Educational Pathways and Personal Factors Associated with Distinguished Achievement in Chemistry

Educational Pathways and Personal Factors Associated with Distinguished Achievement in Chemistry | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Educational Pathways and Personal Factors Associated with Distinguished Achievement in Chemistry Asma yanallah Alomari, Sumaihan Naser Alrashidi, Atef Abdallah Bahrawi This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Due to the increasing need for specialists in sciences distinguished for great accomplishments, examining the factors influencing their talent development has become important. Such factors affect the field and service practices of the talented and distinguished. Based on that significance, the current study aims to identify personal factors linked to an individual’s traits, social skills, and self-motivations. This helps develop the talents of individuals distinguished for accomplishments in chemistry in light of their personal experiences. The study employed a qualitative approach, utilizing quasi-structured interviews as a primary research tool. (18) participants were selected, to whom the study standards in Saudi Arabia apply. The qualitative data were analyzed through coding and classification. The results revealed that (8) groups could contribute to talent development incorporated in: developing team spirit, reinforcing personal inclinations through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences and experiments, passion-driven specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness and readiness for change, vocational development, mastering project management, and shouldering professional responsibility; alongside other groups that support these dimensions. Such results help establish a cognitive framework to guide specialized educational and professional practices, serving the gifted more effectively. They also pave the way for deeper future studies on the dynamics and development of scientific talent. Chemical sciences Great accomplishments Nurturing the gifted Personal factors Self-motivation The distinguished Figures Figure 1 1. Introduction Developing talents and utilizing them to achieve great accomplishments and excellence are essential for building innovative and prosperous societies. When talented individuals are provided with opportunities to cultivate their skills and realize their potential, they can create positive and sustainable changes. The investment in such individuals not only enhances their personal capabilities but also contributes to the development of society through their innovations and unique contributions. Guiding talented individuals toward creativity and inventiveness has therefore become a fundamental objective of education aimed at developing their capabilities. This focus, in turn, consolidates their real development, mental readiness, and personal interests, enabling them to make innovative contributions that serve both society and the economy. Additionally, they achieve personal happiness and prosperity through their distinctive achievements, which contribute to self-realization (Dai & Chen, 2013 ; Dunn et al., 2024 ; Subotnick et al., 2019; Van de Vijver & Mathijssen, 2024 ; Al-Jughaiman, 2019 ). Achieving outstanding accomplishments within one’s domain of interest is a complex process influenced by numerous factors. Given the society's dire need for experts with distinctive achievements, many researchers have emphasized the importance of assessing the factors that contributed to their accomplishments (Preckel et al., 2020 ). Exploring the factors that help develop an individual’s talents helps secure appropriate services and care programs for gifted and distinguished individuals. This consequently leads to a prosperous society by optimally investing in human potential and driving the wheels of progress and advancement. Moreover, it simultaneously enhances the country’s position in the international arena. Within the domain of chemistry, the need for highly skilled specialists is particularly important due to its central role in scientific innovation and industry. However, a review of the existing literature reveals that research focusing specifically on talent development in chemistry remains scarce at both international and local levels. Most relevant studies dealt with the scientific specializations as part of broader domains, such as STEM (Luo &Stoeger, 2023 ; Roy & Mishra, 2021 ). This overarching categorization can obscure the unique personal, educational, and motivational pathways that lead to eminence in chemistry. In this regard, Lou and Stoeger (2023) call for conducting studies and research on the methods of developing talents and fostering specialization in the sub-domains of general chemistry. They specifically recommend the examination of differences between sub-domains and specialization. Therefore, this study addresses two interrelated gaps: the lack of chemistry-specific talent development research and the limited phenomenological understanding of personal factors from the perspective of accomplished chemists. While general talent models emphasize the importance of personal factors such as traits and motivation, empirical evidence remains scarce regarding how these factors manifest and interact within the specific developmental context of chemistry, particularly from the phenomenological perspective of those who have achieved distinction. To address these gaps, a phenomenological qualitative approach is adopted to explore the lived experiences of accomplished chemists. The primary aim is to identify the personal factors related to individual traits, social skills, and self-motivation that have contributed to the development of their talents and their emergence as distinguished figures in the field of chemistry. Ultimately, the current study aims to encourage researchers, decision-makers, and stakeholders in the field of talent to prioritize training programs that enhance educational services. The ultimate objective is also to consolidate the factors that contribute to the development of talented and distinguished individuals in chemistry. The significance of this study is threefold. First, it contributes to the theoretical refinement of talent development models by providing domain-specific and phenomenological evidence from chemistry, which is a field often overlooked in personalized talent research. Second, it offers practical insights for educators, mentors, and policymakers seeking to design more effective, individualized support systems for aspiring chemists. Third, by centering the voices of distinguished achievers, it provides an evidence-based foundation for interventions that nurture not only cognitive ability but also the motivational and socio-emotional competencies essential for long-term excellence and innovation in science. This study is guided by the following research question: What are the personal factors related to traits, social skills, and self-motivation that have contributed to the emergence of distinguished talent in chemistry, as experienced by the achievers themselves? To investigate this question, three sub-questions were formulated to guide data collection and analysis: What personal traits, such as perseverance, openness to experience, and passion-driven focus, do distinguished chemists identify as fundamental to their development and sustained achievement? How do social and interpersonal dynamics, including team collaboration, mentorship, and professional relationship management, shape their developmental pathways and professional identity? In what ways does self-motivation, manifested through self-exploration, adaptability, and commitment to growth, influence their journey toward and persistence in distinction? 2. Theoretical Framework A number of significant models provide a foundational understanding of talent development. Each theory emphasizes different dimensions of this multifaceted process. These theoretical perspectives inform the focus of the current study on personal factors within the domain of chemistry. 2.1 Foundational Models of Talent Development Foundational Models of Talent Development Several models and theories concerned with the factors influencing talent development have been proposed. Sternberg and Kaufman ( 2018 ) summarized them into System Models. These models view talent as integrated components within the individual, including mental, psychological, and social constituents that help them achieve gifted behavior and high performance. Among those theories and concepts is Sternberg’s Theory (1958), which divided intelligence into three types: analytical, innovative, and practical (Sternberg, 2003 ). The Three-cycle Theory of Renzulli (1978–1986) established three conditions to achieve gifted behavior. The first one is: above average abilities, which might be either general and could be applied to all fields or limited. Renzulli ( 2005 ) defined this as the ability possessed by individuals who perform in the top 15–20% of any field. The other two conditions are related to task commitment and a high level of creativity. Sternberg’s and Renzulli’s concepts are the foremost models and the most impactful in forming the talent concept in modern scientific and educational circles. These are distinguished from others by the multiple studies that have dealt with them regarding identification tools and nurturing programs (Al-Jughaiman, 2020). 2.2 Interactive and Developmental Models Other models of talent development focus on the role of internal factors, such as mental and psychological aspects and the social, environmental, and economic factors, as supportive factors. For example, Francoys Gagne’s Differentiated Model of Gifted and Talented (DMGT) (1985) considered talent to be the outcome of instinctive readiness and excellence. The author also highlighted the critical influences of the environment, such as home, school, parents, activities, and meetings, alongside the mental and personal variables (motivation and mood), education, training, practice, and luck. These factors transform the basic daily life talents, which are genetically determined (intellectual, creative, sensory and motor talents), into excellence in specific domains (language, science, mathematics, art, music, and leadership) (Gagné, 2005 ). Some theories unveiled the changes that affect individuals in various ways and at different levels (Dai & Dai, 2017 ; Renzulli, 2008). For example, Dai’s Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) (2021) assumed that the person is an open, dynamic, and adaptable system, subject to self-changes that vary in how they interact with the world and enforce their authority. The theory indicated that talent is an extending process of human adaptation that eventually ends with significant achievements, referred to as “Maximum Achievement” MA. Reaching this stage requires adaptation to social and cultural environments through self-guidance, organizing, knowledge, and skills. Dai described this process as a series of overlapping cycles. The first cycle involves building competencies, dealing with challenges, shaping personality, and guiding individuals to the mission to create a moral connection with it. In the second circle, personal adaptation begins by seeking opportunities that align with their interests and inclinations. This process facilitates a transition to the third circle and the development of self and future. In the third circle, a talent crystallizes and becomes more mature. The circle may require more time to achieve the utmost adaptability, so the individual must set a future-oriented goal to have a lasting impact on society (Dai, 2010 , 2017 , 2019 , 2021 ). 2.3 The Talent Development Model and the Focus of This Study The Talent Development Model (TDM), which serves as the theoretical foundation for this study, is one of the most prominent contemporary theoretical frameworks in the field of gifted education. The model marks a significant shift from the traditional view of giftedness as a fixed and innate trait primarily measured by Intelligence Quotient, towards a dynamic and developmental perspective that focuses on processes and interactions over time (Dai & Chan, 2013; Al-Jughaiman, 2019 ). Building on this framework, the current study seeks to identify personal factors related to individual traits, social skills, and self-motivation. The model posits that transforming early potential into exceptional adult achievement requires a complex and continuous interplay among various individual factors. These factors enable the individual to influence and shape the environment, adapt to it and ultimately turn it into opportunities for accomplishment (Dai, 2017 ). Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the predictive accuracy regarding talent development trajectories increases significantly when research focuses on domain-specific abilities rather than a general approach, as is the case in the current study. This specific focus allows for the design of specialized educational systems that effectively nurture individuals' capacities to generate creative ideas and products with societal impact (Preckel et al., 2020 ). A review of various talent models and theories revealed that the concept of talent is composed of different factors. Some theories focus on individual factors, while other frameworks examine the interaction between an individual's internal capabilities and external factors that enable them to develop their talents into more advanced ones. This interplay ultimately achieves outcomes that benefit both the individual and the environment. The current study tackles the internal factors relevant to the individual, which stem from their personality, including personal behavioral traits, skills, and self-motivation. These factors were explored through in-depth interviews with the study participants. Over decades, research has consistently shown that a person’s traits and behavioral skills can reliably predict their current and future high-level creative performance (Feist & Barron, 1999; Soldz & Vaillant, 2003). 2.4 Summary of Theoretical Perspectives These perspectives informed our phenomenological investigation of personal factors (traits, social skills, and self-motivation) in the development of distinguished achievement in chemistry. The theoretical frameworks discussed above guided this study by highlighting personal characteristics, such as motivation, perseverance, and social skills, as essential contributors to high-level achievement. They also justify the study’s focus on understanding these factors through a phenomenological lens, capturing how distinguished chemists interpret the experiences that shaped their development. 3. Methodology 3.1 Research Design and Approach In light of the study’s objectives, a qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted to explore the lived experiences of distinguished chemists. This design was chosen to gain a deeper understanding of the personal factors influencing talent development, to provide ample space for listening to participants’ perspectives, and to explore the subjective meanings they attribute to their developmental journeys (Denzin & Lincoln, 2017 ; Creswell & Poth, 2018 ). The study was guided by the three investigative sub-questions outlined in the introduction, which focused on personal traits, social dynamics, and self-motivation. These sub-questions informed both the overall structure of data collection and the thematic structure of the data analysis. The phenomenological tradition is particularly suited to uncovering the essence of human experience as described by those who have lived it, making it an appropriate framework for this investigation. 3.2 Participants and Sampling Eighteen participants who were distinguished in chemistry and whose achievements align with the standards of the study were selected through a purposive sampling approach. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria were accessible and ready to participate voluntarily. The snowball strategy was also employed, where participants identified individuals with relevant knowledge about the study’s topic, serving as a link between them and the researchers (Creswell & Poth, 2018 ). Initial participants were identified through personal networks in recognition of their accomplishments in chemistry, as well as through referrals from department heads at universities. Contact was also made with high-performing local and international companies within Saudi Arabia that have demonstrated achievements in chemistry, according to statistics from the Saudi Intellectual Property Authority. These companies included Sadara Chemical, Saudi Aramco, and the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Through these channels, eligible participants were identified, and, via referrals, the sample was expanded until data saturation was approached and 18 participants were secured. The participants included 11 males and 7 females, ranging in age from 30 to 60 years old. Their professional roles varied from academics and researchers to company employees. Twelve participants held doctoral degrees, while six held bachelor’s degrees, all in chemical sciences. 3.3 Study Implementation Participant Selection Criteria To ensure alignment with the study's objectives and consistency across the sample, participants were selected based on the following established criteria. Eligible individuals were required to: (1) be specialized in chemistry with profound scientific and practical experience; (2) have played a documented role in disseminating scientific culture and increasing public awareness about chemistry (Preckel et al., 2020 ); (3) have presented innovative work in the field, evidenced by holding at least a patent or receiving a prestigious chemistry-related award (Preckel et al., 2020 ; Subotnik et al., 2023 ); and (4) have professional output with a direct, tangible impact on industry, society, or their organization. The code “M” was used to refer to each participant, instead of stating his name or workplace, to maintain his privacy and confidentiality in line with the study’s ethics. Development of the Interview Protocol The semi-structured interview protocol was developed through a multi-stage process to ensure relevance, clarity, and methodological rigor. First, a comprehensive review of literature related to talent development and chemistry education was conducted. Second, the draft questions were reviewed by two consultants specializing in gifted education and qualitative research to ensure scientific accuracy, alignment with the research questions, and clarity. Third, a pilot study was conducted with three individuals who met the study criteria but were not included in the final sample. This pilot study helped identify questions that might be difficult or inappropriate, refine wording, and estimate the appropriate interview duration. Following this feedback, the final semi-structured interview protocol was established. To ensure methodological alignment, each interview question was mapped directly onto one of the study’s three investigative sub-questions. This mapping ensured that the protocol comprehensively captured personal traits, social and professional dynamics, and self-motivation factors relevant to the participants’ talent development journeys. The interview guide comprised 5 main open-ended questions: Give a brief overview of your professional background and your specific achievements in the field of chemistry. How did your developmental journey begin, and how did it influence your decision to choose chemical sciences? Were there any personal influences or early indicators that made you choose this particular specialization? What are the foremost personal factors that refined your personality and helped you get to your current achievements? How did you overcome the challenges you faced to achieve your current accomplishments? 3.4 Research Instruments Semi-structured Interviews Semi-structured interviews were conducted, in which the researcher posed the core questions while allowing participants to respond in detail. This approach facilitated active participation and yielded diverse interpretations. The interviews were conducted by phone, face-to-face, or via Zoom and lasted between 20–50 minutes. Follow-up questions were asked based on participants’ responses to deepen understanding and explore emerging themes. 3.5 Data Analysis The qualitative data analysis was conducted using a systematic and multi-stage process that followed the principles of Thematic Analysis developed by Braun and Clarke ( 2006 ). The analysis involved six phases. The initial phase was data collection, during which data were collected through participant interviews, and their names were coded for privacy. Following data collection, the stage of data coding and classifying began. Thematic Analysis was applied through initial coding, which identified the major ideas. To achieve this, the data were examined multiple times to ensure accurate coding, which was then classified into central themes. Next, the process moved to data reviewing. After the initial coding process, the coding and classification were re-examined. If any errors were found, the data were reanalyzed and reclassified according to the most accurate coding and classification. Then, the data were summarized, and themes and codes were presented in an illustrative table for all the data obtained, according to the three axes of the study's investigative sub-questions. Finally, in the stage of writing up the findings and linking them to evidence, the results were documented, accompanied by an explanation of the identified codes and themes. These results were supported by evidence quoted from participants’ interviews by placing them between quotation marks. 3.6 Trustworthiness and Credibility To ensure trustworthiness and credibility of this qualitative study, the researchers applied the framework proposed by Lincoln and Guba ( 1985 ). This framework outlines four key criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Credibility was established through several strategies. Data source triangulation was achieved by involving multiple participants from diverse professional sources across different workplaces and organizations. Member checking was employed, where some participants were provided summaries of their responses and the preliminary themes for feedback and verification, a process that enhances the accuracy of the findings (Creswell & Poth, 2018 ). The researchers also practiced reflexivity to minimize bias by maintaining reflective notes throughout the study to bracket their own assumptions and preconceptions regarding talent development. Dependability was addressed by ensuring a consistent and well-documented research process. The data were reviewed about three weeks after the initial analysis and then again after two months to achieve a more precise and stable interpretation. An audit trail was maintained, detailing all analytical decisions. Additionally, to ensure reliability, the analysis and findings were validated through external auditing; we consulted an expert researcher specializing in qualitative research and another in talent care. Their feedback was compared with the researchers’ conclusions to ensure the thematic analysis was rigorous and the themes were well-aligned with the data. Confirmability was strengthened by ensuring the findings were rooted in the data rather than researcher bias. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The recordings were reviewed multiple times to ensure transcripts accurately reflected participants' words without researcher interpretation (Abdul Karim, 2019 ). Evidence and direct quotations from participants’ responses formed the basis for developing all major topics and sub-topics, ensuring the interpretation remained grounded in the collected evidence. Finally, transferability was supported by providing thick descriptions of the participant context, selection criteria, and research procedures within this report. This allows readers to evaluate the potential applicability of the findings to other similar settings or populations. 3.7 Ethical Considerations The study adhered to ethical guidelines outlined by Creswell and Poth ( 2018 ). Participants were fully informed about the study’s purpose and data collection procedures, and their voluntary consent was obtained. Confidentiality was protected through anonymized coding. Permission to record interviews was obtained, with a commitment to delete recordings after transcription and verification. Participants were also informed of their right to withdraw at any stage without penalty, and all data were handled in accordance with ethical research standards. 4. Results The phenomenological analysis of the interview data revealed a set of personal factors integral to talent development among distinguished chemists. These factors are organized around the three investigative sub-questions that guided the study: personal traits, social and interpersonal dynamics, and self-motivation. Eight central themes emerged from the participants' narratives, which are presented in Fig. 1 and elaborated in the subsections that follow. The themes are: fostering team spirit, enhancing inclination through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences, passion-driven specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness to change and professional development, and project management with a sense of accountability. S 4.1. Personal Traits Contributing to Distinguished Achievement 4.1.1 Perseverance and Commitment The participants identified perseverance and commitment as fundamental personal traits that enabled them to deal with the demanding nature of chemistry. Their responses highlighted consistent effort in mastering complex material, resilience in the face of setbacks, and disciplined self-management. One participant (M5) talked about the challenge he faced and the perseverance he showed to upgrade his level. He said: “I try to revise the lecture and solve the problem, which takes a long time. I spend hours trying to understand chemical interactions, which requires a lot of effort.” Another participant (M9) linked perseverance to the experimental process: “We, in the group of experiments, learnt a lot during undergraduate years that experiments may fail, but we never gave in… I try to discover the error by myself, I reread the protocol the teacher explained and discuss that with my colleagues… Chemical analyses are very precise, even in mass amount. I am quite convinced that perseverance, especially at the beginning, is what leads to accomplishment and excellence.” Participant (M10) showed commitment through structured and consistent study habits. She discussed her consistent commitment to creating a management time schedule throughout her studies, which helped prepare her for academic success. She emphasized that this was important at the beginning of college study as that stage requires adaptability and interaction with a new academic culture after graduating from high school. She said: “I follow a daily schedule, divided in accordance with the difficulty of organic chemistry, which was difficult for me at the onset. But through daily practice, writing summaries, and commitment to a certain schedule, the student’s level improves." 4.1.2 Openness to New Experiments The study results revealed that participants were interested in exploring new ideas and dealing with scientific challenges flexibly. For example, (M2) referred to his experience with his graduation project, saying: “For my graduation project, I chose an experiment which we hadn’t actually implemented. I read the details about the experiment in various research papers, including the conditions under which it should be conducted. However, the equipment was not available in the faculty. When I went to the center, they did not allow me to conduct it there. So, I decided to handle it in a theoretical way and figure out how to predict the effectiveness of the compounds.” Another participant (M11) discussed the importance of engaging in new experiences to enhance his scientific problem-solving skills, especially at the undergraduate level. He said: “By gradually relying on himself, the student gains room to be creative over time. We explain an experiment to him and apply it successfully. Here, the student has to identify where the error lies and how to correct it.” In another context, one participant(M6) referred to her university experience. She said: “I like to relate it to real-life things. That way, I understand more and feel that the study is enjoyable and not just memorization.” 4.1.3 Passion-Driven Specialization The study’s findings on the topic of passion-driven specialization revealed several participant responses. For example, participant (M12) talked about choosing chemistry after his first semester in college and continuing with it, though he had initially wanted to study medicine. When asked about satisfaction with his present career, he answered, saying: “My goal was actually medicine, but after choosing chemistry as my major, I never thought about transferring and never regretted it. Looking positively to the available option, being satisfied with it, and insisting on completing it is the key to excellence.” In the same context, (M18) said: “I did not hesitate to choose chemistry as a major after my first year at the university. It was the most suitable major for me, among other majors.” Participants also described how passion helped them overcome academic challenges. For example, participant (M15) discussed overcoming an early obstacle during college years, attributing it to her belief in her ability and her fondness for the subject. She said: “The belief in my ability and the confidence in my specialization both helped me to surpass failure shock.” Passion also motivated participants to actively engage with chemistry beyond the classroom. The passion for the specialization was a driving force for self-initiative in various forms, such as interacting with what is presented in chemistry lectures and relating that to everyday life. This is manifested in what participant (M7) said: “When studying PH values, I used to apply that at home to my young siblings by changing the color of red cabbage juice to check whether it was acidic or alkaline.” The participant (M15) demonstrated her interaction with the scientific material by expressing her fascination with practical experiments and taking the initiative to carry out the experiment and explain it to her colleagues. She said, “I was amazed in my first years when we used to replace protein with eggs and measure the amount of protein. I used to bring eggs from home and ask the professor to do the experiment for my colleagues.” As for participant (M6), she talked about steering her learning toward topics that hold personal meaning and scientific value for her. Influenced by this passion-driven focus, she committed herself to mastering her chosen topics. This is reflected in her choice of graduation project, which is founded on her profound interest in studying the structure and interactions of organic compounds, synthesizing fragrance molecules, and understanding the thermal and chemical reactions in the aging process of perfumes. She explained: “I chose perfume chemistry for my graduation project and made perfumery soap… the topic was really appealing to me”. When asked about the reason behind choosing that topic for the project, she answered: “The instructor explained to us perfumes and their reactions. The information was so inspiring to me that I read and investigated the topic and its scientific principles. It particularly talks about organic chemistry and creativity in manufacturing. I felt that it truly aligned with my scientific passion, so I was careful about mastering and perfecting it.” 4.2. Social and Interpersonal Dynamics in Professional Development 4.2.1 Fostering Team Spirit The study findings revealed a diversity of participant responses regarding social engagement and teamwork preferences. Some participants described sociable dispositions from an early age. For example, participant (M12) described his social traits by saying: “I am a first-class social and leading personality from my childhood until now.” He added: “I used to explain exams to my friends during high school and intermediate as well.” Another participant (M5) said: “I used to love to be the announcer of the school radio and organize segments among my classmates.” In contrast, other participants recalled a preference for individual work during their formative years. One female participant mentioned that she preferred individual work, saying: “During my school years, I used to prefer individual work over teamwork. In my childhood, I used to play with my toys alone, avoiding participation, even in high school. We did not have projects in those days as we have now.” 4.2.2 Awareness of Academic Relationships Participants described a growing awareness of the importance of academic relationships during their graduate studies, highlighting interactions with supervisors, peers, and within research teams. For example, one participant (M9) discussed the developmental role of supervisory feedback during a master’s program. She said : “During my master’s study, when I used to present to my supervisor the steps I was going to take and what I had accomplished, I felt that he did not see my achievement as noteworthy and often rejected many of my ideas. At first, that really upset and frustrated me, affecting me very much.” Then the participant sat up in her seat, leaned slightly forward, and continued with a more confident tone of voice: “I realized later that this method made my research personality better… every criticism made me stronger …. I knew how to improve myself …. the supervisor started praising me…” In a similar context, participant (M8) discussed her experience working in research groups with female colleagues during her master’s study, highlighting how it contributed to sustaining her motivation. She revealed that she became aware of the importance of relationships with peers. She said: “I always preferred working alone, but when I started my master’s program, the professor divided us into groups so we could collaborate in the lab. I found that positive competition with my colleagues was a stimulus for self-improvement. I was inspired by the success of my colleagues, with whom I shared their joys and accomplishments. Another participant (M4) highlighted his awareness of academic relationships and how to manage them well through effective communication and listening to others. He said: “During my doctoral studies, I realized how important it is to listen to others’ experiences and suggestions, as well as how important it is to ask questions and express my ideas clearly. These skills are important, and their value became dear when I applied them to my research. When we listen to each other and discuss shared issues, this gives us greater confidence in what we have accomplished.” 4.2.3 Project Management and Professional Accountability The participant interviews revealed that skills in project management and a sense of professional accountability were significant factors in their collaborative research experiences. The study participants described the importance of project management skills for scientific work. Participant (M8) emphasized that the effectiveness of project management lies in the ability to balance goals, deadlines, and available resources in a synchronized manner. She noted that this often requires adopting structured project management frameworks that are designed for scientific environments and offer adequate flexibility to adapt to specific research demands and challenges. Participant (M3) highlighted the importance of building relationships within research teams that encompass diverse experiences and cultures. He stated: “Through my work on various projects, I noticed that diverse expertise within project teams builds knowledge among team members. Even if the team is culturally diverse and its members speak different languages, lab work proceeds well. Each person handles a certain task that leverages their experience. Then we discuss and solve the challenges we face collectively.” Participants also identified professional accountability and initiative through effective teamwork. Participant (M18) pointed out that the skill of self-leadership within research teams serves as an indicator of professional responsibility and initiative. He said: “Excellence is not necessary for the individual to be a leader, but to be a leader, he should know quite well the task entrusted to him.” He also emphasized the importance of collaboration among research teams and the ability to express ideas and engage in constructive criticism. He added: “Expressing opinion and giving and receiving information enrich the mind and generate creativity in the individual and the research group.” Additionally, initiative was highlighted as having two key dimensions. Participant (M8) described the first dimension as: establishing strategic relationships with external research teams to exchange specialized expertise related to their research projects, thereby enhancing the quality of scientific outputs, and broadening the scope of shared knowledge. The other dimension involves dividing work according to the strengths of the team’s members to achieve the highest levels of efficiency and productivity in implementing research tasks. 4.3. The Role of Self-Motivation in Sustained Excellence 4.3.1 Enhancing Inclination Through Self-Exploration The participants described a process of self-discovery that shaped their scientific interests and passion for chemistry. The findings unveiled responses that demonstrate personal interests. For example, (M12) said: “experiments attracted me more…. when I was young, I used to collect small stones, trying to break them to discover what was inside. I used to write about what I found and why it didn't break. In the same context, (M13) responded with confidence that he knew himself, his abilities, and his professional interests. When (M17) was asked about why she chose her specialization, she explained that it was a decision driven by her personal interests. She said, “I sat down with myself and wrote on a piece of paper: Who am I? “ Participants also expressed a strong sense of enthusiasm for the field of chemistry. When one of the participants, M8, was asked about the reason behind her interest in chemistry, she smiled, saying: “I used to say to my classmates, you have a chemistry scientist with you.” She added, “I used to have great enthusiasm for lab classes where I found myself.” Regarding the role of external awards at the first stages of learning, (M14) said: “At the elementary stage, my uncle used to encourage me by giving material rewards whenever I got high grades.” 4.3.2 Openness to Change and Professional Development The study participants expressed various activities and mindsets that reflected their openness to change and commitment to ongoing professional development. One significant theme was the role of mentorship and guidance in fostering mutual learning. Participant (14), for example, discussed taking the initiative to guide new researchers. He said: “At the beginning of my career, I took the initiative of guiding and counseling new researchers at the center. That provided me with personal or scientific experience.” Likewise, (M10) discussed her experience supervising master’s and doctoral students, highlighting the skills she gained from this experience. She said: “Through my supervision of higher studies students, I used to divide them into research groups with semi-common goals. I continuously communicate and discuss updates with them. We pinpoint errors in experiments and correct them…. We used to build partnerships with other centers… All of these develop in us skills in guidance, management, leadership, and communication.” Participants also emphasized continuous skill development through academic engagement. Several participants (M2, M12, M13) highlighted the importance of attending conferences, publishing research, and establishing professional relationships as stimuli for growth. Participant, M 2 , confirmed that conferences provide researchers with ideal platforms to highlight their scientific identity and enhance their professional reputation within the global academic community, gaining them appreciation for their specialized expertise. In the same context, (M10) discussed the importance of conferences in fostering collaboration and communication, highlighting her own initiative and commitment to participation. She said: "I participated in one of the conferences with an academic poster and got to know a number of people interested in the same research area and began collaborating with research groups through it." Another aspect was the willingness to engage with and learn from diverse perspectives. Participant (M6) discussed establishing networks with experts, explaining how aligning with others’ perspectives can enhance innovation and talent development in chemistry. She emphasized the importance of building professional relationships as an indicator of openness to change. She said: “At first, I was hesitant to share my ideas, but when I saw how people received and discussed them, I started to enjoy being part of this environment. I felt like I was growing every day with the groups.” Participant (M4) shed light on the importance of aligning with diverse perspectives as part of openness to change and professional development. He said: “Listening to others’ viewpoints, even if we disagree, made me think in different ways.” 4. Discussion The following discussion interprets the phenomenological findings in relation to the existing theoretical frameworks and prior research on talent development. The analysis is organized according to the three investigative sub-questions that guided the study. 5.1. Interpretation of Personal Trait Findings 5.1.1 Perseverance and Commitment The findings of this study highlight that perseverance and commitment are personal traits that distinguish the participating individuals. The former enables them to face academic challenges, such as complex theoretical concepts and temporary setbacks in lab experiments. The latter (commitment) enhances their dedication to achieving their goals, organizing their learning, and immersing themselves in work, such as completing research projects or excelling in exams (Avargil et al., 2019; Basimin et al., 2023 ). The participants' experiences suggest that studying chemistry involves complex content, cumulative knowledge requirements, and often lengthy investigative projects that test students’ and individuals’ flexibility. Their demonstrated perseverance requires analytical and practical skills, deep thinking, and a solid understanding of theoretical concepts, all of which emphasize the role of perseverance and commitment in achieving success. In this context, Lewal (2023) defines perseverance as the ability to uphold one’s viewpoint, without being discouraged, resisted, or frustrated by obstacles. Instead of becoming annoyed by the task at hand, perseverant individuals focus on moving forward efficiently to accomplish their goals. This definition aligns closely with the determination described by participants. Furthermore, numerous studies, such as those by Griep ( 2021 ) and Vogel & Human-Vogel ( 2016 ), have indicated that academic commitment is a major means for academic accomplishment. The students who are more committed focus their efforts on achieving outstanding academic performance. In this regard, Bjork et al. ( 2013 ) emphasized the crucial importance of students’ ability to stay committed to their academic goals and to apply appropriate learning strategies. This, in turn, contributes to achieving better academic outcomes and fostering sustainable educational achievements. These non-cognitive factors are considered key determinants in predicting great achievements (Tang et al., 2019 ). Besides, some studies revealed that perseverance and determination outweigh passion in importance as these factors influence academic achievement and future success (Huescar, 2020). Our findings contribute to this understanding by illustrating how these traits function within the specific domain of chemistry. Research also revealed a correlational link between commitment to one’s tasks and high achievement in certain academic fields such as natural sciences (Jang et al., 2013 ; Mun & Ham, 2016 ). Acknowledging the significance of this factor, the American educational psychologist, Renzulli ( 2002 ), confirmed that commitment to task is essential for achieving satisfactory academic accomplishments, irrespective of the level of cognitive abilities. He introduced the concept of task commitment within the framework of “The Three-Cycle Model”, a concept that is largely popular among researchers in the field of gifted education. According to him, task commitment comprises six major elements: (1) Perseverance, (2) Continuity, (3) Serious Action, (4) Dedicated Practice, (5) Self-Confidence, and (6) the belief in an individual’s ability to complete the work successfully. This vision shows that task commitment is not only an instinctive trait but also a skill that can be developed over time. Consequently, our study reinforces the practical implications of this model, suggesting that teachers and parents have a vital role to play in enhancing students’ commitment to academic tasks to achieve adequate levels of performance. 5.1.2 Openness to New Experiments The participants’ accounts of exploring new ideas and adapting flexibly to challenges highlight the centrality of openness to experiences as a personality trait, which is characterized by intellectual curiosity, a desire to engage with complex ideas, and an attraction to creativity. According to Costa and McCrae ( 1992 ), this trait, a key component of the Five-Factor Model, encompasses dimensions such as openness to new activities and intellectual curiosity. In the context of this study, this openness served as a major drive for intellectual exploration and innovative behavior in higher education (De Young, 2014), enhancing the participants' ability to understand scientific complexities and adapt to academic challenges. Participants' experiences show that openness to experiences enables individuals to shoulder responsibility through learning, which in turn consolidates their abilities to analyze errors and find innovative solutions. For instance, relating scientific concepts to real-world contexts enhanced their enthusiasm for learning and reduced academic pressure, demonstrating a flexible imagination and the ability to devise creative ways to overcome academic challenges. These findings are supported by existing research, which has shown that openness to experience is positively associated with creativity in scientific specializations, enabling new experimental designs and more efficient data analysis methods (Soles, 2020 ). It is also linked to creative achievement in the sciences, particularly when supported by divergent thinking and general cognitive ability (Kaufman et al., 2015 ). Openness is also considered a key indicator of an individual’s ability to engage in lifelong learning and adapt to changes in scientific fields. This ability helps them overcome the ambiguity of difficult subjects and integrate new knowledge easily (Bath & Smith, 2009 ). Moreover, openness interacts with other traits, such as conscientiousness, enabling the ability to adapt to changing tasks, including modifying experimental plans based on unexpected results (LePine et al., 2000 ). Research evidence indicates that openness to experience is closely linked to academic performance in post-secondary education, particularly in environments that foster creativity (Gatzka, 2023 ). Notably, some studies posit that openness can outweigh general intelligence by sparking the desire to explore new ideas and engage in innovative learning opportunities (Ziegler et al., 2012; Gatzka, 2023 ). However, as this study’s participants also demonstrated through their disciplined approach, openness alone may not be enough; it requires interaction with other traits like conscientiousness or flexibility to achieve the highest levels of academic accomplishment (Linn et al., 2015 ). Thus, the present study reinforces the understanding that openness to experience plays a crucial role in enhancing creativity, academic adaptability, and high performance by fostering intellectual curiosity and a willingness to face scientific challenges, enabling individuals to achieve outstanding accomplishments in educational environments that reward innovation and flexibility (Den Hertog, 2016 ; Gatzka, 2023 ). 5.13 Passion-Driven Specialization The study's findings strongly support the view that passion-driven specialization is a pivotal factor in shaping motivations and inclinations. The participants’ experiences indicated that the majority showed a high level of enthusiasm and a genuine inclination toward chemistry in the early stages of their education. Their narratives revealed that this choice represents a method of employing personal interest within a specialized academic framework. The concept of passion-driven specialization captures the participants’ enthusiasm for their chosen field and the positive feelings they associated with chemistry learning. As demonstrated in the results, this passion was reflected in their ability to overcome obstacles in their university careers and in their increased confidence in their academic choice. The participants also demonstrated a tangible connection to scientific subjects that resonated with their everyday lives, driven by a genuine internal motivation. This concept, in turn, directed their learning process toward topics of high personal and academic value, aligning with their unique educational backgrounds. These characteristics align with the definition of passion as a strong inclination toward an activity that individuals find important for investing time and energy (Kunat & Szorc, 2024 ). Moreover, the findings show that the alignment between their chosen professional track and their personal interests unveils a profound passion for the field. This alignment also strengthens their sense of scientific identity, which is defined as the extent of an individual’s sense of belonging to the scientific field. This identity plays a crucial role in shaping academic tracks, fostering involvement with specialization, and increasing motivation toward success in chemistry (Robinson et al., 2019 ; Lockhart et al., 2022 ). Therefore, this study provides experiential evidence that individuals’ passions play a crucial role in shaping their specialization or fields of study, influencing their pursuit of careers and goals with steadfastness, determination, and mastery (Chichekian & Vallerand, 2022 ; Ruiz-Alfonso & León, 2016 ). 5.2. Interpretation of Social Dynamics Findings 5.2.1 Fostering Team Spirit The participants' early experiences with social interaction revealed a spectrum of preferences, from natural sociability to a preference for solitude. This diversity aligns with the understanding that social skills are behaviors that foster positive interaction with others and the environment, including empathy, communication, and negotiation (Lynch & Simpson, 2010 ). For instance, one participant’s account of being a "first-class social and leading personality" from childhood clearly illustrates the early presence of social skills and adaptability. This finding aligns with observations that social abilities become more evident during adolescence (Feldhusen, 2005 ) and reflects a form of social intelligence manifested in organizing and understanding others (Gardner, 1983 ). These results support the view that social spirit and relationship management are traits of distinguished individuals (Clark, 2012 ), a trend supported by studies indicating many gifted individuals possess advanced social skills and high competence (Çitil, 2020 ; Elliott et al., 2024 ; Shechtman & Silektor, 2012 ). On the other hand, the expressed preference for individual work by some participants might be attributed to personal traits or individual preferences. This variation is consistent with typologies of giftedness, such as that by Betts and Neihart ( 1988 ), which includes types characterized by both strong social skills and a preference for isolation. The findings emphasize that while team spirit is a vital element for success within a team framework, individuals’ initial responses vary based on personal traits and early experiences. The accounts of participants who initially preferred isolation resonate with literature noting that some talented individuals face difficulties creating social relationships, especially during adolescence (Neihart, 1999 ; Peterson, 2009 ; Silverman, 2002 ). However, a key insight from this study is that despite variations in early stages, a gradual development of social skills was noted as participants progressed into their professional phases, as further detailed in their responses on academic relationships and project management. This developmental trajectory supports research emphasizing the influence of age and specialization on social skill development (Jarvin & Subotnik, 2010 ; Subotnik et al., 2011 , 2019 ). It also suggests a practical implication: individuals who prefer independent work may require specific strategies to foster a sense of belonging and participation. To achieve this, team activities could be designed to consolidate mutual interest and offer various roles that accommodate personality differences, thereby fostering team spirit in a comprehensive manner. 5.2.2 Awareness of Academic Relationships The findings demonstrate that participants developed a sophisticated awareness of academic relationships, which involves building and managing connections with advisors, peers, and other researchers to achieve academic goals through self-reflection, initiative, and practical skills like constructive communication. For example, one participant’s narrative reveals a maturity in understanding supervisory dynamics, realizing that constructive criticism aimed to reinforce her research skills. This awareness enabled her to manage emotions, respond professionally, and turn feedback into a developmental opportunity, thereby enhancing communication with her supervisor. Similarly, another participant’s account reflects a deep awareness of peer relationships, where positive competition and empathy served as stimuli for self-development. This interaction highlights an ability to engage in research cooperation and positive communication, which enhanced motivation and a sense of belonging to the academic community. A third participant’s experience sheds light on three key dimensions of this awareness: active listening, which values knowledge gained from others; effective communication through clear expression and questioning; and the practical application of these skills to build confidence and research success. These relational dynamics align with the core principles of Rogers’ Person-centered Theory, which emphasizes active listening (empathy), positive acceptance, and congruence (Rogers, 2003 ). Although developed in a therapeutic context, these principles are applicable academically. The participants' motivation to value listening mirrors Rogers’ emphasis on empathy. Their appreciation of others’ perspectives fosters an environment of positive acceptance, while their clear self-expression aligns with the concept of congruence, reflecting authenticity between inner feelings and outward communication. Thus, the basic components of Rogers’ theory provide a useful framework for understanding how awareness reinforces collaborative research environments. The results further reveal that a positive academic milieu, characterized by strong relationships and belonging, enhances individuals’ confidence in themselves and their achievements, highlighting the importance of awareness and social initiative in academic interaction (Zysberg & Schwabsky, 2020 ). This supports prior research indicating a positive correlation between awareness of academic relationships and constructive engagement with faculty and peers. Such purposeful communication and cooperation are essential for boosting motivation, self-awareness, and participation, which are critical for success at both undergraduate and graduate levels (Amerstorfer & Von Münster-Kistner, 2021 ; Trolian et al., 2016 ; Kim & Sax, 2014 ). 5.2.3 Project Management and Professional Accountability The participants’ responses highlight that skills in project management and a sense of professional accountability are fundamental to teamwork and research success. The analysis revealed that project management skills are a pillar for developing scientific talent in chemistry, with their importance evident in dynamic research environments requiring multitasking, adaptation, and cooperative work. Determining research priorities was also noted as a key factor for enhancing efficiency, managing pressure, and fostering innovation. These findings strongly align with existing literature. The emphasis on building relationships within diverse research teams corroborates Mishra et al. ( 2025 ), who noted that such diversity enhances project performance by fostering communication and integrating diverse visions and methodologies to solve problems and support innovation. This study’s participants confirmed the necessity for deliberate efforts to develop cultural awareness to succeed in such environments. Besides, the identified link between responsibility and positive group dynamics is well-supported. Responsibility is closely tied to research group dynamics, where individual roles and behaviors influence both collective success and personal development. Positive dynamics, built on trust and clear communication, enhance motivation and commitment among members. The participants’ experiences validate that project management competencies, including prioritizing tasks, demonstrating team leadership, and taking initiative, are essential efficiencies that contribute to successful careers in chemistry. These skills enable professionals to navigate complex research settings and drive creative achievement forward. In a broader context, these results support the recommendations of Chen and Mao ( 2016 ), who indicated that the full realization of scientific potential requires institutions to strengthen collaboration, develop comprehensive guidance programs, and integrate formal training in personal and professional skills into curricula. The present study provides experiential evidence that such an integrated approach is crucial for preparing a qualified generation of scientists capable of competition and future innovation. 5.3. Interpretation of Self-Motivation Findings 5.3.1 Enhancing Inclination Through Self-Exploration The participants’ deep engagement with their scientific interests, demonstrated through self-directed exploration and a sense of belonging to chemistry, illustrates the foundational role of personal inclination. This concept, which involves discovering personal interests and cultivating enthusiasm for a field, aligns with the definition of inclination as a dynamic emotional and cognitive response that encourages engagement in activities reflecting personal preferences, formed through interactions among self-factors (Lent & Brown, 2019 ). The finding that discovering personal interest is key to professional progress is well-supported in the literature. Discovering real interest is considered crucial for professional decision-making (Ajayi et al., 2022; Nguyen & Aloka, 2023). The participants' narratives of early curiosity, such as experimenting with stones (M12) and introspective questioning (M17), exemplify the principles of Connected Learning, which posits that individuals learn better when grounded in personal interest, supplemented by external support (Ito et al., 2013 ). While some studies note the significant impact of external factors on interest development (Namazova, 2023 ), the current findings emphasize the primacy of intrinsic discovery for this group. The participants' expressed enthusiasm highlights a critical theme in talent development. Enthusiasm arousal is an initial motive for engagement, and researchers agree that what distinguishes outstanding achievers is not merely unusual ability, but also a high level of enthusiasm and real inclination for the field (Olszewski-Kubilius et al., 1992; Simonton, 2015). This finding aligns with the Social Cognitive Career Theory. This theory (SCCT) positions professional inclination as central to career decision-making, suggesting that choosing specialties that match personal interests raises satisfaction and fosters active future performance (Lent & Brown, 2019 ). These dynamics are further illuminated by Self-Determination Theory (SDT). The theory emphasizes that learning based on one’s own inclination and passions reflects intrinsic motivation, with career choices stemming from personal interests that satisfy basic psychological needs (Ryan & Deci, 2000 ). Participant M8’s self-identification as a “chemist” reflects this deep intrinsic love and sense of competence. The interplay between internal and external factors noted by the study participants aligns with research acknowledging the role of external motivations in early development, while affirming that instinctive motivations and inclinations are crucial for sustaining enthusiasm amidst this complex interplay (Olszewski-Kubilius et al., 2015 ). This kind of interaction confirms Sternberg’s ( 2005 ) observation that productive individuals seek environments offering desirable rewards for tasks they are intrinsically motivated and passionate about doing. 5.3.2 Openness to Change and Professional Development The participants’ responses highlight that willingness and openness to professional development, defined as the ability to adapt, develop specialized skills, and build scientific networks, is a crucial factor in sustained growth. Based on the study's data, this openness was manifested in three key areas: engaging in professional environments through mentoring, participating in scientific conferences, and building collaborative relationships to integrate diverse perspectives for innovation in chemistry. These findings are strongly confirmed by the existing literature on professional success in the chemical sciences. Several studies affirm that success in chemical sciences relies on a commitment to continuous professional development to keep pace with advancements and drive innovation, encompassing lifelong learning, formal training, and adaptability in multidisciplinary settings (Ribes, 2018 ; Sturgeon, 2024 ). Participants’ active conference participation aligns with research showing that such events create opportunities to build networks that transcend geographical and specialization boundaries, allowing for idea exchange and collaboration (Green et al., 2010). Furthermore, the mentoring experiences described by the study participants corroborate the mutual benefits of supervision noted by Wong et al. ( 2022 ), where guiding others also aids the supervisor’s professional development and revitalizes their passion for research. The scholarly perception of conferences as knowledge-based social groups is validated by the participants’ experiences. Literature considers conferences pivotal for academic qualification, enabling researchers to broaden knowledge and develop competencies (Hauss, 2021 ). Such function was echoed by the participants who used them to showcase work and forge collaborations. This supports Subramanian’s ( 2020 ) assertion that conferences are crucial platforms for innovation, collaboration, and career-advancing network establishment. Generally, openness to change and professional development emerges from this study as a critical factor in the growth of chemists, enabling adaptation to scientific developments, network building, and contribution to collaborative environments. The participants’ behaviors, such as guiding researchers, participating in conferences, building relationships, and adapting to diverse perspectives, directly enhance creativity and innovation. These professional behaviors align with the personality trait of openness to experience. This trait is associated with taking initiative in network-building, adapting to change, and engaging with new ideas, all of which foster professional growth in chemistry (Barrick et al., 2003 ; Judge et al., 1999 ). 5.4. Theoretical and Practical Implications 5.4.1 Theoretical Implications This study provides several key contributions to talent development theory by giving in-depth, phenomenological evidence from the domain of chemistry. The findings support and put into context core constructs from the established models in this field. The experiences of the study participants highlight these clearly. For example, their persistence with failed experiments and disciplined time management (M5, M9, M10) give a lived-experience view of Renzulli’s task commitment. Also, the shift from early social preferences, like M12’s leadership versus others’ solitude, to mature professional collaboration shows how social skills develop in a dynamic way. This dynamic development aligns with models like Gagné’s DMGT. The results also extend these established models by clearly articulating the domain-specific mechanisms at work. The study isolates chemistry-specific expressions of more general traits. For instance, openness is revealed not simply as intellectual curiosity; instead, it emerges as the adaptive problem-solving necessitated by a lack of equipment (M2). Openness also appears as applying ideas to real-world situations (M6). In addition, passion develops from early inspiration into a driving force for specialized, expert investigation (M6's perfume chemistry project). Additionally, the critical role of project management and accountability within research teams adds a very significant professional-skill dimension. Earlier talent frameworks often overlook this as they focus mainly on academic achievement. When taken together, these findings sharpen theoretical insight. They show how the abstract elements of talent models interact in concrete ways and change within the professional environment of a scientific discipline. The findings underpin and extend Dai's Evolving Complexity Theory, which emphasizes adaptation and system interaction along the course of development. 5.4.2 Practical Implications The findings of this study provide actionable and evidence-based guidance for the stakeholders involved in developing scientific talent. For educators and mentors, the results emphasize the necessity of moving beyond pure content delivery to intentionally nurture the non-cognitive foundations of long-term excellence. Curricula and pedagogy should be designed to foster self-exploration and passion-driven inquiry in a way that allows students to connect chemistry to personal interests, as exemplified by Participant M6’s specialized perfume project. In addition, laboratory experiences should be structured to include “productive failure” opportunities that build perseverance and adaptive problem-solving skills, matching the real challenges described by the study participants. Finally, students need clear instruction and practice in team collaboration, communication, and project management to prepare them for the collaborative reality of professional scientific research. For academic leaders and policymakers, the study highlights the need to design institutional structures that support professional development. Key initiatives should include formalizing and incentivizing mentorship networks. As participants M10 and M14 showed, guiding others benefits both mentor and mentee. Robust funding for conference attendance and external collaboration is also critical. Participants consistently said these activities were pivotal for networking, visibility, and innovation. Institutions should develop holistic talent development programs. These programs should address the interplay of personal traits, social skill growth, and professional socialization. They should not focus only on academic achievement. Stakeholders will be better able to foster the growth of the next generation of professional chemists when a support system is put in place to effectively respond to these interrelated personal, social, and motivational dimensions Conclusion In conclusion, this study aimed to identify personal factors—such as individual traits, social skills, and intrinsic motivations — that contribute to the development of talent among individuals with notable achievements in chemistry, based on their personal experiences. Data was collected through individual interviews conducted by phone, via Zoom, and through face-to-face interviews, with 18 male and female participants who met the study criteria in Saudi Arabia. The data was analyzed qualitatively and inductively, resulting in eight categories that were discussed individually. The categories included: developing social spirit, fostering intrinsic motivation through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences, specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness and readiness for change, professional development and mastering project management, and shouldering professional accountability. The study findings highlighted the importance of social skills, particularly in the post-university stage. Despite variations in the participants’ social abilities and initiatives, these differences did not significantly hinder their productivity. The study also revealed that openness and readiness for change and professional development were crucial factors in nurturing the talents of chemists, which enabled them to keep pace with scientific advancements, build professional networks, and contribute to collaborative research environments. Additionally, the results pinpointed the participants’ early motivation, which enhanced their scientific interests and self-confidence, contributing to their commitment and perseverance in completing their studies or engaging in scientific experiments related to their specializations. Declarations Ethical Considerations in the Study: This research adheres to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki regarding studies involving human subjects. All participants provided informed consent before the survey, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout the research process. Proofreading Declaration: Grammarly (subscribed, non-AI version) was used solely for grammar and proofreading. No AI-generated content was involved in preparing this manuscript. Consent to Participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants were fully informed about the purpose of the research, the procedures involved, and their right to withdraw at any time without any negative consequences. Participation was entirely voluntary, and all participants provided their consent prior to data collection. The Authors' Contributions This study was a collaborative effort among the following contributors: Asma Alomari led the conceptualisation of the research framework and supervised the overall study design. Sumaihan Naser Alrashidi contributed significantly to developing the methodology, data collection, and analysis procedures. Atef Abdallah Bahrawi focused on interpreting the results, drafting the manuscript, and integrating theoretical and practical implications. All authors reviewed, refined, and approved the final version of the manuscript, ensuring accuracy, coherence, and alignment with the research objectives. Consent to Publish Informed consent to publish was obtained from all participants included in the study. Participants consented to the publication of anonymized data and findings derived from their participation. Ethics Statement The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards for research involving human participants. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, in accordance with the ethical guidelines and regulations governing research involving human subjects at the university (KFU254415). Third-Party Material : No Data Availability Statement: Upon a reasonable request, the supporting data of this study can be provided by the corresponding author. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Funding: This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU254415]. Transparency Statement: The author confirms that all aspects of the research have been reported transparently, with comprehensive and precise descriptions of methods, data, and analyses. Clinical trial number : not applicable. References Abdul Karim R. Qualitative research in education. 2nd ed. Al-Rushd Book Store; 2019. Ajayi OB, Moosa M, Aloka PJO. Relationship between career interest and career decision-making of grade 12 learners in township secondary schools in South Africa. Athens J Educ. 2023;10(2):307–22. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-2-7 . Al-Jughaiman A. Scientific directory of planning professional tracks for gifted students. Qandi for Printing, Publishing, and Distribution; 2019. Amerstorfer CM, von Münster-Kistner C. Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Front Psychol. 2021;12:713057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057 . Avargil S. Learning chemistry: Self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills. J Sci Edu Technol. 2019;28(3):285–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x . Barrick MR, Mount MK, Gupta R. Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland's occupational types. Pers Psychol. 2003;56(1):45–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x . Basimin M, Habiddin H, Joharmawan R. Higher order thinking skills and visual representations of chemical concepts: A literature review. Hydrogen: J Kependidikan Kimia. 2023;11(6):1–15. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i6.10173 . Bath DM, Smith CD. The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning. Stud Continuing Educ. 2009;31(2):173–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927758 . Betts GT, Neihart M. Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Q. 1988;32(2):248–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200202 . Bjork RA, Dunlosky J, Kornell N. Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Ann Rev Psychol. 2013;64:417–44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 . Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa . Chen C, Mao Y. (2016). College students' research on the training mode of innovation ability for the Independent College of Guangdong Province. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Education (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/icte2016/4778 Chichekian T, Vallerand RJ. Passion for science and the pursuit of scientific studies: The mediating role of rigid and flexible persistence and activity involvement. Learn Individual Differences. 2022;93:102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102104 . Çitil M. The comparison of the social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence of gifted students and their non-gifted peers. Int J Progressive Educ. 2020;16(2):26–41. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.18 . Clark B. (2012). Growing up gifted (8th ed.). Pearson. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992. Creswell JW. In: Qahtani A, editor. Designing research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Trans.). Dar Al-Masileh for Publishing and Distribution; 2019. (Original work published 2018). Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. SAGE; 2018. Dai DY. The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. Teachers College; 2010. Dai DY. Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) of talent development. Gifted Child Q. 2017;61(3):172–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217709183 . Dai DY. New directions in talent development research: A developmental systems perspective. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019;2019:177–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20302 . Dai DY. (2021). Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development: A new vision for gifted and talented education. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose, editors, Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 99–122). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_7 Dai DY, Chen F. Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Q. 2013;57(3):151–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020 . Dai DY, Renzulli JS. Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Q. 2008;52(2):114–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319302 . Den Hertog JH. (2016). X-factor for innovation: Identifying future excellent professionals [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. University of Twente Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036542531 Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. SAGE; 2017. DeYoung CG. Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In: Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, editors. APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences. American Psychological Association; 2014. pp. 369–99. Dunn EL, Lawrence GP, Gottwald VM, Hardy J, Holliss B, Oliver SJ, Woodman T. (2024). Thirty years of longitudinal talent development research: A systematic review and meta-aggregation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology . Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2024.2309623 Elliott S, Anthony C, Murthy H. Teaching social skills that enable learning and healthy relationships in high-achieving students. Gifted Educ Int. 2024;41(1):32–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241300908 . Feist GJ, Barron FX. Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. J Res Pers. 2003;37(2):62–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6 . Feldhusen JF. Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 46–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.005 . Gagné F. From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 98–119. Gardner H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books; 1983. Gatzka TJ. (2023). Openness and academic success in postsecondary education [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Konstanz]. Konstanz Online Publication System. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-1w6qgf803h569 Greene J, Stockard J, Lewis P, Richmond GL. Coach career development workshops for science and engineering faculty: Views of the career impact on women chemists and chemical engineers. J Chem Educ. 2010;87(4):385–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800043w . Griep Y. Capturing the process of academic commitment: A taxonomy and test of post-secondary student academic commitment trajectories. High Educ Res Dev. 2021;41(10):1900–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1967886 . Hauss K. (2021). What are the social and scientific benefits of participating in academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany. Research Evaluation, 30 (3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa028 Huéscar Hernández E, Moreno-Murcia JA, Cid L, Monteiro D, Rodrigues F. Passion or perseverance? The effect of perceived autonomy support and grit on academic performance in college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062143 . Article 2143. Ito M, Gutiérrez K, Livingstone S, Penuel B, Rhodes J, Salen K, Schor J, Sefton-Green J, Watkins SC. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub; 2013. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/ . Jang J, Chung Y, Choi Y, Kim S-W. Exploring the characteristics of science-gifted students' task commitment. J Korean Association Sci Educ. 2013;33(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.001 . Jarvin L, Subotnik RF. Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in classical music performance. Roeper Rev. 2010;32(2):78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783191003587868 . Judge TA, Higgins CA, Thoresen CJ, Barrick MR. The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Pers Psychol. 1999;52(3):621–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x . Kaufman SB, Quilty LC, Grazioplene RG, Hirsh JB, Gray JR, Peterson JB, DeYoung CG. Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. J Pers. 2015;84(2):248–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156 . Kim YK, Sax LJ. The effects of student–faculty interaction on academic self-concept: Does academic major matter? Res High Educt. 2014;55(8):780–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9335-x . Kunat B, Szorc K. Developing creativity and passion in students at the Talent Academy—Youth University of Real Education. Kultura i Edukacja. 2024;4:139–54. https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2024.04.08 . Kurniasih NR, Harta I. (2018). Task commitment: Concept, characteristic, and its relationship to student mathematics achievements. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS) (pp. 141–146). Lawal BM. Structural equation model of academic mindset, motivation, perseverance, engagement, and secondary school students' performance in economics in South-West, Nigeria. J Social Educational Res. 2023;2(2):85–93. Lent RW, Brown SD. Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. J Vocat Behav. 2019;115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004 . Article 103316. LePine JA, Colquitt JA, Erez A. Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Pers Psychol. 2000;53(3):563–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x . Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE; 1985. Linn MC, Palmer E, Baranger A, Gerard E, Stone E. Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science. 2015;347(6222). Article 1261757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757 . Lockhart ME, Kwok O-M, Yoon M, Wong R. An important component to investigating STEM persistence: The development and validation of the science identity (SciID) scale. Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1). Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00351-1 . Luo L, Stoeger H. Developing eminence in STEMM: An interview study with talent development and STEMM experts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1521(1):112–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14968 . Lynch S, Simpson C. Social skills: Laying the foundation for success. Dimensions Early Child. 2010;38(2):3–12. Mishra A, Lee H, Jeoung S, Torvik VI, Diesner J. Patterns of diversity in biomedical co-authorships: An analysis across authors' ethnicity, gender, age, and expertise. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316890 . Article e0316890. Mun K, Ham EH. An analysis of the relationship of grit, interest, task-commitment, self-regulation ability, and science achievement of high school students. J Korean Association Sci Educ. 2016;36(3):445–55. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0445 . Namazova N. Changing the level of education and career choice depending on the socioeconomic status of the family: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Sustainability. 2023;15(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215845 . Article 15845. Neihart M. The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Rev. 1999;22(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319990955399 . Nguyen TH, Duong THN. An assessment of factors influencing career choices among fresh graduates: A survey of students majoring in business and economics. J Int Econ Manage. 2022;22(1):78–99. https://doi.org/10.38203/jiem.022.1.0043 . Olszewski-Kubilius P, Subotnik RF, Worrell FC. Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Stud. 2015;26(2):195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1088586 . Peterson SJ. Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Q. 2009;53(4):280–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946 . Preckel F, Golle J, Grabner R, Jarvin L, Kozbelt A, Müllensiefen D, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Schneider W, Subotnik R, Vock M, Worrell FC. Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15(3):691–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030 . Renzulli JS. Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality. 2002;10(2):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2 . Renzulli JS. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 246–79. Ribes C. Strategies for success as an industrial chemist. Pure Appl Chem. 2018;90(10):1543–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0718 . Robinson KA, Perez T, Carmel JH, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Science identity development trajectories in a gateway college chemistry course: Predictors and relations to achievement and STEM pursuit. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2019;56:180–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.004 . Rogers CR. Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Constable; 2003. Roy P, Mishra A. Mapping eminence and expertise of talented STEM students—A study of talent development from India. Gifted Talented Int. 2021;36(1–2):82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2021.1960878 . Ruiz-Alfonso Z, León J. The role of passion in education: A systematic review. Educational Res Rev. 2016;19:173–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.09.001 . Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 . Shechtman Z, Silektor A. Social competencies and difficulties of gifted children compared to nongifted peers. Roeper Rev. 2012;34(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627555 . Silverman LK. Asynchronous development. In: Neihart M, Reis SM, Robinson NM, Moon SM, editors. The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Prufrock; 2002. pp. 31–40. Simonton DK. (1992). The child parents the adult: On getting genius from giftedness. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson, editors, Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 278–297). Trillium Press. Soldz S, Vaillant GE. The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. J Res Pers. 1999;33(2):208–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243 . Soles KL. (2020). Relationship between the Big Five and creative self-beliefs in undergraduates in terms of college enrollment and major (Publication No. 1703347) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. UNT Digital Library. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1703347/ Sternberg RJ. Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. Cambridge University Press; 2003. Sternberg RJ. The WICS model of giftedness. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 327–42. Sternberg RJ, Kaufman JC. (2018). Theories and conceptions of giftedness. In S. Pfeiffer, editor, Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 29–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_3 Sturgeon R. Expanding collaborations with Brazilian scientists. Brazilian J Anal Chem. 2024;11(44):1–3. https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.point-of-view-n44 . Subotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011;12(1):3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056 . Subotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. Environmental factors and personal characteristics interact to yield high performance in domains. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804 . Subotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. The role of insider knowledge in the trajectories of highly accomplished scientists. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1527(1):84–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15034 . Subramanian S. (2020). The importance of conferences and networking in PhD and postdoctoral training. Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques, 21 (1), e44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.44 Tang X, Wang M-T, Guo J, Salmela-Aro K. Building grit: The longitudinal pathways between mindset, commitment, grit, and academic outcomes. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(5):850–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-00998-0 . Trolian TL, Jach EA, Hanson JM, Pascarella ET. Influencing academic motivation: The effects of student–faculty interaction. J Coll Student Dev. 2016;57(7):810–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0080 . Van de Vijver A, Mathijssen S. A philosophical approach to talent development. Roeper Rev. 2024;46(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2285053 . Vogel FR, Human-Vogel S. Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. High Educ Res Dev. 2016;35(6):1298–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574 . Wong PYJ, Wong KL, Ghoh C, Chiu MYL. Supervision of supervisory practice: From idea to practice. Int Social Work. 2022;66(6):1918–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728211073648 . Ziegler A, Phillipson SN. Exceptionality and gifted education: A theory-based review of current conceptualizations. High Ability Stud. 2012;23(2):127–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2012.738329 . Zysberg L, Schwabsky N. School climate, academic self-efficacy, and student achievement. Educational Psychol. 2020;41(4):467–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1813690 . Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8410793","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":577646324,"identity":"579c4e26-3e2d-4b9c-b0ec-21906873deb4","order_by":0,"name":"Asma yanallah Alomari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"King Faisal University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Asma","middleName":"yanallah","lastName":"Alomari","suffix":""},{"id":577646325,"identity":"5a23c3de-dc1b-4c7f-9527-cb2bbabec25e","order_by":1,"name":"Sumaihan Naser Alrashidi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"King Faisal University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sumaihan","middleName":"Naser","lastName":"Alrashidi","suffix":""},{"id":577646326,"identity":"33962fb1-9ed6-4e9b-9718-e285c9b387e5","order_by":2,"name":"Atef Abdallah Bahrawi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"King Faisal University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Atef","middleName":"Abdallah","lastName":"Bahrawi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-20 08:53:16","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":100950079,"identity":"3e548b11-f832-421a-9c3d-3efb61f164d7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-23 07:06:50","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":201635,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Draft24122025Final.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/7d3aa558954c8829d842e87b.docx"},{"id":100950757,"identity":"dd63b00f-5c8e-4aa5-9070-2f78c9f66a01","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-23 07:09:07","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":5505,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"944f190d175c444aab3cce574394e647.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/9bed9a312ada0e4223e7158f.json"},{"id":100950374,"identity":"11d07132-8a87-4146-9293-77716c296893","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-23 07:07:53","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":205700,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"944f190d175c444aab3cce574394e6471enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/2046c3351c76590ff43029d4.xml"},{"id":100896624,"identity":"2904d93d-1dad-4fe1-acb1-5849347526dd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-22 14:16:56","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":54660,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/d29dcfbeb76ab82f98ce59d0.png"},{"id":100950927,"identity":"28a988bc-d635-48ec-aaff-3e64f15e06dd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-23 07:09:37","extension":"xml","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":197343,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"944f190d175c444aab3cce574394e6471structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/1f6654d7f4e42efe10f110d0.xml"},{"id":101202642,"identity":"021e7cc0-de90-469e-b255-a28f6204d3ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-27 09:36:52","extension":"html","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":218290,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/10b8519592908b5982973402.html"},{"id":100950361,"identity":"817ea628-ef82-4daf-ae6a-2ea12ccd71f8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-23 07:07:49","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":144405,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/1872c187fe03f658cad534dd.png"},{"id":105895456,"identity":"1022c40d-2ff1-4caf-ae90-87f720fdb3b0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-01 08:40:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1506149,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8410793/v1/62f415e1-a064-40df-a61b-d1a42fab1f61.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Educational Pathways and Personal Factors Associated with Distinguished Achievement in Chemistry","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDeveloping talents and utilizing them to achieve great accomplishments and excellence are essential for building innovative and prosperous societies. When talented individuals are provided with opportunities to cultivate their skills and realize their potential, they can create positive and sustainable changes. The investment in such individuals not only enhances their personal capabilities but also contributes to the development of society through their innovations and unique contributions. Guiding talented individuals toward creativity and inventiveness has therefore become a fundamental objective of education aimed at developing their capabilities. This focus, in turn, consolidates their real development, mental readiness, and personal interests, enabling them to make innovative contributions that serve both society and the economy. Additionally, they achieve personal happiness and prosperity through their distinctive achievements, which contribute to self-realization (Dai \u0026amp; Chen, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Dunn et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Subotnick et al., 2019; Van de Vijver \u0026amp; Mathijssen, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR86\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Al-Jughaiman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAchieving outstanding accomplishments within one’s domain of interest is a complex process influenced by numerous factors. Given the society's dire need for experts with distinctive achievements, many researchers have emphasized the importance of assessing the factors that contributed to their accomplishments (Preckel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Exploring the factors that help develop an individual’s talents helps secure appropriate services and care programs for gifted and distinguished individuals. This consequently leads to a prosperous society by optimally investing in human potential and driving the wheels of progress and advancement. Moreover, it simultaneously enhances the country’s position in the international arena.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin the domain of chemistry, the need for highly skilled specialists is particularly important due to its central role in scientific innovation and industry. However, a review of the existing literature reveals that research focusing specifically on talent development in chemistry remains scarce at both international and local levels. Most relevant studies dealt with the scientific specializations as part of broader domains, such as STEM (Luo \u0026amp;Stoeger, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e; Roy \u0026amp; Mishra, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). This overarching categorization can obscure the unique personal, educational, and motivational pathways that lead to eminence in chemistry. In this regard, Lou and Stoeger (2023) call for conducting studies and research on the methods of developing talents and fostering specialization in the sub-domains of general chemistry. They specifically recommend the examination of differences between sub-domains and specialization.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTherefore, this study addresses two interrelated gaps: the lack of chemistry-specific talent development research and the limited phenomenological understanding of personal factors from the perspective of accomplished chemists. While general talent models emphasize the importance of personal factors such as traits and motivation, empirical evidence remains scarce regarding how these factors manifest and interact within the specific developmental context of chemistry, particularly from the phenomenological perspective of those who have achieved distinction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo address these gaps, a phenomenological qualitative approach is adopted to explore the lived experiences of accomplished chemists. The primary aim is to identify the personal factors related to individual traits, social skills, and self-motivation that have contributed to the development of their talents and their emergence as distinguished figures in the field of chemistry. Ultimately, the current study aims to encourage researchers, decision-makers, and stakeholders in the field of talent to prioritize training programs that enhance educational services. The ultimate objective is also to consolidate the factors that contribute to the development of talented and distinguished individuals in chemistry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe significance of this study is threefold. First, it contributes to the theoretical refinement of talent development models by providing domain-specific and phenomenological evidence from chemistry, which is a field often overlooked in personalized talent research. Second, it offers practical insights for educators, mentors, and policymakers seeking to design more effective, individualized support systems for aspiring chemists. Third, by centering the voices of distinguished achievers, it provides an evidence-based foundation for interventions that nurture not only cognitive ability but also the motivational and socio-emotional competencies essential for long-term excellence and innovation in science.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study is guided by the following research question: What are the personal factors related to traits, social skills, and self-motivation that have contributed to the emergence of distinguished talent in chemistry, as experienced by the achievers themselves? To investigate this question, three sub-questions were formulated to guide data collection and analysis:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat personal traits, such as perseverance, openness to experience, and passion-driven focus, do distinguished chemists identify as fundamental to their development and sustained achievement?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow do social and interpersonal dynamics, including team collaboration, mentorship, and professional relationship management, shape their developmental pathways and professional identity?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn what ways does self-motivation, manifested through self-exploration, adaptability, and commitment to growth, influence their journey toward and persistence in distinction?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"2. Theoretical Framework","content":"\u003cp\u003eA number of significant models provide a foundational understanding of talent development. Each theory emphasizes different dimensions of this multifaceted process. These theoretical perspectives inform the focus of the current study on personal factors within the domain of chemistry.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.1 \u003cb\u003eFoundational Models of Talent Development\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cb\u003eFoundational Models of Talent Development\u003c/b\u003e\u003cp\u003eSeveral models and theories concerned with the factors influencing talent development have been proposed. Sternberg and Kaufman (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) summarized them into System Models. These models view talent as integrated components within the individual, including mental, psychological, and social constituents that help them achieve gifted behavior and high performance. Among those theories and concepts is Sternberg’s Theory (1958), which divided intelligence into three types: analytical, innovative, and practical (Sternberg, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). The Three-cycle Theory of Renzulli (1978–1986) established three conditions to achieve gifted behavior. The first one is: above average abilities, which might be either general and could be applied to all fields or limited. Renzulli (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) defined this as the ability possessed by individuals who perform in the top 15–20% of any field. The other two conditions are related to task commitment and a high level of creativity. Sternberg’s and Renzulli’s concepts are the foremost models and the most impactful in forming the talent concept in modern scientific and educational circles. These are distinguished from others by the multiple studies that have dealt with them regarding identification tools and nurturing programs (Al-Jughaiman, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.2 Interactive and Developmental Models\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOther models of talent development focus on the role of internal factors, such as mental and psychological aspects and the social, environmental, and economic factors, as supportive factors. For example, Francoys Gagne’s Differentiated Model of Gifted and Talented (DMGT) (1985) considered talent to be the outcome of instinctive readiness and excellence. The author also highlighted the critical influences of the environment, such as home, school, parents, activities, and meetings, alongside the mental and personal variables (motivation and mood), education, training, practice, and luck. These factors transform the basic daily life talents, which are genetically determined (intellectual, creative, sensory and motor talents), into excellence in specific domains (language, science, mathematics, art, music, and leadership) (Gagné, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSome theories unveiled the changes that affect individuals in various ways and at different levels (Dai \u0026amp; Dai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Renzulli, 2008). For example, Dai’s Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) (2021) assumed that the person is an open, dynamic, and adaptable system, subject to self-changes that vary in how they interact with the world and enforce their authority. The theory indicated that talent is an extending process of human adaptation that eventually ends with significant achievements, referred to as “Maximum Achievement” MA. Reaching this stage requires adaptation to social and cultural environments through self-guidance, organizing, knowledge, and skills.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDai described this process as a series of overlapping cycles. The first cycle involves building competencies, dealing with challenges, shaping personality, and guiding individuals to the mission to create a moral connection with it. In the second circle, personal adaptation begins by seeking opportunities that align with their interests and inclinations. This process facilitates a transition to the third circle and the development of self and future. In the third circle, a talent crystallizes and becomes more mature. The circle may require more time to achieve the utmost adaptability, so the individual must set a future-oriented goal to have a lasting impact on society (Dai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.3 The Talent Development Model and the Focus of This Study\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Talent Development Model (TDM), which serves as the theoretical foundation for this study, is one of the most prominent contemporary theoretical frameworks in the field of gifted education. The model marks a significant shift from the traditional view of giftedness as a fixed and innate trait primarily measured by Intelligence Quotient, towards a dynamic and developmental perspective that focuses on processes and interactions over time (Dai \u0026amp; Chan, 2013; Al-Jughaiman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBuilding on this framework, the current study seeks to identify personal factors related to individual traits, social skills, and self-motivation. The model posits that transforming early potential into exceptional adult achievement requires a complex and continuous interplay among various individual factors. These factors enable the individual to influence and shape the environment, adapt to it and ultimately turn it into opportunities for accomplishment (Dai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that the predictive accuracy regarding talent development trajectories increases significantly when research focuses on domain-specific abilities rather than a general approach, as is the case in the current study. This specific focus allows for the design of specialized educational systems that effectively nurture individuals' capacities to generate creative ideas and products with societal impact (Preckel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA review of various talent models and theories revealed that the concept of talent is composed of different factors. Some theories focus on individual factors, while other frameworks examine the interaction between an individual's internal capabilities and external factors that enable them to develop their talents into more advanced ones. This interplay ultimately achieves outcomes that benefit both the individual and the environment. The current study tackles the internal factors relevant to the individual, which stem from their personality, including personal behavioral traits, skills, and self-motivation. These factors were explored through in-depth interviews with the study participants. Over decades, research has consistently shown that a person’s traits and behavioral skills can reliably predict their current and future high-level creative performance (Feist \u0026amp; Barron, 1999; Soldz \u0026amp; Vaillant, 2003).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.4 Summary of Theoretical Perspectives\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese perspectives informed our phenomenological investigation of personal factors (traits, social skills, and self-motivation) in the development of distinguished achievement in chemistry. The theoretical frameworks discussed above guided this study by highlighting personal characteristics, such as motivation, perseverance, and social skills, as essential contributors to high-level achievement. They also justify the study’s focus on understanding these factors through a phenomenological lens, capturing how distinguished chemists interpret the experiences that shaped their development.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3. Methodology","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Research Design and Approach\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn light of the study\u0026rsquo;s objectives, a qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted to explore the lived experiences of distinguished chemists. This design was chosen to gain a deeper understanding of the personal factors influencing talent development, to provide ample space for listening to participants\u0026rsquo; perspectives, and to explore the subjective meanings they attribute to their developmental journeys (Denzin \u0026amp; Lincoln, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Creswell \u0026amp; Poth, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The study was guided by the three investigative sub-questions outlined in the introduction, which focused on personal traits, social dynamics, and self-motivation. These sub-questions informed both the overall structure of data collection and the thematic structure of the data analysis. The phenomenological tradition is particularly suited to uncovering the essence of human experience as described by those who have lived it, making it an appropriate framework for this investigation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Participants and Sampling\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEighteen participants who were distinguished in chemistry and whose achievements align with the standards of the study were selected through a purposive sampling approach. Those participants who met the inclusion criteria were accessible and ready to participate voluntarily. The snowball strategy was also employed, where participants identified individuals with relevant knowledge about the study\u0026rsquo;s topic, serving as a link between them and the researchers (Creswell \u0026amp; Poth, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Initial participants were identified through personal networks in recognition of their accomplishments in chemistry, as well as through referrals from department heads at universities. Contact was also made with high-performing local and international companies within Saudi Arabia that have demonstrated achievements in chemistry, according to statistics from the Saudi Intellectual Property Authority. These companies included Sadara Chemical, Saudi Aramco, and the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST). Through these channels, eligible participants were identified, and, via referrals, the sample was expanded until data saturation was approached and 18 participants were secured.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants included 11 males and 7 females, ranging in age from 30 to 60 years old. Their professional roles varied from academics and researchers to company employees. Twelve participants held doctoral degrees, while six held bachelor\u0026rsquo;s degrees, all in chemical sciences.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Study Implementation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eParticipant Selection Criteria\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure alignment with the study's objectives and consistency across the sample, participants were selected based on the following established criteria. Eligible individuals were required to: (1) be specialized in chemistry with profound scientific and practical experience; (2) have played a documented role in disseminating scientific culture and increasing public awareness about chemistry (Preckel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e); (3) have presented innovative work in the field, evidenced by holding at least a patent or receiving a prestigious chemistry-related award (Preckel et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Subotnik et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e); and (4) have professional output with a direct, tangible impact on industry, society, or their organization. The code \u0026ldquo;M\u0026rdquo; was used to refer to each participant, instead of stating his name or workplace, to maintain his privacy and confidentiality in line with the study\u0026rsquo;s ethics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eDevelopment of the Interview Protocol\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe semi-structured interview protocol was developed through a multi-stage process to ensure relevance, clarity, and methodological rigor. First, a comprehensive review of literature related to talent development and chemistry education was conducted. Second, the draft questions were reviewed by two consultants specializing in gifted education and qualitative research to ensure scientific accuracy, alignment with the research questions, and clarity. Third, a pilot study was conducted with three individuals who met the study criteria but were not included in the final sample. This pilot study helped identify questions that might be difficult or inappropriate, refine wording, and estimate the appropriate interview duration. Following this feedback, the final semi-structured interview protocol was established.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure methodological alignment, each interview question was mapped directly onto one of the study\u0026rsquo;s three investigative sub-questions. This mapping ensured that the protocol comprehensively captured personal traits, social and professional dynamics, and self-motivation factors relevant to the participants\u0026rsquo; talent development journeys. The interview guide comprised 5 main open-ended questions:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eGive a brief overview of your professional background and your specific achievements in the field of chemistry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow did your developmental journey begin, and how did it influence your decision to choose chemical sciences?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWere there any personal influences or early indicators that made you choose this particular specialization?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat are the foremost personal factors that refined your personality and helped you get to your current achievements?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow did you overcome the challenges you faced to achieve your current accomplishments?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Research Instruments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eSemi-structured Interviews\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Semi-structured interviews were conducted, in which the researcher posed the core questions while allowing participants to respond in detail. This approach facilitated active participation and yielded diverse interpretations. The interviews were conducted by phone, face-to-face, or via Zoom and lasted between 20\u0026ndash;50 minutes. Follow-up questions were asked based on participants\u0026rsquo; responses to deepen understanding and explore emerging themes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.5 Data Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe qualitative data analysis was conducted using a systematic and multi-stage process that followed the principles of Thematic Analysis developed by Braun and Clarke (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). The analysis involved six phases. The initial phase was data collection, during which data were collected through participant interviews, and their names were coded for privacy. Following data collection, the stage of data coding and classifying began. Thematic Analysis was applied through initial coding, which identified the major ideas. To achieve this, the data were examined multiple times to ensure accurate coding, which was then classified into central themes. Next, the process moved to data reviewing. After the initial coding process, the coding and classification were re-examined. If any errors were found, the data were reanalyzed and reclassified according to the most accurate coding and classification. Then, the data were summarized, and themes and codes were presented in an illustrative table for all the data obtained, according to the three axes of the study's investigative sub-questions. Finally, in the stage of writing up the findings and linking them to evidence, the results were documented, accompanied by an explanation of the identified codes and themes. These results were supported by evidence quoted from participants\u0026rsquo; interviews by placing them between quotation marks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.6 Trustworthiness and Credibility\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure trustworthiness and credibility of this qualitative study, the researchers applied the framework proposed by Lincoln and Guba (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e). This framework outlines four key criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCredibility was established through several strategies. Data source triangulation was achieved by involving multiple participants from diverse professional sources across different workplaces and organizations. Member checking was employed, where some participants were provided summaries of their responses and the preliminary themes for feedback and verification, a process that enhances the accuracy of the findings (Creswell \u0026amp; Poth, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The researchers also practiced reflexivity to minimize bias by maintaining reflective notes throughout the study to bracket their own assumptions and preconceptions regarding talent development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDependability was addressed by ensuring a consistent and well-documented research process. The data were reviewed about three weeks after the initial analysis and then again after two months to achieve a more precise and stable interpretation. An audit trail was maintained, detailing all analytical decisions. Additionally, to ensure reliability, the analysis and findings were validated through external auditing; we consulted an expert researcher specializing in qualitative research and another in talent care. Their feedback was compared with the researchers\u0026rsquo; conclusions to ensure the thematic analysis was rigorous and the themes were well-aligned with the data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConfirmability was strengthened by ensuring the findings were rooted in the data rather than researcher bias. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The recordings were reviewed multiple times to ensure transcripts accurately reflected participants' words without researcher interpretation (Abdul Karim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Evidence and direct quotations from participants\u0026rsquo; responses formed the basis for developing all major topics and sub-topics, ensuring the interpretation remained grounded in the collected evidence. Finally, transferability was supported by providing thick descriptions of the participant context, selection criteria, and research procedures within this report. This allows readers to evaluate the potential applicability of the findings to other similar settings or populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.7 Ethical Considerations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study adhered to ethical guidelines outlined by Creswell and Poth (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Participants were fully informed about the study\u0026rsquo;s purpose and data collection procedures, and their voluntary consent was obtained. Confidentiality was protected through anonymized coding. Permission to record interviews was obtained, with a commitment to delete recordings after transcription and verification. Participants were also informed of their right to withdraw at any stage without penalty, and all data were handled in accordance with ethical research standards.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe phenomenological analysis of the interview data revealed a set of personal factors integral to talent development among distinguished chemists. These factors are organized around the three investigative sub-questions that guided the study: personal traits, social and interpersonal dynamics, and self-motivation. Eight central themes emerged from the participants' narratives, which are presented in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e and elaborated in the subsections that follow. The themes are: fostering team spirit, enhancing inclination through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences, passion-driven specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness to change and professional development, and project management with a sense of accountability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eS\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1. Personal Traits Contributing to Distinguished Achievement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.1 Perseverance and Commitment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants identified perseverance and commitment as fundamental personal traits that enabled them to deal with the demanding nature of chemistry. Their responses highlighted consistent effort in mastering complex material, resilience in the face of setbacks, and disciplined self-management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne participant (M5) talked about the challenge he faced and the perseverance he showed to upgrade his level. He said: \u0026ldquo;I try to revise the lecture and solve the problem, which takes a long time. I spend hours trying to understand chemical interactions, which requires a lot of effort.\u0026rdquo; Another participant (M9) linked perseverance to the experimental process: \u0026ldquo;We, in the group of experiments, learnt a lot during undergraduate years that experiments may fail, but we never gave in\u0026hellip; I try to discover the error by myself, I reread the protocol the teacher explained and discuss that with my colleagues\u0026hellip; Chemical analyses are very precise, even in mass amount. I am quite convinced that perseverance, especially at the beginning, is what leads to accomplishment and excellence.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipant (M10) showed commitment through structured and consistent study habits. She discussed her consistent commitment to creating a management time schedule throughout her studies, which helped prepare her for academic success. She emphasized that this was important at the beginning of college study as that stage requires adaptability and interaction with a new academic culture after graduating from high school. She said: \u0026ldquo;I follow a daily schedule, divided in accordance with the difficulty of organic chemistry, which was difficult for me at the onset. But through daily practice, writing summaries, and commitment to a certain schedule, the student\u0026rsquo;s level improves.\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.1.2 Openness to New Experiments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study results revealed that participants were interested in exploring new ideas and dealing with scientific challenges flexibly. For example, (M2) referred to his experience with his graduation project, saying: \u0026ldquo;For my graduation project, I chose an experiment which we hadn\u0026rsquo;t actually implemented. I read the details about the experiment in various research papers, including the conditions under which it should be conducted. However, the equipment was not available in the faculty. When I went to the center, they did not allow me to conduct it there. So, I decided to handle it in a theoretical way and figure out how to predict the effectiveness of the compounds.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother participant (M11) discussed the importance of engaging in new experiences to enhance his scientific problem-solving skills, especially at the undergraduate level. He said: \u0026ldquo;By gradually relying on himself, the student gains room to be creative over time. We explain an experiment to him and apply it successfully. Here, the student has to identify where the error lies and how to correct it.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn another context, one participant(M6) referred to her university experience. She said: \u0026ldquo;I like to relate it to real-life things. That way, I understand more and feel that the study is enjoyable and not just memorization.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cb\u003e4.1.3 Passion-Driven Specialization\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study\u0026rsquo;s findings on the topic of passion-driven specialization revealed several participant responses. For example, participant (M12) talked about choosing chemistry after his first semester in college and continuing with it, though he had initially wanted to study medicine. When asked about satisfaction with his present career, he answered, saying: \u0026ldquo;My goal was actually medicine, but after choosing chemistry as my major, I never thought about transferring and never regretted it. Looking positively to the available option, being satisfied with it, and insisting on completing it is the key to excellence.\u0026rdquo; In the same context, (M18) said: \u0026ldquo;I did not hesitate to choose chemistry as a major after my first year at the university. It was the most suitable major for me, among other majors.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants also described how passion helped them overcome academic challenges. For example, participant (M15) discussed overcoming an early obstacle during college years, attributing it to her belief in her ability and her fondness for the subject. She said: \u0026ldquo;The belief in my ability and the confidence in my specialization both helped me to surpass failure shock.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Passion also motivated participants to actively engage with chemistry beyond the classroom. The passion for the specialization was a driving force for self-initiative in various forms, such as interacting with what is presented in chemistry lectures and relating that to everyday life. This is manifested in what participant (M7) said: \u0026ldquo;When studying PH values, I used to apply that at home to my young siblings by changing the color of red cabbage juice to check whether it was acidic or alkaline.\u0026rdquo; The participant (M15) demonstrated her interaction with the scientific material by expressing her fascination with practical experiments and taking the initiative to carry out the experiment and explain it to her colleagues. She said, \u0026ldquo;I was amazed in my first years when we used to replace protein with eggs and measure the amount of protein. I used to bring eggs from home and ask the professor to do the experiment for my colleagues.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs for participant (M6), she talked about steering her learning toward topics that hold personal meaning and scientific value for her. Influenced by this passion-driven focus, she committed herself to mastering her chosen topics. This is reflected in her choice of graduation project, which is founded on her profound interest in studying the structure and interactions of organic compounds, synthesizing fragrance molecules, and understanding the thermal and chemical reactions in the aging process of perfumes. She explained: \u0026ldquo;I chose perfume chemistry for my graduation project and made perfumery soap\u0026hellip; the topic was really appealing to me\u0026rdquo;. When asked about the reason behind choosing that topic for the project, she answered: \u0026ldquo;The instructor explained to us perfumes and their reactions. The information was so inspiring to me that I read and investigated the topic and its scientific principles. It particularly talks about organic chemistry and creativity in manufacturing. I felt that it truly aligned with my scientific passion, so I was careful about mastering and perfecting it.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2. Social and Interpersonal Dynamics in Professional Development\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2.1 Fostering Team Spirit\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study findings revealed a diversity of participant responses regarding social engagement and teamwork preferences. Some participants described sociable dispositions from an early age. For example, participant (M12) described his social traits by saying: \u0026ldquo;I am a first-class social and leading personality from my childhood until now.\u0026rdquo; He added: \u0026ldquo;I used to explain exams to my friends during high school and intermediate as well.\u0026rdquo; Another participant (M5) said: \u0026ldquo;I used to love to be the announcer of the school radio and organize segments among my classmates.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast, other participants recalled a preference for individual work during their formative years. One female participant mentioned that she preferred individual work, saying: \u0026ldquo;During my school years, I used to prefer individual work over teamwork. In my childhood, I used to play with my toys alone, avoiding participation, even in high school. We did not have projects in those days as we have now.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2.2 Awareness of Academic Relationships\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants described a growing awareness of the importance of academic relationships during their graduate studies, highlighting interactions with supervisors, peers, and within research teams. For example, one participant (M9) discussed the developmental role of supervisory feedback during a master\u0026rsquo;s program. She said : \u0026ldquo;During my master\u0026rsquo;s study, when I used to present to my supervisor the steps I was going to take and what I had accomplished, I felt that he did not see my achievement as noteworthy and often rejected many of my ideas. At first, that really upset and frustrated me, affecting me very much.\u0026rdquo; Then the participant sat up in her seat, leaned slightly forward, and continued with a more confident tone of voice: \u0026ldquo;I realized later that this method made my research personality better\u0026hellip; every criticism made me stronger \u0026hellip;. I knew how to improve myself \u0026hellip;. the supervisor started praising me\u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a similar context, participant (M8) discussed her experience working in research groups with female colleagues during her master\u0026rsquo;s study, highlighting how it contributed to sustaining her motivation. She revealed that she became aware of the importance of relationships with peers. She said: \u0026ldquo;I always preferred working alone, but when I started my master\u0026rsquo;s program, the professor divided us into groups so we could collaborate in the lab. I found that positive competition with my colleagues was a stimulus for self-improvement. I was inspired by the success of my colleagues, with whom I shared their joys and accomplishments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother participant (M4) highlighted his awareness of academic relationships and how to manage them well through effective communication and listening to others. He said: \u0026ldquo;During my doctoral studies, I realized how important it is to listen to others\u0026rsquo; experiences and suggestions, as well as how important it is to ask questions and express my ideas clearly. These skills are important, and their value became dear when I applied them to my research. When we listen to each other and discuss shared issues, this gives us greater confidence in what we have accomplished.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.2.3 Project Management and Professional Accountability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participant interviews revealed that skills in project management and a sense of professional accountability were significant factors in their collaborative research experiences. The study participants described the importance of project management skills for scientific work. Participant (M8) emphasized that the effectiveness of project management lies in the ability to balance goals, deadlines, and available resources in a synchronized manner. She noted that this often requires adopting structured project management frameworks that are designed for scientific environments and offer adequate flexibility to adapt to specific research demands and challenges.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipant (M3) highlighted the importance of building relationships within research teams that encompass diverse experiences and cultures. He stated: \u0026ldquo;Through my work on various projects, I noticed that diverse expertise within project teams builds knowledge among team members. Even if the team is culturally diverse and its members speak different languages, lab work proceeds well. Each person handles a certain task that leverages their experience. Then we discuss and solve the challenges we face collectively.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants also identified professional accountability and initiative through effective teamwork. Participant (M18) pointed out that the skill of self-leadership within research teams serves as an indicator of professional responsibility and initiative. He said: \u0026ldquo;Excellence is not necessary for the individual to be a leader, but to be a leader, he should know quite well the task entrusted to him.\u0026rdquo; He also emphasized the importance of collaboration among research teams and the ability to express ideas and engage in constructive criticism. He added: \u0026ldquo;Expressing opinion and giving and receiving information enrich the mind and generate creativity in the individual and the research group.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, initiative was highlighted as having two key dimensions. Participant (M8) described the first dimension as: establishing strategic relationships with external research teams to exchange specialized expertise related to their research projects, thereby enhancing the quality of scientific outputs, and broadening the scope of shared knowledge. The other dimension involves dividing work according to the strengths of the team\u0026rsquo;s members to achieve the highest levels of efficiency and productivity in implementing research tasks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec23\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3. The Role of Self-Motivation in Sustained Excellence\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec24\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3.1 Enhancing Inclination Through Self-Exploration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants described a process of self-discovery that shaped their scientific interests and passion for chemistry. The findings unveiled responses that demonstrate personal interests. For example, (M12) said: \u0026ldquo;experiments attracted me more\u0026hellip;. when I was young, I used to collect small stones, trying to break them to discover what was inside. I used to write about what I found and why it didn't break. In the same context, (M13) responded with confidence that he knew himself, his abilities, and his professional interests. When (M17) was asked about why she chose her specialization, she explained that it was a decision driven by her personal interests. She said, \u0026ldquo;I sat down with myself and wrote on a piece of paper: Who am I? \u0026ldquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e Participants also expressed a strong sense of enthusiasm for the field of chemistry. When one of the participants, M8, was asked about the reason behind her interest in chemistry, she smiled, saying: \u0026ldquo;I used to say to my classmates, you have a chemistry scientist with you.\u0026rdquo; She added, \u0026ldquo;I used to have great enthusiasm for lab classes where I found myself.\u0026rdquo; Regarding the role of external awards at the first stages of learning, (M14) said: \u0026ldquo;At the elementary stage, my uncle used to encourage me by giving material rewards whenever I got high grades.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec25\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e4.3.2 Openness to Change and Professional Development\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study participants expressed various activities and mindsets that reflected their openness to change and commitment to ongoing professional development. One significant theme was the role of mentorship and guidance in fostering mutual learning. Participant (14), for example, discussed taking the initiative to guide new researchers. He said: \u0026ldquo;At the beginning of my career, I took the initiative of guiding and counseling new researchers at the center. That provided me with personal or scientific experience.\u0026rdquo; Likewise, (M10) discussed her experience supervising master\u0026rsquo;s and doctoral students, highlighting the skills she gained from this experience. She said: \u0026ldquo;Through my supervision of higher studies students, I used to divide them into research groups with semi-common goals. I continuously communicate and discuss updates with them. We pinpoint errors in experiments and correct them\u0026hellip;. We used to build partnerships with other centers\u0026hellip; All of these develop in us skills in guidance, management, leadership, and communication.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants also emphasized continuous skill development through academic engagement. Several participants (M2, M12, M13) highlighted the importance of attending conferences, publishing research, and establishing professional relationships as stimuli for growth. Participant, M\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, confirmed that conferences provide researchers with ideal platforms to highlight their scientific identity and enhance their professional reputation within the global academic community, gaining them appreciation for their specialized expertise.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e In the same context, (M10) discussed the importance of conferences in fostering collaboration and communication, highlighting her own initiative and commitment to participation. She said: \"I participated in one of the conferences with an academic poster and got to know a number of people interested in the same research area and began collaborating with research groups through it.\"\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother aspect was the willingness to engage with and learn from diverse perspectives. Participant (M6) discussed establishing networks with experts, explaining how aligning with others\u0026rsquo; perspectives can enhance innovation and talent development in chemistry. She emphasized the importance of building professional relationships as an indicator of openness to change. She said: \u0026ldquo;At first, I was hesitant to share my ideas, but when I saw how people received and discussed them, I started to enjoy being part of this environment. I felt like I was growing every day with the groups.\u0026rdquo; Participant (M4) shed light on the importance of aligning with diverse perspectives as part of openness to change and professional development. He said: \u0026ldquo;Listening to others\u0026rsquo; viewpoints, even if we disagree, made me think in different ways.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe following discussion interprets the phenomenological findings in relation to the existing theoretical frameworks and prior research on talent development. The analysis is organized according to the three investigative sub-questions that guided the study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec27\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.1. Interpretation of Personal Trait Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec28\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.1.1 Perseverance and Commitment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings of this study highlight that perseverance and commitment are personal traits that distinguish the participating individuals. The former enables them to face academic challenges, such as complex theoretical concepts and temporary setbacks in lab experiments. The latter (commitment) enhances their dedication to achieving their goals, organizing their learning, and immersing themselves in work, such as completing research projects or excelling in exams (Avargil et al., 2019; Basimin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). The participants' experiences suggest that studying chemistry involves complex content, cumulative knowledge requirements, and often lengthy investigative projects that test students\u0026rsquo; and individuals\u0026rsquo; flexibility. Their demonstrated perseverance requires analytical and practical skills, deep thinking, and a solid understanding of theoretical concepts, all of which emphasize the role of perseverance and commitment in achieving success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this context, Lewal (2023) defines perseverance as the ability to uphold one\u0026rsquo;s viewpoint, without being discouraged, resisted, or frustrated by obstacles. Instead of becoming annoyed by the task at hand, perseverant individuals focus on moving forward efficiently to accomplish their goals. This definition aligns closely with the determination described by participants. Furthermore, numerous studies, such as those by Griep (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) and Vogel \u0026amp; Human-Vogel (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR87\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), have indicated that academic commitment is a major means for academic accomplishment. The students who are more committed focus their efforts on achieving outstanding academic performance. In this regard, Bjork et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) emphasized the crucial importance of students\u0026rsquo; ability to stay committed to their academic goals and to apply appropriate learning strategies. This, in turn, contributes to achieving better academic outcomes and fostering sustainable educational achievements.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese non-cognitive factors are considered key determinants in predicting great achievements (Tang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR84\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Besides, some studies revealed that perseverance and determination outweigh passion in importance as these factors influence academic achievement and future success (Huescar, 2020). Our findings contribute to this understanding by illustrating how these traits function within the specific domain of chemistry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eResearch also revealed a correlational link between commitment to one\u0026rsquo;s tasks and high achievement in certain academic fields such as natural sciences (Jang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; Mun \u0026amp; Ham, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Acknowledging the significance of this factor, the American educational psychologist, Renzulli (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e), confirmed that commitment to task is essential for achieving satisfactory academic accomplishments, irrespective of the level of cognitive abilities. He introduced the concept of task commitment within the framework of \u0026ldquo;The Three-Cycle Model\u0026rdquo;, a concept that is largely popular among researchers in the field of gifted education. According to him, task commitment comprises six major elements: (1) Perseverance, (2) Continuity, (3) Serious Action, (4) Dedicated Practice, (5) Self-Confidence, and (6) the belief in an individual\u0026rsquo;s ability to complete the work successfully. This vision shows that task commitment is not only an instinctive trait but also a skill that can be developed over time. Consequently, our study reinforces the practical implications of this model, suggesting that teachers and parents have a vital role to play in enhancing students\u0026rsquo; commitment to academic tasks to achieve adequate levels of performance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec29\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.1.2 Openness to New Experiments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants\u0026rsquo; accounts of exploring new ideas and adapting flexibly to challenges highlight the centrality of openness to experiences as a personality trait, which is characterized by intellectual curiosity, a desire to engage with complex ideas, and an attraction to creativity. According to Costa and McCrae (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e), this trait, a key component of the Five-Factor Model, encompasses dimensions such as openness to new activities and intellectual curiosity. In the context of this study, this openness served as a major drive for intellectual exploration and innovative behavior in higher education (De Young, 2014), enhancing the participants' ability to understand scientific complexities and adapt to academic challenges.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants' experiences show that openness to experiences enables individuals to shoulder responsibility through learning, which in turn consolidates their abilities to analyze errors and find innovative solutions. For instance, relating scientific concepts to real-world contexts enhanced their enthusiasm for learning and reduced academic pressure, demonstrating a flexible imagination and the ability to devise creative ways to overcome academic challenges.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings are supported by existing research, which has shown that openness to experience is positively associated with creativity in scientific specializations, enabling new experimental designs and more efficient data analysis methods (Soles, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). It is also linked to creative achievement in the sciences, particularly when supported by divergent thinking and general cognitive ability (Kaufman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Openness is also considered a key indicator of an individual\u0026rsquo;s ability to engage in lifelong learning and adapt to changes in scientific fields. This ability helps them overcome the ambiguity of difficult subjects and integrate new knowledge easily (Bath \u0026amp; Smith, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, openness interacts with other traits, such as conscientiousness, enabling the ability to adapt to changing tasks, including modifying experimental plans based on unexpected results (LePine et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Research evidence indicates that openness to experience is closely linked to academic performance in post-secondary education, particularly in environments that foster creativity (Gatzka, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Notably, some studies posit that openness can outweigh general intelligence by sparking the desire to explore new ideas and engage in innovative learning opportunities (Ziegler et al., 2012; Gatzka, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). However, as this study\u0026rsquo;s participants also demonstrated through their disciplined approach, openness alone may not be enough; it requires interaction with other traits like conscientiousness or flexibility to achieve the highest levels of academic accomplishment (Linn et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, the present study reinforces the understanding that openness to experience plays a crucial role in enhancing creativity, academic adaptability, and high performance by fostering intellectual curiosity and a willingness to face scientific challenges, enabling individuals to achieve outstanding accomplishments in educational environments that reward innovation and flexibility (Den Hertog, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Gatzka, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec30\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.13 Passion-Driven Specialization\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study's findings strongly support the view that passion-driven specialization is a pivotal factor in shaping motivations and inclinations. The participants\u0026rsquo; experiences indicated that the majority showed a high level of enthusiasm and a genuine inclination toward chemistry in the early stages of their education. Their narratives revealed that this choice represents a method of employing personal interest within a specialized academic framework. The concept of passion-driven specialization captures the participants\u0026rsquo; enthusiasm for their chosen field and the positive feelings they associated with chemistry learning. As demonstrated in the results, this passion was reflected in their ability to overcome obstacles in their university careers and in their increased confidence in their academic choice. The participants also demonstrated a tangible connection to scientific subjects that resonated with their everyday lives, driven by a genuine internal motivation. This concept, in turn, directed their learning process toward topics of high personal and academic value, aligning with their unique educational backgrounds.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese characteristics align with the definition of passion as a strong inclination toward an activity that individuals find important for investing time and energy (Kunat \u0026amp; Szorc, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, the findings show that the alignment between their chosen professional track and their personal interests unveils a profound passion for the field. This alignment also strengthens their sense of scientific identity, which is defined as the extent of an individual\u0026rsquo;s sense of belonging to the scientific field. This identity plays a crucial role in shaping academic tracks, fostering involvement with specialization, and increasing motivation toward success in chemistry (Robinson et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Lockhart et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, this study provides experiential evidence that individuals\u0026rsquo; passions play a crucial role in shaping their specialization or fields of study, influencing their pursuit of careers and goals with steadfastness, determination, and mastery (Chichekian \u0026amp; Vallerand, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Ruiz-Alfonso \u0026amp; Le\u0026oacute;n, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec31\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2. Interpretation of Social Dynamics Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec32\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2.1 Fostering Team Spirit\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants' early experiences with social interaction revealed a spectrum of preferences, from natural sociability to a preference for solitude. This diversity aligns with the understanding that social skills are behaviors that foster positive interaction with others and the environment, including empathy, communication, and negotiation (Lynch \u0026amp; Simpson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). For instance, one participant\u0026rsquo;s account of being a \"first-class social and leading personality\" from childhood clearly illustrates the early presence of social skills and adaptability. This finding aligns with observations that social abilities become more evident during adolescence (Feldhusen, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) and reflects a form of social intelligence manifested in organizing and understanding others (Gardner, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1983\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese results support the view that social spirit and relationship management are traits of distinguished individuals (Clark, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), a trend supported by studies indicating many gifted individuals possess advanced social skills and high competence (\u0026Ccedil;itil, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Elliott et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Shechtman \u0026amp; Silektor, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). On the other hand, the expressed preference for individual work by some participants might be attributed to personal traits or individual preferences. This variation is consistent with typologies of giftedness, such as that by Betts and Neihart (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e), which includes types characterized by both strong social skills and a preference for isolation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings emphasize that while team spirit is a vital element for success within a team framework, individuals\u0026rsquo; initial responses vary based on personal traits and early experiences. The accounts of participants who initially preferred isolation resonate with literature noting that some talented individuals face difficulties creating social relationships, especially during adolescence (Neihart, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Peterson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Silverman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). However, a key insight from this study is that despite variations in early stages, a gradual development of social skills was noted as participants progressed into their professional phases, as further detailed in their responses on academic relationships and project management.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis developmental trajectory supports research emphasizing the influence of age and specialization on social skill development (Jarvin \u0026amp; Subotnik, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Subotnik et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). It also suggests a practical implication: individuals who prefer independent work may require specific strategies to foster a sense of belonging and participation. To achieve this, team activities could be designed to consolidate mutual interest and offer various roles that accommodate personality differences, thereby fostering team spirit in a comprehensive manner.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec33\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2.2 Awareness of Academic Relationships\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The findings demonstrate that participants developed a sophisticated awareness of academic relationships, which involves building and managing connections with advisors, peers, and other researchers to achieve academic goals through self-reflection, initiative, and practical skills like constructive communication. For example, one participant\u0026rsquo;s narrative reveals a maturity in understanding supervisory dynamics, realizing that constructive criticism aimed to reinforce her research skills. This awareness enabled her to manage emotions, respond professionally, and turn feedback into a developmental opportunity, thereby enhancing communication with her supervisor.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimilarly, another participant\u0026rsquo;s account reflects a deep awareness of peer relationships, where positive competition and empathy served as stimuli for self-development. This interaction highlights an ability to engage in research cooperation and positive communication, which enhanced motivation and a sense of belonging to the academic community. A third participant\u0026rsquo;s experience sheds light on three key dimensions of this awareness: active listening, which values knowledge gained from others; effective communication through clear expression and questioning; and the practical application of these skills to build confidence and research success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese relational dynamics align with the core principles of Rogers\u0026rsquo; Person-centered Theory, which emphasizes active listening (empathy), positive acceptance, and congruence (Rogers, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). Although developed in a therapeutic context, these principles are applicable academically. The participants' motivation to value listening mirrors Rogers\u0026rsquo; emphasis on empathy. Their appreciation of others\u0026rsquo; perspectives fosters an environment of positive acceptance, while their clear self-expression aligns with the concept of congruence, reflecting authenticity between inner feelings and outward communication. Thus, the basic components of Rogers\u0026rsquo; theory provide a useful framework for understanding how awareness reinforces collaborative research environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results further reveal that a positive academic milieu, characterized by strong relationships and belonging, enhances individuals\u0026rsquo; confidence in themselves and their achievements, highlighting the importance of awareness and social initiative in academic interaction (Zysberg \u0026amp; Schwabsky, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR90\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). This supports prior research indicating a positive correlation between awareness of academic relationships and constructive engagement with faculty and peers. Such purposeful communication and cooperation are essential for boosting motivation, self-awareness, and participation, which are critical for success at both undergraduate and graduate levels (Amerstorfer \u0026amp; Von M\u0026uuml;nster-Kistner, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Trolian et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR85\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Kim \u0026amp; Sax, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec34\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.2.3 Project Management and Professional Accountability\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants\u0026rsquo; responses highlight that skills in project management and a sense of professional accountability are fundamental to teamwork and research success. The analysis revealed that project management skills are a pillar for developing scientific talent in chemistry, with their importance evident in dynamic research environments requiring multitasking, adaptation, and cooperative work. Determining research priorities was also noted as a key factor for enhancing efficiency, managing pressure, and fostering innovation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings strongly align with existing literature. The emphasis on building relationships within diverse research teams corroborates Mishra et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e), who noted that such diversity enhances project performance by fostering communication and integrating diverse visions and methodologies to solve problems and support innovation. This study\u0026rsquo;s participants confirmed the necessity for deliberate efforts to develop cultural awareness to succeed in such environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBesides, the identified link between responsibility and positive group dynamics is well-supported. Responsibility is closely tied to research group dynamics, where individual roles and behaviors influence both collective success and personal development. Positive dynamics, built on trust and clear communication, enhance motivation and commitment among members. The participants\u0026rsquo; experiences validate that project management competencies, including prioritizing tasks, demonstrating team leadership, and taking initiative, are essential efficiencies that contribute to successful careers in chemistry. These skills enable professionals to navigate complex research settings and drive creative achievement forward.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn a broader context, these results support the recommendations of Chen and Mao (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e), who indicated that the full realization of scientific potential requires institutions to strengthen collaboration, develop comprehensive guidance programs, and integrate formal training in personal and professional skills into curricula. The present study provides experiential evidence that such an integrated approach is crucial for preparing a qualified generation of scientists capable of competition and future innovation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec35\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.3. Interpretation of Self-Motivation Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec36\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.3.1 Enhancing Inclination Through Self-Exploration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants\u0026rsquo; deep engagement with their scientific interests, demonstrated through self-directed exploration and a sense of belonging to chemistry, illustrates the foundational role of personal inclination. This concept, which involves discovering personal interests and cultivating enthusiasm for a field, aligns with the definition of inclination as a dynamic emotional and cognitive response that encourages engagement in activities reflecting personal preferences, formed through interactions among self-factors (Lent \u0026amp; Brown, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe finding that discovering personal interest is key to professional progress is well-supported in the literature. Discovering real interest is considered crucial for professional decision-making (Ajayi et al., 2022; Nguyen \u0026amp; Aloka, 2023). The participants' narratives of early curiosity, such as experimenting with stones (M12) and introspective questioning (M17), exemplify the principles of Connected Learning, which posits that individuals learn better when grounded in personal interest, supplemented by external support (Ito et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). While some studies note the significant impact of external factors on interest development (Namazova, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), the current findings emphasize the primacy of intrinsic discovery for this group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants' expressed enthusiasm highlights a critical theme in talent development. Enthusiasm arousal is an initial motive for engagement, and researchers agree that what distinguishes outstanding achievers is not merely unusual ability, but also a high level of enthusiasm and real inclination for the field (Olszewski-Kubilius et al., 1992; Simonton, 2015). This finding aligns with the Social Cognitive Career Theory. This theory (SCCT) positions professional inclination as central to career decision-making, suggesting that choosing specialties that match personal interests raises satisfaction and fosters active future performance (Lent \u0026amp; Brown, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese dynamics are further illuminated by Self-Determination Theory (SDT). The theory emphasizes that learning based on one\u0026rsquo;s own inclination and passions reflects intrinsic motivation, with career choices stemming from personal interests that satisfy basic psychological needs (Ryan \u0026amp; Deci, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Participant M8\u0026rsquo;s self-identification as a \u0026ldquo;chemist\u0026rdquo; reflects this deep intrinsic love and sense of competence. The interplay between internal and external factors noted by the study participants aligns with research acknowledging the role of external motivations in early development, while affirming that instinctive motivations and inclinations are crucial for sustaining enthusiasm amidst this complex interplay (Olszewski-Kubilius et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This kind of interaction confirms Sternberg\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR77\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) observation that productive individuals seek environments offering desirable rewards for tasks they are intrinsically motivated and passionate about doing.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec37\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.3.2 Openness to Change and Professional Development\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants\u0026rsquo; responses highlight that willingness and openness to professional development, defined as the ability to adapt, develop specialized skills, and build scientific networks, is a crucial factor in sustained growth. Based on the study's data, this openness was manifested in three key areas: engaging in professional environments through mentoring, participating in scientific conferences, and building collaborative relationships to integrate diverse perspectives for innovation in chemistry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese findings are strongly confirmed by the existing literature on professional success in the chemical sciences. Several studies affirm that success in chemical sciences relies on a commitment to continuous professional development to keep pace with advancements and drive innovation, encompassing lifelong learning, formal training, and adaptability in multidisciplinary settings (Ribes, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Sturgeon, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Participants\u0026rsquo; active conference participation aligns with research showing that such events create opportunities to build networks that transcend geographical and specialization boundaries, allowing for idea exchange and collaboration (Green et al., 2010). Furthermore, the mentoring experiences described by the study participants corroborate the mutual benefits of supervision noted by Wong et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), where guiding others also aids the supervisor\u0026rsquo;s professional development and revitalizes their passion for research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe scholarly perception of conferences as knowledge-based social groups is validated by the participants\u0026rsquo; experiences. Literature considers conferences pivotal for academic qualification, enabling researchers to broaden knowledge and develop competencies (Hauss, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Such function was echoed by the participants who used them to showcase work and forge collaborations. This supports Subramanian\u0026rsquo;s (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) assertion that conferences are crucial platforms for innovation, collaboration, and career-advancing network establishment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenerally, openness to change and professional development emerges from this study as a critical factor in the growth of chemists, enabling adaptation to scientific developments, network building, and contribution to collaborative environments. The participants\u0026rsquo; behaviors, such as guiding researchers, participating in conferences, building relationships, and adapting to diverse perspectives, directly enhance creativity and innovation. These professional behaviors align with the personality trait of openness to experience. This trait is associated with taking initiative in network-building, adapting to change, and engaging with new ideas, all of which foster professional growth in chemistry (Barrick et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Judge et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec38\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.4. Theoretical and Practical Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec39\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.4.1 Theoretical Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study provides several key contributions to talent development theory by giving in-depth, phenomenological evidence from the domain of chemistry. The findings support and put into context core constructs from the established models in this field. The experiences of the study participants highlight these clearly. For example, their persistence with failed experiments and disciplined time management (M5, M9, M10) give a lived-experience view of Renzulli\u0026rsquo;s task commitment. Also, the shift from early social preferences, like M12\u0026rsquo;s leadership versus others\u0026rsquo; solitude, to mature professional collaboration shows how social skills develop in a dynamic way. This dynamic development aligns with models like Gagn\u0026eacute;\u0026rsquo;s DMGT.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results also extend these established models by clearly articulating the domain-specific mechanisms at work. The study isolates chemistry-specific expressions of more general traits. For instance, openness is revealed not simply as intellectual curiosity; instead, it emerges as the adaptive problem-solving necessitated by a lack of equipment (M2). Openness also appears as applying ideas to real-world situations (M6). In addition, passion develops from early inspiration into a driving force for specialized, expert investigation (M6's perfume chemistry project). Additionally, the critical role of project management and accountability within research teams adds a very significant professional-skill dimension. Earlier talent frameworks often overlook this as they focus mainly on academic achievement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen taken together, these findings sharpen theoretical insight. They show how the abstract elements of talent models interact in concrete ways and change within the professional environment of a scientific discipline. The findings underpin and extend Dai's Evolving Complexity Theory, which emphasizes adaptation and system interaction along the course of development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec40\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e5.4.2 Practical Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings of this study provide actionable and evidence-based guidance for the stakeholders involved in developing scientific talent. For educators and mentors, the results emphasize the necessity of moving beyond pure content delivery to intentionally nurture the non-cognitive foundations of long-term excellence. Curricula and pedagogy should be designed to foster self-exploration and passion-driven inquiry in a way that allows students to connect chemistry to personal interests, as exemplified by Participant M6\u0026rsquo;s specialized perfume project. In addition, laboratory experiences should be structured to include \u0026ldquo;productive failure\u0026rdquo; opportunities that build perseverance and adaptive problem-solving skills, matching the real challenges described by the study participants. Finally, students need clear instruction and practice in team collaboration, communication, and project management to prepare them for the collaborative reality of professional scientific research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor academic leaders and policymakers, the study highlights the need to design institutional structures that support professional development. Key initiatives should include formalizing and incentivizing mentorship networks. As participants M10 and M14 showed, guiding others benefits both mentor and mentee. Robust funding for conference attendance and external collaboration is also critical. Participants consistently said these activities were pivotal for networking, visibility, and innovation. Institutions should develop holistic talent development programs. These programs should address the interplay of personal traits, social skill growth, and professional socialization. They should not focus only on academic achievement. Stakeholders will be better able to foster the growth of the next generation of professional chemists when a support system is put in place to effectively respond to these interrelated personal, social, and motivational dimensions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, this study aimed to identify personal factors\u0026mdash;such as individual traits, social skills, and intrinsic motivations \u0026mdash; that contribute to the development of talent among individuals with notable achievements in chemistry, based on their personal experiences. Data was collected through individual interviews conducted by phone, via Zoom, and through face-to-face interviews, with 18 male and female participants who met the study criteria in Saudi Arabia. The data was analyzed qualitatively and inductively, resulting in eight categories that were discussed individually.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe categories included: developing social spirit, fostering intrinsic motivation through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences, specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness and readiness for change, professional development and mastering project management, and shouldering professional accountability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study findings highlighted the importance of social skills, particularly in the post-university stage. Despite variations in the participants\u0026rsquo; social abilities and initiatives, these differences did not significantly hinder their productivity. The study also revealed that openness and readiness for change and professional development were crucial factors in nurturing the talents of chemists, which enabled them to keep pace with scientific advancements, build professional networks, and contribute to collaborative research environments. Additionally, the results pinpointed the participants\u0026rsquo; early motivation, which enhanced their scientific interests and self-confidence, contributing to their commitment and perseverance in completing their studies or engaging in scientific experiments related to their specializations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Considerations in the Study:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research adheres to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki regarding studies involving human subjects. All participants provided informed consent before the survey, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout the research process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProofreading Declaration:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGrammarly (subscribed, non-AI version) was used solely for grammar and proofreading. No AI-generated content was involved in preparing this manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants were fully informed about the purpose of the research, the procedures involved, and their right to withdraw at any time without any negative consequences. Participation was entirely voluntary, and all participants provided their consent prior to data collection.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Authors' Contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was a collaborative effort among the following contributors:\u0026nbsp;Asma Alomari\u0026nbsp;led the conceptualisation of the research framework and supervised the overall study design. Sumaihan Naser Alrashidi contributed significantly to developing the methodology, data collection, and analysis procedures. Atef Abdallah Bahrawi\u0026nbsp;focused on interpreting the results, drafting the manuscript, and integrating theoretical and practical implications. All authors reviewed, refined, and approved the final version of the manuscript, ensuring accuracy, coherence, and alignment with the research objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent to Publish\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInformed consent to publish was obtained from all participants included in the study. Participants consented to the publication of anonymized data and findings derived from their participation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards for research involving human participants. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, in accordance with the ethical guidelines and regulations governing research involving human subjects at the university (KFU254415).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThird-Party Material\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e: No\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability Statement:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUpon a reasonable request, the supporting data of this study can be provided by the corresponding author.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia [Grant No. KFU254415].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTransparency Statement:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe author confirms that all aspects of the research have been reported transparently, with comprehensive and precise descriptions of methods, data, and analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical trial number\u003c/strong\u003e: not applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbdul Karim R. Qualitative research in education. 2nd ed. Al-Rushd Book Store; 2019.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAjayi OB, Moosa M, Aloka PJO. Relationship between career interest and career decision-making of grade 12 learners in township secondary schools in South Africa. Athens J Educ. 2023;10(2):307\u0026ndash;22. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-2-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.30958/aje.10-2-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAl-Jughaiman A. Scientific directory of planning professional tracks for gifted students. Qandi for Printing, Publishing, and Distribution; 2019.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmerstorfer CM, von M\u0026uuml;nster-Kistner C. Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Front Psychol. 2021;12:713057. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAvargil S. Learning chemistry: Self-efficacy, chemical understanding, and graphing skills. J Sci Edu Technol. 2019;28(3):285\u0026ndash;98. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10956-018-9765-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarrick MR, Mount MK, Gupta R. Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland's occupational types. Pers Psychol. 2003;56(1):45\u0026ndash;74. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBasimin M, Habiddin H, Joharmawan R. Higher order thinking skills and visual representations of chemical concepts: A literature review. Hydrogen: J Kependidikan Kimia. 2023;11(6):1\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v11i6.10173\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.33394/hjkk.v11i6.10173\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBath DM, Smith CD. The relationship between epistemological beliefs and the propensity for lifelong learning. Stud Continuing Educ. 2009;31(2):173\u0026ndash;89. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927758\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01580370902927758\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBetts GT, Neihart M. Profiles of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Q. 1988;32(2):248\u0026ndash;53. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200202\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/001698628803200202\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBjork RA, Dunlosky J, Kornell N. Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Ann Rev Psychol. 2013;64:417\u0026ndash;44. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77\u0026ndash;101. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1191/1478088706qp063oa\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen C, Mao Y. (2016). College students' research on the training mode of innovation ability for the Independent College of Guangdong Province. In \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Education\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 1\u0026ndash;6). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/icte2016/4778\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.12783/dtcse/icte2016/4778\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChichekian T, Vallerand RJ. Passion for science and the pursuit of scientific studies: The mediating role of rigid and flexible persistence and activity involvement. Learn Individual Differences. 2022;93:102104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102104\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102104\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026Ccedil;itil M. The comparison of the social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence of gifted students and their non-gifted peers. Int J Progressive Educ. 2020;16(2):26\u0026ndash;41. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.18\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.18\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClark B. (2012). \u003cem\u003eGrowing up gifted\u003c/em\u003e (8th ed.). Pearson.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCosta PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCreswell JW. In: Qahtani A, editor. Designing research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Trans.). Dar Al-Masileh for Publishing and Distribution; 2019. (Original work published 2018).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCreswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. SAGE; 2018.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY. The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. Teachers College; 2010.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY. Envisioning a new foundation for gifted education: Evolving Complexity Theory (ECT) of talent development. Gifted Child Q. 2017;61(3):172\u0026ndash;82. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217709183\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0016986217709183\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY. New directions in talent development research: A developmental systems perspective. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2019;2019:177\u0026ndash;97. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20302\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/cad.20302\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY. (2021). Evolving complexity theory (ECT) of talent development: A new vision for gifted and talented education. In R. J. Sternberg \u0026amp; D. Ambrose, editors, \u003cem\u003eConceptions of giftedness and talent\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 99\u0026ndash;122). Palgrave Macmillan. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY, Chen F. Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Q. 2013;57(3):151\u0026ndash;68. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0016986213490020\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDai DY, Renzulli JS. Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Q. 2008;52(2):114\u0026ndash;30. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319302\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0016986208319302\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDen Hertog JH. (2016). \u003cem\u003eX-factor for innovation: Identifying future excellent professionals\u003c/em\u003e [Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente]. University of Twente Research Repository. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036542531\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3990/1.9789036542531\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDenzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 5th ed. SAGE; 2017.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeYoung CG. Openness/Intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In: Mikulincer M, Shaver PR, editors. APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences. American Psychological Association; 2014. pp. 369\u0026ndash;99.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDunn EL, Lawrence GP, Gottwald VM, Hardy J, Holliss B, Oliver SJ, Woodman T. (2024). Thirty years of longitudinal talent development research: A systematic review and meta-aggregation. \u003cem\u003eInternational Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology\u003c/em\u003e. Advance online publication. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2024.2309623\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/1750984X.2024.2309623\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eElliott S, Anthony C, Murthy H. Teaching social skills that enable learning and healthy relationships in high-achieving students. Gifted Educ Int. 2024;41(1):32\u0026ndash;56. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241300908\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/02614294241300908\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFeist GJ, Barron FX. Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. J Res Pers. 2003;37(2):62\u0026ndash;88. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFeldhusen JF. Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 46\u0026ndash;79. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1017/CBO9780511610455.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGagn\u0026eacute; F. From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 98\u0026ndash;119.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGardner H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books; 1983.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGatzka TJ. (2023). \u003cem\u003eOpenness and academic success in postsecondary education\u003c/em\u003e [Doctoral dissertation, Universit\u0026auml;t Konstanz]. Konstanz Online Publication System. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-1w6qgf803h569\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-1w6qgf803h569\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGreene J, Stockard J, Lewis P, Richmond GL. Coach career development workshops for science and engineering faculty: Views of the career impact on women chemists and chemical engineers. J Chem Educ. 2010;87(4):385\u0026ndash;90. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/ed800043w\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1021/ed800043w\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGriep Y. Capturing the process of academic commitment: A taxonomy and test of post-secondary student academic commitment trajectories. High Educ Res Dev. 2021;41(10):1900\u0026ndash;15. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1967886\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07294360.2021.1967886\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHauss K. (2021). What are the social and scientific benefits of participating in academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany. \u003cem\u003eResearch Evaluation, 30\u003c/em\u003e(3), 331\u0026ndash;343. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa028\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/reseval/rvaa028\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHu\u0026eacute;scar Hern\u0026aacute;ndez E, Moreno-Murcia JA, Cid L, Monteiro D, Rodrigues F. Passion or perseverance? The effect of perceived autonomy support and grit on academic performance in college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062143\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph17062143\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Article 2143.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIto M, Guti\u0026eacute;rrez K, Livingstone S, Penuel B, Rhodes J, Salen K, Schor J, Sefton-Green J, Watkins SC. Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub; 2013. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48114/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJang J, Chung Y, Choi Y, Kim S-W. Exploring the characteristics of science-gifted students' task commitment. J Korean Association Sci Educ. 2013;33(1):1\u0026ndash;16. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJarvin L, Subotnik RF. Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in classical music performance. Roeper Rev. 2010;32(2):78\u0026ndash;87. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/02783191003587868\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/02783191003587868\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJudge TA, Higgins CA, Thoresen CJ, Barrick MR. The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Pers Psychol. 1999;52(3):621\u0026ndash;52. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00174.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKaufman SB, Quilty LC, Grazioplene RG, Hirsh JB, Gray JR, Peterson JB, DeYoung CG. Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. J Pers. 2015;84(2):248\u0026ndash;58. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jopy.12156\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKim YK, Sax LJ. The effects of student\u0026ndash;faculty interaction on academic self-concept: Does academic major matter? Res High Educt. 2014;55(8):780\u0026ndash;809. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9335-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11162-014-9335-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKunat B, Szorc K. Developing creativity and passion in students at the Talent Academy\u0026mdash;Youth University of Real Education. Kultura i Edukacja. 2024;4:139\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2024.04.08\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.15804/kie.2024.04.08\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKurniasih NR, Harta I. (2018). Task commitment: Concept, characteristic, and its relationship to student mathematics achievements. In \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS)\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 141\u0026ndash;146).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLawal BM. Structural equation model of academic mindset, motivation, perseverance, engagement, and secondary school students' performance in economics in South-West, Nigeria. J Social Educational Res. 2023;2(2):85\u0026ndash;93.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLent RW, Brown SD. Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. J Vocat Behav. 2019;115. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Article 103316.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLePine JA, Colquitt JA, Erez A. Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Pers Psychol. 2000;53(3):563\u0026ndash;93. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE; 1985.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLinn MC, Palmer E, Baranger A, Gerard E, Stone E. Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. Science. 2015;347(6222). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eArticle 1261757. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261757\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"Article 1261757. 10.1126/science.1261757\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLockhart ME, Kwok O-M, Yoon M, Wong R. An important component to investigating STEM persistence: The development and validation of the science identity (SciID) scale. Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003eArticle 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00351-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"Article 34. 10.1186/s40594-022-00351-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuo L, Stoeger H. Developing eminence in STEMM: An interview study with talent development and STEMM experts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1521(1):112\u0026ndash;31. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14968\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nyas.14968\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLynch S, Simpson C. Social skills: Laying the foundation for success. Dimensions Early Child. 2010;38(2):3\u0026ndash;12.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMishra A, Lee H, Jeoung S, Torvik VI, Diesner J. Patterns of diversity in biomedical co-authorships: An analysis across authors' ethnicity, gender, age, and expertise. PLoS ONE. 2025;20(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316890\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0316890\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Article e0316890.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMun K, Ham EH. An analysis of the relationship of grit, interest, task-commitment, self-regulation ability, and science achievement of high school students. J Korean Association Sci Educ. 2016;36(3):445\u0026ndash;55. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0445\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0445\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNamazova N. Changing the level of education and career choice depending on the socioeconomic status of the family: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Sustainability. 2023;15(22). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su152215845\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/su152215845\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. Article 15845.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNeihart M. The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Rev. 1999;22(1):10\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/0278319990955399\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/0278319990955399\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNguyen TH, Duong THN. An assessment of factors influencing career choices among fresh graduates: A survey of students majoring in business and economics. J Int Econ Manage. 2022;22(1):78\u0026ndash;99. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.38203/jiem.022.1.0043\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.38203/jiem.022.1.0043\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOlszewski-Kubilius P, Subotnik RF, Worrell FC. Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Stud. 2015;26(2):195\u0026ndash;210. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1088586\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13598139.2015.1088586\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeterson SJ. Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Q. 2009;53(4):280\u0026ndash;2. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0016986209346946\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePreckel F, Golle J, Grabner R, Jarvin L, Kozbelt A, M\u0026uuml;llensiefen D, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Schneider W, Subotnik R, Vock M, Worrell FC. Talent development in achievement domains: A psychological framework for within- and cross-domain research. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15(3):691\u0026ndash;722. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895030\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1745691619895030\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRenzulli JS. Emerging conceptions of giftedness: Building a bridge to the new century. Exceptionality. 2002;10(2):67\u0026ndash;75. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1207/S15327035EX1002_2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRenzulli JS. The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 246\u0026ndash;79.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRibes C. Strategies for success as an industrial chemist. Pure Appl Chem. 2018;90(10):1543\u0026ndash;50. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0718\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1515/pac-2018-0718\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRobinson KA, Perez T, Carmel JH, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Science identity development trajectories in a gateway college chemistry course: Predictors and relations to achievement and STEM pursuit. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2019;56:180\u0026ndash;92. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRogers CR. Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Constable; 2003.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRoy P, Mishra A. Mapping eminence and expertise of talented STEM students\u0026mdash;A study of talent development from India. Gifted Talented Int. 2021;36(1\u0026ndash;2):82\u0026ndash;92. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2021.1960878\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/15332276.2021.1960878\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuiz-Alfonso Z, Le\u0026oacute;n J. The role of passion in education: A systematic review. Educational Res Rev. 2016;19:173\u0026ndash;88. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.09.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.edurev.2016.09.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRyan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68\u0026ndash;78. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShechtman Z, Silektor A. Social competencies and difficulties of gifted children compared to nongifted peers. Roeper Rev. 2012;34(1):63\u0026ndash;72. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.627555\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/02783193.2012.627555\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSilverman LK. Asynchronous development. In: Neihart M, Reis SM, Robinson NM, Moon SM, editors. The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Prufrock; 2002. pp. 31\u0026ndash;40.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSimonton DK. (1992). The child parents the adult: On getting genius from giftedness. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, \u0026amp; D. L. Ambroson, editors, \u003cem\u003eTalent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 278\u0026ndash;297). Trillium Press.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoldz S, Vaillant GE. The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. J Res Pers. 1999;33(2):208\u0026ndash;32. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSoles KL. (2020). \u003cem\u003eRelationship between the Big Five and creative self-beliefs in undergraduates in terms of college enrollment and major\u003c/em\u003e (Publication No. 1703347) [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas]. UNT Digital Library. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1703347/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1703347/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSternberg RJ. Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. Cambridge University Press; 2003.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSternberg RJ. The WICS model of giftedness. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 327\u0026ndash;42.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSternberg RJ, Kaufman JC. (2018). Theories and conceptions of giftedness. In S. Pfeiffer, editor, \u003cem\u003eHandbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 29\u0026ndash;47). Springer. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSturgeon R. Expanding collaborations with Brazilian scientists. Brazilian J Anal Chem. 2024;11(44):1\u0026ndash;3. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.point-of-view-n44\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.point-of-view-n44\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSubotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011;12(1):3\u0026ndash;54. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1529100611418056\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSubotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. Environmental factors and personal characteristics interact to yield high performance in domains. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2804. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02804\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSubotnik RF, Olszewski-Kubilius P, Worrell FC. The role of insider knowledge in the trajectories of highly accomplished scientists. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2023;1527(1):84\u0026ndash;96. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15034\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/nyas.15034\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSubramanian S. (2020). The importance of conferences and networking in PhD and postdoctoral training. \u003cem\u003eCurrent Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques, 21\u003c/em\u003e(1), e44. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.44\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/cpet.44\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTang X, Wang M-T, Guo J, Salmela-Aro K. Building grit: The longitudinal pathways between mindset, commitment, grit, and academic outcomes. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;48(5):850\u0026ndash;63. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-00998-0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10964-019-00998-0\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrolian TL, Jach EA, Hanson JM, Pascarella ET. Influencing academic motivation: The effects of student\u0026ndash;faculty interaction. J Coll Student Dev. 2016;57(7):810\u0026ndash;26. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0080\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1353/csd.2016.0080\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan de Vijver A, Mathijssen S. A philosophical approach to talent development. Roeper Rev. 2024;46(1):27\u0026ndash;38. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2285053\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/02783193.2023.2285053\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVogel FR, Human-Vogel S. Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. High Educ Res Dev. 2016;35(6):1298\u0026ndash;310. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWong PYJ, Wong KL, Ghoh C, Chiu MYL. Supervision of supervisory practice: From idea to practice. Int Social Work. 2022;66(6):1918\u0026ndash;31. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/00208728211073648\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/00208728211073648\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZiegler A, Phillipson SN. Exceptionality and gifted education: A theory-based review of current conceptualizations. High Ability Stud. 2012;23(2):127\u0026ndash;43. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2012.738329\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13598139.2012.738329\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZysberg L, Schwabsky N. School climate, academic self-efficacy, and student achievement. Educational Psychol. 2020;41(4):467\u0026ndash;82. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1813690\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/01443410.2020.1813690\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Chemical sciences, Great accomplishments, Nurturing the gifted, Personal factors, Self-motivation, The distinguished","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDue to the increasing need for specialists in sciences distinguished for great accomplishments, examining the factors influencing their talent development has become important. Such factors affect the field and service practices of the talented and distinguished. Based on that significance, the current study aims to identify personal factors linked to an individual\u0026rsquo;s traits, social skills, and self-motivations. This helps develop the talents of individuals distinguished for accomplishments in chemistry in light of their personal experiences. The study employed a qualitative approach, utilizing quasi-structured interviews as a primary research tool. (18) participants were selected, to whom the study standards in Saudi Arabia apply. The qualitative data were analyzed through coding and classification. The results revealed that (8) groups could contribute to talent development incorporated in: developing team spirit, reinforcing personal inclinations through self-exploration, perseverance and commitment, openness to new experiences and experiments, passion-driven specialization, awareness of academic relationships, openness and readiness for change, vocational development, mastering project management, and shouldering professional responsibility; alongside other groups that support these dimensions. Such results help establish a cognitive framework to guide specialized educational and professional practices, serving the gifted more effectively. They also pave the way for deeper future studies on the dynamics and development of scientific talent.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Educational Pathways and Personal Factors Associated with Distinguished Achievement in Chemistry","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-01-22 14:16:52","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8410793/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9ac1b876-4d5d-4434-b486-95a3bfb796a1","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 22nd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-01T08:38:21+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-01-22 14:16:52","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8410793","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8410793","identity":"rs-8410793","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}