Variation of Structure and Cellular Functions of Type IA Topoisomerases across the Tree of Life.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 ⓘ

This review examines type IA topoisomerase mechanisms across Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, highlighting how conserved N-terminal domains combine with variable C-terminal sequences to facilitate essential cellular functions and contribute to human genetic disorders.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text ⓘ

This review examines the structural diversity and cellular functions of type IA topoisomerases, including Topo I, Topo III, and reverse gyrase, across Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. The authors detail how conserved N-terminal domains form a toroidal architecture that undergoes conformational changes to facilitate DNA strand passage and supercoiling regulation, while C-terminal domains diversify to interact with specific protein partners or nucleic acids. A key limitation noted is the variability in enzyme presence among species, such as the absence of Topo III in many bacteria compared to its near-universal presence in Archaea and Eukarya. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Topoisomerases regulate the topological state of cellular genomes to prevent impediments to vital cellular processes, including replication and transcription from suboptimal supercoiling of double-stranded DNA, and to untangle topological barriers generated as replication or recombination intermediates. The subfamily of type IA topoisomerases are the only topoisomerases that can alter the interlinking of both DNA and RNA. In this article, we provide a review of the mechanisms by which four highly conserved N-terminal protein domains fold into a toroidal structure, enabling cleavage and religation of a single strand of DNA or RNA. We also explore how these conserved domains can be combined with numerous non-conserved protein sequences located in the C-terminal domains to form a diverse range of type IA topoisomerases in Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. There is at least one type IA topoisomerase present in nearly every free-living organism. The variation in C-terminal domain sequences and interacting partners such as helicases enable type IA topoisomerases to conduct important cellular functions that require the passage of nucleic acids through the break of a single-strand DNA or RNA that is held by the conserved N-terminal toroidal domains. In addition, this review will exam a range of human genetic disorders that have been linked to the malfunction of type IA topoisomerase.
Full text 40,191 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Section 2

Topo I and Topo III both have well-conserved N-terminal domains and variable C-terminal domains. The N-terminal region of Topo I and Topo III has a common toroidal-shaped architecture, consisting of four individual domains (D1–D4). A unique feature of four-domain toroidal assembly is that the polypeptide chain travels back and forth within these domains ( Figure 1 ). The arrangement not only ensures connectivity between adjacent domains but also permits flexibility between them, which is crucial for the conformational changes necessary for multiple steps in the catalytic cycle of these enzymes. D1 is a typical Toprim (topoisomerase-primase) domain, a catalytic domain found in a broad range of proteins for catalyzing the breakup and formation of a phosphodiester bond [ 20 , 37 , 38 ]. The α/β fold domain is comprised of a central four-stranded parallel β-sheet, flanked by two α helices on each side ( Figure 1 ). The secondary structures of D1 are quite conserved in Topo I and Topo III. The absence of the β4 strand in Streptococcus mutans Topo I is an exception [ 39 ]. The Toprim domain hosts three conserved acidic residues that contribute to the catalytic site, one glutamate on the loop between β1 strand and α1 helix, and two aspartates in a DxD motif on the loop before α3 helix ( Figure 1 ). A Toprim domain often has an insert(s) for added function(s) [ 20 ]. D1 of Topo I and Topo III is characterized by a long insert between the β2 strand and α2 helix ( Figure 1 ). The insert is mostly independent of the core of D1 in its conformation. It has a minor contribution to the DNA-binding groove within D4, the major binding site of G-segment DNA. That was the reason why this insert was assigned as a part of D4 in our earlier reports [ 34 , 40 , 41 ]. However, for the convenience of the description of domain arrangement and consistency within other studies, we will refer to this protruding insert as a part of D1. The arch-like D2 was described earlier by Berger et al. [ 42 ] as a six-stranded anti-parallel β-barrel though it looks significantly different from a common β-barrel with two sets of extended β-strands (two hairpin-like motifs) that constitute the two sides of the structurally stable arch ( Figure 1 ). The arch itself is rather rigid and exhibits limited expansion even when a dsDNA is trapped within the central cavity [ 43 ]. Furthermore, the order of strands of the β-barrel is the same as the ferredoxin-reductase-like β-barrel [ 44 ], which has a pseudo-2-fold symmetry and two symmetry-related extended loops. A major part of the long loop between β5 and β6 strands is the charged front central loop. The loop between β2 and β3 strands on the back of the toroidal cavity contains multiple secondary structures, including the prominent α1 helix, as well as a charged sequence motif. The two loops in the front and on the back of the toroid cavity may both play a related role in the regulation of T-segment motion in and out of the central cavity [ 43 ]. Additionally, D2 seems to resemble the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding-fold (OB-fold), which is formed by two sets of three-stranded antiparallel β-sheets. The two β-sheets are packed through hydrogen bonds between their edge strands to form a β-barrel, commonly characterized by an α-helix at one end and DNA-binding site at the other end [ 45 , 46 ]. Since OB-fold proteins play critical roles in the maintenance of genome integrity [ 45 , 47 ], it could be interesting to explore the evolution pathway of D2. D3 is a domain of a four- or five-helix bundle. The first three and the last helices are conserved. The helical domain carries the most important catalytic tyrosine and a conserved neighboring arginine on the loop between the second and third helices ( Figure 1 ). The helical bundle domain itself does not have any significant conformational change upon G-segment or simultaneous G- and T- segments binding to Topo I [ 31 ], even though there is a substantial movement of the domain with respect to other domains. The presence of a possible DNA-binding helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif in the domain, like α1 and α2 helices and their linker, was once discussed [ 42 ] for the possibility that it could participate in DNA binding by inserting the HTH motif into the T-segment DNA major groove, particularly when the DNA is trapped inside the toroidal cavity. However, the determination of the T-segment binding structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Topo I (MtbTopoI) rules out this possibility and supports a binding mechanism that primarily involves interactions between positively charged and polar residues present on the rim of the central cavity and the DNA backbone of one T-segment strand [ 43 ]. D4 has eight well-defined helices and one β-hairpin motif ( Figure 1 ). This is the only N-terminal domain that exhibits noteworthy intra-domain conformational change, particularly upon the binding of G-segment DNA. The conformational change upon G-segment binding includes a rearrangement of helices so that the domain can tightly wrap the G-segment inside the DNA-binding groove ( Figure 2 A,B). The energy required for such an intra-domain conformational change is likely derived primarily from its interactions with G-segment DNA of a minimum length. Earlier experimental data indicate that a six-base ssDNA could not be cleaved by EcTopoI [ 48 ], which indicates the energy released from a six-base ssDNA’s interaction with the binding groove does not suffice to overcome the energy barrier for the intra-domain conformational change to place the oligo in a position for cleavage by the catalytic tyrosine. The key residues contributing to the catalytic site of Topo I and III are spatially separated in the apo structure ( Figure 1 ). The conformational change induced by the binding of the G-segment ssDNA moves the conserved glutamate and DxD motif in D1, the catalytic tyrosine and a conserved arginine in D3 close to one another, thereby forming a catalytic site proximal to the sugar-phosphate backbone of the ssDNA ( Figure 2 C). In this configuration, the catalytic tyrosine forms two hydrogen bonds with the scissile phosphate, one to the bridging 5′-oxygen and one to a non-bridging O atom. The strictly conserved neighboring arginine binds the G-segment ssDNA with a salt bridge and a hydrogen bond to a non-bridging O atom of the scissile phosphate. Additionally, the conserved glutamate from D1 participates in the formation of a hydrogen bond to the bridging 3′-oxygen of the scissile phosphate. Interestingly, the two aspartates from the DxD motif do not interact with the G-segment directly. Based on the conformation of the active site, a G-segment cleavage mechanism that involves proton relay was proposed [ 22 ]. A covalent bond is subsequently formed between the catalytic tyrosine and the 5′-end of the cleaved G-segment, which creates a covalent intermediate. As discussed earlier, D4 is the only N-terminal domain that undergoes intra-domain conformational change upon G-segment binding ( Figure 2 B). Alternations in the relative domain–domain orientation and inter-domain movements serve as the mechanistic foundation for the conformational changes adopted by four-domain N-terminal toroidal assembly during the distinct steps of the topoisomerase catalytic cycle ( Figure 2 D). The first evidence of interdomain movement was observed in the crystal