The Effect of a Synthetic Progestin (R 2323) on Gonadal and Endometrial Cells in vitro and in vivo
Gestrinone affected hormonal activities and proliferation of granulosa, endometrial, and carcinoma cells in vitro, and altered gonadotropin and steroid levels in patients with XY gonadal dysgenesis and uterine myoma.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper studied the effects of the synthetic progestin gestrinone (R 2323) on human endometrial and endometrial cancer cell lines and on pig granulosa-theca cells in vitro, assessing cell proliferation and steroid hormone production, and on gonadotropins/sex steroids in vivo in patients with XY gonadal dysgenesis and uterine leiomyoma. In vitro, adding 10 ng/mL to human endometrial monolayer cultures induced secretory-phase–like changes, while endometrial cancer cells showed a proliferation peak at 50 ng/mL that became inhibitory with longer culture, and pig granulosa cell estradiol-17β production increased dose-dependently with progesterone production stimulated at 50 ng/mL but suppressed at 500 ng/mL. In vivo, gestrinone reduced LH and FSH in XY gonadal dysgenesis while increasing estradiol-17β, whereas in leiomyoma patients taken for days 7–9 of the menstrual cycle it did not suppress ovulation and produced minimal hormone changes. The authors acknowledge via their design that these in vitro and short-duration in vivo observations reflect cellular and hormonal responses rather than long-term clinical outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it explicitly frames gestrinone as a therapy of interest for endometriosis and compares its action to danazol, proposing a stronger “pseudopregnancy mini-pill” effect with direct actions on the gonads and endometrium.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
689 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T11:29:38.187967+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:40.384591+00:00