Ectopic pregnancy: a review of 113 selected cases

Canadian Medical Association journal · 1966 · vol. 95(10) , pp. 535–9 · PMID:5955716 · PMC1935646
Other OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-08-06 ⓘ

This review of 113 ectopic pregnancy cases identified salpingitis as the most common cause and found that conservative surgery, particularly salpingectomy, was effective for tubal and interstitial pregnancies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

One hundred and thirteen selected cases of ectopic pregnancy were analyzed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic factors. The incidence of this condition was higher in "ward" patients and in the Negro. Salpingitis was the commonest etiological factor. The common symptoms were pain, a missed period, vaginal bleeding, faintness, nausea and vomiting, and shoulder pain. The common signs were abdominal tenderness, a positive "chandelier sign", rebound tenderness, a pelvic mass and pallor. Fertility of the women in this series was equal to that of women in the general population of the same age group. The frog (pregnancy) test was the only significant laboratory test. Colpocentesis proved very helpful, whereas dilatation and curettage did not. Conservative operation, consisting of salpingectomy plus a uterine wedge, was recommended for tubal pregnancy and was performed in 107 patients. The ovary was removed only if involved. Interstitial pregnancies were treated by removal of the corneal portion of the uterus and by salpingectomy, rather than hysterectomy; this procedure was successful in four out of four patients. Incidental appendectomy is not recommended.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Pregnancy, Ectopic Adolescent Adult Colposcopy Female Humans Hysterosalpingography Pregnancy Pregnancy Tests

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:57:58.406719+00:00