Indications and Efficacy of Progestogen-Monotherapy as Menopause Hormone Therapy: A Narrative Review

review public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-29

Progestogen monotherapy effectively treats menopausal symptoms and offers benefits for sleep and bone health in women with estrogen contraindications, though more research is needed on long-term safety.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and other manifestations of menopause; however, its use is limited in women with contraindications to oestrogen. Progestogen monotherapy, though historically underutilized, represents a viable alternative in this population. This narrative review summarizes the indications, efficacy, and limitations of progestogen monotherapy as MHT. A structured literature search identified systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies evaluating progestogen monotherapy for menopausal symptom management, bone health, and oncologic safety. Evidence supports its use in patients with contraindications specific to oestrogen, including those with certain gynecologic malignancies (e.g., low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, select ovarian cancers), prior venous thromboembolism, coronary artery disease, compensated liver disease, and endometriosis. Contraindications to progestogen monotherapy are limited to unexplained abnormal vaginal bleeding and personal history of breast cancer, with caution utilised in patients with meningioma. Clinical data demonstrate that progestogens provide significant VMS relief, with efficacy observed across oral, intramuscular, and transdermal preparations. Micronized progesterone shows additional benefits for sleep quality, while synthetic progestins such as medroxyprogesterone acetate, megestrol acetate, and norethindrone acetate variably confer bone protection. Effects on mood appear neutral overall. Breast cancer risk associated with progestogen monotherapy remains uncertain due to limited and underpowered studies. Despite promising evidence, research is constrained by heterogeneous methodologies, small sample sizes, and lack of contemporary trials directly comparing progestogen monotherapy with standard MHT or nonhormonal alternatives. In conclusion, progestogen monotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated, and under-recognized therapeutic option for women with contraindications to oestrogen-containing MHT. Its optimal use may be tailored to clinical context: micronized progesterone for sleep disturbance, norethindrone acetate for bone health, or progestins with known antineoplastic properties in hormone-sensitive tumours. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to better define long-term safety and efficacy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 17
hormone estrogen progestogen progestogen estrogen progestogen progesterone progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate megestrol acetate norethisterone acetate progestogen progesterone progestin
organisms 1
noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:11:53.302379+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:07:14.604116+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-12T09:48:33.364277+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine