Abstract
Background: Dydrogesterone has been in use for over 60 years and has demon strated a favorable
efficacy and safety balance across multiple obstetric and gynecologica l indications. Despite the
extensive literature on dydrogesterone, studies on dydrogesterone utilizati on patterns are largely
lacking in Indian patients
Aim: To assess the dydrogesterone dosing patterns in Indian women with recurrent pregnancy loss,
infertility due to luteal phase deficit, and gynecological conditions su ch as endometriosis in the real-
world setting.
Methodology: A rigorous literature search was performed by an information specialist c linician for
relevant publications using databases. 63 Gynecologists from across India wit h at least 10 years of
experience were invited to participate in the web-based survey.
Results
65% experts opined that a 12-week treatment with dydrogesterone is optimal for achieving
positive outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. Treatment till term was preferred by
28.57% of experts, reflecting a practice of continuing dydro gesterone SR therapy throughout
pregnancy. In patients at risk of first-trimester abortion, the most preferre d regimen (46.03%) was a 40
mg oral loading dose of dydrogesterone followed by 10 mg orall y three times daily until 12 completed
weeks of gestation or 1 week after bleeding stops, The 40 mg dydr ogesterone dose followed by 20 mg
SR daily was preferred by 36.51% respondents. In endometriosis, the m ost preferred dosing regimen
(39.68%) was 10 mg of dydrogesterone twice daily for six months, startin g from the 5th day of the
menstrual cycle. The 20 mg SR per day dose was preferred by 66.67% for treating pe lvic pain in
women with endometriosis. The 10 mg twice-per-day dose (53.9 7%) was widely regarded as effective
for managing dysmenorrheal. The 20 mg SR regimen was the prefe rred dose by 61.90% of respondents
in young women undergoing Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation with dydrogesterone to suppress
LH pulse surge under stimulation in an oocyte donor programme. 90.48% of respondents reported
observing a dose-dependent improvement in outcomes in patients undergoing ART.
Conclusion
Oral dydrogesterone carries the least risk of miscarriage while treating threatened abortion
and recurrent pregnancy loss as compared to other progesterone. Dyd rogesterone is now emerging as a
preferred progesterone in both obstetric and gynecological disorders in the real-world setting in India.
Keywords
Dydrogesterone, recurrent abortion, endometriosis, pregnancy, ART
Introduction
Dydrogesterone has been in use for over 60 years and has dem onstrated a favorable efficacy
and safety balance across multiple obstetric and gynecological indications [1, 2] . Amongst
diverse progesterone-deficient obstetrical conditions such as recurrent pregnancy loss and
infertility due to luteal phase deficit, Dydrogesterone has been proven to be effec tive and
safe. In fact, dydrogesterone is the most commonly prescribed progesterone during
pregnancy [3, 4, 5] . Dydrogesterone is also useful in the management of diverse gyneco logical
conditions such as endometriosis, dysfunctional uterine bleeding, secondary amenorrhea,
irregular menstrual cycles, and premenstrual syndrome [3, 4, 5].
Dydrogesterone is a stereoisomer of progesterone that is pharmacologically close to
endogenous progesterone [6, 7, 8, 9]. It has high oral bioavailability and is more specific or more
selective for progesterone receptors than micronized progesterone. Therefore, a 10-20 times
lower oral dose than micronized progesterone is required to exert the pharmacological action
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2025; 7(1): 57-62
~ 58 ~
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.obstetricsjournals.com
[6, 7, 8] . Several studies have shown that dydrogesterone
directly stimulates progesterone receptors without affecting
progesterone levels. Dydrogesterone also binds 50% more to
the receptor than progesterone itself [7].
Oral dydrogesterone is associated with the lowest risk of
miscarriage in women with threatened abortion and
recurrent pregnancy loss as compared to other progesterones
[3, 4, 5] . Oral micronized progesterone has limited use in
clinical practice because it undergoes extensive first-pass
metabolism and has a relatively low bioavailability [9]. The
dosing of dydrogesterone varies depending upon the
indication (Table 1).