structure of an EcTopoI fragment containing D2 and D3 only [ 49 ]. This structure shows the interdomain flexibility with a large relative rotation (up to 52°) between these two domains and, importantly, suggests a possible mechanism of opening the N-terminal toroid assembly for the transfer of the T-segment. However, such a large inter-domain rotation has not yet been observed in a full-length N-terminal domain structure. The Apo form of N-terminal domains is considered to be in a closed conformation, in which D1 and D4 associate with D3 through a range of non-covalent interactions to maintain the conserved toroidal shape. In a G-segment bound pre-cleavage or post-religation state [ 22 , 50 ], D3 moved away from D1 to create an interdomain space and an extended binding site for the 3′-end of the G-segment. The interdomain movement also reduces the contact between D3 and D4. Interestingly, in a crystal structure with a cleaved G-segment and the formation of a covalent intermediate [ 40 ], it is noteworthy that despite a cleaved single-stranded oligonucleotide substrate covalently attached to its catalytic tyrosine, D3 does not swing away from D1 and D4 to allow for the opening of the gate between D1 and D3. It seemingly suggests that interactions with a short oligo substrate used in crystallization may not provide sufficient driving force to facilitate the opening of the gate. Molecular packing inside the crystal may restrict the observation of all interdomain movement and related conformation of the enzyme throughout the various stages of its catalytic cycle. However, crystal structure can still provide insights into certain domain–domain movements relevant to the conformational change required for its functions. Our recently published MtbTopoI structure in complex with both G- and T-segments may represent a catalytic stage right after G-segment religation and before T-segment release form the central cavity [ 43 ]. The new structure provides more detailed information on inter-domain movement in comparison to Apo and G-segment bound-only structures. For example, the 3′ regions of the G-segment and D1 move closer to each other, creating a second kink of the G-segment. This association might potentially serve as a preparatory step for D3 to move away from D1 to open the protein gate. The movement of D3, in a combination of translation and rotation, reduces its contact with D1 and D4 significantly [ 43 ]. The arch-like D2 is expected to exhibit a certain level of flexibility in its connection to D3 and D4 because of its two loop-like links to each of these two domains. Small back-and-forth movement of D2 has been observed in apo structures from different crystals of EcTopoI [ 18 , 51 ] and MtbTopoI [ 22 , 41 ]. The relative D2 movement observed in G- and/or T-segment bound structures [ 31 , 34 , 40 , 43 ] could be a result of conformational changes induced by DNA-binding and molecular packing combined. However, in the structures with only G-segment bound, D2 tends to rotate backward slightly [ 22 , 40 , 50 ]. The two hinge joints from D2 to D3 and D4 have not been well defined. The core of the arch-like D2 is rigid, while its two extended side bases could serve as hinge joints (or parts of hinge joints) for the relative rotation of D2 with respect to D3 and D4. When the T-segment is captured inside the central bound structure, the distance between the two side bases at the bottom of D2 expands by about 3 Å [ 43 ]. In the early EcTopoI D2-D3 domains structure [ 49 ], the relative rotation between these two domains was attributed to being through a “break point”, which is a part of the D2 side base that connects to D3. Further exploration is needed to understand how this D2 movement is related to the mechanism of gate opening-and-closing.

Section 3

In contrast to highly conserved N-terminal domains, the C-terminal domains of Topo I and III are characterized by the variation in their sequences, as well as their numbers and orders of structural motifs. Two initially identified C-terminal domains are Topo_C_ZnRpt and Topo_C_Rpt, which are the two major types of C-terminal domains in bacterial Topo I [ 30 ]. The Topo_C_ZnRpt type domain contains a C4 zinc finger, which is relatively easy to recognize from the amino acid sequence, particularly in cases when there are multiple repeats of these domains. The five C-terminal domains of EcTopoI represent the prototype of the Topo_C_ZnRpt domain [ 52 , 53 ]. From the first to the last, they also show the degeneration of the C4 zinc finger during evolution and/or gene duplication. A typical Topo_C_ZnRpt domain is a four-stranded antiparallel β-sheet locked by a Zn-binding site formed by four cysteines on the top of the domain ( Figure 3 A) [ 34 ]. The first identifiable CXXC motif is situated immediately after the first strand, creating a so-called knuckle on β1_ β2 loop (first Zn knuckle, Figure 3 A). The other two ligand cysteines are on the β3_ β4 loop, forming a second but non-canonical knuckle (second Zn knuckle, Figure 3 A) with a variable spacer between two cysteines. According to the classification of Zn-fingers [ 54 ], the 4-Cys Zn finger fold formed from two knuckles with each from a β-hairpin is called a zinc ribbon [ 53 , 55 ]. Here, we consider the β1 strand, β1_β2 loop, and β2 strand together as one hairpin, and the β3 strand, β3_β4 loop, and β4 strand together as the second hairpin. The two hairpins make an angle because of the twist of the β-sheet. Therefore, domains D5, D6, and D7 of EcoTopo1 are called zinc ribbon domains [ 53 ]. Apparently, the 4-Cys zinc ribbon fold at one end of the domain helps stabilize these small β folds. The last two C-terminal domains (D8, D9) of EcTopoI retain the zinc ribbon fold [ 53 , 56 ] but have lost the cysteines for Zn-binding. The Topo_C_ZnRpt, along with other types of zinc finger motifs, such as zf-GRF and zf-CCHC, are present in Topo III sequences across the domains of life [ 30 , 33 , 57 ]. The zf-GRF in Caenorhabditis elegans Topo III has been shown to be important for its function in recombination [ 58 ]. While zinc fingers are absent in the C-terminal domains of Topo III from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other Ascomycota fungi, they are present in Topo III from many other fungal species [ 30 ]. The Topo_C_Rpt domain does not contain any zinc finger-forming cysteine residues. It was identified based on the repeats of sequence motifs in the C-terminal region of Topo I in Actinobacteria , and its existence was first confirmed in MtbTopoI [ 41 ]. The four Topo_C_Rpt domains present in M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis Topo I C-terminal domains (D5-D8) are considered prototypical, as they are each composed of an antiparallel four-stranded β-sheet and a C-terminal helix packed on one side of the twisted β-sheet ( Figure 3 B). The signature motif, G(R/K)(Y/F)GPY, is located at the β2_β3 turn and its vicinity. The highly positively charged insertion in the D6 domain of some Topo_C_Rpt domains forms part of the β3_β4 loop, which is partially disordered due to its high flexibility ( Figure 3 B). Interestingly, the crossing-over helix (α1) is capped by a very conserved threonine residue, which (residue number i) forms two hydrogen bonds using its sidechain to the amide group of i+3 and i+4 residues, respectively. The interaction between the α1 helix and β-sheet is highly hydrophobic, and their interface area forms a major part of the domain core. The α1 helix apparently stabilizes the four-stranded β-sheet of the Topo_C_Rpt domain. Both Topo_C_ZnRpt and Topo_C_Rpt are characterized by a common four-stranded β-sheet [ 30 ]. A highly conserved aromatic residue (first DNA binding site) is situated in the middle of the third strand, β3, which plays an important role in the interaction with ssDNA ( Figure 3 A,B) [ 31 , 34 ]. The interaction primarily involves π–π stacking between the sidechain of the aromatic residue and the nucleotide base of ssDNA ( Figure 3 C,D). These domains also contain a second nucleotide-binding site, which is contributed by another aromatic residue ( Figure 3 A,B). In Topo_C_ZnRpt, the aromatic residue of the second binding site could be located on the turn between β2 and β3 strands (β2_β3 turn) or on the loop between β3 and β4 strands ( Figure 3 A) [ 34 ]. A sequence motif G(R/K)(Y/F)G on the β2_β3 turn usually indicates a second nucleotide-binding site ( Figure 3 C). In Topo_C_Rpt, there is a common R(Y/F) motif on the β2_β3 turn ( Figure 3 B) [ 31 ]. The aromatic Y/F residue serves as the second nucleotide binding site through π–π stacking ( Figure 3 D) in a similar manner to the first binding site. Interestingly, the arginine, in turn, does not interact directly with DNA substrate in the currently available crystal structures ( Figure 3 C,D) [ 31 ]. It is possible that arginine may be involved in the initial substrate recruitment. Generally, one Topo_C_ZnRpt or one Topo_C_Rpt domain can bind two consecutive nucleotides of a ssDNA substrate ( Figure 3 C,D). It is likely that any domains lacking characteristic aromatic residues may not participate in direct interaction with the ssDNA substrate. Despite limited biochemical and structural information available for the zf-GRF and zf-CCHC C-terminal domains present in eukaryotic Topo III, the known functions of these small zinc-finger-containing homology domains found in other proteins [ 59 , 60 ], as well as structural modeling [ 30 ], suggest that they are potential ssDNA binding domains, similar to Topo_C_ZnRpt and Topo_C_Rpt, and may also function as RNA binding domains [ 61 , 62 ]. In addition to these repeated structural motifs, the C-terminal domains of type IA topoisomerases can also utilize other sequence elements to interact with nucleic acid substrates. One instance of such elements is the long lysine repeats that confer high enzyme processivity for Topo I from Streptomyces and other Actinobacteria [ 32 , 63 ]. The C-terminal arginine–glycine–glycine (RGG) box present in human TOP3B and other related Topo III [ 57 ] has also been shown to be required for both RNA and DNA topoisomerase activity [ 64 ].

Section 4

Protein partners that interact directly with type IA topoisomerases can modulate the physiological functions of individual topoisomerase by either enhancing the activity and stability of the topoisomerase protein or directing the topoisomerase to a specific cellular location where the type IA topoisomerase activity is needed. In E. coli , direct interaction between Topo I and RNA polymerase is important for the relaxation of transcription-driven negative supercoiling and prevention of R-loop accumulation by Topo I [ 36 , 65 , 66 , 67 ], while E. coli Topo III has been shown to interact physically and functionally with the DnaX complex at the replication fork to remove precatenanes [ 68 ]. Human TOP3A forms a dissolvasome complex with RMI1, RMI2, and BLM helicase for DNA repair [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ], while human TOP3B is stabilized in a complex with TDRD3 [ 64 , 73 , 74 ] for regulation of mRNA translation and turnover [ 75 ] as well as promotion of transcriptional activation and repression in response to starvation [ 76 ]. Lastly, the direct interaction between reverse gyrase and various DNA repair proteins in Archaea is likely to correlate with its role in genome stability [ 29 ]. It has been suggested that at least one type IA topoisomerase can be found in the genome of nearly every organism because of the ability of type IA topoisomerases to resolve topological entanglements encountered in replication, recombination, or repair that require cutting and rejoining of a single strand of DNA [ 77 ]. The requirement for overcoming these topological barriers can probably be satisfied largely by the presence of the structurally conserved toroidal N-terminal domains that form the active site for DNA cutting-rejoining. Topo III, encoded by the topA gene in archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus , has been shown to act as a decatenase [ 78 ]. Deletion of topA in Sulfolobus islandicus resulted in slow growth and defects in cell cycle control consistent with the involvement of Topo III decatenation activity for chromosomal segregation [ 79 ]. E. coli Topo III is much more efficient in DNA decatenation than Topo I due to shorter pauses between decatenation cycles [ 80 ]. The relatively greater efficiency of decatenation activity over relaxation activity for Topo III is likely to be conserved for Topo III encoded by topA in Archaea. E. coli Topo III can unlink daughter chromosomes during DNA replication along with Topo IV [ 81 ]. Topo III activity partially rescues Topo IV deficiencies probably by removing precatenanes within single-strand regions near the replication fork [ 68 , 82 ]. The relaxation of negatively supercoiled DNA by bacterial Topo I countering the supercoiling activity of gyrase plays an important role in the homeostatic regulation of global DNA supercoiling in bacteria, as shown first in E. coli [ 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 ] and more recently for other bacteria [ 87 , 88 , 89 ]. The crystal structure of full-length EcTopo I, with ssDNA bound to the C-terminal domains [ 34 ], suggests that the C-terminal Topo_C_ZnRpt domains (or zinc ribbon domains) strongly and specifically interact with the ssDNA in the negatively supercoiled region of DNA. This interaction may be the root of the efficient recognition and suppression of hypernegative supercoiling of DNA. The interactions observed between the Topo_C_Rpt domains of MsmTopoI and ssDNA [ 31 ] may play a similar role in the efficient relaxation of negatively supercoiled DNA by bacterial Topo I with the C-terminal Topo_C_Rpt domains. DNA supercoiling is highly dependent on transcription, as predicted by the model of Liu and Wang [ 90 ], with Topo I relaxing the negative supercoils in the DNA template behind the advancing polymerase and gyrase, relaxing the positive supercoils ahead of the polymerase. The direct protein–protein association of the C-terminal domains of Topo I with RNA polymerase has been demonstrated in biochemical studies for both E. coli and M. smegmatis [ 36 , 67 , 91 ]. More recent genome-wide ChIP-Seq analysis showed colocalization of M. tuberculosis , Streptococcus pneumoniae , and E. coli Topo I with RNA polymerase, often at promoters and during transcription elongation [ 66 , 92 , 93 ]. Interaction between transcribing RNA polymerase and Topo I C-terminal domains is required to prevent R-loop formation in E. coli [ 66 ]. Topo I deficiency leads to constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR) from R-loop [ 94 ] and excessive transcription–replication conflicts that result in lethality [ 95 ]. There have been conflicting reports for a long time on whether E. coli topA null mutants are viable without compensatory mutations. Although compensatory mutations appear frequently in gyrase genes [ 83 , 84 ], E. coli topA null mutants can also acquire mutations rapidly in other genes that reduce cSDR and transcription–replication conflicts [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 ]. Amplification of parC and parE genes coding for Topo IV has often been observed to compensate for the loss of bacterial Topo I relaxation activity in topA null mutants [ 98 , 99 , 100 ]. Overproduction of Topo IV can also allow the isolation of viable topA topB null mutants of E. coli and B. subtilis by preventing over-replication from R-loops [ 96 , 101 , 102 ]. When Topo I and gyrase are the only type IA and type IIA topoisomerases present in a bacterial species, Topo I is expected to be essential. In these bacteria, Topo III is not available to provide overlapping activities, and there are no Topo IV genes for providing relaxation activity [ 103 ] or amplification [ 96 , 99 ] that would rescue the topA null mutants. The essentiality of Topo I has been demonstrated for M. tuberculosis and M. smegmatis that do not have Topo III or Topo IV [ 104 , 105 , 106 ]. Results from saturation mutagenesis also indicated that Topo I is essential for Mycobacterium abscessus [ 107 ]. The obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis has Topo I and gyrase as the only topoisomerases. Knockdown of topA transcription by CRISPRi downregulated expression of late developmental genes and impaired the C. trachomatis developmental cycle [ 89 ]. Helicobacter pylori has no Topo III or Topo IV but has multiple topA genes coding for Topo I ( Table 1 ). Transposon mutagenesis suggested that for at least one of these Topo I (corresponding to A0A402E4A0 in Table 1 ), the C-terminal region with four zinc fingers cannot be disrupted without causing lethality [ 35 ]. Although Pseudomonas aeruginosa has Topo IV, failure to obtain a knockout mutant of Topo I (corresponding to A0A431XC87 in Table 1 ) suggested that this Topo I is essential [ 108 ]. The mutant that lacked the last 59 amino acids at the C-terminal region was shown to be viable but showed pleiotropic effects on the type III secretion system (T3SS), phenazine production, antibiotic susceptibility, and biofilm formation [ 108 ]. Streptococcus pneumoniae has both Topo III and Topo IV. Nevertheless, Topo I has been reported to be essential for the growth of S. pneumoniae , and the ratio of GyrA:Topo I determines the level of supercoiling [ 88 ]. Overexpression of either wild-type S. pneumoniae Topo I or a mutant Topo I that has reduced relaxation activity affects global transcription differentially [ 109 ]. The roles of topoisomerases in DNA topology regulation in Archaea should differ from Bacteria based on the topoisomerases present [ 29 ]. Gyrase activity is not always present in Archaea [ 110 ], and no type IA Topo I with robust relaxation activity has been identified in Archaea. The type IIB Topo VI present in archaeal species is capable of relaxing both positive and negative supercoils, in addition to possessing decatenase activity [ 29 , 111 ]. The histone variants [ 112 ] and nucleoid-associated proteins (NAP) present can also constrain and modulate DNA supercoiling for regulation of DNA topology in Archaea [ 113 , 114 ] similar to NAPs in Bacteria [ 113 , 115 , 116 ], with mechanisms that may include direct stimulation of topoisomerase activities [ 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 ]. In the hyperthermophilic archaeon S. solfataricus , it was reported that homeostatic control of DNA supercoiling is mainly mediated by the fine-tuning of TopR1, one of the two reverse gyrases [ 121 ]. Genetic studies suggested that the other reverse gyrase TopR2 in Sulfolobales may have another more important function [ 122 ]. Based on previous work, the requirement of reverse gyrase activity for hyperthermophiles [ 28 , 123 ] may be related to DNA protection and repair in addition to positive DNA supercoiling [ 29 , 124 , 125 ]. Targeted inactivation of mouse TOP3A showed that this type IA topoisomerase is essential for early embryonic development [ 126 ]. In the course of DNA repair, efficient displacement loop (D-loop) disruption during homologous recombination by BLM helicase is facilitated by the association of BLM with the TOP3A–RMI1–RMI2 complex [ 69 , 127 ]. Exonuclease DNA2-mediated resection of broken DNA ends as the first step of homologous recombination, is also stimulated by the TOP3A–RMI1–RMI2 complex together with the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex [ 127 ]. Targeting Arabidopsis thaliana TOP3A activity to Holliday junction-like DNA repair intermediates requires the C-terminal zinc finger domain [ 33 ]. Mutations in human TOP3A result in a Bloom syndrome-like disorder with increased sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) [ 128 ]. It was found that in ATRX wild-type pediatric osteosarcomas with alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), TOP3A is required for proper BLM localization, and TOP3A amplification promotes ALT DNA synthesis [ 129 ]. Recent large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and functional studies identified TOP3A as one of the ovarian endometriosis risk-associated genes, possibly due to the role of DNA repair and homologous recombination in endometriosis [ 130 ]. TOP3A can be localized both in the nucleus and mitochondria [ 131 , 132 ]. Mitochondrial TOP3A has been shown to be required for the maintenance of Drosophila mtDNA genome integrity [ 132 , 133 ], decatenation, and segregation of human mtDNA [ 134 ]. The type IA human TOP3A in mitochondria contributes to mtDNA replication and mtDNA topology control [ 135 , 136 ] along with the type IB TOP1MT [ 7 ]. It has been suggested that impaired mitochondrial metabolism plays an important role in the pathogenesis of TOP3A-deficient Bloom syndrome-like disorder [ 137 , 138 ]. A homozygous variant in the TOP3A gene has been associated with multiple mtDNA deletions [ 137 ]. Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) plus syndrome due to pathogenic biallelic missense variants in the TOP3A gene may be associated with reduced TOP3A activity, affecting its mitochondrial functions [ 134 , 139 ]. Based on the correlation of the disease characteristics and positions of the different pathological TOP3A variants on the crystal structure of TOP3A N-terminal domains, it has been proposed that variants with more severe effects on TOP3A catalytic activity could lead to Bloom syndrome-like disorder, while variants expected to have less severe impact on TOP3A catalytic activity could result in adult-onset mitochondrial disease [ 140 ]. The function of TOP3B could be based on its interaction with either DNA or RNA as a substrate, potentially affecting both transcription in the nucleus and translation in the cytoplasm. The role of TOP3B–TDRD3 in neurodevelopment and disorders such as schizophrenia and cognitive impairment was first discovered [ 64 , 141 ] in association with Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 protein (FMRP), an RNA-binding protein essential for synaptic formation [ 142 ]. TOP3B deficiency in mice has later been shown to induce changes in neuro-behaviors and alterations in connectivity between the different brain regions [ 143 ]. Characterization of TOP3B or TDRD3 knockout mice suggested defective neuronal activity-dependent transcription as well as defective post-transcriptional regulation as mechanisms behind the cognitive impairment [ 144 , 145 ]. A study of TOP3B or TDRD3 knockout in human HCT116 colon cancer cells indicated that TOP3B–TDRD3 can regulate mRNA translation and turnover with mechanisms that may not always depend on the TOP3B topoisomerase activity [ 75 ]. Additional analysis of these mutant HCT116 cells demonstrated disrupted transcription for both starvation-activated genes and starvation-repressed genes in response to starvation [ 76 ]. A study in Drosophila suggested that TOP3B may act as an RNA topoisomerase in siRNA-guided heterochromatin formation and transcriptional silencing [ 146 ]. Methyl arginines in the TOP3B RGG box near its C-terminus mediate interactions between FMRP and TOP3B-TDRD3 [ 64 , 147 ]. Substitution of TOP3B methyl arginines with lysines resulted in reduced in vitro activity for relaxation of negatively supercoiled DNA, accumulation of transcription-associated R-loops in vitro and in cells, as well as reduced stress granule localization for TOP3B [ 147 ]. Helicase DHX9 has been identified as an interaction partner of the TDRD3/TOP3B complex to suppress promoter-associated R-loops [ 148 ]. TOP3B also forms a complex with the helicase DDX5 independent of TDRD3 for the resolution of R-loops [ 149 ]. TOP3B can suppress R-loops by more than one mechanism [ 149 ]. In addition to the relaxation of hypernegatively supercoiled DNA behind the RNA polymerase complex, TOP3B can decatenate the intertwined DNA and RNA strands after unwinding the R-loop by cutting either the DNA or RNA strand to create a gate for passage of the other strand of the R-loop [ 149 ]. Increased R-loop from loss of TOP3B function in a patient with bilateral renal cancer has been linked to genome instability [ 150 ]. Human TOP3B has been shown to associate with mRNAs and form a covalent cleavage complex [ 151 ], indicating that certain mRNAs are cellular substrates for their RNA topoisomerase activity. mRNAs bound by TOP3B include those encoding proteins with neuronal functions related to schizophrenia and autism [ 64 ]. Results from eCLIP-seq analysis of HCT116 cells showed that TOP3B preferentially binds coding regions of long mRNAs [ 75 ]. Analysis of in vitro cleavage site preference on RNA did not reveal any sequence preference for cleavage by human TOP3B [ 24 ]. It is possible that RNA structure or interacting partners of TOP3B may direct TOP3B to specific RNA substrates. The TOP3B-TDRD3 complex has been reported to be required for efficient replication of positive-sense ssRNA viruses [ 152 ]. However, it was recently shown that TOP3B is dispensable for replication of murine coronavirus [ 153 ]. While TOP3B knockout may have an effect on ZIKA virus replication [ 152 ], the latest result suggested that TOP3B does not have a universal role in promoting the replication of positive-sense ssRNA virus. Formation of covalent catalytic intermediate between bacterial or archaeal type IA topoisomerases and cellular RNA has not been demonstrated even though they can also act as RNA topoisomerases in biochemical assays in vitro [ 14 , 15 ]. While TOP3B from animals have TDRD3-dependent association with polyribosomes, no polyribosome association could be detected for type IA topoisomerases from yeast and E. coli for possible function in translation [ 14 ]. Based on the accumulation of rRNA precursors in an M. smegmatis Topo I knockdown strain and the rescue of rRNA processing deficiency in RNase E knockdown cells by Topo I expression, it was proposed that mycobacteria Topo I participates in rRNA processing [ 154 ].

Intro

The double helical structure of DNA can lead to topological barriers during cellular processes, including replication, transcription, recombination, and repair. Topoisomerases are ubiquitous enzymes that can resolve topological barriers and also regulate the level of global and local supercoiling of the DNA genome. The pursuit of enzyme activities that can alter the topological state of DNA led to the discovery of Escherichia coli topoisomerase I (named ω protein initially) by James C. Wang [ 1 , 2 ]. Purification and characterization of additional topoisomerases, including bacterial DNA gyrase [ 3 ] and mammalian topoisomerase I (called DNA untwisting enzyme initially) [ 4 ] by others showed that the different topoisomerases act by distinct mechanisms [ 5 ] for coupling DNA strand passage with cutting and rejoining of DNA to change the DNA topology and solve the various topological problems in the genome [ 6 , 7 ]. Sequence and structural information further demonstrated that there are different families and subfamilies of topoisomerases [ 5 , 8 , 9 ]. Members of the type IA topoisomerases subfamily share the common features of cleaving a single-strand of DNA to form the covalent complex with the 5′-phosphoryl end of the cleaved DNA [ 10 ], requiring divalent ions for catalytic activity [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. In the strand passage model of enzyme mechanisms, the segment of DNA being cleaved is referred to as the G-segment. This cleavage of DNA enables a “gate” to open, allowing for the transportation of another DNA segment, called the T-segment, across the break. The subsequent religation of the G-segment leads to a change in DNA topology. These intermediate steps require extensive conformational changes in the topoisomerase structure to open and close the gate [ 11 , 12 ]. If the T-segment DNA is the complementary strand of the G-segment in a double-stranded DNA, the catalytic cycle results in a change in DNA supercoiling. If the T-segment is from another DNA molecule, a decatenation reaction can be catalyzed. Type IA topoisomerases are the only topoisomerases that have been shown to catalyze topological changes in RNA substrates [ 14 , 15 ]. Table 1 shows some representative examples of the distribution of various type IA topoisomerases (Topo I, Topo III, reverse gyrase) in species across Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Among these type IA topoisomerases [ 16 ], Topo I primarily functions in the relaxation of negatively supercoiled DNA to prevent excessive underwinding. In contrast, Topo III is crucial for resolving replication and recombination intermediates through its decatenation activity. Topo I and Topo III can be recognized based on the differences in their conserved amino acid sequences proximal to the active site ( Figure S1 ). Reverse gyrase is the sole topoisomerase capable of utilizing the energy from ATP hydrolysis via its helicase domain to catalyze positive supercoiling of DNA. Four conserved domains of type IA topoisomerases form a toroid structure first observed in E. coli Topo I (EcTopoI) [ 17 , 18 ] that contains the essential catalytic tyrosine [ 19 ] and Toprim residues for binding of divalent ions [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Sequence alignment ( Figure S1 ) shows that Topo III enzymes have a strictly conserved lysine [ 23 , 24 ] that follows the first Toprim glutamate not found in a similar position in bacterial Topo I, and also a conserved proline that follows the catalytic tyrosine not seen in bacterial Topo I. Table I shows that Archaea and Eukarya species almost always have one or two Topo III present, while Bacteria species have at least one Topo I, but Topo III is not always present. One or two reverse gyrase with a helicase-like domain linked to the conserved type IA topoisomerase domain capable of the introduction of positive supercoiling [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] can be found in hyperthermophiles among archaeal and bacterial species [ 28 , 29 ]. Additional sequences that follow the type IA topoisomerase domain in Topo I and Topo III have diversified in evolution [ 16 , 30 ]. These sequences in the C-terminal domains of Topo I and Topo III can interact with either nucleic acid substrates or protein partners to facilitate the various type IA topoisomerase functions in cellular processes [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Recent insights into the structural organization and physiological functions of type IA topoisomerases are reviewed here.

Conclusions

The universal presence of type IA topoisomerases and their catalytic activity on RNA substrates suggest that the ancestor of this subfamily of topoisomerases may act on RNA genomes in early life forms. The exact physiological functions of type IA topoisomerases currently found in Archaea remain to be fully elucidated. The fusions and gene duplications of unique domains to the catalytic core of type IA topoisomerases allow the individual topoisomerases to adapt to their specific roles in cellular physiology. A closer examination of the sequence and domain organization of type IA topoisomerases that have not been studied in detail could offer additional examples of the spectrum of potential functional roles for this important class of genome regulators. The crystal structures of type IA topoisomerases have provided static pictures of the domain organizations and binding interactions with DNA substrates. Transient intermediates with large conformational changes have been proposed in the model for catalysis. Single-molecule studies have been useful for providing support for the mechanistic model [ 155 , 156 ], but a structure of the critical intermediates with the toroid in a fully open conformation has not been observed directly. Future studies with cryo-EM could provide more information on conformations that are obstructed in crystal structures due to crystal packing or other limitations. There has been increased interest in type IA topoisomerases since the report of the RNA topoisomerase activity of TOP3B and the associated function in neurological development [ 64 , 141 ]. While the ability to utilize RNA as substrate in vitro is conserved in other type IA topoisomerases throughout evolution [ 14 ], it remains uncertain if their RNA topoisomerase activities have significant physiological functions. It is also unclear how the interactions with DNA and RNA substrates may differ. Replacement of the DNA substrates in available crystal structures with RNA substrates would require some rearrangements of type IA topoisomerase residues. It would be very helpful for future studies to utilize separation-of-function mutations or small molecule probes that selectively target the enzyme activity on either DNA or RNA substrate alone without affecting the other. Additionally, new three-dimensional structures of type IA topoisomerases with RNA substrates bound would provide valuable insights into the mechanism of substrate selectivity and interaction with RNA.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC