d-026d-4a2c-8f05-81784f4576ec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:22:48","extension":"xlsx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":26346,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Casarinetal2025Supplementary1TabS1S529102025.xlsx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/0ee38e238650f9370739ea96.xlsx"},{"id":95656480,"identity":"9ff86c68-398b-4d1a-9657-6ec1ea6f040b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-11-11 16:18:49","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2034693,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Casarinetal2025Supplementary2FigS1S2929102025.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7979889/v1/45716ce215da217f28339c9f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The ornamental stones of the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy): autoptic, geochemical and minero-petrographic multi-analytical characterisations","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eRocks and sediments have been exploited for millennia to decorate artefacts and obtain building materials. During Roman times, huge amounts of lithologies were quarried and transported to build and decorate the external and internal surfaces of baths, theatres, villas, streets and monuments in general, as well as for statuary, either from surrounding areas or from many and faraway sites (Pensabene \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). The importance of these activities and prices concerning ornamental stones is marked by the \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eEdictum de Pretiis Rerum Venalium\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e (Diocletian, 301 A.D.) (Gnoli \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e). The Romans distinguished \u003cem\u003eMarmora\u003c/em\u003e, i.e. stones susceptible to being polished (mirror-like surface), from \u003cem\u003elapides\u003c/em\u003e, which could not be polished. These raw materials include i) tenacious sedimentary limestones, conglomerates, travertines and alabasters, ii) metamorphic lithotypes (like breccias, marbles) and iii) igneous rocks (lavas, lithified pyroclasts, granitoids stones, etc.) (Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Taelman et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Petrographically, marbles are metamorphic rocks subdivided into pure and impure marbles if the carbonate minerals are \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;95 or \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;50 plus\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;95 vol.%, respectively (Fettes and Desmons \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). In archaeology, marbles are instead frequently defined following the Latin mining and thus unrelated to mineralogical and petrographic criteria; consequently, \u003cem\u003emarmora\u003c/em\u003e are lithotypes characterised by high aesthetic, cutting and polishing properties, often divided into white or \u003cem\u003estricto sensu\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003es.s.) versus\u003c/em\u003e coloured or \u003cem\u003elato sensu\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003el.s.\u003c/em\u003e) (European Commission - Extra-Expo project \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Here, Roman white and polychrome marbles, along with a third grey-striped marble category, sampled from the ancient \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e, the modern city of Chieti, (Abruzzo, Italy) (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ea,b), are investigated through a multi-analytical approach. The identification and provenance of the polychromatic samples were first established across mesoscopic textural and structural attributes by i) analysing polished rock slabs through specific autoptic expertise or ii) using comparative criteria with well-known and previously catalogued samples and/or classical treatises (Corsi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1845\u003c/span\u003e; Gnoli \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; Borghini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e). By contrast, the provenances of marble \u003cem\u003es.s.\u003c/em\u003e samples require additional petrographic and stable δ\u0026sup1;\u0026sup3;C\u0026permil; and δ\u0026sup1;⁸O\u0026permil; isotopic determinations, in line with the updated protocol for white marble and grey varieties (Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Antonelli et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009a\u003c/span\u003e; Yavuz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Antonelli and Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). In parallel, all three marble categories were also distinguished according to their microscopic textures and structures determined \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e TOM (transmission optical microscope) observations on representative thin sections. These results and conclusions were complemented with quantitative mineralogical (XRPD and Raman) and geochemical (XRF-EDS) determinations to gain further characteristics of these rocks. This study enriches the characterisation portfolio of \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e, white marbles and some polychrome lithologies present in the \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e thermae and other archaeological sites (Agostini and Rossi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). In general, it provides an extended and complementary quantitative approach to analyse Roman ornamental polychrome stones and to constrain their geochemical, mineralogical and petrographic attributes.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHistorical and archaeological context.\u003c/em\u003e The Roman \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e, the former city of Chieti, developed on an italic settlement (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ea) favoured by the geographical strategic context dominating the Aterno-Pescara valley and the Tiburtina Valeria Roman road (Agostini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e settlement thrived upon the hill of the periadriatic belt of Abruzzo, made of Plio-Pleistocene permeable sandy association, overlaying poorly permeable clays (ISPRA \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e); this geological association favoured the emergence of some natural springs nodal for ancient urban sites. In fact, the archaeological remains of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e include many important monuments, such as the Roman theatre and the Civitella\u0026rsquo;s amphitheatre, the sacred area of the temples and thermal baths complex with the cisterns; the latter site was accurately decorated with aesthetic stony panels, pilasters and mosaic (Agostini et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). These thermal baths were built between the 1st and 2nd century AD on the eastern slope of the hill (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb) and associated with an extensive and nine-vaulted cistern system fed by waters tapped from a close spring (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ec-d). Unfortunately, this part of the ancient city underwent landslides and erosion that led to the collapse of the eastern part of the complex (Agostini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNowadays, the thermal baths and cisterns are constituted of a few rooms accessible \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e a staircase from a transverse corridor (\u003cem\u003evestibulum\u003c/em\u003e) that led, through a colonnaded entrance, to a large room, paved with mosaic decoration (the probable \u003cem\u003eapodyterium\u003c/em\u003e) and connected by an aisle with the \u003cem\u003epraefurnium\u003c/em\u003e to produce heat (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ec-d) Three chambers used for hot baths, a \u003cem\u003etepidarium\u003c/em\u003e and two \u003cem\u003ecalidaria\u003c/em\u003e, are in the southern part, while the room for cold baths (\u003cem\u003efrigidarium)\u003c/em\u003e equipped with semicircular tubs is near the \u003cem\u003eapodyterium\u003c/em\u003e, which was partially ruined after the landslide between the 2nd and 4th century AD (Adinolfi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). The large rooms were decorated with polychrome marble slabs and mosaics of great value, large carved columns and refined sculptures, demonstrating the importance of the \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Samples and Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eWe first collected as many different types of stones as possible; they are single rectangular-shaped pieces and only a fraction of them has a precise original location (Tab. S1), i.e. the specimens from the \u003cem\u003etepidarium\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eapodyterium\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003efrigidarium\u003c/em\u003e are respectively 1, 12 and 28, while those from unknown sites are 15 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ed). These 56 rock fragments were sampled and divided into 3 main categories: 6 white marbles, 5 grey-striped marbles and 45 polychrome stones (Tab. S1). The specimens of the latter category were visually compared with the most similar and known ornamental catalogued samples according to an expert-based judgement; moreover, available images in several databases were considered from references or by comparing samples to images of polychrome stones previously identified. Due to their mesoscopic heterogeneity, each sample was first photographed and then divided into two halves: i) one for further hand-specimen textural observations and Raman determinations and ii) the other for producing homogeneous powders for XRPD and XRF-EDS analyses, as well as representative thin sections using as small as possible specimen, on the order of 5 x 5 x 1 cm (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea,b).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe microscopic textural (number, abundance, colour, size, shape and boundary of mineralogical phases) and structural (arrangement of phases in space) features were analysed using a polarised transmission optical microscope (TOM) Zeiss Axioskop 50 (Dept. INGEO, University \u0026ldquo;G. d\u0026rsquo;Annunzio\u0026rdquo;). The microscope is equipped with a Qimaging MicroPublisher 3.3 RTV digital camera linked to a computer with image analysis software Image-Pro Plus v.6.0 (Media Cybernetic Inc.) (Potere et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Radica et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Although the microscopic features are usually investigated only for white marble samples (marble \u003cem\u003es.s.\u003c/em\u003e), here they are adopted and the Maximum Grain Size (MGS) was measured for every stone, thus expanding the number of quantitative parameters and implementing the existing databases.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBulk rock geochemistry of powdered samples, \u003cem\u003ei.e.\u003c/em\u003e major and minor oxides, was quantified with a PANalytical Epsilon 3-XL X-ray fluorescence energy-dispersive spectrometer (XRF-EDS) (University of Milano-Bicocca). The X-ray source is a Rh anode operating at variable kV (4 to 50) and \u0026micro;A (1 to 3000) conditions. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by heating the samples at 1050\u0026deg;C for 5 hours. The collected data were preliminary analysed with the Malvern Panalytical Epsilon 3 software platform, using the Omnian-standardless model, which allows qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis of unknown materials without the construction of calibration curves. The quantitative analysis was then repeated in 6 different instrumental conditions, using the Panalytical WROXI\u0026reg; \u0026ndash; synthetic, high-quality Certified Reference Materials for calibration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eStable isotope ratios of oxygen and carbon were assessed using a Gasbench II preparation system coupled with a ThermoFinnigan Five Plus mass spectrometer operating in continuous flow mode, following the protocol described by McCrea (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1950\u003c/span\u003e). The analysed powders were reacted with pure phosphoric acid at 70\u0026deg; C. Isotopic ratios are reported as δ\u0026sup1;\u0026sup3;C\u0026permil; and δ\u0026sup1;⁸O\u0026permil; values relative to the Vienna-Pee Dee Belemnite (V-PDB) standard. These ratios were compared with the isotopic published dataset of white marbles and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e varieties (Antonelli et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009a\u003c/span\u003e-\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003eb\u003c/span\u003e; Yavuz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Antonelli and Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Perna et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eX-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) was carried out with an X\u0026rsquo;Pert PRO PANalytical diffractometer in Bragg-Brentano geometry (University of Milano-Bicocca). Each pattern was recorded in the 3\u0026deg;-71\u0026deg; angular range of 2θ, with a step size of 0.02\u0026deg; and a counting time of 2 s/step; the Cu Kα1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.5406 \u0026Aring; incident radiation was produced with 40 kV and 40 mA. Data elaboration was made with X\u0026rsquo;Pert Highscore v.2.1 software (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK), using the ICDD PDF2-2004 database, following the typical procedure of search-match reported in several other studies (Iezzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Della Ventura et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). A semi-quantitative evaluation of the abundance of crystalline phases (wt.%) was assessed using the Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) method (Hubbard and Snyder 1998; Chipera and Bish \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e), through which the intensity scaling factor of each mineralogical phase (I) was compared with a \u0026ldquo;virtual\u0026rdquo; corundum crystalline phase (I\u003csub\u003ecor\u003c/sub\u003e.) not necessarily present in the XRPD patterns. Then, the semi-quantitative content (wt.%) of each crystalline phase is pursued by the ratio \u0026ldquo;I/I\u003csub\u003ecor\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026rdquo; (Galderisi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe XRPD results were complemented by unpolarised Raman spectroscopy measurements carried out on a few \u0026micro;m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e portions of the specimens, allowing the textural identification of the most prominent carbonate and silicate minerals. Spectra were collected in the frequency range of 30-1550 cm\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e using a coherent sapphire single-frequency 488 nm laser as excitation source, and an iHR 320 Horiba spectrometer coupled with a Sincerity UV\u0026ndash;Vis CCD camera (Institut f\u0026uuml;r Glas und Keramik, Erlangen). The black crosses shown in the photos in Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea,b represent the Raman spots. For each sample, between 8 and 12 different spots were investigated with an OptoSigma PAL-50-L NA 0.42 objective. Spectra were background-subtracted with a linear function and normalised to the total area. CaCO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e (Sigma Aldrich) was measured as well under the same conditions and used as a reference.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutoptic determinations.\u003c/em\u003e The polychrome stones present different fabrics (textural and structural characteristics) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). PNORN-1 and PNORN-2A have a saccharoidal texture, whilst the remaining stones have a brecciated to slightly deformed appearance. PNORN-1 has large purple veins that run across the white areas; PNORN-2A presents cm-sized parallel to slightly curved bands with greenish to whitish tones (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). PNORN-X1 shows a brecciated aspect made of centimetric white to dark red clasts in a pinkish matrix. PNORN-2C-1 and PNONR-2C-2 samples show similar characteristics, with many large, closely spaced white clasts (from a few to many cm) in a dark red to black matrix (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). PNORN-2C-3 samples also show similar characteristics, plus yellowish to dark red clasts. Compared to all the other rock samples, PNORN-4 has much darker hues and the white clasts have limited size compared to the other polychrome samples (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). Autoptic analysis indicates that stones of the thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e correspond to 4 well known lithotypes: \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto antico\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Phrygium\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-1), \u003cem\u003eCipollino Verde (Marmor Carystium\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-2A), \u003cem\u003ePortasanta (Marmor Chium\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-X1) and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Scyreticum\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) (Tab. S2 and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). These outcomes corroborate with previous determinations reported in Agostini et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). The grey striped marbles (PNORN-3 series, Tab. S2) exhibit a white background with numerous dark grey to light grey, thin, convoluted veins, typical of the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e marble varieties (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb). Instead, the third category of white marbles cannot be determined only by their mesoscopic appearance. PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c exhibit a white tone, tending towards pale grey or bluish tones, frequently with graphitic parallel foliation or crossed by linear grey veins, whereas PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b and PNORN-X2-d samples have a warmer white tone, often with ivory or milky hues; the former three samples have calcite crystals larger than the latter three ones (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTOM.\u003c/em\u003e TOM observations reflect the first qualitative autoptic observations (Tab. S2). Calcite crystals are by far the most abundant mineral in all samples. PNORN-1 (\u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto antico\u003c/em\u003e) shows a heteroblastic texture with embayed crystals up to an MGS of 2.7 mm, plus polysynthetic twinning with some bendings, mosaic microstructure and recrystallised fractures; tiny and sparsely distributed opaque to black/brown/reddish unidentifiable (by TOM) crystals also occur (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Calcite crystals in \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-2A) vary from hetero- to homeoblastic, with an MGS of 2.1 mm, a lineated microstructure and embayed crystal boundaries. Along the lineations, grey to green sheet silicates are located, visible also at the mesoscopic scale (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). Additionally, some quartz crystals and again opaque black zones are present. All the other polychrome stones are brecciated, with micritic to cryptocrystalline calcitic clasts preventing observations of their crystal boundaries (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). Although the PNORN-X1 (\u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e) is not a metamorphic rock, its sedimentary clasts in veins show MGS of 1.6 mm. \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e samples (PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) display marble angular clasts having calcite crystals of small dimension (~\u0026thinsp;0.06 to 0.2 mm). These clasts show some zones in which there are a few larger calcite crystals; according to Lazzarini (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e), the MGS for these samples can consider the recrystallisation in these portions; following this approach, the MGS are 0.8, 0.7, 1.7 and 2.4 mm for PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4, respectively (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, pre-kinematic larger calcite porphyroclasts are visible. These clasts are well separated by dark veins hosting unspecified reddish to black tiny crystals.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e sample PNORN-3 has a heteroblastic texture with embayed to sutured calcite crystals, polysynthetic twinning, a mosaic microstructure and a MGS of 2.7 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e); it shows few microcrystalline veins or bands of oriented impurities/opaque minerals, often associated with the grey carbonaceous veins visible to the naked eye (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb). PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c white marble samples have heteroblastic texture. PNORN-2B has a mortar microstructure with embayed to sutured calcite boundaries and a MGS of 3.7 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). PNORN-X2 and PNORN-X2-c have similar characteristics (mortar microstructure, embayed to sutured crystal boundaries); MGS is 2.6 mm and 2.9 mm, respectively (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). PNORN-X2-a has a texture from homo- to heteroblastic, mosaic microstructure and curved to straight crystal boundaries, with calcite crystals having a maximum size of 0.8 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). PNORN-X2-b and PNORN-X2-d are both homeoblastic, characterised by a mosaic microstructure with both straight and curved crystal boundaries (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). PNORN-X2-b tends to be polygonal, with triple joints and its MGS is 0.7 mm, whereas in PNORN-X2-d triple joints are rare, with the maximum size of calcite of 0.6 mm (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eXRF-EDS.\u003c/em\u003e Bulk oxide compositions of all the samples are plotted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea and compiled in Tab. S3. The sum of CaO and LOI (\u003cem\u003eLoss On Ignition\u003c/em\u003e) is invariably higher than 90 wt.% (CaO: 52.1 to 57.4 wt.%), while the other oxides sum up between 0.6 and 8.3 wt.%. CaO\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;LOI is the lowest and the highest for the \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-2A and the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-3-b, respectively (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Polychrome stones show higher values of SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;MgO (7.7 wt.% for \u003cem\u003eCipollino\u003c/em\u003e, 3.2 wt.% for \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-1; PNORN-2A; 3.1 wt.% for \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-X1; from 1.8 wt.% to 5.8 wt.% for \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e, PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) compared to \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e (0.6\u0026ndash;1.5 wt.%) and white marble varieties (0.8-1 wt.%) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Bulk compositions of white marbles and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e marbles are similar to each other, with PNORN-3-d having the relatively highest MgO and lowest CaO contents (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). The highest amount of SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e is reached by \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-2A, SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e: 4.8 wt.%) and in general, is higher for polychrome samples (from 0.4 wt. % to 1.5 wt.%) and lower for \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e and white marbles (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e is relatively rich in \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCipollino\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-1 and PNORN-2A); the highest Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and MgO amounts are in \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-4 and PNORN-2C-3, respectively (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea and Tab. S3). SnO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and MnO are invariably below the detection limit (LOD\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;0.05 wt.%), except for \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e (MnO: 0.10 wt.%); TiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e is appreciable only for \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e and PNORN-4 \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e. Again, K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO and SrO are both detectable in \u003cem\u003eCipollino\u003c/em\u003e, while K\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO and SrO are individually present in \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e and PNORN-3-b \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e, respectively (Tab. S3).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eStable isotopes of oxygen and carbon.\u003c/em\u003e The stable C and O isotope ratios of white marble samples are reported in Tab. S3 and plotted in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, in two plots corresponding to fine-grained (MGS\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;2.00 mm) and medium- to coarse-grained (MGS\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2.00 mm) white marbles. Isotopic δ\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eO and δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC ratios of medium-grained samples are respectively \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1.54\u0026permil; and 2.18\u0026permil; for PNORN-2B, -2.03\u0026permil; and 2.75\u0026permil; for PNORN-X2, -2.31\u0026permil; and 3.50\u0026permil; for PNORN-X2-c (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). Marble varieties having MGS\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;2.00 mm have stable isotope values of -1.83\u0026permil; and 2.25\u0026permil; (PNORN-X2-a), -2.19\u0026permil; and 2.34\u0026permil; (PNORN-X2-b), -1.95\u0026permil; and 2.24\u0026permil; (PNORN-X2-d) for δ\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eO and δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC, respectively (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e specimens (PNORN-3 series) have δ\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eO ranging from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3.03\u0026permil; to -2.52\u0026permil; (PNORN-3-c and PNORN-3-d, respectively), while minimum and maximum values for δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC are 2.26\u0026permil; (PNORN-3-d) and 4.22\u0026permil; (PNORN-3-b) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eXRPD.\u003c/em\u003e The XRPD patterns of the analysed stones are stacked in Figs. S2a,b, along with recognised minerals; the single XRPD patterns are reported in Fig. S4 to Fig. S21. The background is invariably flat and the Bragg reflections are extremely sharp and intense, indicating that all phases are highly crystalline and amorphous material is absent (Fig. S4 to Fig. S21). Calcite invariably shows the most intense Bragg peaks (Figs. S2a,b). The abundance of phases in wt.% per sample is tabulated in Tab. S4; the RIR quantification indicates that calcite ranges from 83.5 wt.% (PNORN-2A) to 99.0 wt.% (PNORN-X2-a and PNORN-X2-c) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb), whereas dolomite is relatively significant only for PNORN-X1 (\u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-2C-3, the two samples with the highest amounts of MgO (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea,b). However, in other \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e samples, dolomite is absent (Tab. S4). In \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e, dolomite varies from 1 to 2 wt.%, while it is lacking in all white marble varieties (Tab. S4). The amount of quartz is low but present in all samples; it attains 0.5 wt.% in \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-1 and in \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e samples, except for PNORN-2C-3, in which it arrives at 3 wt.% (Tab. S4). In \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e, the quartz content is 2.5 wt.% and 3.0 wt.%, respectively, while it is constant at 1 wt.% for white (less in PNORN-X2, qtz: 0.5 wt.%) and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e marbles (Tab. S4). Alkali-feldspars are also low but detectable for PNORN-1 (Tab. S4). \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e is also rich in muscovite and clinochlore in line with the highest SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e; similarly, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 samples have 3.0 wt.% clinochlore, while PNORN-4 hosts talc (Tab. S3 and Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). Illite is 3.0 wt.% in \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-3 and PNORN-3-d; it is also detectable in medium-grained marbles PNRON-2B and PNORN-X2; it attains 4.0 wt.% in PNORN-X2-d fine-grained white marble (Tab. S4). Finally, hematite is detected in the four \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e, while rutile is present only in PNORN-X2-b.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRaman spectroscopy.\u003c/em\u003e The micro-Raman data (Tab. S4 and Fig. S3) complement the XRPD results and enable the correlation of textural features with crystal\u0026ndash;chemical attributes in the polychrome stones and the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e sample PNORN-3. The individual Raman spectra are displayed in Fig. S22 to Fig. S28. As expected, calcite displays the most intense Raman vibration centred at \u0026sim;1090 cm\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e (black spectra in Fig. S3), but some other faint vibration modes are also present (red spectra in Fig. S3). In agreement with XRPD results, the \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e specimen PNORN-1 exhibits the presence of alkali-feldspars, whereas the spectra of \u003cem\u003eCipollino\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-2A and PNORN-X1, respectively) reveal the presence of quartz (Fig. S3). Unexpectedly, aragonite was detectable exclusively by Raman in PNORN-4 (\u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e specimen), which is also the only sample in which Fe oxides/hydroxides (attributable to hematite) could be identified (Fig. S3). Consistent with the XRPD data, in \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-3, dolomite was detected. Sheet-silicates are not determined by Raman, possibly due to their fine grain sizes and/or high localisation in domains.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWhite and Greco scritto marbles.\u003c/em\u003e The isotopic comparisons of white and grey-striped marbles with those present in reference databases are reported in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, along with mineralogical (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, S3) and especially petrographic (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) parameters. They indicate that the white marbles analysed here have two different provenances: Carrara (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Lunense\u003c/em\u003e) (PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-d) and Marmara Island (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Proconnesium\u003c/em\u003e) (PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-c), corroborating the previous outcomes of Agostini et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). The provenance of the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e was instead undetermined in Agostini et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e); our new isotopic results firmly hypothesise from the Asia Minor field (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e), considering provenance areas reported in Antonelli et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009a\u003c/span\u003e), Yavuz et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) and the Murecine samples of Perna et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e our \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e samples (PNORN-3, PNORN-3-a, PNORN-3-b, PNORN-3-c, PNORN-3-d) plus one from Agostini et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e) plot close to the isotopic field recorded for marble from the Microasiatic quarry of Hasan\u0026ccedil;avuşlar (near Ephesus, Turkey); furthermore, also our new TOM determinations match with an Ephesian origin for the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e samples of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e. Importantly, these data coupled with those reported in Antonelli et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009b\u003c/span\u003e) and those recently published by Perna et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) suggest a possible enlargement of the Hasan\u0026ccedil;avuşlar \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e field towards higher δ\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eO and δ\u003csup\u003e13\u003c/sup\u003eC ratios (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePolychrome stones.\u003c/em\u003e The polychrome stones are typically recognised only \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e autoptic determinations. Here, we compare and complement this aspect (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) with geochemical (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea and Tab. S3), mineralogical (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, Fig.\u003cspan refid=\"MOESM2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS2\u003c/span\u003e, S3 and Tab. S4) and petrographic (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e and Tab. S2) quantitative parameters. The \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e polychrome PNORN-1 specimen is a marble \u003cem\u003es.s.\u003c/em\u003e (Tab. S2 and Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) due to its calcite\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;95 wt.% with only minor alkali-feldspars and quartz (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); its heteroblastic mosaic texture is made of calcite grains with embayed contours and a MGS of 2.7 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). These features are corroborated by high CaO and LOI, coupled with SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e contents close to 1 wt.% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea, Tab. S3). The opposite situation is presented by the impure (calcite\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;95%) \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-2A marble, the poorest in calcite (~\u0026thinsp;84 wt.%) and the richest for the other remaining four minerals, i.e. dolomite, quartz, muscovite and clinochlore (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); coherently, the amount of SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;MgO is the highest (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea, Tab. S3). This stone has calcite grains invariably with embayed boundaries, displaying a (prevalently) heteroblastic mosaic texture; it is the unique rock with a foliated fabric and attains an MGS close to 2.1 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). The \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e PNORN-X1 has the largest content of dolomite (5.5 wt.%) and a low, but significant amount of quartz (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, S2, S3 and Tab. S4); this paragenesis corroborates the relatively high contents of both SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e and MgO\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;1 wt.% (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea, Tab. S3). Petrographically, the PNORN-X1 is a calcitic tectonic breccia, characterised by a brecciated texture of micritic/cryptocrystalline calcite clasts, with a (sedimentary, see above) MGS up to 1.6 mm in its veins (Tab. S2, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). The four \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4) samples are the same stone, although they appear different in hand-specimen at least for an unexpert eye (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea); in fact, they represent the different facies of the same lithotype. They have the same brecciated and textural attributes of the marbles\u0026rsquo; clasts; nonetheless, their MGS measured ranging from 0.7 mm up to 2.4 mm (Tab. S2, Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e). These similarities are further agreed by their mineral contents, since quartz and hematite occur in all these stones; in addition, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 host also clinochlore, plus only dolomite in PNORN-2C-3 and talc for PNORN-4 (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, S2 and Tab. S4). These slight mineralogical differences are also reflected by SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and MgO variations. These low but detectable geochemical, mineralogical and MGS differences are related to heterogeneities of the same original lithotype.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eComparisons of mineralogical, geochemical and MGS data from the literature.\u003c/em\u003e The differentiation of several ornamental Roman stones could be challenging to an inexperienced researcher. Thereby, to complement and further corroborate autoptic determinations, we compare the mineralogical, geochemical and MGS salient attributes of the lithotypes from the Roman thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e (Chieti, Italy) (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). This approach could help integrate and enlarge the few existing databases to characterise these stones further. The mineralogy of white marbles and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e are mainly made of calcite (\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;94 wt.%) plus minor amounts of dolomite (only \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026le; 2 wt.%) and quartz\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;illite\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;rutile, invariably\u0026thinsp;\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;5 wt.% (Tab. S4); conversely, \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e polychrome stones host alkali-feldspar (\u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e), muscovite\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;clinochlore (\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;13 wt.%), hematite\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;talc clinochlore (\u0026le;\u0026thinsp;6 wt.%), respectively, in addition to calcite, quartz and eventually dolomite (Tab. S4).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, two coupled triangular diagrams and six binary plots of oxide ratios (SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/MgO, Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e/ MgO) are displayed, allowing a straightforward visualisation and discrimination of compositional clusters from isolated ones (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The polychrome \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e sample (PNORN-1, black circle in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) is invariably well separated in any of these eight plots, showing the highest value of Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e between the polychrome samples. The \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-2A, red triangle in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) is also perfectly separated from any other stones, except in the triangular SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and in the SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e plots, where it overlaps with the \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-X1, dark red square in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). This \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-X1, dark red square in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) sample is the poorest in Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e content between polychrome ornamental stones analysed here; it is poorly discriminable from other Roman stones, except in the plots SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/MgO \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e/MgO \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e stones, i.e. PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 (yellow diamond, blue triangle, pink hexagon and grey triangle, respectively, in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) are all clustered and isolated from other samples in the SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e triangular plot, plus the SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/MgO \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e the SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e/MgO \u003cem\u003evs\u003c/em\u003e SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e and SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Al\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e vs SiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e/Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e binary plots (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The other white varieties and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e stones have a primary geochemical distinction from the polychrome stones since they have invariably (very) lower amounts of Fe\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e (both triangular plots of Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S3 of the Online Resource 1); by contrast, they are wholly or poorly discriminable among themselves in both triangular and binary diagrams (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBelow, these previous data are considered together with geochemical plus MGS (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e); such comparisons are limited in the literature for polychrome stones and force us to consider also decorative marbles from modern excavations. In Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e and Tab. S5, the provenance sites, ancient name, petrographic type and possible quarries of the ornamental stones of the thermal baths from \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e (Chieti, Italy) are resumed. The whole chemistry compositions of white marble are similar between the different varieties considered for the comparison, with only minor discrepancies for the MgO and CaO (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e); the same situation is also valid for the various \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e rocks (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). Again, the major oxides of polychrome \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e stones analysed here overlap with those from literature; in contrast, the \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e is more variable than the oxide ranges measured in this study (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e), proposing that an enlarged bulk geochemical characterisation of these ornamental stones could be valuable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA similar comparison of the MGS values is presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, mainly for white marbles since only a few works exist on polychrome samples (Arnoldi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Badouna et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Bağci \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Carroll et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ccedil;elik and Sert \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Columbu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). The MGS of our \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e is just slightly larger than the average MGS of the white variety of the Docimium (\u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e) fine-grained marble, usually below 2 mm (Antonelli and Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Bağci \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Capedri and Venturelli \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; \u0026Ccedil;elik and Sert \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Columbu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, the MGS value of the PNORN-1 sample (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) is well within the range of the \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e stones (Al-Bashaireh \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Hence, the PNORN-1 sample corresponds to the \u003cem\u003eMarmor phrigium\u003c/em\u003e extracted in the Afyon region in Turkey (Al-Bashaireh \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Attanasio et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5). The MGS of other \u003cem\u003eCipollino\u003c/em\u003e stone(s), even of modern time excavations, such as those from Badouna et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) or Apuan Cipollino from Arnoldi et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e), are invariably smaller than that of PNORN-2A, being around 0.3 mm; conversely, the MGS of PNORN-2A is indeed in the range of impure marble corresponding to the \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e anciently labelled \u003cem\u003eMarmor carystium\u003c/em\u003e from the Euboea region in Greece (Al-Bashaireh \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5). The maximum grain-size in sedimentary veins (see above) of our PNORN-X1 \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e perfectly overlaps the measurements from literature by Lazzarini (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, the presence of micritic clasts showing ooid shapes (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e) and the presence of quartz and dolomite (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, S2, S3) in both PNORN-X1 and the \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e of Lazzarini (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) and Carroll et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) further support this conclusion, i.e. our \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e correspond to the tectonic breccia called \u003cem\u003eMarmor chium\u003c/em\u003e of Romans, quarried in the Greek island of Chios (Gnoli \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e; Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5). The equivalent of our PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e samples have been primarily characterised by autoptic attributes (Taelman and Antonelli \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e); they show some analogies with the Italian \u003cem\u003eBreccia Medicea\u003c/em\u003e, a metabreccia quarried at Serravezza and Stazzema villages, in the Apuan Alps (Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Taelmann et al. 2019). The MGS of our PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 and those of the \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e from literature have the same minimum and maximum values (Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e; Karambinis and Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). It can be thus concluded that the four PNORN-2C-1, PNORN-2C-2, PNORN-2C-3 and PNORN-4 stones from Chieti are the same metaconglomerate corresponding to the ancient \u003cem\u003eMarmor scyreticum\u003c/em\u003e, also known as \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e, from the Skyros Island of Sporades in Greece (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAs previously discussed, the MGS values of the white marbles from \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e have been compared with those present in the literature. In particular, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e shows 7 of the chief white marbles used in antiquity sourced from the database in Antonelli and Lazzarini (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). The coupling of petrographic/textural and isotopic signatures, as formerly treated, pointed out that the fine-grained decorative marbles is \u003cem\u003eMarmor lunense\u003c/em\u003e from Carrara in Italy (PNORN-X2-a, PNORN-X2-b, PNORN-X2-d) and medium-grained specimens are \u003cem\u003eMarmor proconnesium\u003c/em\u003e, excavated in Marmara Island, Turkey (PNORN-2B, PNORN-X2, PNORN-X2-c) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5). Finally, the analysed grey-stripped \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e from Chieti (PNORN-3, PNORN-3-a, PNORN-3-b, PNORN-3-c and PNORN-3-d) show chemical compositions that are close both to that of Ephesus (Turkey) or Cap de Garde (Annaba, Algeria provenance) (Columbu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Gallala et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) and MGS values comparable between these two stones (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) (Antonelli et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009a\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003eb\u003c/span\u003e; Yavuz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Antonelli and Lazzarini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Columbu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Taelman et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Perna et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e); as previously assert, the more suitable provenance for these marbles \u003cem\u003es.s.\u003c/em\u003e is from Hasan\u0026ccedil;avuslar in Turkey (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S5).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe ornamental stones decorating the thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e are first divided into three polychrome, grey-striped and white marble categories (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The polychrome ones are then sub-grouped into four different stones corresponding to \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e, according to their autoptic discrimination, while the grey-striped type corresponds to the \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e samples (Tab. S2). Instead, the white marbles require further geochemical (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e Tab. S3) and petrographic (Fig. \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e, Tab. S2) determinations. The two white marbles have isotopic (δ\u0026sup1;⁸O, δ\u0026sup1;\u0026sup3;C) signatures (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) plus MGS (Tab. S2) and microscopic features indicative of provenance from the ancient quarries of Ancient Prokonnesos in Turkey and Alpi Apuane in Italy (Tab. S5). In addition to these standard determinations, further mineralogical and geochemical analyses from this study and in previous studies provide further quantitative discriminations (Tab. S3,S4 and Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). All these data represent possible new datasets to extend and support available datasets to discriminate rocks used by the Romans and depict provenance from different sites in the Mediterranean (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe existing data on the thermal bath of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e indicate that the \u003cem\u003ePavonazzetto\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eGreco scritto\u003c/em\u003e were used to decorate two different parts of the \u003cem\u003eapodyterium\u003c/em\u003e, while the same ambient of the cold tub of the \u003cem\u003efrigidarium\u003c/em\u003e were covered with \u003cem\u003eCipollino verde\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eProconnesian\u003c/em\u003e marble and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e, (PNORN-2A, PNORN-2B, PNORN-2C-1, 2C-2 and 2C-3); the different facies of the \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e (PNORN-4) was used in the \u003cem\u003etepidarium\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Statements and Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSupplementary Information.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eTables from Tab. S1 to Tab S.5 are given in the Supplementary Material1.xlxs. Supplementary figures from Fig. S1 to Fig. S28 are in the Supplementary Material2.pdf\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements.\u003c/strong\u003e Most of this study was conducted during the Ph.D. of A. Casarin; it was funded by the “Fondi Ateneo of the University G. D'Annunzio” and PRIN (2017J277S9_003) project “Time Scales of Solidification in Magmas: Application to Volcanic Eruptions, Silicate Melts, Glasses, Glass-Ceramics” awarded to G. Iezzi and to the project “DPC-ReLUIS” awarded to G. Brando.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interest.\u003c/strong\u003e The authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/strong\u003e.Conceptualisation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A.; sampling: G.I., M.I.P., E.C., R.T., I.C., M.G.M., D.P., D.R.; methodology: A. Casarin, F.A., A. Cavallo, F.R., M.R.C.; data curation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A., A. Cavallo, F.R., M.R.C., D.d.L.; \u0026nbsp;writing-original draft preparation: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A.; writing-review and editing: A. Casarin, G.I., F.A., M.R.C., D.d.L., I.C., M.G.M., G.B., F.R., A. Cavallo, M.I.P., E.C., R.T., D.P., D.R.; resources: G.I., G.B., F.A., A. Cavallo, D.d.L.. All authors have read and agreed to this version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAdinolfi G, Agostini S, Carmagnola R, di Carlo M, Mancini MC, Menozzi O, Palumbo D, Petraccia V (2019) Le Terme Romane di Chieti: un caso esemplificativo. https://eurotech.udanet.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/POSTER_TermeRomaneChieti-scaled.jpg Accessed June 2024\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAgostini S (2018) The stratified growth of Chieti from roman times to tomorrow: a new,\u0026nbsp;geology-based conscience in city planning and renewal. Alp Mediterr Quat 31(2):195-205. https://doi.org/10.26382/AMQ.2018.13\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAgostini S, Rossi MA (2012) La presenza di marmi e pietre policrome in siti archeologici dell\u0026rsquo;Abruzzo. Quaderni Di Archeologia d\u0026rsquo;Abruzzo: Notiziario Della Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici Dell\u0026rsquo;Abruzzo: 4, 2012, 87\u0026ndash;93. https://doi.org/10.1400/250309\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAgostini S, Mariottini M, Romano J, Rossi MA (2002) Polychrome stones from the Roman baths in Chieti (Abruzzo, Italy). In: Lazzarini L (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA VI, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity, Venice, 15\u0026ndash;18 June 2000, pp 73\u0026ndash;78\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAkbulut ZF (2022) Experimental investigation of the surface properties of accidental stained carbonate natural stones. Case Stud Constr Mater 17: e01626. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01626\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAl-Bashaireh K (2021) Ancient white marble trade and its provenance determination. J Archaeol Sci Rep 35: 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2020.102777\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAl-Bashaireh K (2022) The white marbles and polychrome stones of the five-aisled basilica at Gadara (Umm Qais), Jordan: archaeometric characterization for provenance identification. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14(2): 1\u0026ndash;18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01470-6\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntonelli F, Lazzarini L (2013) White and coloured marbles of the roman town of Urbs salvia (Urbisaglia, Macerata, Marche, Italy). Oxf J Archaeol 32(3): 293\u0026ndash;317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ojoa.12016\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntonelli F, Lazzarini L (2015) An updated petrographic and isotopic reference database for white marbles used in antiquity. Rendiconti Lincei 26(4): 399\u0026ndash;413. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12210-015-0423-4/\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntonelli F, Nestola, F (2021). An innovative approach for provenancing ancient white marbles: the contribution of x-ray diffraction to disentangling the origins of G\u0026ouml;ktepe and Carrara marbles. Sci Rep 11(1): 22312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01800-7\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntonelli F, Lazzarini L, Cancelliere S, Dessandier D (2009a) Minero-Petrographic and Geochemical Characterization of \u0026lsquo;Greco Scritto\u0026rsquo; marble from Cap De Garde, near Hippo Regius (Annaba, Algeria). Archaeometry, 51(3): 351\u0026ndash;365.\u0026nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4754.2008.00408.X\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAntonelli F, Lazzarini L, Cancelliere S, Dessandier D (2009b) Volubilis (Meknes, Morocco): Archaeometric study of the white and coloured marbles imported in the Roman age. J Cult Herit 10(1): 116\u0026ndash;123. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2008.04.006\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eArnoldi C, Azzaro E, Barbieri M, Tucci P (1999) Petrographic and geochemical features of the \u0026ldquo;Cipollino Verde\u0026rdquo; marble from the Apuan Alps (northern Tuscany, Italy) and archaeometric implications. Period Mineral 68: 145\u0026ndash;162\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAttanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2015) Analysis and Discrimination of Phrygian and other Pavonazzetto-like marbles. In: Pensabene P, Gasparini E (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA X, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble \u0026amp; Other Stones in Antiquity, Rome, 21-26 May 2012, pp 753-764\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBadouna I, Koutsovitis P, Karkalis C, Laskaridis K, Koukouzas N, Tyrologou P, Patronis M, Papatrechas C, Petrounias P (2020) Petrological and Geochemical Properties of Greek Carbonate Stones, Associated with Their Physico-Mechanical and Aesthetic Characteristics. Minerals 10(6): 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/MIN10060507\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBadouna I, Koutsovitis P, Laskaridis K, Patronis M, Papatrechas C (2016) Aesthetic characteristics of greek ornamental stones associated with mineral, geochemical and structural properties. Bull Geol Soc Greece 50(4): 1771\u0026ndash;1780. https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.14104\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBağci M (2020) Mineralogical, petrographic, and geochemical characterization of colored İscehisarmarbles (Afyonkarahisar, W-Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci 29(6): 946\u0026ndash;975. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-2001-20\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBeltrame C, Percic T, Lazzarini L (2019) The archaeometric identification of the marbles of the Roman shipwrecks of Capo Granitola (TP), Isola delle Correnti and Marzamemi I (SR). J Archaeol Sci: Rep 23: 953\u0026ndash;967. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2018.11.021\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBorghini G (ed.) (1989) Marmi antichi, De Luca Edizioni D\u0026rsquo;Arte, Rome, Italy\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCapedri S, Venturelli G (2004) Accessory minerals as tracers in the provenancing of archaeological marbles, used in combination with isotopic and petrographic data. Archaeometry, 46(4): 517\u0026ndash;536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00171.x\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCarroll M, Montana G, Randazzo L, Giarrusso R (2008)\u0026nbsp;Recovering evidence for the use of marble and coloured limestone in the first century AD in excavations at the sanctuary of Venus in Pompeii. Fasti On Line Documents \u0026amp; Research 119: 281-311\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u0026Ccedil;elik MY, Sert M (2020) The importance of \u0026ldquo;Pavonazzetto marble\u0026rdquo; (Docimium-Phrygia/Iscehisar-Turkey) since ancient times and its properties as a global heritage stone resource. Environ Earth Sci 79(9): 1\u0026ndash;18.\u0026nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1007/S12665-020-08943-2/FIGURES/17\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChipera SJ, Bish DL (2013) Fitting Full X-Ray Diffraction Patterns for Quantitative Analysis: A Method for Readily Quantifying Crystalline and Disordered Phases. Adv Mater Phys Chem 03(01): 47\u0026ndash;53. https://doi.org/10.4236/ampc.2013.31a007\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eColumbu S, Antonelli F, Lezzerini M, Miriello D, Adembri B, Blanco A (2014) Provenance of marbles used in the Heliocaminus Baths of Hadrian\u0026rsquo;s Villa (Tivoli, Italy). J Archaeol Sci 49(1): 332\u0026ndash;342. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAS.2014.05.026\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCorsi F (1845) Delle Pietre Antiche. Dalla Tipografia Salviucci, Rome, Italy\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDella Ventura G, Iezzi G, Redhammer GJ, Hawthorne FC, Scaillet B, Novembre D (2005) Synthesis and crystal-chemistry of amphiboles along the magnesioriebeckite \u0026ndash; magnesio-arfvedsonite series as a function of fO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. Am Mineral 90: 1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1682\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eEuropean Commission - Extra-Expo project (2015) Marble, the divine stone. Its extraction, trade and use since the beginning of the humanity until the present\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFettes D, Desmons J (2007) Metamorphic Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms. Cambridge University Press\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGalderisi A, Iezzi G, Bianchini G, Paris E, de Brito J (2022) Petrography of construction and demolition waste (CDW) from Abruzzo region (Central Italy). Waste Manag 137: 61\u0026ndash;71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2021.10.028\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGallala W, Youn\u0026egrave;s A, Gaied ME, Hadjzobir S, Sparks K, Molli G (2017) A multi-analytical approach for determining the provenance of the marbles from Ruspina Roman baths (Monastir, Tunisia). Archaeol Anthropol Sci 9(6): 1275\u0026ndash;1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12520-016-0323-2/FIGURES/9\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGnoli R (1988) Marmora romana. Edizioni dell\u0026rsquo;Elefante, Rome, Italy\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHubbard CR, Snyder RL (1988) RIR - Measurement and Use in Quantitative XRD. \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Powder Diffr 3(2): 74\u0026ndash;77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715600013257\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIezzi G, Della Ventura G, C\u0026aacute;mara F, Pedrazzi G, Robert JL (2003) \u003csup\u003eB\u003c/sup\u003eNa\u0026ndash;\u003csup\u003eB\u003c/sup\u003eLi solid-solution in A-site-vacant amphiboles: synthesis and cation ordering along the ferri-clinoferroholmquistite\u0026ndash;riebeckite join. Am Mineral 88(7): 955-961. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2003-0702\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eISPRA (2012) Carta Geologica d\u0026rsquo;Italia alla scala 1:50.000, Progetto CARG. Foglio n. 361 \u0026ldquo;Chieti\u0026rdquo;. Servizio Geologico d\u0026rsquo;Italia\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKarambinis M, Lazzarini L (2015) The Roman marble quarries of Aliko Bay and of the islets of Rinia and Koulouri (Skyros, Greece). In: Pensabene P, Gasparini E (ed) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: ASMOSIA X, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of ASMOSIA, Association for the Study of Marble \u0026amp; Other Stones in Antiquity, Rome, 21-26 May 2012, pp 791-804\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLazzarini L (2007) Poikiloi Lithoi, Versiculores Maculae: i marmi colorati della Grecia Antica: storia, uso, diffusione, cave, geologia, caratterizzazione scientifica, archeometria, deterioramento. Serra F (Ed)\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLazzarini L (2019) Ancient Mediterranean polychrome stones. In: Artioli G, Oberti R (ed) The Contribution of Mineralogy to Cultural Heritage. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, Vol. 20, pp. 367\u0026ndash;392. Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1180/EMU-notes.20.10\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMcCrea JM (1950) On the Isotopic Chemistry of Carbonates and a Paleotemperature Scale. J Chem Phys 18(6): 849\u0026ndash;857. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747785\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePensabene P (1993) Marmi antichi. Problemi d\u0026rsquo;impiego, di restauro e d\u0026rsquo;identificazione.\u0026nbsp;L\u0026apos;Erma di Bretschneider, Rome, Italy\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePensabene P (2002) Committenza edilizia a Ostia tra la fine del I e i primi decenni del III secolo. Lo studio dei marmi e della decorazione architettonica come strumento d\u0026rsquo;indagine. M\u0026eacute;langes de l\u0026rsquo;\u0026Eacute;cole Fran\u0026ccedil;aise de Rome. Antiquit\u0026eacute;, 114(1): 181\u0026ndash;324. https://doi.org/10.3406/mefr.2002.10698\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePerna S, Antonelli F, Lazzarini L (2023) Archaeometric analysis of the \u0026lsquo;greco scritto\u0026rsquo; marble slabs from the Edificio dei Triclinii at Murecine (Pompeii, Italy). Archaeometry, 65(1): 1\u0026ndash;16. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12811\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePotere D, Iezzi G, Scisciani V, Tangari AC, Nazzari M (2023) Provenance and deposition of a lithified volcanic-rich layer (VRL-5.5) at 5.5 Ma from Central Apennines (Italy). Sci Rep 13: 6880.\u0026nbsp;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33256-2\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRadica F, Casarin A, Iezzi G, Bravo M, de Brito J, Galderisi A, Brando G, Nazzari M, Scarlato P (2024) Cement vs aggregates and textures of aggregates in a mortar: Comparative image analysis methods and analytical protocols. Constr Build Mater 453: 139033. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2024.139033\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRussell B (2013) Gazetteer of Stone Quarries in the Roman World. Version 1.0. Data set/Database: http://oxrep.classics.ox.ac.uk/databases/stone_quarries_database/\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTaelman D, Antonelli F (2022) Provenance of the white and polychrome marbles used for the architecture and sculpture of roman Sentinum (Sassoferrato, Marche, Italy). Archaeometry 64(1): 1\u0026ndash;24. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12690\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTaelman D, Delpino C, Antonelli F (2019) Marble decoration of the Roman theatre of Urvinum Mataurense (Urbino, Marche region, Italy): An archaeological and archaeometric multi-method provenance study. J Cult Herit 39: 238\u0026ndash;250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.03.009\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTaelman D, Mei O, Antonelli F (2023) On the Use of White Marbles in Roman Forum Sempronii (Fossombrone, Marche, Italy): An Overview of the Archaeometric Data on Architectural Elements. Heritage 6(3): 2942\u0026ndash;2955. https://doi.org/10.3390/HERITAGE6030156\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTarquini S, Isola I, Favalli M, Battistini A, Dotta G (2023) TINITALY, a digital elevation model of Italy with a 10 meters cell size (Version 1.1). Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV). https://doi.org/10.13127/tinitaly/1.1\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYavuz AB, Bruno M, Attanasio D (2011) An updated, multi-method database of Ephesos marbles, including White, Greco Scritto and Bigio varieties. Archaeometry 53(2): 215\u0026ndash;240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2010.00542.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"archaeological-and-anthropological-sciences","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"aasc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences](http://link.springer.com/journal/12517)","snPcode":"12520","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12520/3","title":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Roman baths, polychrome stones, white marbles, autoptic, XRPD and XRF analyses","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAncient Romans exploited aesthetic natural stones from many sites across their Empire around the Mediterranean, transporting them for thousands of kilometres, to decorate their buildings. Petrographically, these metamorphic, sedimentary and igneous rocks display considerable differences, ranging from simple white stones to vividly coloured lithotypes. The source Region of these coloured stones is typically reconstructed from autoptic (visual and comparative examination of macroscopic or hand-sample scale) determinations, also tacking advantage from the personal expertise of some specialists of the sector.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHere, the ornamental stones of the 2nd-century A.D. thermal baths of \u003cem\u003eTeate Marrucinorum\u003c/em\u003e (Chieti, Abruzzo region, Italy) are considered and investigated by different and complementary methods. According to their autoptic features or mesoscopic textures, the initial 56 samples were divided into three categories: polychrome stones, grey-striped and white crystalline marbles. These rocks were analysed \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e bulk autoptic, mineralogical (XRPD) and geochemical (XRF) methods; also, representative thin sections were used for transmission optical microscope (TOM) petrographic and micro-Raman determinations. The δ\u0026sup1;⁸O and δ\u0026sup1;\u0026sup3;C isotopic signatures were also characterised for white and grey-striped marbles.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe complementary and multi-analytical approach unveils that the grey-striped marble is \u003cem\u003eGreco Scritto\u003c/em\u003e, the white marbles come from Carrara (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Lunense\u003c/em\u003e) and Marmara Island (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Proconnesium\u003c/em\u003e) sources, whilst the four polychrome stones correspond \u003cem\u003eto Pavonazzetto Antico (Marmor Phrygium\u003c/em\u003e), \u003cem\u003eCipollino Verde\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Carystium\u003c/em\u003e), \u003cem\u003ePortasanta\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Chium\u003c/em\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eBreccia di Settebasi\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eMarmor Scyreticum\u003c/em\u003e). The coupling of qualitative observations with quantitative measurements further constrains the provenance and features of aesthetic rocks employed in the ancient town by the Romans.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The ornamental stones of the Roman thermal baths of Teate Marrucinorum (Chieti, Italy): autoptic, geochemical and minero-petrographic multi-analytical characterisations","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-11-11 11:37:33","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7979889/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2025-12-22T20:03:50+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-22T14:59:00+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-15T10:56:24+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2025-12-03T15:03:17+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"230939723715951978429534913069925744713","date":"2025-11-10T11:44:43+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"89216949675002544501051276555979595217","date":"2025-11-07T08:15:00+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"303404292203367137286081719394654654490","date":"2025-10-30T19:14:08+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-10-30T18:10:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-10-30T18:06:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2025-10-30T13:43:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","date":"2025-10-29T12:30:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"archaeological-and-anthropological-sciences","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"aasc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences](http://link.springer.com/journal/12517)","snPcode":"12520","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12520/3","title":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5dc21d9f-1761-4cf2-b778-c8306fd96a6e","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-15T07:10:31+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-11-11 11:37:33","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7979889","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7979889","identity":"rs-7979889","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}