Unmatched cell line collections are not optimal for identification of PARP inhibitor response and drug synergies

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,849 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose While PARP inhibitors have shown great efficacy in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, many preclinical studies, including combination therapies, fail to translate into clinical approval, potentially due to the limitations of preclinical models. The goal of this brief report was to identify appropriate cell line models to investigate PARP inhibitor sensitivity and synergies.

Methods

An in-silico study of cell line collections was performed to assess the correlation between BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sensitivity to PARP inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with a platinum-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, we characterised an isogenic model with matched cell lines containing Brca1 and Brca2 mutations and investigated the response of cells to PARP inhibitor alone, or in combination with chemotherapy.

Results

Using cell line collections, cell lines with BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations are not associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Other factors, such as high PARP1 expression and low-level genome alterations showed correlation with increased sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor. Furthermore, cell line collections did not reflect the synergy observed in patients to combination PARP inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy. Subsequently, we demonstrated that the ID8 isogenic model cell lines with specific mutations in Brca1 and Brca2 represent patient response to PARP inhibitor monotherapy, and in combination with chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This study suggests exercising caution when using cell line collections as part of model selection when investigating PARP inhibitor sensitivity and synergy. Our data proposes that using an isogenic preclinical model is more likely to accurately reflect patient response. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00