Table 1: Doses of dydrogesterone in some obstetrics and gynecology indications
Indication Dose of dydrogesterone
Endometriosis 1 to 3 tablets of Dydrogesterone (10 mg) from the 5th to the 25th day of the cycle or for the entire cycle. Dosages of 10
mg several times a day should be spread over the day. Treatment should start at the highest dose
Dysmenorrhoea 1 to 2 tablets of Dydrogesterone (10 mg) to be given from the 5th to the 25th day of the cycle.
Infertility as a result
of corpus luteum
insufficiency
1 tablet of Dydrogesterone (10 mg) every day from the 14th to the 25th day of the cycle.
Treatment should be continued for at least 6 consecutive cycles.
It is advisable to continue this treatment for the first months of any pregnancy at dosages as indicated for habitual
abortion.
Threatened abortion
4 tablets of Dydrogesterone at once, followed by 1 tablet of Dydrogesterone mg every 8 hours. Dosages of 10 mg
several times a day should be spread over the day. It is recommended that treatment should start at the highest dose. If
the symptoms persist or recur during the treatment, the dose should be increased by 1 tablet of Dydrogesterone every 8
hours. The effective dose should be maintained for one week after symptoms have ceased; it can then be gradually
reduced. If the symptoms recur, the treatment should be resumed immediately at the effective dose.
Habitual abortion
1 tablet of Dydrogesterone 10 mg per day up to the 20th week of pregnancy; the dose can then be gradually reduced.
Treatment should preferably be started before conception. If the symptoms of threatened abortion occur during
treatment, treatment should be continued as described for that indication.
Despite the extensive literature on dydrogesterone, studies
on dydrogesterone utilization patterns are largely lacking in
Indian patients. Therefore, the present surveillance study
was conducted with the objective of assessing the
dydrogesterone dosing patterns in Indian women with
conditions such as dysfunctional uterine bleeding,
endometriosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, and assisted
reproductive technology (ART) in the real-world setting.
Aim
To assess the dydrogesterone dosing patterns in Indian
women with recurrent pregnancy loss, infertility due to
luteal phase deficit, and gynecological conditions such as
endometriosis in the real-world setting
Methodology
The expert opinions were elicited according to an a priori
protocol, with the following steps: (1) Perform a systematic
literature review, (2) Invite the expert gynecologists to
answer a web-based questionnaire about the use of
dydrogesterone, and (3) Analyze the opinions of the expert
gynecologists and develop the report and manuscript for
publication based on survey results.
Literature Review for Framing the questionnaire for the
web-based survey
A rigorous literature search was performed by an
information specialist clinician for relevant publications
using databases in English, including PubMed, Web of
Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The keywords
included dydrogesterone, luteal phase support, threatened
abortion recurrent abortion, assisted reproductive
technology, and hormone replacement therapy. A structured
questionnaire was prepared after the literature review
Selection of experts
63 Gynecologists from across India with at least 10 years of
experience were invited to participate in the web-based
survey. Each gynecologist shared the experience of the past
10 patients they had treated with dydrogesterone.
Collection of data and analysis
The web-based survey forms were retrieved, and data was
collated. Analysis of the cumulative data was used to
prepare the report and subsequent manuscript for
publication, the experts ratified the findings of the report
and approved the final manuscript.
Recurrent pregnancy loss
Background
According to the European Society of Human Reproduction
and Embryology (ESHRE) guidelines, recurrent pregnancy
loss (RPL) is defined as the loss of two or more pregnancies.
The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)
defines RPL as the loss of two or more clinical pregnancies.
Neither of these definitions requires the pregnancies to be
consecutive, although most women with RPL do experience
a consecutive loss. About 5% of women experience RPL.
Approximately 23 million pregnancy losses occur globally
every year, which is estimated to account for 15-20% of all
clinically recognized pregnancies. Progesterone plays a
critical role in the maintenance of pregnancy, and
progesterone supplementation is useful in reducing the risk
of pregnancy loss [10]. Several mechanisms may explain the
positive effect of dydrogesterone treatment in RPL patients.
One of the most important explanations is the
immunomodulatory effect [11] . Dydrogesterone significantly
down-regulated the secretion of the Th1 cytokines IFN- α
and TNF- γ and the Th17 cytokine IL -17A and IL-23 [12] .
Compared to vaginal progesterone, oral dydrogesterone has
been proven to be superior in preventing per vaginal
bleeding and prolonging the viability of the pregnancy until
the end of the second trimester [13] . Several studies have
found positive effects of dydrogesterone treatment in RPL
patients. A randomized controlled trial conducted by [14]
reported that women who were treated with dydrogesterone
had reduced chances of spontaneous abortion as compared
to women in the control group, who received no additional
treatment (13.4% vs. 29%, respectively; p-value ≤ 0.05 ) [14].
Dydrogesterone 40 mg stat dose followed by 10 mg twice a
day for one week provides corpus luteal support and has
~ 59 ~
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.obstetricsjournals.com
been shown to reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss in
threatened abortion during the first trimester in women
without a history of recurrent abortion [15].
Expert opinion on the preferred dosing regimen of
dydrogesterone in patients with recurrent pregnancy
loss to improve outcomes
In order to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss, 50.79% of
experts opined that the most preferred dosing regimen was a
regular dose of 10 mg twice daily. The loading dose of 40
mg followed by 10 mg as a maintenance dose was preferred
by 31.75% of experts. The lower-loading dose options (20
mg SR and 30 mg SR followed by 10 mg) were the least
preferred dosing regimen (17.46%).
Expert opinion on the duration of treatment with
dydrogesterone for positive outcomes in women with
recurrent pregnancy loss
The majority of respondents (65.08%) indicated that a 12-
week treatment duration is optimal for achieving positive
outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Treatment till term was preferred by 28.57% of experts,
reflecting a practice of continuing dydrogesterone SR
therapy throughout pregnancy in selected cases where
ongoing progesterone support is deemed necessary. Shorter
durations, such as 8 weeks and 10 weeks, were rarely
chosen (both 3.17%), indicating that clinicians do not
widely prefer stopping treatment before the first trimester is
completed.
Expert opinion regarding the dosing dydrogesterone
regimen they follow in patients at risk of abortion in the
first trimester
In patients at risk of first-trimester abortion, the most
preferred regimen (46.03%) was a 40 mg oral loading dose
followed by 10 mg orally three times daily until 12
completed weeks of gestation or 1 week after bleeding
stops, The 40 mg dose followed by 20 mg SR daily was
preferred by 36.51% respondents indicating its growing
acceptance among clinicians for convenience and sustained
therapeutic effect. The 30 mg SR daily dose was preferred
by 15.87% of respondents, while the 40 mg oral dose three
times daily was accepted by just 1.59% of respondents.
Endometriosis
Background
Endometriosis is characterized by chronic -
pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, infe rtility associated with
reduced ovarian reserve, diminished antral follicle count,
and anti -Müllerian hormone levels. Endometriosis has a
significant adverse impact on the health -related quality of
life (HR -QoL) and psychological well -being of affected
women [11]. Endometriosis is an estrogen -dependent
condition [11].
Dydrogesterone can induce atrophy in ectopic endometrial
tissue and inhibit the formation of de novo endometriotic
tissue while leaving the endometrium unaffected.
Dydrogesterone relieves. the symptoms of endometriosis.
Dydrogesterone can be used in women who are attempting
to become pregnant
[11].
There are two regimens of dydrogesterone used for treating
endometriosis: a prolonged cyclical regimen (between the
5th and the 25th days of the menstrual cycle) and a
continuous regimen, with doses ranging from 10 to 30 mg
daily Although dydrogesterone has been available for
several years, it is unknown whether these regimens are
comparable in terms of reducing the severity of
endometriosis-related pelvic pain and improving associated
HR-QoL parameters
[11]. A prolonged cyclical regimen of
dydrogesterone 20 or 30 mg daily taken between the 5th a nd
the 25th days of the menstrual cycle and a continuous
regimen of dydrogesterone 20 or 30 mg daily were effective
and achieved a comparable reduction in chronic pelvic pain.
A greater reduction of chronic pelvic pain in patients taking
dydrogesterone 30 mg daily [11].
Expert opinion regarding the dosing regimen of
dydrogesterone in women with mild endometriosis
In endometriosis, the most preferred dosing regimen
(39.68%) was 10 mg of dydrogesterone twice daily for six
months, starting from the 5th day of the menstrual cycle,
indicating that a longer treatment duration was favored for
managing mild endometriosis effectively. Shorter-duration
regimens such as 10 mg twice daily for three months
(30.16%) and 20 mg SR for three months (30.16%) were
equally preferred by a significant number of experts.
Expert opinion on the dydrogesterone regimen they
preferred in women with endometriosis
The cyclical regimen was the most preferred regimen
(53.97%), where dydrogesterone was administered from the
5th to the 25th day of the menstrual cycle. The continuous
regimen was preferred by 46.03% respondents with daily
doses of 10 mg to 30 mg SR. (Figure 1)
A. A cyclical regimen, from the 5th to the 25th days of the menstrual cycle
B. A continuous one, with daily doses ranging from 10mg to 30mg SR
Fig 1: Dydrogesterone regimen preferred in women with endometriosis
~ 60 ~
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.obstetricsjournals.com
Expert opinion on the dose of dydrogesterone that
significantly reduced pelvic pain in women with
endometriosis
The 20 mg SR per day dose was preferred by 66.67% for
treating pelvic pain in women with endometriosis. This
suggests that the majority of clinicians find this dose to
provide an optimal balance between efficacy and safety. The
30 mg SR per day dose was preferred by 30.16% of
respondents as the second most preferred option to be used
in patients who may require a higher dosage for more severe
pain symptoms. The 40 mg per day dose was rarely used
(3.17%) possibly due to concerns about side effects or lack
of additional benefit over lower doses.
Expert opinion on the dose of dydrogesterone useful in
women with dysmenorrhea
The 10 mg twice-per-day dose (53.97%) was widely
regarded as effective for managing dysmenorrhea in clinical
practice. The 20 mg SR per day dose was also highly
preferred (46.03%), demonstrating its utility as a sustained-
release option that simplifies dosing while providing
comparable efficacy. (Figure 2)
A. 10 mg per day twice per day for 21 days from the 5th to 25th day of each menstrual cycle.
B. 20 mg SR per day for 21 days from the 5th to 25th day of each menstrual cycle.
Fig 2: Dydrogesterone dose in women with dysmenorrhea
Luteal phase support
Background
The luteal phase is defined as the period between ovulation
and the onset of menses following luteolysis. During the
preovulatory peak of gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone
(LH) allows the transformation of granulosa cells into large
luteal cells, which ensures the production of progesterone.
During the luteal phase, LH allows the maintenance of
optimal secretion of progesterone. The subsequent secretory
transformation of the endometrium opens a short window of
implantation. The progesterone secreted by the corpus
luteum allows maintenance of pregnancy during part of the
first trimester. It has an immunomodulatory effect and
regulates sub endometrial blood flow, and helps to maintain
pregnancy by preventing embryo rejection. Dydrogesterone
efficacy and safety has been evaluated in several clinical
studies, and it has been demonstrated to be non-inferior to
micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP).
Oral dydrogesterone may potentially become a preferred
drug for luteal phase support in millions of women
undergoing In vitro fertilization (IVF) [16] . Oral
dydrogesterone 10 mg three times daily may replace
micronized vaginal progesterone as the standard of care for
luteal phase support in IVF, owing to the oral route being
more patient-friendly than intravaginal administration, as
well as it being a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment
[17].
In a meta-analysis, with daily administration of oral
dydrogesterone (20 to 40 mg) versus MVP capsules (600 to
800 mg) or gel (90 mg), the pregnancy or live birth rates in
women undergoing fresh cycle IV were compared. A higher
pregnancy rate and live birth rate were observed in women
receiving oral dydrogesterone versus MVP for luteal phase
support [9].
Expert opinion regarding the dose of dydrogesterone
given in young women undergoing Progestin-Primed
Ovarian Stimulation with dydrogesterone to suppress
LH pulse surge under stimulation in an oocyte donor
programme.
The 20 mg SR regimen was the preferred dose by 61.90% of
respondents, indicating that clinicians favor the sustained-
release option for its convenience, consistent efficacy, and
ability to maintain steady hormone levels throughout the
stimulation process. The 10 mg every 8 hours regimen
(38.10%) is also a widely used alternative, reflecting its
clinical utility in situations where immediate and consistent
hormone suppression is needed, albeit with a more frequent
dosing schedule.
Expert opinion regarding preferred dose of
dydrogesterone for luteal phase support in women
undergoing ART
The 10 mg bid dose (44.44%) was the most preferred
regimen, indicating its widespread use and perceived
efficacy for luteal phase support in women undergoing
Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). The 20 mg SR
dose was preferred by 38.1% of experts, reflecting the
advantages of convenience and consistent hormone levels.
The 30 mg SR dose was preferred by just 17.46% of
experts.
Expert opinion regarding dose dependent improvement
in outcomes in patients undergoing ART
90.48% of respondents reported observing a dose-dependent
improvement in outcomes in patients undergoing ART,
indicating a strong consensus that adjusting the dose of
dydrogesterone positively influences treatment success
rates. Only 9.52% opined that they did not observe dose-
dependent improvements, which might be due to either
~ 61 ~
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.obstetricsjournals.com
clinical variations, patient-specific factors, or alternative
treatment approaches.
Expert opinion on a dose-dependent change in
tolerability profile and adherence to treatment with
dydrogesterone in their patients undergoing art
69.84% of clinicians observed a dose-dependent change in
tolerability and adherence, indicating that dosage
adjustments directly impact patient experience and
compliance with dydrogesterone treatment during ART.
Expert opinion on dose-dependent risk of congenital
anomalies in women treated with dydrogesterone in the
first trimester for reducing the risk of abortion
The majority of respondents (74.60%) opined that there is
no dose-dependent risk of congenital anomalies associated
with the use of dydrogesterone in the first trimester to
reduce the risk of abortion. This reflects confidence in the
safety profile of dydrogesterone when used appropriately
during early pregnancy.
Conclusion
Dydrogesterone has been in use for over 60 years and has
demonstrated a favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability
profile across multiple obstetric and gynecological
indications. Dydrogesterone SR is the most commonly
prescribed progesterone during pregnancy. Oral
dydrogesterone carries the least risk of miscarriage while
treating threatened abortion and recurrent pregnancy loss as
compared to other progesterone. Various guidelines, such as
FOGSI, the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (ACOG) guidance, and ESHRE guidelines,
have discussed the studies of dydrogesterone in
endometriosis and recurrent pregnancy loss.
In order to prevent recurrent pregnancy loss, the most
preferred dosing regimen (50.79%) among respondents was
a regular dose of 10 mg twice daily. The loading dose of 40
mg followed by 10 mg as a maintenance dose is the second
most chosen option (31.75%). The majority of respondents
(65.08%) indicated that a 12-week treatment duration is
optimal for achieving positive outcomes in women with
recurrent pregnancy loss. In patients at risk of first-trimester
abortion, the most preferred regimen (46.03%) was a 40 mg
oral loading dose followed by 10 mg orally three times daily
until 12 completed weeks of gestation or 1 week after
bleeding stops. In endometriosis, the most preferred dosing
regimen (39.68%) was 10 mg of dydrogesterone twice daily
for six months, starting from the 5th day of the menstrual
cycle, indicating that a longer treatment duration was
favored for managing mild endometriosis effectively.
Shorter-duration regimens, such as 10 mg twice daily for
three months (30.16%) and 20 mg SR for three months
(30.16%), were equally preferred by a significant number of
experts. The 20 mg SR per day dose was preferred by
66.67% for treating pelvic pain in women with
endometriosis. The 10 mg twice-a-day dose of
dydrogesterone was preferred by 44.44% of experts,
indicating its widespread use and perceived efficacy for
luteal phase support in women undergoing ART. The 20 mg
SR dose was preferred by 38.1% experts owing to the
advantages of convenience and consistent hormone levels.
