Endometriosis Knowledge Among Emergency Medicine Providers: Diagnostic Skills and Symptom Recognition

In: Women's Health Reports · 2026 · vol. 7 · doi:10.1177/26884844261420627 · W7135109310
article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

A survey of emergency medicine providers revealed knowledge gaps and a desire for education regarding endometriosis, despite most accurately recognizing its common symptoms.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-14 · read from full text

This survey study assessed the knowledge, diagnostic skills, and management practices regarding endometriosis among 59 emergency medicine providers, including physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers. The results indicated that while most participants considered themselves moderately to somewhat knowledgeable, there was significant variability in symptom recognition, with chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea viewed as highly suspicious for the condition compared to acute pelvic pain. Furthermore, a majority of respondents expressed interest in additional educational resources, particularly clinical decision tools and written materials, to improve their ability to identify and manage patients presenting with potential endometriosis symptoms in the emergency department. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically focusing on the diagnostic awareness and symptom recognition capabilities of emergency medicine providers.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: Endometriosis is associated with significant diagnostic delays, averaging 6.7 years, largely due to nonspecific symptoms and inadequate diagnostic approaches. Over 15,000 emergency department (ED) visits in the United States annually involve patients with endometriosis, highlighting the need for knowledge of endometriosis. This study surveys emergency medicine (EM) attendings, residents, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and fellows to assess knowledge and practice in managing endometriosis-related ED complaints. Methods: A questionnaire from a prior endometriosis survey was modified for EM providers and administered anonymously via email (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) in monthly newsletters to providers at an academic and six associated community EDs. Descriptive statistics were applied for analysis. Results: Among 59 respondents, 60.3% were female, 37.9% male, and 1.7% nonbinary. Most were attending physicians (44.8%) or residents (31.0%). Regarding knowledge of endometriosis, 50.0% of respondents rated themselves as “somewhat knowledgeable,” while 37.9% were “moderately knowledgeable,” and 5.2% were “not knowledgeable at all.” 36.2% felt they lacked adequate knowledge on managing endometriosis in the ED. 13.8% did not consider endometriosis in their differential diagnoses, despite 89.7% reporting that they evaluated gynecological complaints frequently (36.2% monthly, 43.1% weekly, and 10.3% daily). 74.1% desired education on endometriosis. Symptom recognition exceeded respondents’ self-reported knowledge; >60% reported they were at least “likely” to associate endometriosis with dyspareunia, cyclical painful defecation, dysmenorrhea, fertility disorders, menstrual cycle abnormalities, and chronic pelvic pain. Conclusions: There may be a gap in endometriosis knowledge among EM providers, with many expressing interest in further education. Targeted training may improve diagnostic accuracy, reducing diagnostic delays.
Full text 7,634 characters · extracted from oa-html · 7 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective:

Methods

Results:

