Efficacy of pulsed magnetic therapy, high-intensity magnetic stimulation of the pelvic floor muscles and intrauterine plasma therapy to restore endometrial receptivity after intrauterine interventions: a randomized trial
This randomized trial found that high-intensity magnetic stimulation of pelvic floor muscles combined with intrauterine plasma therapy most effectively restored endometrial receptivity and increased pregnancy rates after intrauterine interventions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The randomized trial studied whether pulsed magnetic therapy, high-intensity magnetic stimulation of pelvic floor muscles, or intrauterine plasma therapy could restore endometrial receptivity after intrauterine interventions in women with impaired implantation and thin or otherwise unreceptive endometrium, using comparative randomized allocation across the treatment modalities. The paper reports that these physical and intrauterine plasma approaches were evaluated in the context of endometrial dysfunction thought to result from basal layer damage, inflammation, and intrauterine pathology, with attention to mechanisms such as improved microcirculation, reduced inflammation, and enhanced endometrial repair. A key caveat explicitly emphasized is that endometrial receptivity can be influenced by multiple etiologies (e.g., chronic endometritis, hormonal dysregulation, fibroids, and adhesions/synechiae), meaning response may vary depending on underlying causes beyond the intervention itself. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper discusses endometriosis among etiological factors associated with development of uterine polyps and intrauterine adhesions/synechiae that can impair implantation, though the trial’s main focus is post–intrauterine-intervention restoration of endometrial receptivity using magnetic and intrauterine plasma therapies.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,554 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (21)
- Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology via openalex
- W2093920790 via openalex
- W2094512534 via openalex
- W2117923798 via openalex
- W2126112097 via openalex
- W2159835867 via openalex
- W2164975811 via openalex
- W2167445965 via openalex
- W2528495505 via openalex
- W2544935783 via openalex
- W2549534110 via openalex
- W2766169409 via openalex
- W2905326323 via openalex
- W2906761789 via openalex
- W2910952364 via openalex
- W2913196966 via openalex
- W2969694311 via openalex
- W2996979673 via openalex
- W3088985054 via openalex
- W2055859834 via openalex
- W3154863291 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00