Dydrogesterone is now emerging as a preferred
progesterone in both obstetric and gynecological disorders
in the real-world setting in India.
Conflict of Interest: All authors have no conflict of interest
to declare.
Funding: The study was supported by Aristo
Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Mumbai.
Acknowledgment: None.
References
1. Queisser-Luft A. Dydrogesterone use during
pregnancy: overview of birth defects reported since
1977. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(6):375-377.
doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.12.016.
2. Katalinic A, Shulman LP, Strauss JF, Garcia-Velasco
JA, van den Anker JN, sixth author, et al . A critical
appraisal of safety data on dydrogesterone for the
support of early pregnancy: a scoping review and meta-
analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2022;45(2):365-373.
doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.03.032.
3. Lou C, Wang C, Zhao Q, Jin F. Effect of
dydrogesterone and progesterone on threatened
miscarriage due to corpus luteum insufficiency. Am J
Transl Res. 2021;13(5):4544-4552.
4. Verma S, Yadav P. To study the comparison between
oral dydrogesterone and micronized progesterone in
threatened miscarriage in terms of pain lower abdomen
and bleeding per vaginum. Ann Int Med Dent Res.
2020;7(1):11-15.
5. Zhao H, He W, Yang Z. A pairwise and network meta-
analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of
progestogens in threatened abortion. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 2022;156(3):383-393. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13707.
6. Ott J, Egarter C, Aguilera A. Dydrogesterone after 60
years: a glance at the safety profile. Gynecol
Endocrinol. 2022;38(4):279-287.
doi:10.1080/09513590.2021.2016692.
7. Carp HJ. Progestogens in obstetrics and gynecology.
2nd ed. Cham: Springer Nature; 2021.
8. Filicori M. Clinical roles and applications of
progesterone in reproductive medicine: an overview.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(Suppl 161):3-7.
doi:10.1111/aogs.12791.
9. Griesinger G, Blockeel C, Kahler E, Pexman-Fieth C,
Olofsson JI, Driessen S, et al . Dydrogesterone as an
oral alternative to vaginal progesterone for IVF luteal
phase support: a systematic review and individual
participant data meta-analysis. PLoS One.
2020;15(11):e0241044.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241044.
10. Tetruashvili N, Domar A, Bashiri A. Prevention of
pregnancy loss: combining progestogen treatment and
psychological support. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1827.
11. Bashiri A, Galperin G, Zeadna A, Baumfeld Y,
Wainstock T. Increased live birth rate with
dydrogesterone among patients with recurrent
pregnancy loss regardless of other treatments. J Clin
Med. 2023;12(5):1967.
12. AbdulHussain G, Azizieh F, Makhseed M, Raghupathy
R. Effects of progesterone, dydrogesterone and estrogen
on the production of Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines by
lymphocytes from women with recurrent spontaneous
miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol. 2020;140:103132.
13. Das R, Rout RR, Tiwari RVC, Tiwari HD, Ravuri P,
Kommuri S, Varma PK. Evaluation of per vaginal
~ 62 ~
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology https://www.obstetricsjournals.com
bleeding with different drugs in successful pregnancy in
patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: an original
research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022;14(Suppl
1):S193-S195.
14. El-Zibdeh MY. Dydrogesterone in the reduction of
recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Steroid Biochem Mol
Biol. 2005;97(5):431-434.
doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2005.08.007.
15. Omar MH, Mashita MK, Lim PS, Jamil MA.
Dydrogesterone in threatened abortion: pregnancy
outcome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;97(5):421-
425.
16. Patki A. Role of dydrogesterone for luteal phase
support in assisted reproduction. Reprod Sci.
2024;31(1):17-29.
17. Tournaye H, Sukhikh GT, Kahler E, Griesinger G. A
phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the
efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone
versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal
support in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod.
2017;32(5):1019-1027.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.