Full text
1,966 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Species of Passionate Interest expands on the concept of the "cultural keystone species," reviewing its intellectual history and proposing future applications in the field of biodiversity conservation. The paper critiques the classic view of the "keystone" species in Western conservation science, emphasizing the need to consider the dynamic cultural context and the diversity of emotional connections humans weave with the wider ecological world. Through relating biodiversity loss to human consciousness and the possibility of social transformation by way of "ecosophy," the paper emphasizes the importance of future-oriented approaches that go beyond preservation towards creating new eco-social cultural formations altogether. “Species of passionate interest,” whether the result of sustenance, ritual, sport, admiration, conflict or economic promise, are found across all cultures and are exceedingly consequential for the ways we hope to understand how different cultural contexts might more ethically relate to one another. As such, the lens offered to conservation praxis by species of passionate interest might just provide the inspiration for developing more flexible and creative conservation practices, ones which combine biocultural conservation and eco-social transformation together.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X23Q0S
Life Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences
Cultural Keystone Species, Natural-Cultural Systems, Ecosophy, biodiversity, affect theory
Published: 2026-01-28 03:25
Last Updated: 2026-01-28 03:25
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.