Systematic benchmarking of basecalling models for RNA modification detection with highly-multiplexed nanopore sequencing

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,732 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Nanopore direct RNA sequencing (DRS) holds promise for advancing our understanding of the epitranscriptome by detecting RNA modifications in native RNA molecules. Recently, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has released basecalling models capable of detecting several RNA modifications. However, their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, as well as cross-reactivity against other modification types, remains largely unexplored. Here, we systematically benchmark modification-aware models by evaluating their performance on a highly-multiplexed panel of synthetic molecules covering all possible sequence contexts, as well as on biological samples from a diverse set of species. We find that modification-aware models reliably detect diverse RNA modification types across a broad range of sequence contexts. However, they are prone to elevated false positive rates and exhibit notable cross-reactivity with other RNA modification types. We show that the use of modification-free controls allows significant, yet incomplete removal of false positives, thus constituting an essential control. Finally, we demonstrate that basecalling error patterns and alterations in current features can identify differentially modified sites, for modifications for which modification-aware models are absent. Overall, our results underscore the utility and accuracy of modification-aware basecalling models for RNA modification detection, while highlighting the importance of including diverse control samples to mitigate false positive rates. Competing Interest Statement EMN is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of IMMAGINA Biotech. GD, IM, and EMN have received travel bursaries from ONT to present their work at conferences.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0