The impact of systemic lupus erythematosus on women's sexual functioning
review
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have reported the relationship between women's sexual problems and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the results are contradictory. The objective of this paper was to explore the impact of SLE on women's sexual function. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI Scholar, VIP and WanFang databases were searched up to April 2017. Studies evaluating the impact of SLE on women's sexual function with the use of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scoring system were included. Statistical analyses were executed using version 5.0 Review Manager statistical software. Data were pooled using a fixed or random effects model according to heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 2 identified studies matched the inclusion criteria, reporting on a total of 236 patients with SLE. No significant difference was observed between SLE patients and healthy controls on desire (P = .24; MD = -0.44 [-1.17, 0.29]), arousal (P = .12; MD = -0.39 [-0.89, 0.11]), lubrication (P = .17; MD = -0.53 [-1.28, 0.23]), orgasm (P = .27; MD = -0.27 [-0.75, 0.21]), satisfaction (P = .25; MD = -0.10 [-0.27, 0.07]) and pain (P = .17; MD = -0.50 [-1.22, 0.22]), except for total FSFI (P = .001; MD = -1.24 [-1.97, -0.50]). CONCLUSION: SLE has some influence on women' sexual function. However, further studies of a larger population of female patients are required to further evaluate the mechanism by which SLE affects sexual function.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (27)
- doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 via openalex
- doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.09.016 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0961203313500370 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2015/214878 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01528.x via openalex
- W2163170433 via openalex
- W2222541742 via openalex
- W6639456452 via openalex
- W6684061484 via openalex
- W6689195929 via openalex
- doi:10.1620/tjem.237.193 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s12974-015-0423-4 via openalex
- doi:10.4065/81.11.1462 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.08.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00296-009-0850-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2015/204513 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/009262300278597 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.berh.2004.01.002 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jsm.12672 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keg079 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.11.004 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/art.38302 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02464.x via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:01:13.017405+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK