Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading

Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading Charles Winterhalter , Kathryn J Stratton , Stepan Fenyk , Heath Murray doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640380 Charles Winterhalter 1 Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: Charles.winterhalter{at}newcastle.ac.uk Kathryn J Stratton 1 Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Stepan Fenyk 1 Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Heath Murray 1 Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University , Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: Heath.murray{at}newcastle.ac.uk Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF ABSTRACT DNA damage occurs in all cells and must be repaired to maintain genome integrity. Many DNA lesions are targeted for removal by repair systems that excise the damage, thereby generating a temporary single-strand discontinuity in the chromosome. If DNA repair has not been completed prior to a round of genome duplication, the single-strand discontinuity (nick or gap) can be converted to a double-strand break (DSB) by an oncoming replication fork. Because the genomic location of nucleobase damage is stochastic, investigating the fate of replication machinery (replisome) at DNA repair sites with single-strand discontinuities has been limited. Here we have addressed this issue by expressing Cas9 nickases in Bacillus subtilis to create site specific single-strand discontinuities in a bacterial chromosome. We find that a nick in either leading or lagging strand arrests DNA replication, while the fate of the replicative helicase is distinct and depends upon the strand nicked. Genetic, biochemical, and single cell analyses indicate that replisome/nick encounters generate a single-end DSB which requires recombinational repair to enable PriA-dependent replication restart. Together this work defines the physiologically relevant pathway used by B. subtilis to reinitiate DNA synthesis following replication fork inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. Highlights Single-strand discontinuities inactivate the bacterial replisome Nicks on the leading or lagging strand template differentially affect fate of the helicase Replication forks are repaired via recombinational repair The single strand binding protein (SSB) acidic tail is essential for replication restart DNA replication restart is PriA-dependent Download figure Open in new tab INTRODUCTION Intracellular DNA can become damaged and/or distorted through a multitude of endogenous and exogenous sources (e.g. post-replication mismatches, base oxidation, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers) 1 , 2 . Damaged and distorted DNA can be mutagenic, resulting in permanent changes to genetic information of progeny. To avoid these negative consequences on genome stability, specialised DNA repair systems recognise and remove the damaged (base/nucleotide excision repair) or distorted (mismatch repair) DNA. As part of their repair mechanism, these systems excise the damaged or mismatched base, causing the formation of a nick or single-strand gap in the affected DNA strand 3 . Critically, if a replication fork progresses towards such a single-strand discontinuity before repair is complete, the encounter can generate a single-end double-strand break (seDSB) 4 . Elegant experiments using bacteriophage λ demonstrated that an engineered nick in either strand of the viral genome generated replication-dependent DSBs ( Fig. 1A ) 5 . While active DNA replication was necessary to generate DSBs at a nick 5 , the fate of the bacterial DNA replication machinery (replisome) at single-strand discontinuities has not been determined. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Single-strand discontinuities arrest DNA synthesis and generate DNA damage. (A) Diagram illustrating the impact of leading and lagging strand discontinuities on a replication fork, with the bacterial replicative helicase translocating along the lagging strand template. (B) Genetic system employed to create a site-specific single-strand discontinuity in the B. subtilis chromosome. Black boxes correspond to antibiotic resistance markers, pink to Cas9 variants and green to sgRNA. Chromosome annotations refer to the replication origin (0°), terminus (180°) and sgRNA target sequence (yellow box). (C) Spot-titre analysis of strains engineered to express (+xylose) either nCas9 or dCas9. Individual sgRNAs were designed to target the leading or lagging strand template at loci located at either −90° (top panel) or +90° (bottom panel). (D) MFA using whole genome sequencing of strains engineered to express (+xylose) either nCas9 or dCas9. Individual sgRNAs were designed to target the leading or lagging strand template at loci located at either −90° (left panel) or +90° (right panel). The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. (E) Fluorescence microscopy images of the DNA damage reporter mNG-RecA in strains engineered to express (+xylose) either nCas9 or dCas9 (sgRNAs target −90°). Fluorescent RecA organises into bundles in the presence of DNA damage. Green signal corresponds to mNG-RecA fluorescence, grey scale images show corresponding phase contrast images. Scale bar indicates 2.5 µm. (F) Quantification of fluorescence microscopy images of the DNA damage reporter mNG-RecA in strains engineered to express (+xylose) either nCas9 or dCas9 (sgRNA target −90°). Detection of spots and bundles corresponds to distinct foci or filament-like structures annotated in panel (E). Error bars indicate standard deviation and circles overlaid on bars correspond to two biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The replisome is a multicomponent complex of proteins and enzymes that unwinds the chromosome and coordinates synthesis of new DNA polymers on the leading and lagging strands 6 , 7 . The most stable component of the replisome, and most pivotal for its processivity, is helicase 8 , 9 . Cellular replicative helicases are toroid enzymes that unwind DNA by encircling and translocating along a single client nucleic acid strand, acting as a wedge to disrupt base pairing 10 . Studies of bacterial replisomes in vitro and in vivo have revealed that the machinery is intrinsically dynamic, with most factors observed to bind and unbind interaction partners multiple times per replication cycle 11 , 12 . This behaviour enables the replisome to overcome a range of potential roadblocks and remain associated with the template, competent to continue DNA synthesis 13 . However, recent studies in eukaryotic systems have indicated that single-strand discontinuities generate DSBs and arrest DNA replication by impairing helicase progression 14 , 15 . Most bacterial chromosomes contain a single replication origin ( oriC ) that promotes assembly of two independent replication forks for bidirectional DNA synthesis 16 , 17 . Consequently, replisomes initiated from oriC must continue until they complete replication of their respective chromosome arm 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 . In contrast, eukaryotic chromosomes contain multiple replication origins, therefore no single replication fork is essential to complete genome duplication 15 , 16 , 22 . If a bacterial replisome encounters a single-strand discontinuity and generates a DSB, it has been proposed that rescue of the broken chromosome occurs through homologous recombination and that reassembly of the replisome follows helicase loading at the repaired replication fork 23 . Determining how bacteria react and respond when a replication fork encounters a single-strand discontinuity is crucial to understanding how these organisms ensure genome stability. Here we have investigated this question by expressing Cas9 nickases (nCas9) in the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis . The results show that a nick located in either template strand blocks downstream DNA synthesis. Resumption of DNA replication is dependent upon a core set of recombinational repair proteins and the PriA-dependent replication restart system to reload the replicative helicase. RESULTS Single-strand discontinuities in a bacterial chromosome arrest DNA synthesis Damaged and mismatched nucleobases can be located randomly throughout a genome, making it a challenge to directly analyse conflicts between DNA replication and repair. To mimic the formation of a single-strand discontinuity produced during DNA repair, an experimental system capable of generating a nick was developed in B. subtilis using Cas9 nuclease variants and single-guide RNAs (sgRNA) 14 , 15 , 22 , 24 . Cas9 carrying single amino acid substitutions (Cas9 D10A or Cas9 H840A ) creates nickases that can cleave the phosphodiester bond of one DNA strand (nCas9), while the double mutant (Cas9 D10A/H840A ) creates a catalytically inactive enzyme (dCas9) 25 . Each cas9 allele was integrated into the B. subtilis chromosome under the control of a xylose-inducible promoter ( Fig. 1B ) 26 . The location of sgRNA hybridisation is indicated by coordinates between the origin (0°) and terminus (∼180°) on either the right (+) or left (-) arm of the chromosome. To avoid complications arising from potential activation of prophage following DNA damage in the laboratory strain of B. subtilis , a derivative lacking these genetic elements (Δ6) was used throughout this study 27 . Cell viability following nicking was quantified using spot-titre assays, where strains are grown to saturation in liquid medium without xylose, before samples were serially diluted and plated onto solid medium with or without xylose to enumerate the number of colony forming units (CFUs). It was observed that the Cas9 D10A nickase elicits a stronger phenotype than Cas9 H840A upon induction with xylose ( Supplementary Figure 1A-B ) 25 . To achieve comparable nicking efficiency at different sites in the chromosome, the cas9 D10A allele was used throughout the remainder of this study, in conjunction with distinct sgRNAs targeted to non-essential regions of the genome. Using sgRNAs to target either leading or lagging strands at loci on the left or right chromosome arms, it was observed that expression of nCas9 resulted in severe growth inhibition ( Fig. 1C , Supplementary Figure 1C ). In contrast, expression of dCas9 targeted to the same locations did not affect the number of CFUs ( Fig. 1C , Supplementary Figure 1D ), indicating that DNA nicking is necessary to cause growth inhibition. Next chromosome replication was investigated using whole genome marker frequency analysis (MFA). Expression of nCas9 was induced for one hour in exponentially growing cultures. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was harvested for next-generation sequencing, reads were mapped onto the reference genome sequence, and data is displayed with the chromosome origin ( oriC ) at the centre of the graphs (Supplementary Figure 2). Introduction of nicks in either the leading or the lagging strand resulted in a drop in sequencing coverage from the nick site to the terminus region, whereas expression of dCas9 with the same sgRNAs did not appear to inhibit DNA replication ( Fig. 1D ). Copy number at the nick position was low in the presence of nCas9, potentially reflecting DNA degradation 28 . Consistent with a DNA replication-dependent phenotype, spot-titre analyses showed that nick induction in late-exponential phase does not result in loss of viability, whereas induction in early-exponential phase results in severe growth defects ( Supplementary Figure 1E ). Therefore, because cells expressing nCas9 are unable to synthetise DNA downstream of the nick, incomplete chromosome synthesis can explain the strong growth inhibition observed in spot-titre assays ( Fig. 1C ). Previous results indicated that a bacterial replication fork encountering a single-strand discontinuity generates a DSB 5 . To determine whether DNA damage was generated following nCas9 induction, localisation of an ectopic mNeonGreen-RecA reporter (mNG-RecA) was observed in live cells using fluorescence microscopy (endogenous recA is present in these merodiploid strains). It has been shown in B. subtilis that following DNA damage fluorescently labelled RecA recombinase assembles into bundles 29 , 30 , 31 . Consistent with the literature, in unstressed cells mNG-RecA is observed evenly distributed over the nucleoid ( Supplementary Figure 3A ) 32 . Following expression of nCas9 for 90 minutes during exponential growth, mNG-RecA bundles were detected in 59% of cells when the leading strand template was nicked and 48% of cells when the lagging strand template was nicked ( Fig. 1E-F , Supplementary Figure 3B ). In contrast, expression of dCas9 did not significantly promote mNG-RecA bundling ( Fig. 1E-F , Supplementary Figure 3B ), validating that mNG-RecA is a functional reporter for DNA damage. These results are consistent with the model that the bacterial replisome generates DNA damage upon encountering of a nick in either strand of the parental DNA duplex. Single-strand discontinuities in a bacterial chromosome inactivate the replisome MFA indicated that following expression of nCas9, DNA synthesis does not proceed beyond the nick. We wondered whether the replisome is arrested at a single-strand discontinuity or whether it is inactivated. If the latter event occurs, then the bacterial replication restart system would be required to reload helicase and promote replisome assembly 33 , 34 . In B. subtilis there is only one known replication restart system composed of the essential proteins PriA and the helicase loaders DnaD, DnaB, and DnaI (note that in B. subtilis the replicative helicase is DnaC) 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 . Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to determine the enrichment of helicase and replication restart proteins surrounding a nick in either the leading or lagging strand template. Following induction of nCas9 for one hour in exponentially growing cells, samples were harvested for ChIP. Relative protein enrichment proximal to the nick was normalised to a control locus located on the opposite chromosome arm equidistant from oriC (+90, Fig. 2A ). ChIP showed that helicase is specifically enriched upstream of nicks located in either template strand ( Fig. 2B , Supplementary Figure 4). This upstream helicase enrichment was not detected when dCas9 was expressed, indicating that the Cas9-sgRNA nucleoprotein complex alone does not perturb replication fork progression ( Fig. 2B , Supplementary Figure 4). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Replication restart is necessary to resume DNA synthesis following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. (A) Diagram illustrating genomic loci probed via ChIP-qPCR at either −90° or +90°. The sgRNA targeted Cas9 protein variants to the locus at −90°. Lagging strand and leading strand templates are represented in black and grey lines, respectively (numbers refer to strand polarity). The blue arrow indicates leading strand synthesis and red arrows indicate lagging strand synthesis. (B-F) ChIP-qPCR analyses of helicase (DnaC) and replication restart proteins (PriA, DnaD, DnaB, DnaI) in strains engineered to express either nCas9 or dCas9. The sgRNAs targeted Cas9 proteins to a locus located at −90° and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. (G) Diagram illustrating the fate of helicase (red circle) upon encountering a single-strand discontinuity in either the leading or lagging strand template. (H) MFA using whole genome sequencing in strains engineered to express low levels of sgRNAs and Cas9 proteins (weak nicking system). The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. (I) Genetic system employed to express limiting levels of PriA in strains harbouring the weak nicking system. (J) Spot-titre analysis of strains engineered to express nCas9 (+xylose) with either high or limiting PriA. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. (K) MFA using whole genome sequencing in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9 with either high or limiting PriA. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Interestingly, significant enrichment of helicase was observed downstream of the nick site when cleavage occurred in the template used for leading strand synthesis ( Fig. 2B , Supplementary Figure 4). The bacterial replicative helicase translocates in the 5′➔3′ direction along the template used for lagging strand synthesis 16 . Therefore, ChIP results suggest that when the lagging strand template is nicked helicase runs-off the DNA substrate, whereas when the leading strand template is nicked helicase remains associated with the template DNA and progresses past the single-strand discontinuity ( Fig. 2B ). Consistent with the observed downstream helicase enrichment ( Fig. 2A-B ) and replisome inactivation ( Fig. 1D ), reconstituted helicase assays in vitro have shown that when the bacterial enzyme encounters a leading strand nick it transitions to encircling double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and slides along the double-helix without further unwinding activity 40 . The enrichment of helicase upstream of nick sites is consistent with either helicase stalling or helicase reloading via the replication restart pathway. To further investigate these models, ChIP was used to probe the presence of replication restart proteins surrounding the nicks. Following nCas9 induction, enrichment of PriA, DnaD, DnaB and DnaI was detected upstream (but not downstream) of the sgRNA target sequences, while these proteins were absent from this region when dCas9 was expressed ( Fig. 2C-F ). These results suggest that nicks in either the leading or lagging strand template elicit the replication restart pathway to reload the replicative helicase, and they are consistent with models where helicase either runs off the template (lagging strand template nick) or translocates downstream (leading strand template nick) in an inactive state ( Fig. 2G ). A weakened nCas9 system permits DNA replication restart While replication restart proteins were enriched upstream of nick sites ( Fig. 2B-F ), viability assays and MFA both indicated that downstream DNA synthesis was inhibited ( Fig. 1C-D ). We speculated that persistent nCas9 cleavage activity competes with productive DNA replication restart. Therefore, to allow interrogation of processes occurring downstream of DNA cleavage and replisome inactivation, a weaker nCas9 system was developed. An ssrA degradation tag 41 was directly fused to cas9 D10A to promote nCas9-ssrA proteolysis, and expression of both nCas9-ssrA and sgRNAs were placed under the control of xylose-inducible promoters ( Supplementary Figure 5A ). In this background, induction of nCas9 did not significantly inhibit cell viability or alter chromosome content ( Supplementary Figure 5B-C ), and MFA showed that DNA synthesis continued after a one-hour xylose induction, consistent with low tolerable levels of nickase activity ( Fig. 2H , note a reduction in read depth upstream of nickase target sites, likely reflecting recombinational repair). This dampened nicking system was employed to determine genes essential for replication restart. PriA is required to restart DNA replication at single-strand DNA discontinuities The master replication restart factor priA is essential for growth in B. subtilis. To ascertain whether PriA-dependent replication restart is required following chromosome nicking, an IPTG-dependent titratable PriA complementation system was developed ( Supplementary Figure 6A ). Here conditions were established to express PriA-ssrA at a low level, sufficient to maintain viability while limiting the amount of PriA activity within a cell ( Supplementary Figure 6B-C ). When nCas9-ssrA and sgRNA were induced under conditions with limiting PriA-ssrA, spot-titre analyses showed that cell growth is inhibited ( Fig. 2I-J ). As expected, higher expression of PriA-ssrA rescued viability ( Supplementary Figure 6D ). Following induction of nCas9 and sgRNA for one hour during exponential growth, MFA showed that limiting levels of PriA-ssrA could not sustain chromosome synthesis downstream of the nick site ( Fig. 2K ). These data indicate that PriA is essential to restart DNA replication at a single-strand DNA discontinuity, consistent with the observed enrichment of helicase loading proteins ( Fig. 2D-F ) and with the model that replisomes encountering a nick are inactivated. A core set of recombinational repair proteins are necessary for DNA replication past a single-strand discontinuity Genetic and cytological data suggest that when a replisome encounters a nick, it generates a substrate with ssDNA that is sensed by RecA ( Fig. 1C-E ). Evidence from several experimental systems indicate that under these conditions a single-end DSB is formed (seDSB) 28 , 42 . In bacteria, it has been proposed that a replication-dependent DSB is repaired through homologous recombination with the intact sister chromosome, thereby repairing the lesion and recreating a replication fork to resume DNA synthesis 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 . To determine the factors required for chromosome replication following nCas9 nicking, a targeted reverse genetic analysis was employed, focused on genes previously implicated in homologous recombination and other DNA repair processes (Supplementary Data 1). Using this approach, spot-titre analyses revealed that eight non-essential genes were required for normal growth upon nick induction: DNA end-processing genes addA / addB and recombinational repair genes recF / recO / recR / recA / recG / recU ( Fig. 3A and Supplementary Figure 7A ). Functional complementation of each synthetic lethal deletion confirmed that these gene products are necessary to support growth in cells expressing nCas9 ( Supplementary Figure 7B ). Interestingly, the screen revealed that several factors implicated in DNA repair are not essential for viability under these conditions, such as those classed for end-processing (RecQ, RecS, RecJ) 28 , 47 , maintaining chromosome structure (“SMC-like” RecN, SbcCD, SbcEF) 48 , 49 , and recombination mediation (RecD2, RecX) 50 , 51 , 52 . Gene products involved in Holliday junction migration (RuvA, RuvB) 47 displayed a small colony phenotype but not a loss of CFUs ( Supplementary Figure 8D ), suggesting they play a notable yet less critical role in the repair pathway. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. The repair of single-strand discontinuities requires recombination. (A) Spot-titre analysis of recombinational repair mutants in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. (B) MFA using whole genome sequencing of recombinational repair mutants in the presence or absence of the weak nCas9 system. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. (C) Diagram illustrating proposed molecular events required for recombinational repair to repair a seDSB created after a replication fork encounters a single-strand discontinuity in the leading strand template. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Focusing on the eight mutants that produced the most severe growth defects, MFA was used to analyse DNA replication following induction of nCas9 and sgRNA in exponentially growing cells (Supplementary Figure 9, note several of the deletion mutants display altered replication profiles near the origin or terminus, consistent with previous studies) 53 , 54 , 55 . The results showed that DNA end-processing ( addA / addB ) and recombination mutants ( recF / recO / recR / recA / recG ) are defective in chromosome replication downstream of the nick site, with the only exception being recU ( Fig. 3B , Supplementary Figures 10, 11, note MFA profiles reflect distinct mutant backgrounds). Together, these observations support the recombinational repair model for rescuing a collapsed replication fork 56 . Moreover, the requirement for the AddAB helicase/nuclease complex, which engages linear DNA substrates at a nearly blunt end 57 , strongly suggests that bacterial replisomes encountering a nick generate a seDSB 58 , 59 . Based on the proposed activities of these proteins, the following model was developed ( Fig. 3C ). AddAB helicase/nuclease processes a broken replication fork at a seDSB to generate a single-stranded substrate with a 3′-end required for recombination ( Fig. 3C (I-III)) 23 , 58 , 59 . The single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is recognised and bound by the single-stranded binding protein (SSB), which must be removed by the RecFOR system to allow RecA filament formation ( Fig. 3C (IV-V)) 23 , 60 , 61 , 62 . RecA is the master bacterial recombinase that binds to ssDNA with a free 3′-end, identifies homologous DNA on the intact sister chromosome, and performs strand invasion and exchange ( Fig. 3C (V-VI)) 63 . RecG is a helicase that remodels branched DNA substrates, likely acting at the Holliday junction or at the replication fork (these are not mutually exclusive) ( Fig. 3C (VII)) 64 , 65 . RecU is a structure specific nuclease involved in cleaving the Holliday junction generated by RecA ( Fig. 3C (VII)) 66 . AddAB helicase activity is necessary for recombinational repair at a nick The genetic analysis above indicated that the AddAB helicase/nuclease was responsible of processing the seDSB ( Fig. 3 ). While both AddA and AddB subunits harbour nuclease activity, the two enzymes cleave distinct strands of the DNA duplex following unwinding by the AddA helicase ( Fig. 4A ) 59 . However, whether all AddAB activities are required for recombinational repair in live cells remained unclear. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. The helicase activity of AddAB is necessary and sufficient to support DNA replication past a nick. (A) Diagram illustrating differential resection of a linear DNA in the presence of either the AddA or AddB helicase/nuclease activities. Dotted lines indicate nuclease cleavage. (B) ChIP-qPCR analyses of mNG-AddA and mNG-AddB in strains engineered to express nCas9. Left panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. The sgRNAs targeted nCas9 to a locus located at −90° and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. (C) Spot-titre analysis in strains with AddAB variants (AddA ΔHEL , AddA ΔNUC , AddB ΔNUC AddA ΔNUC AddB ΔNUC ) engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. (D) MFA using whole genome sequencing of strains with either AddA ΔHEL or AddA ΔNUC AddB ΔNUC engineered to express nCas9. Top panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. To determine whether AddAB was acting directly on broken replication forks generated by replisome inactivation at a nick, enrichment of AddAB was investigated using ChIP. AddA and AddB were independently fused to the fluorescent protein mNeonGreen (mNG), which here was used as an epitope tag. The results showed that mNG-AddA and mNG-AddB are maximally enriched 2 kb upstream of nicks, consistent with a direct role in end-processing under these conditions ( Fig. 4B ). The enzymatic activities of AddA and AddB were then reduced through substitution of catalytic residues ( Fig. 4A ) 59 . Spot-titre analyses showed that the helicase defective AddA K36A (AddA ΔHEL ) is unable to sustain bacterial growth upon induction of nicks, whereas nuclease defective variants of either AddA D1172A (AddA ΔNUC ) or AddB D961A (AddB ΔNUC ) grew comparably to a strain encoding wild-type AddAB ( Fig. 4C ). MFA confirmed that DNA synthesis is blocked downstream of a nick in the strain expressing AddA ΔHEL , whereas the strains expressing AddA ΔNUC , AddB ΔNUC or AddA ΔNUC AddB ΔNUC were comparable to wild-type ( Fig. 4D , Supplementary Figure 12A-B ). An immunoblot showed that the AddA ΔHEL variant is stably expressed ( Supplementary Figure 12C ), indicating that AddAB helicase activity alone is necessary for the enzyme to process the seDSB. Since AddAB nuclease activity was dispensable for recombinational repair, we wondered whether another nuclease might fulfil this role. RecJ is a single-strand DNA-specific exonuclease that has been observed to co-localise with the replisome in B. subtilis 67 . Deletion of recJ in conjunction with either addA Δ NUC , addB Δ NUC , or addA Δ NUC addB Δ NUC did not reduce the number of CFU following nicking ( Supplementary Figure 12D ), indicating that RecJ nuclease activity is not required. Based on these observations, it appears that under these conditions AddAB helicase activity and an unspecified nuclease promote end-processing of the seDSB to generate a 3′-tail. SSB recruitment requires AddAB helicase activity The requirement of the RecFOR system for recombinational repair ( Fig. 2 ) implied that SSB is bound to ssDNA at the seDSB. To interrogate this hypothesis, recruitment of SSB was probed using ChIP following induction of nCas9 and sgRNA in exponentially growing cells. The results showed that SSB is enriched upstream of a leading or a lagging strand nick ( Fig. 5A ), and that this enrichment was dependent upon AddAB ( Fig. 5B ). Further analysis of AddAB showed that only helicase activity was required to promote SSB enrichment upstream of a nick ( Fig. 5C ). Together these results support the role of AddAB to unwind a seDSB and provide a ssDNA substrate for SSB. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 5. SSB requires AddA helicase activity for loading upstream of a nick. (A) ChIP-qPCR analyses of SSB in strains engineered to express nCas9 in the presence of either endogenous AddAB (top) or heterologous RexAB (bottom) end-processing machinery. Locations for respective chi sites are indicated. The sgRNAs targeted nCas9 to a locus located at −90° and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. (B) ChIP-qPCR analyses of SSB in strains with recombinational repair mutants engineered to express nCas9. qPCR primers amplified either a site located −3 kb from the sgRNA target (−90°) or a control locus (+90°) used for normalisation. Note a significant increase in SSB enrichment in some of mutants tested under these conditions. Two-sided Student t-test results: * indicates p-value = 0.0143 for lagging strand Δ recF , p-value = 0.1666 and p-value = 0.0223 for leading/strand Δ recG backgrounds, respectively (n = 3, see Methods/Source Data for details). (C) ChIP-qPCR analyses of SSB in strains with AddA and AddB variants engineered to express nCas9. Alleles refer to wild-type (WT), knockouts (Δ), and point mutations inactivating nuclease (ΔNUC) or helicase (ΔHEL) activities. qPCR primers amplified either a site located −3 kb from the sgRNA target (−90°) or a control locus (+90°) used for normalisation. (A-C) Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. AddAB helicase/nuclease activity is thought to be modulated by interaction of the enzyme with ssDNA binding motifs termed chi sites scattered throughout the genome 59 , 68 , 69 . The locations of B. subtilis chi sites are shown below the qPCR primer pairs used to probe SSB enrichment ( Fig. 5A ). The cluster of chi sites located 1-2 kb upstream of the nick site correlates well with the observed peak enrichment of SSB in nicking strains ( Fig. 5A ). To further investigate the connection between chi site location and SSB enrichment, the endogenous addA/addB genes were deleted and functionally complemented by the homologous genes from Staphylococcus aureus ( rexA/rexB , Supplementary Figure 12E ). While these enzymes are related, B. subtilis and S. aureus chi sequences are distinct ( chi Bs is 5′-AGCGG-3′ and chi Sa is 5′-GAAGCGG-3′) 59 , 70 , 71 and accordingly the locations of the respective chi sites upstream of the targeted nick at −90° are different ( Fig. 5A ). Revaluation of SSB enrichment by ChIP in the strain expressing RexAB showed that the SSB profile is shifted upstream to a position proximal to the first chi Sa sites ( Fig. 5A ). Taken together, the data suggest that end-processing is necessary to deposit SSB onto ssDNA generated from a seDSB, and that AddAB nuclease activity can be abolished without compromising recombinational repair. The SSB C-terminal tail is required for recombinational repair at a nick SSB forms a homotetramer that binds ssDNA non-specifically via its N-terminal domain 72 . Each SSB monomer harbours a long disordered C-terminal domain that contains a protein interaction sequence at the terminus (the C-terminal tail or CTT) ( Fig. 6A-B , Supplementary Figure 13A ) 73 . While the B. subtilis SSB-CTT is dispensable for cell viability, it is required for efficient repair of DNA lesions created by either UV irradiation or mitomycin C treatment 49 , 74 . To determine whether the SSB-CTT is required for recombinational repair following replisome inactivation at a nick, an IPTG-inducible SSB complementation system was generated in a Δ ssbA strain, allowing exogenous expression of either the wild-type protein or a variant lacking the last six amino acids (SSB ΔCTT , Supplementary Figure 13B ). Spot-titre analyses confirmed that SSB ΔCTT can complement a Δ ssbA mutant similar to wild-type SSB and that viability was dependent upon IPTG ( Supplementary Figure 13C ), while immunoblots showed that the inducible SSB proteins were being expressed at levels comparable to the endogenous protein ( Supplementary Figure 13D ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 6. The SSB-CTT is essential to recruit RecO following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. (A) Schematic of SSB primary structure with corresponding functions. Numbers indicate amino acid residue boundaries between the N-terminal domain (NTD), C-terminal domain (CTD) and C-terminal tail (CTT). (B) Structural model of B. subtilis SSB homotetramer in the presence of single-strand DNA (AlphaFold 3). A sixty nucleotide homopolymer of thymidine bases (dT 60 ) is shown in black and SSB-CTT residues are highlighted in red. (C) Spot-titre analysis of SSB variants in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. Top panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. (D) MFA using whole genome sequencing in strains with SSB variants engineered to express nCas9. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. (E) ChIP-qPCR analyses of SSB, His-RecO and His-RecA proteins in strains engineered to express nCas9. qPCR primers amplified either a site located −3 kb from the sgRNA target (−90°) or a control locus (+90°) used for normalisation. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. (F) ChIP-qPCR analyses of His-RecA in strains with recombinational repair mutants engineered to express nCas9. Top panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. qPCR primers amplified either a site located −3 kb from the sgRNA target (−90°) or a control locus (+90°) used for normalisation. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. The SSB complementation system was then moved into strains capable of expressing nCas9 and sgRNA ( Supplementary Figure 13E ). Spot-titre analyses showed that wild-type SSB supports viability following induction of nicking, whereas the SSB ΔCTT variant could not ( Fig. 6C ). MFA confirmed that chromosome replication from the nick site to the terminus is arrested when SSB lacks its C-terminal tail ( Fig. 6D ). Therefore, the results indicate that the SSB-CTT is necessary for DNA repair following replisome inactivation at a nick. The SSB-CTT recruits RecO during recombinational repair The SSB-CTT acts as a protein interaction hub 49 that directly interacts with several factors shown above to be necessary for recombinational repair, including RecO, RecG, and PriA ( Figs. 2I-K , 3A-B, Supplementary Figure 13A ). ChIP showed that the SSB ΔCTT variant was enriched upstream of a nick at similar levels to the wild-type protein ( Fig. 6E ), indicating that the growth defect of the SSB ΔCTT variant following nicking was not due to a general loss of SSB activity. To investigate the essential role of the SSB-CTT, ChIP was employed to probe the recruitment of His-RecO upstream of nick sites. Enrichment of His-RecO was abolished in cells harbouring SSB ΔCTT ( Fig. 6E ), indicating that the SSB:RecO interaction depends on the SSB-CTT ( Supplementary Figure 13F ). The RecFOR system is thought to promote RecA binding ssDNA by stimulating the dissociation of SSB 23 , 75 . ChIP confirmed that enrichment of His-RecA was dependent upon both AddAB and RecFOR systems ( Fig. 6F ). Critically, enrichment of His-RecA was also dependent upon the SSB-CTT ( Fig. 6E ). Taken together, these results are consistent with the model that AddAB processes a seDSB to generate ssDNA for SSB, followed by RecFOR mediating displacement of SSB to allow RecA loading on ssDNA 23 , 75 , 76 , 77 . Further, they suggest that an essential role of the SSB-CTT is to recruit RecO for this process. RecG is recruited to sites of recombinational repair ChIP enrichment of RecA was independent of RecG ( Fig. 6F ), suggesting that RecG acts downstream of RecA-mediated strand exchange, consistent with proposed activities in DNA remodelling. RecG has been implicated in a myriad of DNA transactions including reversal of replication forks, migration of Holliday junctions, regulation of RecA strand exchange, processing of flaps generated when DNA replication forks converge, and stabilisation of D-loops 65 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 . To determine whether RecG acts directly during recombinational repair, the endogenous recG allele was fused to a FLAG epitope tag and recruitment of FLAG-RecG was probed using ChIP following induction of nCas9 and sgRNA in exponentially growing cells. The results showed that FLAG-RecG is maximally enriched ∼3 kb upstream of a nick in either leading or lagging strand ( Fig. 7A ), consistent with RecG playing a direct role in DNA remodelling necessary to resume DNA replication ( Fig. 3B ) 49 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 7. RecG and RecU are recruited to sites of recombinational repair. (A) ChIP-qPCR analyses of FLAG-RecG in strains engineered to express nCas9. Top panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. The sgRNAs targeted nCas9 to a locus located at −90° and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images of Δ recU mutant strains engineered to express nCas9 (sgRNAs targeted to −90°). Grey scale images correspond to phase contrast. Blue signal corresponds to DAPI staining (DNA) and red signal corresponds to Nile red staining (membrane) in composite fluorescence images. Cas9 proteins were induced (+xylose) during the exponential growth phase for 90 minutes before cells were collected for imaging. Scale bar indicates 5 µm. (C) ChIP-qPCR analyses of RecU-FLAG in a strain engineered to express nCas9. Top panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. The sgRNAs targeted nCas9 to a locus located at −90° and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. RecU is recruited to sites of recombinational repair Of the recombination proteins found to be important for supporting growth following nick induction, the Holliday junction resolvase RecU was conspicuous 28 . First, deletion of recU impaired growth less than the other mutants ( Fig. 3A ). Second, MFA indicated that DNA replication past a nick was independent of recU ( Fig. 3B , Supplementary Figure 11B ). Therefore, we considered the possibility that growth defects associated with Δ recU following chromosome nicking were indirect, as the deletion mutant is known to elicit diverse chromosome segregation abnormalities ( Fig. 7B , Supplementary Figure 14) 82 . To address this hypothesis, the endogenous recU allele was fused to a FLAG epitope tag and enrichment of RecU-FLAG was determined using ChIP. The results show that RecU-FLAG was specifically recruited to DNA upstream of a nick site ( Fig. 7E ), consistent with a direct role in Holliday junction resolution. However, due to the pleiotropic phenotype of a Δ recU mutant, its precise importance during recombinational repair remains unclear. DISCUSSION In this study we have characterised the fate of the bacterial replisome in vivo after it encounters a single-strand discontinuity in template DNA ( Fig. 1A ). The results indicate that a nick in the template for either the leading or lagging strand arrests DNA synthesis, likely generates a seDSB that elicits repair by homologous recombination, followed by PriA-dependent replication restart ( Figs. 1 - 3 ). These findings are consistent with the observation that a nick in a replicating bacteriophage chromosome generates DSBs 5 and with recent reports of the impact of nicks in eukaryotic replication systems 14 , 15 , 22 . Importantly, while replisomes are thought to be generally tolerant to many types of DNA damage 83 , it appears that the bacterial replication machinery cannot readily bypass single-strand interruptions as these lesions affect helicase progression ( Figs. 2 , 8(I)). Replication beyond a nick requires recombinational repair ( Fig. 3 ). Genetic analysis combined with ChIP indicates that a single pathway is utilised under these experimental conditions: AddAB unwinds the DNA ( Fig. 8 (II)); SSB binds the ssDNA produced by AddAB ( Fig. 8 (III)); RecFOR counteracts SSB and allows RecA to bind ssDNA ( Fig. 8 (IV-V)); RecA promotes strand invasion of the homologous chromosome and generates a D-loop ( Fig. 8 (VI)); RecG remodels a DNA substrate formed during recombination ( Fig. 8 (VII)); PriA binds to the repaired replication fork ( Fig. 8 (VIII)) and reloads helicase to promote replisome assembly and DNA replication restart ( Fig. 8 (IX)). The observed lack of redundancy between proteins involved in recombinational DNA repair suggests that the pathway identified here is the major route for fixing broken replication forks in B. subtilis 48 , 84 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 8. Model for seDSB repair and helicase reloading following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. Model illustrating molecular events that are required or dispensable for recombinational repair of a seDSB created after a replication fork encounters a single-strand discontinuity located on either the leading or lagging strand template. Building upon these findings, we investigated specific protein activities to help elucidate their roles during recombinational repair of a replisome inactivated at a single-strand discontinuity. Below we discuss these findings in what we propose is chronological order. The replicative helicase is inactivated after it encounters a nick In bacteria the replicative helicase encircles and tracks along the template for lagging strand synthesis. ChIP data suggests that there are distinct fates of the helicase depending on the location of a nick ( Fig. 2A-B , Supplementary Figure 4). As expected for a nick in the lagging strand template, helicase enrichment was only observed at the cleavage site and upstream, consistent with the model that helicase runs-off the template when it encounters the single-strand discontinuity ( Figs. 2G , 8 (I)). In contrast, when the nick was in the leading strand template, helicase was also enriched downstream of the cleavage site, suggesting that the enzyme continued translocation. We propose that upon encountering a nick in the leading strand template, helicase slides onto the dsDNA template in an inactive conformation that cannot perform further DNA unwinding ( Figs. 2G , 8 (I)) 40 . This model is consistent with in vitro experiments using Thermus aquaticus helicase, where after unwinding up to a leading strand nick, the enzyme can continue to translocate with the two strands of DNA passing through the central channel with no resultant unwinding 40 . Whether the bacterial helicase is actively removed from dsDNA under these conditions, akin to what has been observed for the eukaryotic CMG helicase in Xenopus extracts 14 , requires further investigation. AddAB helicase activity is necessary and sufficient for recombinational repair AddAB and related enzymes have been shown to bind blunt end dsDNA or dsDNA with short overhangs (4-20 nucleotides with either a 5′- or a 3′-end) 59 , 85 . Moreover, AddAB is inert on DNA substrates lacking a blunt end 57 . The requirement for AddAB to efficiently process DNA past a nick ( Fig. 3 ), specifically AddAB helicase activity to recruit SSB ( Figs. 4C-D , 5), is consistent with the model that a seDSB is generated when a bacterial replisome encounters a single-strand discontinuity. When the template for leading strand synthesis is nicked, the DNA polymerase likely runs-off the end of the substrate to produce a blunt or nearly blunt end, suitable for recognition by AddAB. However, when the template for lagging strand synthesis is nicked, a substrate with a 3′-tail would likely be produced. Because the reverse genetic screen showed that no other major nucleases are required for this recombinational repair pathway ( Fig. 3 , Supplementary Figures 8, 12D and Supplementary Data 1), we speculate that the high local concentration of replication factors could facilitate priming near the end of the 3′-tail, thereby filling the ssDNA with an Okazaki fragment to create a suitable substrate for AddAB ( Fig. 8 (I-II)). Alternatively, unidentified nucleases may degrade the ssDNA tail 86 . The master recombination factor RecA requires ssDNA to promote homologous pairing. A long-standing question is how this ssDNA is generated in vivo . Most current models suggest that enzymes resect a DSB to generate a single-strand terminating with a 3′-end 28 , 34 . Here we tested this model by mutating the nuclease activities of AddA and AddB. The results showed that neither nuclease activity is required for recombinational repair under the experimental conditions tested ( Fig. 4C-D ). Moreover, deletion of the major exonuclease RecJ in a strain expressing the nuclease-dead AddAB variant did not display a synthetic phenotype ( Supplementary Figure 12D ). In contrast, AddAB helicase activity was required for recombinational repair ( Fig. 4D ), consistent with a previous study of the ancestral AdnAB resection machinery in Mycobacteria tuberculosis 87 and supported by c hi -dependence to facilitate SSB loading ( Fig. 5A , Supplementary Figure 12E ). The local concentration of SSB is high near the site of DNA replication 88 , 89 , which together with phase separation 90 , 91 may facilitate its rapid association with ssDNA emerging from AddAB. In fact, in vitro the AddA NUC AddB NUC nuclease-dead enzyme does not unwind dsDNA in the absence of SSB 92 , suggesting that AddAB unwinding and SSB binding ssDNA may be coupled. Together these results raise the unexpected possibility that during recombinational repair at a nick, the key activity during end-processing is to separate the strands and create a ssDNA substrate for SSB ( Figs. 5C , 8 (II-III)). Interaction of the SSB C-terminal tail with RecO is necessary for recombinational repair The SSB-CTT is an established protein interaction hub that has been shown to directly bind several of the essential replication and repair factors required at nicks, including RecO 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , RecG 97 , 98 , and PriA 74 , 99 ( Supplementary Figure 13A ). However, the critical activities performed by the SSB-CTT in vivo had not been established 49 . Based on the results above, we conclude that the SSB-CTT interaction with RecO is necessary for recombinational repair ( Fig. 6 ). RecO is part of the RecFOR system required for RecA loading onto ssDNA in vitro 76 and RecA-GFP foci formation in vivo 23 . Because RecO activity precedes the activities of RecG and PriA (i.e. RecA binding ssDNA is blocked, Fig. 6F ), further conclusions regarding the importance of these protein:protein interactions cannot be drawn. Historically the RecFOR system has been proposed to mediate ssDNA gap-filling, rather than recombination at a DSB 61 . While it is possible that multiple types of DNA lesions are associated with nicks generated by nCas9 in B. subtilis , we note that recruitment of SSB and RecA was dependent on AddAB ( Figs. 5B , 6F ). Because AddAB-dependent end-processing is not associated with models for recombinational repair of ssDNA gaps, the data presented here is most consistent with RecFOR acting within the proposed seDSB repair pathway ( Fig. 8 ). Supporting this viewpoint, AddAB has been shown to be epistatic to RecFOR in Thermus thermophilus 100 and RecFOR is essential for DSB repair in Deinococcus radiodurans 101 . In vitro the RecO:RecR complex facilitates loading of RecA onto SSB-coated ssDNA 102 , 103 . Because RecO, RecR, and RecF were all required for recombinational repair following nicking ( Fig. 3 ), we propose that the essential role of RecF here is to recruit RecR and generate the RecO:RecR complex. This model is consistent with a hand-off mechanism for RecR observed in vitro 102 . Since SSB and RecO are enriched at a broken replication fork ( Fig. 6E ), we predict that there is a mechanism (potentially facilitated via RecF) to regulate RecO:RecR complex formation until it is required, thus safeguarding the SSB-coated DNA from promiscuous RecA loading ( Figs. 5B , 6F , 8 (III-V)). RecG is necessary to complete recombinational repair prior to replication restart The biological role of the DNA translocase RecG has been a long-standing question 64 , 65 . MFA shows that a Δ recG mutant cannot efficiently replicate past a nick ( Fig. 3B ) and ChIP indicates that RecG is enriched upstream of the lesion ( Fig. 7A ) 54 . We propose that RecG acts to remodel a DNA substrate formed after RecA-mediated strand invasion, either the Holliday junction or the replication fork ( Fig. 8 (VI-VII)). Branch migration of the Holliday junction away from the replication fork could be required for downstream steps necessary for PriA-dependent helicase loading 104 . Alternatively, RecG may process the replication fork itself, preparing it for PriA loading on the correct substrate (Supplementary Figure 15) 54 , 55 . Holliday junction migration and resolution are not necessary for replication restart While recU was identified as important in our genetic screen following nicking ( Fig. 3A ) and RecU was specifically enriched upstream of a nick ( Fig. 7C ), it was found that RecU is not necessary for replication restart per se ( Fig. 3B ). Single cell analyses revealed significant chromosome segregation defects in all Δ recU mutants ( Fig. 7B , Supplementary Figure 14) 82 , likely explaining the observed loss in viability ( Fig. 3A , Supplementary Figure 7A ). Together these results support the model that recombinational repair is mechanistically distinct from resolution of conjoined chromosomes 56 . Potentiating ROS-mediated antibiotic toxicity by perturbing DNA repair In this work, the nicks generated by Cas9 enzymes were used as proxies for single-strand discontinuities formed during removal of damaged DNA from a bacterial genome. We find that when a bacterial replication fork encounters a single strand discontinuity it becomes inactivated. By identifying the essential factors and activities required to repair the DSB formed after a replisome encounters a nick, we have provided a set of molecular targets whose disruption could potentiate the activity of antimicrobial compounds that damage DNA. METHODS Experimental model and growth The following bacterial organisms were used: E. coli and B. subtilis. Unless otherwise stated in method details, strains were grown at 37°C using nutrient agar (NA) or lysogeny broth (LB: 10 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L NaCl, 5 g/L yeast extract) for routine selection and maintenance of bacterial strains. Supplements were added as required: ampicillin (100 µg/ml), erythromycin (1 µg/ml) in conjunction with lincomycin (25 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (5 µg/ml), kanamycin (5 µg/ml), spectinomycin (50 µg/ml), zeocin (10 μg/ml), xylose (1% w/v) and IPTG (0.05 mM, 0.1 mM or 1 mM). Bacterial strains Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 2. Oligonucleotides Oligonucleotides were purchased from Eurogentec and Sigma to assemble recombinant DNA (sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 3) or perform quantitative PCR (Supplementary Data 4). Design of sgRNA targets was performed using the online portal CRISPick with default parameters 105 and recombinant DNA assembly was achieved via in vitro mutagenesis (see below). E. coli plasmid construction E. coli transformations for constructs harbouring priA were performed in CW198 via heat-shock following the Hanahan method 106 and propagated in LB with appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. DH5α [ F- Φ 80lacZ Δ M15 Δ (lacZYA-argF) U169 recA1 endA1 hsdR17(rk-, mk+) phoA supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 λ - ] was used for other plasmids construction. Plasmids were purified using QIAprep spin miniprep kits and recombinant DNA confirmed by sequencing (Supplementary Data 3). Descriptions, where necessary, are provided below. pCW367, pCW368, pCW478, pCW479, pCW510, pCW717, pCW734, pCW736 and pCW850 were generated by Quickchange mutagenesis using mutagenic primer pairs containing an overlap of 10-15 bp. PCR products were treated with DpnI for at least 3 hours to digest template DNA and 10 μl were used for E. coli transformation. pCW20, pCW300, pCW301, pCW327, pCW460, pCW471, pCW472, pCW575, pCW734, pCW736 and pCW766 were generated by Gibson assembly using the NEB Hi-Fi cloning kit according to manufacturer instructions following purification of individual PCR fragments using QIAquick PCR purification kits. Linear recombinant DNA assembly For recombinant DNA assembly without E. coli propagation, pCW573, pCW574, pCW577, pCW578, pCW605, pCW640, pCW672, pCW702, pCW720, pCW732, pCW758, pCW759, pCW760, pCW777, pCW779, pCW781, pCW783, pCW785, pCW802, pCW803, pCW804, pCW809, pCW834, pCW848, pCW854, pCW855, pCW857 and pCW859 were assembled linearly using a multistep in vitro assembly process followed by nested PCR amplification prior to B. subtilis transformation. Briefly, individual PCR fragments corresponding to homology regions and insert DNA were amplified, purified and DNA ends ligated using the NEB Hi-Fi cloning kit. Raw Gibson assembly products were then amplified using nested primer pairs annealing towards the end of homology regions and PCR products were used for B. subtilis transformation. Following isolation of B. subtilis colonies resistant to the appropriate antibiotic markers, genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit, regions corresponding to recombinant DNA were amplified via PCR using oligonucleotides annealing outside homology fragments to ensure double crossover had occurred and results were confirmed via PCR product sequencing. Note that CW2045 and derivatives harbour the additional addA D682E mutation necessary to propagate addB D961A -addA D1172A in live cells, which is surface exposed and structurally unlikely to impact AddAB end-processing activities ( Supplementary Figure 12F ). B. subtilis strain construction Transformation of competent B. subtilis cells was performed using an optimized two-step starvation procedure 107 . Briefly, recipient strains were grown overnight at 37°C in transformation medium (Spizizen salts: 0.2% w/v ammonium sulphate, 1.4% w/v dipotassium phosphate, 0.6% w/v potassium phosphate, 0.1% w/v tri-sodium citrate, 0.02% w/v magnesium sulphate supplemented with 1 μg/ml ammonium iron(III) citrate, 6 mM MgSO 4 , 0.5% w/v glucose, 0.02 mg/ml tryptophan and 0.02% w/v casein peptone) supplemented with IPTG where required. Overnight cultures were diluted 1:20 into fresh transformation medium supplemented with IPTG where required and grown at 37°C for 2.5-3 hours with continual shaking. An equal volume of prewarmed starvation medium (Spizizen salts supplemented with 6 mM MgSO 4 and 0.5% w/v glucose) was added and the culture was incubated at 37°C for two hours with continual shaking. DNA was added to 350 μl cells and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for one hour with continual shaking. 20-200 μl of each transformation was plated onto selective media supplemented with IPTG where required and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 hours. Results were validated by propagating cells on relevant antibiotic markers and sequencing. Sanger sequencing identified that the strong nCas9/sgRNA nicking system is prone to accumulation of suppressor mutations either disrupting protospacer or its promoter sequence ( Supplementary Figure 1F ), therefore it is recommended to rebuild these strains periodically to validate their identity. For strain construction of essential gene knockouts (e.g., ssbA and priA ), an ectopic copy of the gene of interest was placed under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter and recombinant products were transformed in wild-type B. subtilis . Note that priA was C-terminally fused to a degradation tag ( priA-ssrA ) to promote proteolysis and reduce background expression in the absence of IPTG. Cells harbouring an ectopic expression cassette were transformed with recombinant DNA to knockout the corresponding endogenous gene copy and colonies were obtained in the presence of IPTG to avoid accumulation of suppressor mutations. Thereafter, these strains were always propagated in the presence of IPTG to enable genetic complementation via the inducible essential gene copy. For the construction of protein fusions, ssrA tags (AANDENYSENYALAA) were directly fused to C-terminal ends of target proteins (e.g. Cas9-ssrA variants and PriA-ssrA), whereas the fluorescent mNG-RecA DNA break reporter was constructed by N-terminal fusion via a short serine/glycine linker (SG 3 ). Spot-titre assays Cells were grown in LB overnight in the presence of 0.5% w/v glucose. Overnight cultures were diluted in fresh LB medium using 10-fold serial dilutions and 5 μL aliquots were spotted onto NA plates with or without xylose. NA plates were supplemented with IPTG when required as indicated on individual figure panels. All plates were incubated for 24 hours or up to 48 hours when indicated. Experiments were performed independently at least three times and representative data are shown. Antibody purification SSB anti-serum was used as delivered from Eurogentec. Other primary antibodies received from Eurogentec (anti-DnaI, anti-DnaC, anti-PriA) were affinity purified prior to use. Anti-sera were diluted 1:1 with PBS and applied to respective antibody/NHS-activated agarose columns. Purified antibodies were eluted with glycine, dialysed with PBS and concentrated. Affinity purified antibodies were stored at −20°C in 1X PBS with 50 % v/v glycerol. The antibody validation report is available as a Source Data file. Immunoblot analyses Cultures were grown overnight in LB and diluted 1:100 in fresh medium the next morning. Diluted cells were grown to an absorbance at 600 nm (A 600 ) of 0.2-0.3, induced with 1% w/v xylose or 1 mM IPTG where required and further incubated for one hour. Cells were harvested using centrifugation, resuspended in 1x PBS supplemented with one tenth of a peptidase inhibitor tablet and sonicated (40 amp) twice for 12 seconds with 3 second pulses at 4°C. Samples were adjusted to 1X LDS buffer and 125 mM DTT, fixed for 5 minutes at 95°C and centrifuged for 2 minutes prior to loading the supernatant on polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis using NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris gradient gels run in MES SDS buffer and transferred to methanol-activated Hybond-P PVDF membranes using Wypall X60 cloths for blotting in a semi-dry apparatus (Bio-rad Trans-Blot Turbo, transfer buffer: 300 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM glycine, 140 mM tricine, 0.05% w/v SDS, 2.5 mM EDTA). Membranes were washed twice using PBST (1X PBS supplemented with 0.1% v/v Tween-20) prior to blocking for 90 minutes at room temperature (blocking buffer: PBST supplemented with 7.5% w/v milk). Individual polypeptides were probed using the following primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer following overnight incubation at 4°C: anti-Cas9 (1:1000, Merck SAB4200701), anti-FtsZ 108 (1:5000), anti-PriA (1:1000, Eurogentec), anti-SSB (1:1000, Eurogentec) and anti-mNeonGreen (1:1000, ProteinTech 32F6). Detection was performed with anti-rabbit (1:10000 for PriA/SSB, ProteinTech SA00001-2), anti-sheep (1:5000 for FtsZ, Merck A3415) or anti-mouse (1:5000 for Cas9/mNeonGreen, ProteinTech SA00001-1-A) horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies in combination with the Clarity ECL substrate using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 mini digital imaging system. Detection of Cas9, FtsZ, PriA, SSB and mNeonGreen was within a linear range. Experiments were independently performed at least twice and representative data are shown. Whole genome sequencing Cells were grown in rich chemically defined medium (RCDM: Spizizen salts supplemented with 1 μg/ml ammonium iron(III) citrate, 0.1 mM CaCl 2 , 0.13 mM MnSO 4 , 6 mM MgSO 4 , 0.5% w/v glucose, 0.1% w/v glutamate, 0.02 mg/ml tryptophan and 0.02% w/v casein peptone) overnight and diluted 1:100 in fresh RCDM the next morning. Diluted cells were grown to an absorbance at 600 nm (A 600 ) of 0.2-0.3, induced with 1% w/v xylose and further incubated for one hour. Growth was arrested by adding 0.05% w/v sodium azide to cultures followed by vigorous mixing, cells were collected by centrifugation, the supernatant discarded, and pellets were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen before genomic DNA extraction using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit and a final elution volume of 50 µl in ultrapure water. Individual gDNA libraries were prepared using the DNA Prep tagmentation kit and pre-paired i5/i7 indices prior to pooling and DNA quantification with the 1X dsDNA high sensitivity kit using a Qubit instrument. Pooled libraries were diluted to 100 pM in resuspension buffer and 20 µl were loaded onto iSeq 100 i1 Reagent v2 sequencing chips for whole-genome sequencing using an iSeq100 sequencer. Following whole-genome sequencing and demultiplexing embedded within the iSeq100 indexed sequencing workflow, .FASTQ files were extracted and loaded onto the CLC Genomics Workbench (version 23) for initial data processing. Paired .FASTQ files were mapped onto the B. subtilis Δ6 reference genome using the ‘Map Reads to Reference’ function and a .BAM file was created from mapped sequencing reads for each sequenced genome. An in-house script written in R (version 4.5) using the Rsamtools library was employed to deconvolute .BAM files to validate even read distribution for sense/antisense strands prior to calculating density coverage and extracting cumulated densities per chromosome position. Fluorescence microscopy Strains were grown overnight at 37°C in RCDM and the following day, cultures were diluted 1:100 into fresh imaging medium (RCDM where glucose is replaced by 0.5% v/v glycerol) in the presence of 0.1 mM IPTG for induction of mNeonGreen-RecA expression where required. Cells were allowed to grow to an A 600 of 0.3, induced with 1% w/v xylose and further incubated for 90 minutes. DAPI (5 µg/ml) and Nile red (1 µg/ml) stains were used to visualise the nucleoid and cell membrane following a 10 minute incubation on a benchtop incubator prior to imaging. Cells were mounted on ∼1.25% agar pads (in sterile ultrapure water) and a 0.13- to 0.17-mm glass coverslip was placed on top. Microscopy was performed on an inverted epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Ti) fitted with a Plan Apochromat Objective 100x/1.40 NA Oil Ph3. Light was transmitted from a CoolLED pE-300 white light source through a Sutter Instruments liquid light guide and images were collected using a Photometrics Prime camera. Chroma fluorescence filter sets were used with 100 ms GFP, 250 ms DAPI and 50 ms mCherry exposure times at 100% LED power. Digital images were acquired using NIS Elements (version 5) and analysed via the Fiji software (version 1.53) 109 . Quantification of mNeonGreen-RecA features was manually curated from the count of 100 individual cells. All experiments were independently performed at least twice and representative data are shown. Chromatin immunoprecipitation Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed by following an established protocol with minor modifications 35 . Strains were grown overnight at 37°C in RCDM and the following day, cultures were diluted 1:100 into fresh medium and allowed to grow to an A 600 of 0.2-0.3. Cells were induced with 1% w/v xylose and further incubated for one hour prior to ChIP. Samples were adjusted to 1X PBS and crosslinked with 1% v/v formaldehyde for 10 minutes on a roller at room temperature, then quenched with 0.1 M glycine. Cells were pelleted at 4°C, washed three times with ice-cold 1X PBS (pH 7.3), frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Frozen cell pellets were resuspended in 500 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 20% w/v sucrose, 10 mM EDTA, 100 µg/ml RNase A, one quarter of a peptidase inhibitor tablet, 4 mg/ml lysozyme) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min to degrade the cell wall. Protoplasts were supplemented with 500 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer (300 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 2% v/v Triton X-100, one quarter of a peptidase inhibitor tablet) to lyse cells and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for a further 10 minutes before cooling on ice for 5 minutes. Lysis and immunoprecipitation buffer volumes were multiplied by the number of antibodies to probe per sample. DNA samples were sonicated (40 amp) three times for 2 minutes at 4°C to obtain an average fragment size of 500 to 1000 base pairs. Cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 4°C and the supernatant transferred to a fresh Eppendorf tube. To determine the relative amount of DNA immunoprecipitated compared to the total amount of DNA, 100 µl of supernatant was removed, treated with 0.5 mg/ml pronase at 37°C for four hours then stored on ice. To immunoprecipate protein-DNA complexes, 800 µl of the remaining supernatant was incubated with individual antibodies (2 µl anti-SSB, 2 µl anti-PriA, 2 µl anti-DnaD 36 , 2 µl anti-DnaB 36 , 2 µl anti-DnaI, 2 µl anti-DnaC, 2 µl anti-mNeonGreen (ProteinTech 32F6), 4 µl anti-His (Qiagen 34660) or 25 µl anti-FLAG M2 beads (Merck M8823) for 90 minutes at room temperature (or 120 min for FLAG-tagged strains). 750 µg of protein G Dynabeads (Invitrogen 10009D) were equilibrated by washing with bead buffer (1X PBS, 0.01% v/v Tween 20), resuspended in 25 µl of bead buffer and incubated with the sample supernatant for 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoprecipitated complexes were collected by applying the mixture to a magnet and washed with the following buffers in the respective order: 0.5X immunoprecipitation buffer for 15 min, 0.5X immunoprecipitation buffer supplemented with 500 mM NaCl for 15 min, stringent wash buffer (250 mM LiCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.5% v/v Igepal, 0.5% w/v sodium deoxycholate, 10 mM EDTA) for 20 min. Finally, protein-DNA complexes were washed a further three times with TET buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% v/v Tween 20) and resuspended in 100 µl of TEN buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl). Formaldehyde crosslinks of both the immunoprecipitate and total DNA were reversed by incubation at 65°C for 18 hours in the presence of 1 mg/ml proteinase K. DNA was then removed from the magnetic beads, cleaned using QIAquick PCR purification columns and used for quantitative PCR analyses. Quantitative PCR Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using the Luna qPCR master mix to measure relative amounts of DNA bound by SSB, PriA, DnaD, DnaB, DnaI, DnaC, mNeonGreen-AddA, mNeonGreen-AddB, His-RecO, His-RecA, FLAG-RecG and RecU-FLAG at specific genomic locations (e.g. near the nick site located at −90° on the chromosome or the origin oriC compared to a control site located at +90° on the chromosome). All PCR reactions were assembled using the QIAgility robotic workstation in 20 μl reaction volumes in a Rotor-Disc 100 and qPCRs were run on a Rotor-Gene Q instruments. Standard curves were obtained using the Rotor-Gene Q software (version 2) to calculate the efficiency of each primer pair, which varied ∼5% between sets. Oligonucleotides were designed to amplify specific genomic regions using the Primer3Plus tool 110 , were typically 20-25 bases in length (Supplementary Data 4) and amplified a ∼100 bp PCR product. Individual fold enrichment ratios were obtained as follows: first, every Ct value was converted to 1/2 Ct and technical triplicates were averaged to generate a single enrichment value; second, genomic location specific enrichment was normalised by corresponding values obtained at +90° on the chromosome. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for three biological replicates. Unpaired, two-sided Student t-tests were employed to evaluate enrichment significance where relevant for n = 3 biological replicates (each averaged from three technical replicates) with control/test groups corresponding to parent/mutant genetic backgrounds, respectively. Protein structure prediction and representation Protein models for SSB:ssDNA and SSB:RecO were generated using AlphaFold 3 and polypeptides corresponding to individual protein entities as input 111 . Main and alternative models were manually examined and Model 0 was chosen to highlight key features using the Pymol Molecular Graphics 2.1 software (version 3.1) 112 . Structural highlights of the AddAB complex were derived from the crystal structure PDB: 4CEH 68 . DATA AVAILABILITY Source data are provided with this paper. The SSB:ssDNA and SSB:RecO models generated by AlphaFold 3 in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo database under accession code DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14793919 . All data presented in this study are provided in the Supplementary Information/Source Data file and are available under open access (CC BY). For additional information and requests, please contact the lead contact: Charles Winterhalter. CODE AVAILABILITY The R code used to process next-generation sequencing data used in this study is available under open access (CC BY) in the Zenodo database under accession code DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14793122. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS STATEMENT CW and HM contributed to the conception/design of the work. CW, KJS and SF generated results presented in the manuscript. CW created figures. CW and HM wrote/edited the manuscript. COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT The authors declare no competing interests. SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS/CAPTIONS Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 1. Impact of Cas9 variants on B. subtilis growth. (A) Spot-titre analysis of strains expressing (+xylose) either Cas9 D10A nickase, Cas9 H840A nickase, or Cas9 D10A/H840A catalytically inactive nuclease in the presence of the same sgRNA. Left panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. (B) Immunoblot of Cas9 variants in the presence of a sgRNA targeted to a locus at −90°. Cas9 proteins were induced (+xylose) during the exponential growth phase for 1 hour before cells were harvested for protein extraction. The tubulin homolog FtsZ was used as a loading control and data is representative from at least two biological repeats. (C) Spot-titre analysis of a strains expressing (+xylose) the Cas9 D10A nickase with different sgRNAs targeting locations along the left chromosome arm. (D) Spot-titre analysis of strains expressing (+xylose) the Cas9 D10A-H840A catalytically inactive nuclease. Left panel shows the genetic system employed in this experiment for sgRNAs targeted to a locus at either −90° or +90°. (E) Strains were induced to express (+xylose) nCas9 or dCas9 during exponential or stationary phase for 4 hours, followed by spot-titre analysis in the absence of xylose to determine CFUs remaining after treatment. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. (F) Spot-titre analysis of suppressor colonies isolated from strains expressing (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. Identity of suppressors was identified via sequencing. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 2. MFA using whole genome sequencing of B. subtilis Δ 6. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. Note that arbitrary chromosome boundaries indicated on x-axis may not represent termination events occurring in the cell ( terminus region highlighted in yellow). Redundant ribosomal DNA sequences result in peaks throughout the genome (rDNA sequences highlighted in brown). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 3. Live cell fluorescence microscopy using the mNG-RecA DNA damage reporter. (A) Phase contrast image and fluorescence signal from the mNG-RecA reporter in wild-type B. subtilis under standard laboratory growth conditions. Scale bar indicates 2.5 µm. (B) Fluorescence microscopy images of mNG-RecA in strains engineered to express either nCas9 or dCas9 (sgRNA target −90°). Fluorescent RecA organises into bundles in the presence of DNA damage. Green signal corresponds to mNG-RecA fluorescence, grey scale images show corresponding phase contrast images. Cas9 proteins were induced (+xylose) during the exponential growth phase for 1 hour before cells were collected for imaging. Scale bar indicates 5 µm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 4. The replicative helicase DnaC is recruited near a single-strand discontinuity. ChIP-qPCR analyses of helicase (DnaC) in strains engineered to express either nCas9 or dCas9. The sgRNAs targeted Cas9 proteins to a locus located at −90°. The replication origin ( oriC ) was used as positive control and protein enrichment was normalised to the control locus at +90°. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean and circles overlaid on bars correspond to three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 5. An attenuated nCas9 system does not arrest cell growth. (A) Schematic showing differences between the strong and weak nicking systems used to introduce a single-strand discontinuity. (B) Spot-titre analysis of strains expressing (+xylose) the strong or weak nicking system in the presence of the same sgRNA. Control indicates a strain encoding the Cas9 D10A/H840A catalytically inactive nuclease. sgRNAs targeted to a locus located at −90°. (C) Live cell fluorescence microscopy in strains expressing either the strong or the weak nCas9 system. Grey scale images correspond to phase contrast, blue signal corresponds to DAPI staining (nucleoid), red signal corresponds to Nile red staining (membrane) and merge corresponds to DAPI/Nile red composite images. Cas9 proteins were induced (+xylose) during the exponential growth phase for 90 minutes before cells were collected for imaging. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 6. System employed to limit PriA expression during replisome inactivation at single-strand discontinuities. (A) Genetic system employed for priA complementation. The IPTG inducible priA-ssrA cassette was placed at an ectopic locus. (B) Spot-titre analysis of strains expressing different levels of PriA-ssrA (IPTG-dependent) in the presence or absence of the endogenous priA . (C) Immunoblot of PriA variants expressed at a range of IPTG concentrations. The tubulin homolog FtsZ was used as a loading control and data is representative from at least two biological repeats. (D) Spot-titre analysis of strains with a low or high level of PriA-ssrA (uninduced or 1 mM IPTG) engineered to express nCas9 (+xylose). sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 7. Recombinational repair is necessary for viability following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. (A) Spot-titre analysis of recombinational repair mutants in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. Plates were the same as shown in Fig. 3A imaged after 48 hours. (B) Spot-titre analysis of recombinational repair mutants complemented with ectopic epitope-tagged copies in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental weak nicking strain is shown above. (C) Diagram illustrating proposed molecular events required for recombinational repair to repair the seDSB created after a replication fork encounters a single-strand discontinuity in the lagging strand template. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 8. Viability following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity relies on a minimal set of recombinational repair genes. (A-D) Spot-titre analysis of DNA repair mutants grouped by known/proposed functions in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 9. MFA using whole genome sequencing of recombinational repair mutants. (A-C) MFA using whole genome sequencing of (A) Δ addA , Δ addB, Δ recF , (B) Δ recO , Δ recR, Δ recA , (C) Δ recU , and (C-D) Δ recG mutant strains. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position (same data as in Fig. 3B for background). A region flanking the replication origin is enlarged. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 10. MFA using whole genome sequencing of recombinational repair mutants in strains expressing nCas9: highlighting the oriC region. MFA using whole genome sequencing of recombinational repair mutant strains engineered to express nCas9. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position (same data as in Fig. 3B knockout panels). A region flanking the replication origin is enlarged. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 11. MFA using whole genome sequencing of post-synapsis recombinational repair mutants in strains expressing nCas9. (A-B) MFA using whole genome sequencing in either (A) Δ recG or (A) Δ recU mutant strains engineered to express nCas9. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position (same data as in Fig. 3B post-synapsis panels). Genomic regions of interest are enlarged. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 12. End-processing activities required following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. (A-B) MFA using whole genome sequencing of strains with either AddA ΔHEL , AddA ΔNUC or AddB ΔNUC engineered to express nCas9. The frequency of sequencing reads was plotted against genome position. AddA ΔHEL samples were the same as shown in Fig. 4D . (C) Immunoblot of mNG-AddA variants. The tubulin homolog FtsZ was used as a loading control and data is representative from at least two biological repeats. (D) Spot-titre analysis of Δ recJ mutants combined with AddAB nuclease deficient variants in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. (E) Spot-titre analysis of Δ addAB mutants complemented with rexAB in strains engineered to express (+xylose) nCas9. sgRNAs were targeted to a locus at −90°. The parental nicking strain control is shown above. (F) Crystal structure of the B. subtilis AddAB complex with locations of catalytic sites and the AddA D6 82 residue indicated (PDB template: 4CEH). The black backbone corresponds to DNA, AddA is displayed in orange and AddB in beige. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 13. System employed to investigate the function of the SSB-CTT following replisome inactivation at single-strand discontinuities. (A) Diagram illustrating potential essential interactions of the SSB-CTT. (B) Genetic system employed for ssbA complementation. An IPTG inducible copy of ssbA was placed at an ectopic locus. (C) Spot-titre analysis of strains expressing (+IPTG) ssbA variants with and without the endogenous ssbA . (D) Immunoblot of SSB variants expressed using the ssbA complementation system. The tubulin homolog FtsZ was used as a loading control and data is representative from at least two biological repeats. (E) Genetic system employed to express SSB variants in a background encoding the weak nicking system. (F) Structural model of a complex between a SSB homotetramer and RecO from B. subtilis (AlphaFold 3). Cyan corresponds to SSB with CTT residues coloured in red and RecO is displayed in beige. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 14. A Δ recU mutant displays chromosome segregation defects. (A-B) Live cell fluorescence microscopy of Δ recU mutants using nucleoid and membrane stains in (A) wild-type or (B) strains expressing nCas9. Grey scale images correspond to phase contrast, blue signal corresponds to DAPI staining (nucleoid), red signal corresponds to Nile red staining (membrane) and merge corresponds to DAPI/Nile red composite images. Cas9 proteins were induced (+xylose) during the exponential growth phase for 90 minutes before cells were collected for imaging. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Download figure Open in new tab Supplementary Figure 15. Potential role of RecG in replication fork remodelling. Diagram illustrating the proposed function of RecG to ensure productive helicase reloading following replisome inactivation at a single-strand discontinuity. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA File name: 20251019_Supplementary-Data.xlsx Description. Excel file containing all Supplementary Data spreadsheets. Supplementary Data 1 . Supplementary Table too large to fit in a PDF containing the list of repair gene knockouts tested in the genetic screen (related to Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure 8). Supplementary Data 2 . Supplementary Table too large to fit in a PDF containing genotypes from strains generated in this study. Supplementary Data 3 . Supplementary Table too large to fit in a PDF containing genotypes and sequences of recombinant DNA used to construct strains in this study, related to Supplementary Data 2. Supplementary Data 4 . Supplementary Table too large to fit in a PDF containing oligonucleotide sequences used for qPCR in this study. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Early-Career Award [226338/Z/22/Z] to CW and Wellcome Trust Discovery Award [225811/Z/22/Z] to HM. We would also like to express our gratitude to Frances Davison and Amandeep Kaur for technical assistance, James Grimshaw for microscope maintenance and Frederic Schramm for insightful discussions. Funder Information Declared Wellcome Trust, https://ror.org/029chgv08 , 226338/Z/22/Z , 225811/Z/22/Z Footnotes Following peer review, changes were made to the main text, supplementary information and associated display items. REFERENCES 1. ↵ Dwyer DJ , Kohanski MA , Collins JJ . Role of reactive oxygen species in antibiotic action and resistance . Curr Opin Microbiol 12 , 482 – 489 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 2. ↵ Charbon G , Bjorn L , Mendoza-Chamizo B , Frimodt-Moller J , Lobner-Olesen A . Oxidative DNA damage is instrumental in hyperreplication stress-induced inviability of . Nucleic Acids Research 42 , 13228 – 13241 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Lindahl T , Wood RD . Quality control by DNA repair . Science 286 , 1897 – 1905 ( 1999 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 4. ↵ Michel B , Sinha AK , Leach DRF . Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 82 , ( 2018 ). 5. ↵ Kuzminov A . Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 , 8241 – 8246 ( 2001 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 6. ↵ Kornberg A , Baker TA. DNA replication, 2 edn. W.H. Freeman and Co ( 1992 ). 7. ↵ O’Donnell M . Replisome architecture and dynamics in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 281 , 10653 – 10656 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl FREE Full Text 8. ↵ Kim DE , Narayan M , Patel SS . T7 DNA helicase: a molecular motor that processively and unidirectionally translocates along single-stranded DNA . J Mol Biol 321 , 807 – 819 ( 2002 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 9. ↵ Xu ZQ , Dixon NE. Bacterial replisomes . Curr Opin Struct Biol 53 , 159 – 168 ( 2018 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Fernandez AJ , Berger JM . Mechanisms of hexameric helicases . Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 56 , 621 – 639 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Beattie TR , et al. Frequent exchange of the DNA polymerase during bacterial chromosome replication . Elife 6 , ( 2017 ). 12. ↵ Graham JE , Marians KJ , Kowalczykowski SC . Independent and Stochastic Action of DNA Polymerases in the Replisome . Cell 169 , 1201 – 1213 e1217 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Yeeles JT , Marians KJ . The Escherichia coli replisome is inherently DNA damage tolerant . Science 334 , 235 – 238 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 14. ↵ Vrtis KB , Dewar JM , Chistol G , Wu RA , Graham TGW , Walter JC . Single-strand DNA breaks cause replisome disassembly . Mol Cell 81 , 1309 – 1318 e1306 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Pavani R , et al. Structure and repair of replication-coupled DNA breaks . Science 385 , eado3867 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ O’Donnell M , Langston L , Stillman B . Principles and concepts of DNA replication in bacteria, archaea, and eukarya . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5 , ( 2013 ). 17. ↵ Pelliciari S , Dong MJ , Gao F , Murray H . Evidence for a chromosome origin unwinding system broadly conserved in bacteria . Nucleic Acids Res 49 , 7525 – 7536 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Kuempel PL , Duerr SA , Seeley NR . Terminus region of the chromosome in Escherichia coli inhibits replication forks . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74 , 3927 – 3931 ( 1977 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 19. ↵ Louarn J , Patte J , Louarn JM . Evidence for a fixed termination site of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli K12 . J Mol Biol 115 , 295 – 314 ( 1977 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. ↵ Adams RT , Wake RG . Highly specific labeling of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome terminus . Journal of Bacteriology 143 , 1036 – 1038 ( 1980 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 21. ↵ Sargent MG . Specific labeling of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome terminus . Journal of Bacteriology 143 , 1033 – 1035 ( 1980 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 22. ↵ Xu Y , et al. DNA nicks in both leading and lagging strand templates can trigger break-induced replication . Mol Cell 85 , 91 – 106 e105 ( 2025 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. ↵ Lenhart JS , Brandes ER , Schroeder JW , Sorenson RJ , Showalter HD , Simmons LA . RecO and RecR are necessary for RecA loading in response to DNA damage and replication fork stress . J Bacteriol 196 , 2851 – 2860 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 24. ↵ Jinek M , East A , Cheng A , Lin S , Ma EB , Doudna J . RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells . Elife 2 , ( 2013 ). 25. ↵ Lee J , et al. Prime editing with genuine Cas9 nickases minimizes unwanted indels . Nature Communications 14 , ( 2023 ). 26. ↵ Peters JM , et al. A Comprehensive, CRISPR-based Functional Analysis of Essential Genes in Bacteria . Cell 165 , 1493 – 1506 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Westers H , et al. Genome engineering reveals large dispensable regions in Bacillus subtilis . Mol Biol Evol 20 , 2076 – 2090 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 28. ↵ Lenhart JS , Schroeder JW , Walsh BW , Simmons LA . DNA repair and genome maintenance in Bacillus subtilis . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76 , 530 – 564 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Simmons LA , Grossman AD , Walker GC . Replication is required for the RecA localization response to DNA damage in Bacillus subtilis . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 , 1360 – 1365 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 30. ↵ Lesterlin C , Ball G , Schermelleh L , Sherratt DJ . RecA bundles mediate homology pairing between distant sisters during DNA break repair . Nature 506 , 249 – 253 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 31. ↵ Kidane D , Graumann PL . Dynamic formation of RecA filaments at DNA double strand break repair centers in live cells . J Cell Biol 170 , 357 – 366 ( 2005 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 32. ↵ Simmons LA , et al. Comparison of responses to double-strand breaks between Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis reveals different requirements for SOS induction . J Bacteriol 191 , 1152 – 1161 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 33. ↵ Smits WK , Goranov AI , Grossman AD . Ordered association of helicase loader proteins with the Bacillus subtilis origin of replication in vivo . Mol Microbiol 75 , 452 – 461 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. ↵ Michel B , Sandler SJ . Replication Restart in Bacteria . J Bacteriol 199 , ( 2017 ). 35. ↵ Winterhalter C , et al. The DNA replication initiation protein DnaD recognises a specific strand of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome origin . Nucleic Acids Res 51 , 4322 – 4340 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 36. ↵ Winterhalter C , et al. SirA inhibits the essential DnaA:DnaD interaction to block helicase recruitment during Bacillus subtilis sporulation . Nucleic Acids Res , ( 2022 ). 37. ↵ Matthews LA , Simmons LA . Regulation of DNA Binding and High-Order Oligomerization of the DnaB Helicase Loader . J Bacteriol 202 , ( 2020 ). 38. ↵ Bruand C , Farache M , McGovern S , Ehrlich SD , Polard P. DnaB , DnaD and DnaI proteins are components of the Bacillus subtilis replication restart primosome . Molecular Microbiology 42 , 245 – 255 ( 2001 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 39. ↵ Kaguni JM . Replication initiation at the Escherichia coli chromosomal origin . Curr Opin Chem Biol 15 , 606 – 613 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Kaplan DL . The 3’-tail of a forked-duplex sterically determines whether one or two DNA strands pass through the central channel of a replication-fork helicase . J Mol Biol 301 , 285 – 299 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 41. ↵ Griffith KL , Grossman AD . Inducible protein degradation in Bacillus subtilis using heterologous peptide tags and adaptor proteins to target substrates to the protease ClpXP . Mol Microbiol 70 , 1012 – 1025 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 42. ↵ Kowalczykowski SC . An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7 , ( 2015 ). 43. ↵ Kuzminov A . Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli . Bioessays 17 , 733 – 741 ( 1995 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 44. ↵ Kuzminov A . Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 16 , 373 – 384 ( 1995 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 45. ↵ Kuzminov A . DNA replication meets genetic exchange: chromosomal damage and its repair by homologous recombination . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98 , 8461 – 8468 ( 2001 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 46. ↵ Kuzminov A , Schabtach E , Stahl FW . Chi sites in combination with RecA protein increase the survival of linear DNA in Escherichia coli by inactivating exoV activity of RecBCD nuclease . EMBO J 13 , 2764 – 2776 ( 1994 ). OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science 47. ↵ Yasmin T , Azeroglu B , Cockram CA , Leach DRF . Distribution of Holliday junctions and repair forks during Escherichia coli DNA double-strand break repair . PLoS Genet 17 , e1009717 ( 2021 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 48. ↵ Sanchez H , Kidane D , Castillo Cozar M , Graumann PL , Alonso JC . Recruitment of Bacillus subtilis RecN to DNA double-strand breaks in the absence of DNA end processing . J Bacteriol 188 , 353 – 360 ( 2006 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 49. ↵ Costes A , Lecointe F , McGovern S , Quevillon-Cheruel S , Polard P . The C-terminal domain of the bacterial SSB protein acts as a DNA maintenance hub at active chromosome replication forks . PLoS Genet 6 , e1001238 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ Ramos C , et al. The RecD2 helicase balances RecA activities . Nucleic Acids Research 50 , 3432 – 3444 ( 2022 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Cárdenas PP , et al. RecX Facilitates Homologous Recombination by Modulating RecA Activities . Plos Genetics 8 , ( 2012 ). 52. ↵ Mortier-Barrière I , et al. A key presynaptic role in transformation for a widespread bacterial protein:: DprA conveys incoming ssDNA to RecA . Cell 130 , 824 – 836 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 53. ↵ Narula J , Kuchina A , Lee DD , Fujita M , Suel GM , Igoshin OA . Chromosomal Arrangement of Phosphorelay Genes Couples Sporulation and DNA Replication . Cell 162 , 328 – 337 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 54. ↵ Azeroglu B , Leach DRF . RecG controls DNA amplification at double-strand breaks and arrested replication forks . FEBS Lett 591 , 1101 – 1113 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl PubMed 55. ↵ Azeroglu B , et al. RecG Directs DNA Synthesis during Double-Strand Break Repair . PLoS Genet 12 , e1005799 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ Kuzminov A . Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63 , 751 – 813 , table of contents ( 1999 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 57. ↵ Chedin F , Ehrlich SD , Kowalczykowski SC . The Bacillus subtilis AddAB helicase/nuclease is regulated by its cognate Chi sequence in vitro . J Mol Biol 298 , 7 – 20 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 58. ↵ Symington LS . End resection at double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6 , ( 2014 ). 59. ↵ Yeeles JT , Dillingham MS . A dual-nuclease mechanism for DNA break processing by AddAB-type helicase-nucleases . J Mol Biol 371 , 66 – 78 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 60. ↵ Kidane D , Sanchez H , Alonso JC , Graumann PL . Visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in live bacteria reveals dynamic recruitment of Bacillus subtilis RecF, RecO and RecN proteins to distinct sites on the nucleoids . Mol Microbiol 52 , 1627 – 1639 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 61. ↵ Cox MM , Goodman MF , Keck JL , van Oijen A , Lovett ST , Robinson A . Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 87 , e0007822 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl PubMed 62. ↵ Nirwal S , et al. Mechanism of RecF-RecO-RecR cooperation in bacterial homologous recombination . Nat Struct Mol Biol 30 , 650 – 660 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Bell JC , Kowalczykowski SC . RecA: Regulation and Mechanism of a Molecular Search Engine: (Trends in Biochemical Sciences , June 2016, Vol. 41 , No. 6 , 491 -- 507 ). Trends Biochem Sci 41, 646 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 64. ↵ Bianco PR . I came to a fork in the DNA and there was RecG . Prog Biophys Mol Biol 117 , 166 – 173 ( 2015 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 65. ↵ Lloyd RG , Rudolph CJ . 25 years on and no end in sight: a perspective on the role of RecG protein . Curr Genet 62 , 827 – 840 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 66. ↵ West SC . Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins . Annu Rev Genet 31 , 213 – 244 ( 1997 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 67. ↵ Rosch TC , et al. Single molecule tracking reveals spatio-temporal dynamics of bacterial DNA repair centres . Sci Rep 8 , 16450 ( 2018 ). 68. ↵ Krajewski WW , Fu X , Wilkinson M , Cronin NB , Dillingham MS , Wigley DB . Structural basis for translocation by AddAB helicase-nuclease and its arrest at chi sites . Nature 508 , 416 – 419 ( 2014 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 69. ↵ El Karoui M , Biaudet V , Schbath S , Gruss A . Characteristics of Chi distribution on different bacterial genomes . Res Microbiol 150 , 579 – 587 ( 1999 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 70. ↵ Chedin F , Noirot P , Biaudet V , Ehrlich SD . A five-nucleotide sequence protects DNA from exonucleolytic degradation by AddAB, the RecBCD analogue of Bacillus subtilis . Mol Microbiol 29 , 1369 – 1377 ( 1998 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 71. ↵ Halpern D , et al. Identification of DNA motifs implicated in maintenance of bacterial core genomes by predictive modeling . PLoS Genet 3 , 1614 – 1621 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science 72. ↵ Dubiel K , et al. Structural Mechanisms of Cooperative DNA Binding by Bacterial Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Proteins . J Mol Biol 431 , 178 – 195 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 73. ↵ Shereda RD , Kozlov AG , Lohman TM , Cox MM , Keck JL . SSB as an organizer/mobilizer of genome maintenance complexes . Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 43 , 289 – 318 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 74. ↵ Lecointe F , et al. Anticipating chromosomal replication fork arrest: SSB targets repair DNA helicases to active forks . EMBO J 26 , 4239 – 4251 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 75. ↵ Sakai A , Cox MM . RecFOR and RecOR as distinct RecA loading pathways . J Biol Chem 284 , 3264 – 3272 ( 2009 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 76. ↵ Morimatsu K , Kowalczykowski SC . RecFOR proteins load RecA protein onto gapped DNA to accelerate DNA strand exchange: a universal step of recombinational repair . Mol Cell 11 , 1337 – 1347 ( 2003 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 77. ↵ Raychaudhury P , Marians KJ . The recombination mediator proteins RecFOR maintain RecA* levels for maximal DNA polymerase V Mut activity . J Biol Chem 294 , 852 – 860 ( 2019 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 78. ↵ Carrasco B , Torres R , Moreno-Del Alamo M , Ramos C , Ayora S , Alonso JC . Processing of stalled replication forks in Bacillus subtilis . FEMS Microbiol Rev 48 , ( 2024 ). 79. ↵ Sanchez H , Carrasco B , Cozar MC , Alonso JC . Bacillus subtilis RecG branch migration translocase is required for DNA repair and chromosomal segregation . Mol Microbiol 65 , 920 – 935 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 80. ↵ Torres R , Gandara C , Carrasco B , Baquedano I , Ayora S , Alonso JC . DisA Limits RecG Activities at Stalled or Reversed Replication Forks . Cells 10 , ( 2021 ). 81. ↵ Torres R , Romero H , Rodriguez-Cerrato V , Alonso JC . Interplay between Bacillus subtilis RecD2 and the RecG or RuvAB helicase in recombinational repair . DNA Repair (Amst ) 55 , 40 – 46 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 82. ↵ Ayora S , Carrasco B , Doncel-Perez E , Lurz R , Alonso JC . Bacillus subtilis RecU protein cleaves Holliday junctions and anneals single-stranded DNA . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 , 452 – 457 ( 2004 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 83. ↵ Sun B , et al. T7 replisome directly overcomes DNA damage . Nat Commun 6 , 10260 ( 2015 ). 84. ↵ Fernandez S , Ayora S , Alonso JC . Bacillus subtilis homologous recombination: genes and products . Res Microbiol 151 , 481 – 486 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 85. ↵ Unciuleac MC , Shuman S . Double strand break unwinding and resection by the mycobacterial helicase-nuclease AdnAB in the presence of single strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) . J Biol Chem 285 , 34319 – 34329 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 86. ↵ Lovett ST . The DNA Exonucleases of Escherichia coli . EcoSal Plus 4 , ( 2011 ). 87. ↵ Gupta R , Unciuleac MC , Shuman S , Glickman MS . Homologous recombination mediated by the mycobacterial AdnAB helicase without end resection by the AdnAB nucleases . Nucleic Acids Res 45 , 762 – 774 ( 2017 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 88. ↵ Su’etsugu M , Errington J . The replicase sliding clamp dynamically accumulates behind progressing replication forks in Bacillus subtilis cells . Mol Cell 41 , 720 – 732 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 89. ↵ Reyes-Lamothe R , Sherratt DJ , Leake MC . Stoichiometry and architecture of active DNA replication machinery in Escherichia coli . Science 328 , 498 – 501 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 90. ↵ Mascarenhas J , Weber MH , Graumann PL . Specific polar localization of ribosomes in Bacillus subtilis depends on active transcription . EMBO Rep 2 , 685 – 689 . ( 2001 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 91. ↵ Lewis PJ , Thaker SD , Errington J . Compartmentalization of transcription and translation in Bacillus subtilis . EMBO J 19 , 710 – 718 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 92. ↵ Yeeles JT , van Aelst K , Dillingham MS , Moreno-Herrero F . Recombination hotspots and single-stranded DNA binding proteins couple DNA translocation to DNA unwinding by the AddAB helicase-nuclease . Mol Cell 42 , 806 – 816 ( 2011 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 93. ↵ Umezu K , Kolodner RD . Protein interactions in genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. Interactions involving RecO and RecR overcome the inhibition of RecA by single-stranded DNA-binding protein . J Biol Chem 269 , 30005 – 30013 ( 1994 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 94. ↵ Hobbs MD , Sakai A , Cox MM . SSB protein limits RecOR binding onto single-stranded DNA . J Biol Chem 282 , 11058 – 11067 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 95. ↵ Inoue J , Honda M , Ikawa S , Shibata T , Mikawa T . The process of displacing the single-stranded DNA-binding protein from single-stranded DNA by RecO and RecR proteins . Nucleic Acids Res 36 , 94 – 109 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 96. ↵ Manfredi C , Carrasco B , Ayora S , Alonso JC . Bacillus subtilis RecO nucleates RecA onto SsbA-coated single-stranded DNA . J Biol Chem 283 , 24837 – 24847 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 97. ↵ Bonde NJ , Henry C , Wood EA , Cox MM , Keck JL . Interaction with the carboxy-terminal tip of SSB is critical for RecG function in E. coli . Nucleic Acids Res 51 , 3735 – 3753 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 98. ↵ Buss JA , Kimura Y , Bianco PR . RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression . Nucleic Acids Research 36 , 7029 – 7042 ( 2008 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 99. ↵ Kozlov AG , Jezewska MJ , Bujalowski W , Lohman TM . Binding Specificity of Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein for the χ Subunit of DNA pol III Holoenzyme and PriA Helicase . Biochemistry-Us 49 , 3555 – 3566 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl 100. ↵ Gomez-Campo CL , et al. Differential requirement for RecFOR pathway components in Thermus thermophilus . Environ Microbiol Rep 16 , e13269 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 101. ↵ Bentchikou E , Servant P , Coste G , Sommer S . A major role of the RecFOR pathway in DNA double-strand-break repair through ESDSA in Deinococcus radiodurans . PLoS Genet 6 , e1000774 ( 2010 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 102. ↵ Henry C , Mbele N , Cox MM . RecF protein targeting to postreplication (daughter strand) gaps I: DNA binding by RecF and RecFR . Nucleic Acids Res 51 , 5699 – 5713 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 103. ↵ Henry C , et al. RecF protein targeting to post-replication (daughter strand) gaps II: RecF interaction with replisomes . Nucleic Acids Res 51 , 5714 – 5742 ( 2023 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 104. ↵ McGlynn P , Al-Deib AA , Liu J , Marians KJ , Lloyd RG . The DNA replication protein PriA and the recombination protein RecG bind D-loops . J Mol Biol 270 , 212 – 221 ( 1997 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 105. ↵ Doench JG , et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 . Nat Biotechnol 34 , 184 – 191 ( 2016 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 106. ↵ Hanahan D , Jessee J , Bloom FR . Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria . Methods Enzymol 204 , 63 – 113 ( 1991 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 107. ↵ Anagnostopoulos C , Spizizen J . Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis . J Bacteriol 81 , 741 – 746 ( 1961 ). OpenUrl FREE Full Text 108. ↵ Lucet I , Feucht A , Yudkin MD , Errington J . Direct interaction between the cell division protein FtsZ and the cell differentiation protein SpoIIE . EMBO J 19 , 1467 – 1475 ( 2000 ). OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 109. ↵ Schindelin J , et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis . Nat Methods 9 , 676 – 682 ( 2012 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 110. ↵ Untergasser A , Nijveen H , Rao X , Bisseling T , Geurts R , Leunissen JA . Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3 . Nucleic Acids Res 35 , W71 – 74 ( 2007 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 111. ↵ Abramson J , et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3 . Nature 630 , 493 – 500 ( 2024 ). OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 112. ↵ Delano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System.) ( 2002 ). View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted October 24, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading Charles Winterhalter , Kathryn J Stratton , Stepan Fenyk , Heath Murray bioRxiv 2025.02.28.640380; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640380 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading Charles Winterhalter , Kathryn J Stratton , Stepan Fenyk , Heath Murray bioRxiv 2025.02.28.640380; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.28.640380 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Molecular Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7622) Biochemistry (17650) Bioengineering (13871) Bioinformatics (41880) Biophysics (21424) Cancer Biology (18566) Cell Biology (25461) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13365) Ecology (19866) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24290) Genetics (15590) Genomics (22475) Immunology (17713) Microbiology (40328) Molecular Biology (17148) Neuroscience (88473) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2827) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4816) Physiology (7635) Plant Biology (15114) Scientific Communication and Education (2044) Synthetic Biology (4286) Systems Biology (9815) Zoology (2268)