Predicting Lodging Severity in Sorghum Breeding Trials Using UAV-Based Photogrammetrically Derived Height Data

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,897 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Lodging in sorghum presents a significant challenge for plant breeders due to the trade-off between lodging resistance and grain yield. Manually measuring lodging across thousands of plots is time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone, making selection for lodging resistance challenging in breeding programs. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived metrics offer a potential high-throughput, cost-effective alternative for lodging phenotyping. This study developed a framework for predicting plot-level lodging from UAV imagery across 2,675 sorghum breeding plots. Multi-temporal canopy height data were collected at two critical time points: maximum crop height and at manual lodging assessment. Height percentiles were extracted from UAV derived point clouds generated using photogrammetric algorithms. These data were used to develop parametric, non-parametric, and ensemble prediction models, which were evaluated using three statistical metrics. The ensemble model, averaging predictions from all models, achieved the highest accuracy with Pearson correlations of r = 0.80-0.84 and lowest residual mean square error (RMSE=16-18), explaining 64-70% of variation in manual lodging counts. Model diagnostics and iterative refinement, including inspection of UAV imagery and dataset curation, had minimal impact on model performance, demonstrating the robustness of the approach. Model performance was consistent across sites, with minimal effects of stratified sampling on accuracy, confirming the ensemble approach as optimal for plot-level lodging assessment. This study demonstrates that integrated multi-temporal UAV imagery offers a practical alternative to labor-intensive manual evaluation methods by enabling high-throughput lodging assessment suitable for implementation in sorghum breeding programs. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00