Distinct Hippocampal Cellular Pathologies Influence Cognition Across Diagnostic Categories, Also Distinguishing Schizophrenia from Affective Psychoses

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,280 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction Total and social cognition deficits independently predict functioning in psychosis, but targeting these in clinical trials are unsuccessful in improving function. The admixture of schizophrenia and affective psychoses cases could be a roadblock if these differ in cellular pathology.

Methods

We examined cognitive functioning (MATRICS) and hippocampal cellular pathologies based on metabolite biomarker concentrations (1H-MRSI), using categorical and transdiagnostic classifications in 80 participants: 22 non-psychotic affective disorder (NP-aff), 25 healthy controls (HC), and 33 with psychosis, including 20 schizophrenia and 13 affective psychoses (aff-P) cases.

Results

NP-aff and HC had similar total cognition (46.64±12.01 vs 41.10±17.88), both superior psychosis (28.34±12.34; p’s<0.01). Metabolite concentrations were similar across all groups but showed significant within-group associations to cognitive tests. For HC, total cognition, working memory and reasoning deficits were associated with reduced neuronal integrity (-.414, -.422, -.433, p’s<.05), although no biomarker predicted total cognition in the clinical groups. For NP-aff, elevated myelin/membrane concentrations accompanied cognitive deficits; significantly so for visual learning deficits (.446, p<.05), which were also associated with decreased glia (-.503, p<.05). In all psychotic cases only reduced myelin/membrane concentrations predicted cognitive deficits (- .514, p<.05); but separating schizophrenia from aff-P showed reduced glutamate/excitation in schizophrenia (-.673, p<.05) in contrast to higher myelin/membrane and neuronal integrity concentrations (.575, .581, p’s<.05) in aff-P.

Conclusions

Schizophrenia and affective psychosis significantly differed for biomarkers of cellular pathology related to social cognition. Distinctly different underpinnings for cognition were also identified for other groups, aligning with DSM-5 and ICD disorder based categories. These findings include support for heterogeneous, but not transdiagnostic, conceptualizations of cognition and psychosis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This version of the manuscript has been revised to fix several typos and grammatical errors.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00