Conclusions

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results | Characteristics | All participants n = 59a | |---|---| | Gender | | | Female | 35.0 (60.3%) | | Male | 22.0 (37.9%) | | Nonbinary | 1.0 (1.7%) | | Missing* | 1 | | Years in practice | | | 15 years | 5.0 (8.6%) | | 11–15 years | 9.0 (15.5%) | | 5–10 years | 18.0 (31.0%) | | Missing* | 1 | | Role | | | Attending physician | 26.0 (44.8%) | | Emergency medicine resident | 18.0 (31.0%) | | Fellow | 1.0 (1.7%) | | Nurse practitioner | 5.0 (8.6%) | | Physician assistant | 8.0 (13.8%) | | Missing* | 1 | | Frequency of gynecological complaints | | | Daily | 6.0 (10.3%) | | Less than once a month | 3.0 (5.2%) | | Never | 3.0 (5.2%) | | Several times per month | 21.0 (36.2%) | | Several times per week | 25.0 (43.1%) | | Missing* | 1 | | Knowledge of endometriosis | | | Moderately knowledgeable | 22.0 (40.0%) | | Not knowledgeable at all | 3.0 (5.5%) | | Somewhat knowledgeable | 29.0 (52.7%) | | Very knowledgeable | 1.0 (1.8%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Knowledge of endometriosis management | | | No | 21 (38.2%) | | Yes | 34.0 (61.8%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Frequency of endometriosis in differential | | | As a diagnosis of exclusion after I have ruled out emergent conditions | 31.0 (56.4%) | | Every time | 3.0 (5.5%) | | I do not consider this as a diagnosis in the emergency department | 8.0 (14.5%) | | When additional symptoms are suggestive of endometriosis | 13.0 (23.6%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Education and training on endometriosisb | | | Clinical practice | 25 (42.4%) | | Medical school | 40 (67.8%) | | Nurse Practitioner school | 7 (11.9%) | | Other sources | 1 (1.7%) | | Personal experience | 9 (15.3%) | | Physician assistant school | 8 (13.6%) | | Residency | 15 (25.4%) | | Knowledge on the percentage of women with endometriosis | | | 20% | 2.0 (3.6%) | | 11–15% | 30.0 (54.5%) | | 16–20% | 15.0 (27.3%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Dysmenorrhea symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 2.0 (3.6%) | | Likely | 14.0 (25.5%) | | Not likely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Somewhat likely | 9.0 (16.4%) | | Very likely | 24.0 (43.6%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Dyspareunia symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Likely | 15.0 (27.3%) | | Not likely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Somewhat likely | 11.0 (20.0%) | | Very likely | 17.0 (30.9%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Acute pelvic pain symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 1.0 (1.8%) | | Likely | 13.0 (23.6%) | | Not likely | 18.0 (32.7%) | | Somewhat likely | 18.0 (32.7%) | | Very likely | 5.0 (9.1%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Chronic pelvic pain symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 5.0 (9.1%) | | Likely | 12.0 (21.8%) | | Not likely | 5.0 (9.1%) | | Somewhat likely | 3.0 (5.5%) | | Very likely | 30.0 (54.5%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Cyclical painful defecation symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 1.0 (1.8%) | | Likely | 14.0 (25.5%) | | Not likely | 7.0 (12.7%) | | Somewhat likely | 9.0 (16.4%) | | Very likely | 24.0 (43.6%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Cyclical urinary disorders symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 1.0 (1.8%) | | Likely | 15.0 (27.3%) | | Not likely | 9.0 (16.4%) | | Somewhat likely | 17.0 (30.9%) | | Very likely | 13.0 (23.6%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Menstrual cycle disorders (i.e., irregular/heavy bleeding, abnormal menstrual cycles) symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Likely | 19.0 (34.5%) | | Not likely | 5.0 (9.1%) | | Somewhat likely | 7.0 (12.7%) | | Very likely | 18.0 (32.7%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Fertility disorders symptoms as suspicious for endometriosis | | | Extremely likely | 4.0 (7.3%) | | Likely | 24.0 (43.6%) | | Not likely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Somewhat likely | 8.0 (14.5%) | | Very likely | 13.0 (23.6%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Frequency of recommending pelvic exam | | | All of the time | 7.0 (12.7%) | | Most of the time | 32.0 (58.2%) | | Never | 1.0 (1.8%) | | Rarely | 6.0 (10.9%) | | Sometimes | 9.0 (16.4%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Frequency of ordering pelvic ultrasound | | | Most of the time | 19.0 (34.5%) | | Never | 3.0 (5.5%) | | Rarely | 3.0 (5.5%) | | Sometimes | 30.0 (54.5%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Referral for endometriosisb | | | General gynecologist | 52.0 (88.1%) | | Endometriosis specialist | 2.0 (3.4%) | | Outside organizations | 5.0 (8.5%) | | Free clinic | 2 (3.4%) | | Gynecologists consult in ER | 3 (5.1%) | | Primary care physician | 22.0 (37.3%) | | Public health clinic | 1.0 (1.7%) | | Management of endometriosisb | | | Acetaminophen | 42 (71.2%) | | Hormone contraception if there are no immediate plans for a pregnancy | 23 (39.0%) | | NSAIDs | 51 (86.4%) | | Opioids | 12 (20.3%) | | Warm compresses | 1 (1.7%) | | Medications prescribed for dysmenorrheab | | | Acetaminophen | 40 (67.8%) | | Hormone contraception if there are no immediate plans for a pregnancy | 35 (59.3%) | | NSAIDs | 52 (88.1%) | | Opioids | 6 (10.2%) | | Other | 1 (1.7%) | | Interest in more information | | | No | 12 (21.8%) | | Yes | 43.0 (78.2%) | | Missing* | 4 | | Preferred method of receiving informationb,c | | | Conference or grand rounds | 22.0 (51.2%) | | Online modules | 9.0 (20.9%) | | Clinical decision tool | 23.0 (53.5%) | | Written materials | 25.0 (58.1%) | | Podcast or video | 13.0 (30.2%) | | Reason for noninterest in additional informationd | | | I already have all the information I need | 5.0 (41.7%) | | Not relevant to my practice | 2.0 (16.7%) | | Not relevant to my practice, I already have all the information I need | 1.0 (8.3%) | | Other | 4.0 (33.3%) | | Missing* | 47 |

Discussion

Conclusions Authors’ Contributions Abbreviations - APP - advanced practice provider - CME - continuing medical education - ED - emergency department - EM - emergency medicine - NSAIDs - nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Acknowledgments Author Disclosure Statement Funding Information

References

Supplementary Material Please find the following supplemental material available below. For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with. For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article. Cite Cite Cite Download to reference manager If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice Information, rights and permissions Information Published In

Keywords

Authors Metrics and citations Metrics Publication usage* Total views and downloads: 219 *Publication usage tracking started in December 2016 Publications citing this one Receive email alerts when this publication is cited Web of Science: 0 Crossref: There are no citing articles to show. Figures and tables Figures & Media Tables View Options View options PDF/EPUB View PDF/EPUBAccess options If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below: loading institutional access options Alternatively, view purchase options below: Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareunia

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (12)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK