Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 69,913 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance View ORCID Profile A. Nicoliaa , View ORCID Profile A. Cuccurullo , K. Tamada , View ORCID Profile K. Yoneyama , View ORCID Profile J.L. Rambla , View ORCID Profile A. Granell , View ORCID Profile F. Camerlengo , G. Festa , View ORCID Profile G. Francese , F. Contaldi , A. D’Alessandro , View ORCID Profile M.M. Rigano , View ORCID Profile L. Principio , View ORCID Profile N. D’Agostino , View ORCID Profile T. Cardi doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636032 A. Nicoliaa 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for A. Nicoliaa For correspondence: alessandro.nicolia{at}crea.gov.it A. Cuccurullo 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy 2 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II , Portici (NA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for A. Cuccurullo K. Tamada 3 Graduate School of Agriculture, Ehime University , Ehime, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site K. Yoneyama 3 Graduate School of Agriculture, Ehime University , Ehime, Japan 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saitama University , Saitama, Japan Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for K. Yoneyama J.L. Rambla 5 Department of Biology, Biochemistry and Natural Sciences, Jaume I University , Castellón de la Plana, Spain Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for J.L. Rambla A. Granell 6 Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (CSIC-UPV) , Valencia, Spain Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for A. Granell F. Camerlengo 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for F. Camerlengo G. Festa 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site G. Francese 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for G. Francese F. Contaldi 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site A. D’Alessandro 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site M.M. Rigano 2 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II , Portici (NA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for M.M. Rigano L. Principio 2 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II , Portici (NA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for L. Principio N. D’Agostino 2 Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II , Portici (NA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for N. D’Agostino T. Cardi 1 CREA, Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops , Pontecagnano (SA), Italy 7 CNR-IBBR, Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources , Portici (NA), Italy Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for T. Cardi Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract Parasitic weed infestations pose an increasing threat to agriculture worldwide, especially in the Mediterranean region. Phelipanche ramosa and P. aegyptiaca (broomrapes) cause severe damage to field-grown tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L. ). Strigolactones (SLs), apocarotenoid phytohormones, play a critical role in plant physiology and development, and are also the primary signals that trigger the germination of parasitic weed seeds. We generated CRISPR/Cas9 tomato knock-out lines for the SlD27 gene, as well as three other key genes involved in SL biosynthesis ( SlCCD7 , SlCCD8 , SlMAX1 ), all within the same genetic background. The edited lines exhibited a marked reduction in SL content in root exudates, along with impaired broomrape seed germination. A comprehensive analysis of morphological, reproductive, and fruit-related traits revealed gene-specific effects on plant phenotype, including vegetative traits, fruit set, fruit development, and volatilome. Specifically, the knock-out of two CCDs and the MAX1 had a specific impact not only on plant development but also on the production of volatile organic compounds during fruit ripening. In contrast, the Sld27 lines, produced for the first time in this study, displayed a phenotype similar to the control non-edited plants, suggesting that the D27 gene holds promise as a breeding target for enhancing resistance to parasitic weeds in tomato. Highlight The characterization of tomato CRISPR/Cas9-edited lines for the four core genes involved in strigolactone biosynthesis revealed gene-specific effects on plant phenotype, with D27 emerging as a potential target for resistance to parasitic weeds. Introduction Parasitic weeds are plants that have partially (hemiparasites) or entirely (holoparasites) lost their autotrophic ability and depend on external hosts for water and nutrients ( Vurro et al ., 2019 ). Broomrapes ( Orobanche and Phelipanche spp .), holoparasites of the Orobanchaceae family, establish parasitism by forming a vascular connection with host roots and are significant agricultural pests in the Mediterranean region ( Cuccurullo et al ., 2022 ). Among vegetable crops, tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) is particularly affected by Phelipanche ramosa L. and P. aegyptiaca L., leading to substantial yield losses ( Vurro et al ., 2019 ). Identifying novel tomato varieties/genotypes resistant to parasitic weeds is therefore highly desirable. The use of new genomic techniques (NGT), such as genome editing, could accelerate the development of resistant varieties in breeding programs ( Yıldırım et al ., 2024 ). Strigolactones (SLs) are carotenoid-derived phytohormones exuded by plant roots to recruit arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) under nutrient-deficient conditions ( e.g. phosphorous and nitrogen). Furthermore, they serve as the primary signal inducing the germination of parasitic weed seeds ( Mashiguchi et al ., 2021 ). Altering SL biosynthesis, and thereby reducing their release into the rhizosphere, prevents the germination of parasitic weed seeds in the soil, disrupting the initial phase of infection ( i.e. pre-attachment) ( Fernández-Aparicio et al ., 2016 ). Extensive research on SL biosynthesis has been conducted in model species ( e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana L.) and selected crops ( e.g. rice, tomato; reviewed in Al-Babili and Bouwmeester, 2015 ; Mashiguchi et al ., 2021 ; Dun et al ., 2023 ). In tomato, SLs are synthesized through a series of sequential reactions primarily localized in the plastid. The conversion of all-trans-β-carotene to carlactone is catalyzed by a carotenoid isomerase (Dwarf27 – D27) and two Carotenoid Cleavage Deoxigeneases (CCD7 and CCD8) ( Vogel et al ., 2010 ; Kohlen et al ., 2012 ). Carlactone is further oxidated to carlactonic acid (CLA) by the cytosolic enzyme More Axillary Growth (MAX1) ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ). Subsequent oxidation steps, catalyzed by various cytochrome P450 enzymes, produce canonical SLs, including orobanchol, didehydro-orobanchol and solanacol ( Wakabayashi et al ., 2019 ; Wang et al ., 2022 ). Tomato lines altered in the function of core SL pathway genes ( CCD7 , CCD8 and MAX1 ) have been previously developed demonstrating reduced colonization by parasitic weeds and providing valuable insight into potential future solutions for mitigating the impact of such parasitic weeds on tomato (reviewed in Cuccurullo et al ., 2022 ). They also exhibited pleiotropic effects, including increased shoot branching and reduced height, confirming the multiple roles of SLs in plant development and physiology ( Mashiguchi et al ., 2021 ). However, previous studies on the genes involved in SL biosynthesis were conducted in various genetic backgrounds (reviewed in Cuccurullo et al ., 2022 ), complicating direct comparisons of the observed phenotypes. Moreover, specific functional studies on the carotenoid isomerase D27 in tomato and other crops, as well as its relevance in conferring resistance to parasitic weeds, remain unexplored. In this study, we generated CRISPR/Cas9 tomato knock-out (KO) lines for the SlD27 gene and three other key SL biosynthetic genes ( SlCCD7 , SlCCD8 , SlMAX1 ) within the same genetic background. We evaluated the SL content in root exudates and assessed the germination rates of P. ramosa and P. aegyptiaca in an in vitro assay. Furthermore, to compare the effects of inactivating the different genes, and assess the breeding and agronomic value of the edited lines, we performed a comprehensive characterization of morphological, reproductive and fruit-related traits, including the characterization of the volatilome. Materials and methods A detailed description of the materials and methods used in this work can be found in the supplementary materials. Generation of CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out plants The design of the single-guide RNAs (sgRNA) and the prediction of off-targets for the Sl D27 , Sl CCD7 , Sl CCD8 and Sl MAX1 genes were performed with the software CRISPR-P 2.0 ( Liu et al ., 2017 ). CRISPR/Cas9 vector assembly was performed via the Golden Gate Cloning method ( Engler et al ., 2014 ). Vector efficiency was preliminary assessed in tomato hairy roots (HRs) ( Ron et al ., 2014 ). The four validated vectors were independently introduced into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105. Transformation of tomato cotyledons ( S. lycopersicum L. cv. Ailsa Craig ) was carried out following the protocol by Qiu et al . (2007) . At least two independent knock-out (KO) lines per gene, each showing an out-of-frame insertion in the coding sequence, were selected and advanced to the T 2 generation through self-pollination. All the PCR primers used are listed in the Supp. Table S1. Parasitic weed germination assay Tomato plants were grown in pots (3 to 4 biological replicates per genotype) filled with vermiculites under a 16 h light (approximately 240 µmol m −2 s −1 ) and 8 h dark cycle at 23-25°C. To collect root exudates containing SLs, tap water (100-200 mL) was poured onto the soil surface, and the drained solutions containing root exudates were collected. These solutions were extracted with ethyl acetate, and the ethyl acetate phase was subsequently dried over anhydrous MgSO 4 and concentrated in vacuo . All crude samples were stored at 4°C until use. These root exudate samples were used for both germination assay and LC-MS/MS analysis. Germination assays with broomrape seeds were conducted as reported previously ( Yoneyama et al ., 2007 ). Seeds germination was assessed by counting seeds where the radicle had protruded through the seed coat. LC-MS/MS analysis of root exudates Tomato SLs were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) following the protocol described by Yoneyama et al ., (2022) . The analysis was performed on a Acquity UPLC System (Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA) connected to a Xevo TQD triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Milford, Massachusetts, USA) with an electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were used to detect specific SLs. Detection of plant morphological, reproductive and fruit-related traits Four biological replicates for each of the T 2 tomato biallelic homozygous edited lines Sld27 ( d27 -KO1, d27 -KO2), Slccd7 ( ccd7 -KO1, ccd7 -KO2, ccd7 -KO3), Slccd8 ( ccd8 -KO1, ccd8 -KO2, ccd8 -KO3) and Slmax1 ( max1 -KO1, max1 -KO2), as well as non-edited control plants, were transplanted into pots containing a mixture of peat and perlite. These plants were grown in a phytotron under regular watering and fertilizing conditions, with the pots arranged in a randomized design. The morphological, reproductive and fruit-related traits were recorded at specific days after transplanting (DAT). Ten fruits per biological replicate were tagged at the breaker stage. Fruits were harvested after 7 days (breaker + 7) measured and subsequently used for biochemical analysis. Five additional fruits per biological replicate were harvested at the mature green stage and stored in a controlled environment to estimate water loss. The number of adventitious roots was counted on plants at 120 DAT. Extraction and U/HPLC-PDA analysis of chlorogenic acid, rutin, naringenin and sugars Each biological replicate was analyzed in duplicate for simple sugars (fructose, glucose) for the two flavonoids naringenin chalcone (NaCh) and rutin (Rut), and the phenol chlorogenic acid (CA). The CA and the NaCh and Rut were extracted following a previously described method ( de Vos et al ., 2007 ), with minor modifications. The analyses were performed using an Ultimate 3000 UPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.). The extraction of simple sugars was performed on 250 mg of lyophilized powder and extract subjected to analysis on the E-Alliance HPLC system (Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA), with data acquired and analyzed using Waters Empower software. Peak areas for CA, NACh, Rut and sugars were recorded using authentic, distinct, and appropriately diluted standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Finally, compound content was expressed as fold change relative to the non-edited control plants. Extraction and HPLC-PDA analysis of carotenoids and tocopherols Carotenoids and tocopherols were extracted following the protocols described by Barja et al . (2021) and Ezquerro et al . (2022) with modifications. Liquid chromatography was performed using an HPLC Water Alliance 2695 Separations module, with carotenoids detected by a Waters 996 PDA detector and tocopherols identified using a Waters 2475 Multi λ fluorescence detector. Peak areas were recorded and analyzed using Waters Millennium software (Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). The areas were normalized by internal standard, and carotenoid and tocopherols content was expressed as a fold change relative to the non-edited control plants. Extraction and GC/MS analysis of volatile organic compounds Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were extracted and analyzed as reported in Rambla et al ., (2017) . For the analysis, 500 mg of fresh pericarp powder, obtained from the five pooled fruits per biological replicate and stored at −80°C, were used. VOCs were captured using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and subsequently separated and identified by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC/MS). VOCs from the headspace were extracted using a 65 µm PDMS/DVB solid-phase microextraction fiber (SUPELCO-MERCK, Darmstadt, Germany). Desorption of the compounds from the fiber occurred at the injection port of a 6890N gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Data acquisition was performed using a 5975B mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Compound identification was accomplished by comparing retention times and mass spectra with those of pure standards. Peak areas were recorded and normalized results were expressed as the ratio of compound abundance in each sample relative to the reference admixture. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s HSD with the software package Real Statistic ( https://real-statistics.com/ ). Statistical analysis on VOCs was performed by t-test with the software Office 365 Excel (Redmond, Washington, US). Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was conducted using the MASS package in R ( https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/index.html ). Results Knock-out mutants of strigolactone biosynthetic genes were efficiently generated using CRISPR/Cas9 The sgRNAs designed to specifically target genes involved in SL biosynthesis demonstrated substantial activity, with efficiencies ranging from 35 % to 89 %, in hairy root (HR) assays mediated by Agrobacterium rhizogenes (Supp. Table S2). Independent transformation of tomato cotyledons using A. tumefaciens and the same four vectors employed in the HR assays resulted in the generation of 10 KO plant lines: two lines each for Sld27 and Slmax1 , and three lines each for Slccd7 and Slccd8 ( Fig. 1 ). Sanger sequencing of target genes from selected T 2 -generation plants (T-DNA free) confirmed that all edited lines were biallelic and homozygous for their respective mutations. Additionally, the presence of potential off-target effects was ruled out (Supp. Table S3). Editing in the newly generated Sld27 , Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines resulted in frameshift mutations, leading to KO genotypes ( Fig. 1 ). In the Sld27 KO lines, the limited size of the exons hampered sgRNA design, necessitating targeting of the 5’ untranslated region. A single insertion was introduced before the start codon, accompanied by either a deletion ( Sld27 -KO1) or an insertion ( Sld27 -KO2) of a single base in the second exon ( Fig.1 ). The three Slccd7 KO lines exhibited deletions in the first exon: 1 bp in Slccd7 -KO1 and Slccd7 -KO2, and 2 bp in Slccd7 -KO3, whereas the three Slccd8 KO lines displayed a broader range of deletions in the second exon: 2 bp in Slccd8 -KO2, 4 bp in Slccd8 -KO1 and 5 bp in Slccd8 -KO3. Finally, the two Slmax1 -KO lines exhibited deletions in exon 3: 1 bp in Slmax1 -KO2 and 4 bp in Slmax1 -KO1 ( Fig. 1 ) Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Schematic representation of induced mutations targeting core strigolactone biosynthesis genes in CRISPR/Cas9-edited tomato lines The figure provides an overview of the compartmentalized strigolactone (SL) biosynthesis pathway in tomato, depicting the enzymatic steps from all- trans -β-carotene to carlactonic acid. The genomic structure of each SL biosynthesis gene is illustrated, with genes represented as black arrows oriented from the 5’(left) to the 3’(right) end (not drawn to scale). Exons are shown as grey boxes, and the CRISPR/Cas9 target sites are marked with inverted red triangles. Local alignment between the cDNA sequences of wild-type and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines are displayed for each gene. The 20-nucleotide single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequence is underlined by a black arrow below the wild-type sequence, indicating its orientation. Mutations resulting from CRISPR/Cas9 activity, are highlighted in red (deletions) and blue (insertions) within the KO line sequences. Out-of-frame mutations are shown in the corresponding translated amino acid sequences below each cDNA sequence, with the premature stop codon indicated by a red asterisk. Strigolactones are not detectable in root exudates of edited tomato lines Tomato plants produce and exude at least five SLs, including orobanchol, solanacol, 6,7-didehydroorobanchol, phelipanchol and epihelipanchol ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ; Wakabayashi et al ., 2022 ). Authentic standards of orobanchol and solanacol were available, allowing for their confirmation. Both SLs were readily detectable in the root exudates of control non-edited plants but were absent in the edited tomato lines. This provided a functional confirmation that the four genes involved in the SL biosynthetic pathway were successfully knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 (Supp. Fig. S1A, B). Authentic standards for 6,7-didehydroorobanchol, phelipanchol, and epihelipanchol were not available under our experimental conditions. Consequently, MRM channels for these SLs were set based on previously reported data ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ; Wakabayashi et al ., 2022 ). A distinct single peak was observed exclusively in the root exudates of non-edited control plants and not in the edited lines (Supp Fig. S1C). However, it remained unclear whether this peak corresponded to 6,7-didehydroorobanchol, phelipanchol, or epihelipanchol. Root exudates from the edited tomato lines exhibited reduced germination activity for root parasitic weeds We evaluated the effects of root exudates from non-edited control plants and CRISPR/Cas9 edited lines on the germination of P. ramosa and P. aegyptiaca ( Fig. 2A, B ), for which tomato is a regular host, and Orobanche minor , usually not found in tomato fields and used as non-host control (Supp. Fig. S2). The Slccd7 and Slccd8 lines were the most effective, inhibiting parasite germination by more than 90 %. A similar reduction was observed in the germination of P. ramosa seeds treated with Sld27 root exudates. However, in P. aegyptiaca , residual germination rates up to approximately 21 % was observed with the d27 -KO2 root exudates ( Fig. 2B ). Additionally, root exudates from Slmax1 lines appeared to stimulate higher germination rates in P. ramosa and O. minor compared to P. aegyptiaca ( Fig. 2A, B ; Supp. Fig. S2) Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Germination-stimulating activity of tomato root exudates on Phelipanche spp. seeds Root exudates were sampled from non-edited control plants (wild-type, Wt) and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines targeting strigolactone biosynthesis genes (for each line, n = 3-4). These samples were used in germination assay with seeds of Phelipanche ramosa (A) and P. aegyptiaca (B). Statistically significant differences among genotypes are indicated by different letters ( p < 0.05), as determined by Tukey’s HSD test. GR24 (10 -6 M) was included as positive control in the assays. The Sld27 edited tomato lines exhibit morphological, reproductive, and fruit-related traits similar to those of the wild-type The Sld27 , Slccd7, Slccd8 and Slmax1 CRISPR/Cas9 KO lines generated in this study were compared with the control non-edited plants by evaluating a total of 13 phenotypic traits (Supp. Table S4). Considering the morphological traits, height reduction was significant in Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 at all sampling points, due to a reduction in internode length particularly evident at 33 DAT. The increase in lateral branching was more pronounced in the Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines, which exhibited a doubling in the number of branches. The Slccd7 and Slccd8 lines showed a remarkable increase in adventitious root production compared to the control (up to 35-fold in Slccd8 ). Interestingly, the Slmax1 lines displayed a smaller and less consistent increase in hairy roots (Supp. Table S4). The analysis of reproductive traits evidenced that the Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines showed a significant reduction in flower numbers on the third inflorescence; notably, the Slccd7 lines were comparable to the non-edited control plants. The Slmax1 lines exhibited a remarkable reduction in fruit set (up to 73 %) a trait found also in the ccd7 -KO3, whereas the Slccd8 lines were similar to control (Supp. Table S4). Interestingly, the examination of fruit-related traits highlighted an extended period from anthesis to the onset of ripening (up to 7 days) in the Slmax1 lines. Aside from the marginal significance observed in ccd7 -KO3, the other Slccd7 lines, as well as the Slccd8 lines, did not show significant changes. The Slmax1 lines exhibited also the most pronounced reduction in fruit weight (up to 17.58 grams). Similarly, two out of three Slccd7 lines experienced a significant decrease (up to 11.34 grams), whereas among Slccd8 lines, only ccd8 -KO1 showed a significant reduction. Alterations in fruit width mirrored the changes in fruit weight, with the most severe reduction in Slmax1 (up to 0.72 cm). Fruit length was also significantly reduced, with Slmax1 lines showing the most pronounced reduction (up to 0.61 cm) (Supp. Table S4; Supp. Fig. S3). The Sld27 lines generally did not show significant differences in the morphological, reproductive and fruit-related traits compared to non-edited plants, evidencing a control-like phenotype (Supp. Table S4; Supp. Fig. S3). These results were largely confirmed when the thirteen morpho-physiological traits were subjected to linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to verify the best separation of the lines according to the linear trait combinations and rank traits for their importance in group separation. The LDA model produced two canonical variables ( i.e. discriminant functions), LD1 and LD2, which explained 79.08 % and 15.17 % of the variance, respectively (Supp. Table S5). Interestingly, the Sld27 lines clustered very close to the non-edited control group ( Fig. 3A ) and were clearly distinguishable from the other lines ( Slccd7 , Slccd8 , Slmax1 ), indicating a high degree of similarity between these mutants and the control in terms of the traits evaluated. LD1 was positively correlated (r ≥ 0.60) with plant height, average internode length, number of flowers on the third inflorescence, and fruit weight. Conversely, LD1 was negatively correlated (r ≤ −0.60) with the number of lateral branches, number of adventitious roots, and number of days between anthesis and the breaker stage. LD2 was positively correlated with the fruit set percentage and fruit width ( Fig. 3B ; Supp. Table S5). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3. Bidimensional distribution of genotypes (ovals) and lines (dots) after linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of morphological, reproductive, and fruit-related traits (A) Bidimensional distribution of scores assigned to CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines targeting strigolactone biosynthesis genes: Sld27 ( d27 -KO1, d27 -KO2; orange), Slccd7 ( ccd7- KO1, ccd7- KO2, ccd7- KO3; yellow), Slccd8 ( ccd8- KO1, ccd8- KO2; blue) and Slmax1 ( max1- KO1, max1 -KO2; green). The non-edited control genotype (wild-type, Wt) is represented in grey (for each line, n=4). The two scores for each line were calculated using the linear discriminant functions LD1 (x-axis) and LD2 (y-axis), which together explain 94.25 % of the observed variability. (B) Traits with strong correlation to LD1 and LD2 are highlighted (+: positive corr., r ≥ 0.6; -: negative corr., r ≤ - 0.6). DAT: days after transplant. Profiling of fruit metabolites produced by edited tomato lines The ANOVA and post-hoc analysis failed to clearly identify any specific line with differences in the average content of fructose and glucose between SL-depleted lines and the control (Supp. Table S6). Regarding polar metabolites, quantification of chlorogenic acid showed no detectable level in the ccd7 -KO3, whereas all other lines resembled the control (Supp. Table S7). The analysis of the flavonoid rutin did not reveal statistically significant differences in post-hoc analysis between the edited lines and controls. Conversely, the flavonoid naringenin chalcone appeared to be generally increased, but statistically significant only in max1 -KO1 (Sup. tab. S7). Examining non-polar metabolites, the major carotenoids and tocopherols exhibited negligible changes, with the sole exception of the δ-tocopherol, that was reduced in ccd8 -KO2 and the all-trans lycopene, which appeared slightly reduced in max1 -KO2 (Supp. Table S8). The ripe fruits unequivocally revealed sixty-four different VOCs. Specific VOC and metabolic pathways resulted highly affected by SL-depletion in tomato fruits (Supp. Table S9). Indeed, considering the benzenoid/phenylpropanoid pathway (B), eugenol, guaiacol and methyl salicylate were significantly increased (up to 2.02-, 2.8- and 8-fold, respectively) in the Slmax1 lines. Among the branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) related compounds, 3-methyl butanoic acid was highly reduced in Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 (up to 0.29-fold). Similarly, 1-nitro-3-methylbutane was significantly reduced in both Slmax1 lines (up to 0.12-fold). Within the phenylalanine derivative (Phe) group, the 2-phenylethanol was reduced in Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines (up to 0.29- and 0.16-fold, respectively). These declines were more pronounced for 1-nitro-2-phenylethane, which was also affected in the Slccd7 lines. On the contrary, the pathways of fatty acid derivative (L), apocarotenoid (ApoC) and terpenoid (T) seemed to be not affected by mutations in SL genes (Supp. Table S9). LDA was performed to summarize the behavior of the lines and confirm their separation based on VOC content, while simultaneously ranking the various compounds by their significance in group differentiation. Interestingly, the LDA identified four clusters: 1) non-edited control plants; 2) Sld27 lines; 3) Slccd7 and Slccd8 lines; 4) Slmax1 lines ( Fig. 4A ). The canonical variable LD1 accounted for 57.19% of the variability and was positively correlated (r ≥ 0.60) with two BCAA related compounds (3-methylbutanoic acid, 1-nitro-3-methylbutane), one L compound (E-2-pentenal) and two Phe compounds (2-phenylethanol, 1-nitro-2-phenylethane). Conversely, LD1 exhibited negative correlation (r ≤ −0.60) with two T compounds (p-cymene, 2-caren-10-al) (Supp. Table S10). The second canonical variable, LD2, explained 25.69% of the variability and was negatively correlated (r ≤ −0.60) with two B compounds (guaiacol, methyl salicylate) and positively correlated (r ≥ 0.60) with one BCAA-related compound (3-methylbutanenitrile) ( Fig. 4B ; Supp. Table S10). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4. Bidimensional distribution of genotypes (ovals) and lines (dots) after linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (A) Bidimensional distribution of scores assigned to CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines targeting strigolactone biosynthesis genes: Sld27 ( d27 -KO1, d27 -KO2; orange), Slccd7 ( ccd7- KO1, ccd7- KO2, ccd7- KO3; yellow), Slccd8 ( ccd8- KO1, ccd8- KO2; blue) and Slmax1 ( max1- KO1, max1 -KO2; green). The non-edited control genotype (wild-type, Wt) is represented in grey (for each line, n = 4). Scores for each line were derived using linear discriminant functions LD1 (x-axis) and LD2 (y-axis), which together account for 82.88 % of the observed variability. (B) Selected VOCs with strong correlations to LD1 and LD2 are highlighted (+: positive corr., r ≥ 0.6; -: negative corr., r ≤ −0.6). Metabolic pathways associated with the VOCs are indicated as follows: BCAA, Branched-chain amino acid related; L, Fatty acid derivative; Phe, Phenylalanine derivative; T, Terpenoid; B, Benzenoid/Phenylpropanoid. Discussion Various tomato lines with either complete or partial inactivation of genes involved in SL biosynthesis have been previously generated using different strategies and genetic backgrounds ( Cuccurullo et al ., 2022 ), thus preventing the direct comparisons of gene effects on parasitic plant resistance and on host plant phenotype. In this study, we successfully generated a complete panel of CRISPR/Cas9 KO lines targeting the core genes ( SlD27 , SlCCD7 , SlCCD8 and SlMAX1 ) involved in SL biosynthesis, all within the same cultivar, Ailsa Craig. Studying mutants in the same genetic background is valuable because it minimizes genetic variability and epistatic effects, allowing researchers to attribute observed phenotypic differences specifically to the mutation of interest. This approach ensures that differences in traits are not confounded by background genetic effects, leading to more accurate and reproducible conclusions. Additionally, using a consistent genetic background enhances the reliability of downstream analyses, and facilitates the identification of gene-specific roles in biological processes. This is particularly critical in complex traits like metabolism, development, or stress responses, where subtle genetic interactions can influence outcomes. To assess the potential breeding value of these novel alleles as sources of resistance against parasitic weeds, we evaluated the biochemical composition of the root exudates and their effects on the germination of two common broomrapes species parasitizing tomato. Additionally, we performed a comprehensive phenotypic characterization of the edited lines, with a particular focus on the biochemical profile of the fruits. Phenotypic changes, varying in both intensity and specificity, are influenced by disruptions at different points along the SL biosynthetic pathway Notably, this study represents the first characterization of a d27 loss of function mutant in a dicotyledonous crop species. The absence of significant morphological changes observed in tomato Sld27 lines, is consistent with the mild phenotypes reported in rice and Arabidopsis d27 mutants ( Lin et al ., 2009 ; Waters et al ., 2012 ). We have extended these findings to include reproductive and fruit-related traits in tomato. The D27 gene is an iron-containing isomerase that is conserved across higher plants and algae but absent in animals and fungi ( Waters et al ., 2012 ). Previous studies on D27 have been limited in scope, primarily focused on Arabidopsis, rice and the bryophyte Marchantia polymorpha ( Lin et al ., 2009 ; Waters et al ., 2012 ; Jibran et al ., 2024 ). Similar to rice and Arabidopsis, the SlD27 gene is essential for SL biosynthesis in tomato, as evidenced by the absence of detectable SLs in root exudates of Sld27 lines and the marked reduction in the germination observed in the parasitic plant species P. ramosa L. and P. aegyptiaca L. Similarly, root exudates from the Arabidopsis d27 mutant caused a significant reduction in the germination rate of the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica L. ( Yang et al ., 2023 ). In rice d27 mutant, the 2’-epi-5-deoxystrigolin was undetectable in the root exudates ( Lin et al ., 2009 ). The control-like phenotype observed in the tomato Sld27 lines may be explained by non-enzymatic isomerization induced by light exposure, of all-trans-β-carotene to 9-cis-β-carotene (reviewed in Khoo et al ., 2011 ), a phenomenon that could be sufficient to sustain SL biosynthesis in the epigeal part of the Sld27 mutant. However, recent studies have demonstrated the existence of D27 paralogues genes ( D27-Like1 and D27-Like2 ), in rice ( Liu et al ., 2020 ) and Arabidopsis ( Gulyás et al ., 2022 ; Yang et al ., 2023 ). Notably, the D27-Like1 isomerase has been shown to contribute, albeit to a lesser extent, to SL biosynthesis in Arabidopsis ( Yang et al ., 2023 ). In tomato, the presence of D27-like genes was predicted through phylogenetic analysis, although their importance in SL biosynthesis and plant development needs to be clarified ( Cuccurullo et al ., 2024 ). In contrast to the Sld27 lines, the Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines exhibited significant alterations in morphological, reproductive, and fruit-related traits. The Slccd s lines were notably characterized by an increased production of adventitious roots compared to the other lines. This trait has been previously documented in ccd7 and ccd8 lines from various species ( Rasmussen et al ., 2012 ; Liu et al ., 2013 ). For instance, Kohlen et al ., (2012) reported an elevated number of adventitious roots in the stems of Slccd8 RNAi-lines. This phenomenon is thought to be related to higher auxins concentrations and/or increased auxin sensitivity ( Kohlen et al ., 2012 ; Rasmussen et al ., 2012 ). However, it remains intriguing to explore whether the extensive proliferation of hairy roots observed in the Slccd7 and Slccd8 lines is also linked to the absence of additional specific apocarotenoids produced by these two CCDs. The Slmax1 lines, edited in the downstream gene of SL biosynthetic pathway, exhibited unique phenotypes not previously evidenced or specifically associated ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ; Bari et al ., 2021 ), with this genotype. Slmax1 lines retained a significant germination rate for P. ramosa and for the non-host species O. minor . The latter differs from Phelipanche spp. because it is not characterized by spontaneous germination, and it seems to be specifically sensitive to SLs and not to other germination inducers ( i.e. isothiocyanates). Therefore, a possible explanation for this discrepancy may lie in the accumulation of carlactone in the Slmax1 lines. In Arabidopsis, carlactone exhibits SL-like activity and has a clear stimulating effect on S. hermonthica seed germination ( Alder et al ., 2012 ). Although carlactone has been proposed as the possible mobile signal in plants ( Al-Babili and Bouwmeester, 2015 ; Dun et al ., 2023 ), it has not been detected in root exudates but only in root extracts of rice and Arabidopsis ( Seto et al ., 2014 ). It is important to note that in a Slmax1 TILLING mutant, trace levels of SLs were still detectable in both root exudates and root extracts. However, no germination assay was performed to assess whether these small amounts of SLs were sufficient to induce residual broomrape germination ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ). It remains unclear if the Slmax1 lines release additional unknown SL substrates of SlMAX1 that might trigger the germination of parasitic plant seeds. The Slmax1 lines were also characterized by a dramatic reduction in fruit set and by a consistent increase in the time from anthesis to the onset of ripening (breaker); these traits were accompanied by the phenotypes already observed in the Slccd s lines (reduction in number of flowers and fruit weight/size). General reproductive defects in the Slmax1 genotype have been previously reported ( Zhang et al ., 2018 ), as well as reductions in flower and/or fruit size associated with SL depletion in Slccd8 lines ( Kohlen et al ., 2012 ; Bari et al ., 2019 ). While the role of SLs in flowering (i.e. induction, number of flowers and inflorescence size) has been extensively studied in tomato and other species, with recent model proposed ( Visentin et al ., 2024 and references therein), the role of SLs in fruit set and ripening remains less understood. In strawberry the expression of the two MAX1 orthologues was high in style before and after pollination, compared to the lower expression of the CCD7 orthologue and the negligible expression of the D27 and CCD8 orthologues ( Wu et al ., 2019 ). These findings align with our observations, highlighting a significant contribution of SlMAX1 to fruit set. This suggests the intriguing possibility of a specific additive effect of the SlMAX1 loss of function in combination with SL depletion. Additionally, it is plausible that the reproductive and fruit phenotypes observed in Slccd s and S lmax1 lines are linked to the co-regulation of SLs and auxin sensitivity and/or transport ( Kohlen et al ., 2012 ; Mashiguchi et al ., 2021 ). However, the extent of this regulation in fleshy fruits warrants further investigation, and the impact of photosynthate redistribution in highly branched phenotypes cannot be excluded. CCDs and MAX1 specifically impact the production of VOCs during fruit ripening Despite the observed phenotypes in Slccd s and Slmax1 lines, the carotenoid, sugar and flavonoid content in the fruits did not differ significantly from the control. Additionally, water loss, an important determinant of changes in fruit firmness during ripening ( Gidado et al ., 2024 ), remained unaltered. While these results were not surprising for the Sld27 lines, given their control-like phenotype, they were unexpected for the lines with more pronounced pleiotropic effects, such as Slccd s or Slmax1 . Interestingly, previous works reported high expression of CCD7 in tomato fruit at immature green stage ( Vogel et al ., 2010 ) and of CCD7 and CCD8 in young kiwi fruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) ( Ledger et al ., 2010 ). To explore potential variations in tomato fruit ripening that may have been overlooked, we analyzed VOCs in fruits from our panel of SL-depleted lines. In addition to their significance as breeding traits for fruit quality, VOCs, deriving from a diversity of metabolic pathways, served as important metabolic checkpoints for possible direct or indirect effects of SLs. The Slmax1 fruits lines showed a significant and consistent accumulation of methyl salicylate (MeSA) and guaiacol. MeSA is derived from the methylation of the phytohormone salicylic acid (SA) and acts as a transduction signal in systemic acquired resistance (SAR). In tomato fruit, MeSA concentration typically peak at 15 days after pollination, then decline and remain constant during ripening. As a volatile compound, it is generally associated with a wintergreen flavor, which is often negatively perceived by consumers ( Tieman et al ., 2010 ; Frick et al ., 2023 ; Kaur et al ., 2023 ).. Similarly, guaiacol is synthesized from SA ( Mageroy et al ., 2012 ; Zhou et al ., 2021 ). Guaiacol contributes to a “smoky” or “medicinal” flavor and is prominently emitted in tomato fruits at the mature green stage in both “smoky” and “non-smoky” varieties, although its levels drop dramatically in non-smoky varieties after the breaker stage ( Tikunov et al ., 2013 ). It is often negatively perceived by consumers ( Kaur et al ., 2023 ) and the tomato variety used in this work belongs to the “smoky” group, with a high production of guaiacol in the ripe fruit. In general, changes in in the B pathway can be determined by external causes, such as biotic stress or plant treatments ( Huang et al ., 2020 ), which could not be excluded in our Slmax1 lines. However, in Arabidopsis, Kusajima et al . (2022) demonstrated that the max4 mutant ( Slccd8 homologous ) exhibited higher free SA levels in leaves compared to the max3 mutant (the Slccd7 homologous), which was similar to control levels. This suggests that the perturbation of SA homeostasis may increase with further disruption of the SL biosynthetic pathway. Amino acid-derived VOCs are key contributors to tomato aroma and flavor, forming during the ripening process ( Kaur et al ., 2023 ). Consistently with a normal ripening process, the two immediate downstream aldehydes of the amino acid phenylalanine (2-phenylacetaldehyde; floral flavor; Phe) and leucine (3-methylbutanal; malty, earthy flavor; BCAA), both positively contributing to the flavor, were unaltered in SL-depleted lines. In contrast, several downstream VOCs positively contributing to flavor and derived from phenylalanine (2-phenylethanol: nutty, fruity flavor; 1-nitro-2-phenylethane: musty, earthy flavor; Phe) and leucine (1-nitro-3-methylbutane; 3-methylbutanenitrile; BCAA) were dramatically reduced by SL-depletion. Interestingly, we did not observe large variations in the production of VOCs belonging to the ApoC and L pathways, the two more interconnected to carotenoids ( Kaur et al ., 2023 ). Therefore, considering the few VOCs altered in the SL-depleted Sld27 lines, it is likely that the activity of CCD7, CCD8, and MAX1 directly or indirectly influences the ripening-associated biosynthesis of specific VOCs, thereby potentially affecting tomato flavor. The investigation of SLs roles in the ripening processes of both climacteric and non-climacteric species remains an underexplored but compelling area of research ( Ferrero et al ., 2018 ; Li et al ., 2023 , 2024 ) and our results contribute valuable insights into these dynamics. Field use of SL-depleted tomato lines Based on morpho-physiological characterization and resistance phenotype, the D27 gene presents a promising breeding target for developing parasitic plant resistance in tomato. However, the control-like phenotype observed in the Sld27 lines requires further validation under a broader range of physiological conditions (e.g. abiotic/biotic stress resistance) due to potential overlaps of carotenoid isomerases with other hormonal pathways ( e.g. abscisic acid) ( Tolnai et al ., 2023 ; Ye et al ., 2024 ). Moreover, field trials are essential to evaluate yield performance comprehensively. The genetic materials developed in this study provide a unique platform for in-depth exploration of SL biosynthesis in a model crop of critical agriculture importance, such as tomato. These resources will be further enriched in the future by incorporating additional CRISPR/Cas9-edited genes involved in the late-step biosynthesis and transport of SLs. The resulting edited plants have the potential to be used not only in field trials as complete specimens but also as rootstock for commercial cultivars/hybrids. Notably, recent field trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of Slccd7 and Slccd8 rootstock in controlling P. aegyptiaca without yield losses or any apparent pleiotropic effect under normal growing conditions ( Karniel et al ., 2024 ). However, the use of specific SL-depleted genotypes ( e.g. Slccd7 ) as rootstock may also influence physiological traits, such as drought recovery or flowering ( Visentin et al ., 2020 , 2024 ). Additionally, while the use of grafting has shown documented benefits for yield and quality improvement ( Caradonia et al ., 2023 ; Parisi et al ., 2023 ), its adoption in open-field cultivation systems, particularly for processed tomato production, remains constrained due to the higher cost of grafted plants. This underscores the appeal of precise genetic modification ( e.g. D27 ) in elite hybrid cultivars as a cost-effective and scalable solution for integrating SL-related resistance traits into commercial production systems. Author contributions AN, NDA and TC conceived the experiments. FC, AC and FC assembled the vectors and carried out in silico analysis. AN, AC and GF carried out the in vitro experiments. AN and AC carried out phenotypic analysis in the phytotron. GF and ADA did the metabolic analysis on sugars and flavonoids. AN, LP and JLR carried out metabolic analysis on carotenoids and VOCs. AN, AC, GF, MMR, JLR and AG analyzed metabolic data and revised results. KT and KY carried out strigolactone analysis on root exudates and performed germination assay. AN, AC, NDA and TC wrote the manuscript. All the authors revised and approved the manuscript. Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interests Funding The work presented here was financially supported by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forests (MASAF), project BIOTECH-Cisget (DM 15924, 18-05-2018). JLR acknowledges funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation by a Juan de la Cierva-incorporación grant (IJC2020-045612-I). AG acknowledges funding from the Spanish Ministry for PGC project PID2022-141438OB-I00 and to the EU for Harnesstom contract 101000716. KY was supported by Japan Science and Technology Agency (FOREST, JPMJFR220F). Data availability The Sanger sequences of target and off-target sites for the Sld27 , Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 lines, including non-edited control plant, are available at Mendeley Data repository (doi: https://doi.org/10.17632/7vwj6cz972.1 ). Supplementary Figure S1. Detection of strigolactones in root exudates of non-edited control plants (wild-type, Wt) and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines targeting core strigolactone biosynthesis genes ( Sld27 , Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 ) . Quantification was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). (A) Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) chromatograms for orobanchol (m/z 347.1 → 97.0). (B) MRM chromatograms for solanacol (m/z 343.1 → 96.9). (C) MRM chromatograms for 6,7-didehydro-orobanchol, phelipanchol and epiphelipanchol (m/z 345.1 → 97.0). STD: standard Supplementary Figure S2 . Germination-stimulating activity of the tomato root exudates on Orobanche minor . Root exudate samples were collected from both non-edited control plants (wild-type, Wt) and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out (KO) lines targeting core strigolactone biosynthesis genes ( Sld27 , Slccd7 , Slccd8 and Slmax1 ) (for each line, n = 3-4). Germination assays were conducted using these root exudates, with GR24 (10[[ M) included as a positive control. Statistically significant differences among genotypes are indicated by different letters (p < 0.05), as determined by Tukey’s HSD test. Supplementary Figure S3 . Representative images of stem (A), inflorescence (B), adventitious roots (C) and fruit (D) of the CRISPR/Cas9 edited lines ( Sld27 , Slccd7 , Slccd8 , Slmax1 ), compared to non-edited control plants (wild-type, Wt). All images are shown to scale for accurate visual comparison. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Maurizio Vurro and Angela Boari for their valuable assistance with parasitic weed manipulation. They are grateful to Andrea Mazzucato and Gianfranco Diretto for their guidance on plant phenotypic analysis. Special thanks to Giuseppe Mennella for his advice on metabolic analysis, to Accursio Venezia and Mario Parisi for their support with phytotron and plant management. The authors also appreciate Andrea Burato, Giovanna Forte, Francesco Vitale, and Mario Salzano for their help with plant handling and tomato sampling. Finally, the authors acknowledge Teresa Caballero Vizcaíno and Ana Espinosa Ruiz and the Plant Metabolomics lab of the IBMCP for their technical support in plant metabolomics. References ↵ Al-Babili S , Bouwmeester HJ . 2015 . Strigolactones, a Novel Carotenoid-Derived Plant Hormone . Annual Review of Plant Biology 66 , 161 – 186 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Alder A , Jamil M , Marzorati M , Bruno M , Vermathen M , Bigler P , Ghisla S , Bouwmeester H , Beyer P , Al-Babili S . 2012 . The path from β-carotene to carlactone, a strigolactone-like plant hormone . Science 335 , 1348 – 1351 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Bari VK , Nassar JA , Aly R. 2021 . CRISPR/Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 1 in tomato confers resistance to root parasitic weed Phelipanche aegyptiaca . Scientific Reports 11 , 3905 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Bari VK , Nassar JA , Kheredin SM , Gal-On A , Ron M , Britt A , Steele D , Yoder J , Aly R. 2019 . CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE 8 in tomato provides resistance against the parasitic weed Phelipanche aegyptiaca . Scientific Reports 9 , 11438 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Barja MV , Ezquerro M , Beretta S , et al. 2021 . Several geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase isoforms supply metabolic substrates for carotenoid biosynthesis in tomato . New Phytologist 231 , 255 – 272 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Caradonia F , Francia E , Alfano V , Ronga D . 2023 . Grafting and Plant Density Influence Tomato Production in Organic Farming System . Horticulturae 9 , 669 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Cuccurullo A , D’Agostino N , Rigano MM , Nicolia A . 2024 . Editing the Dwarf27 (D27) gene family member to uncover their role in tomato plant physiology and development . Proceedings of the LXVII SIGA Annual Congress. Bologna . ↵ Cuccurullo A , Nicolia A , Cardi T . 2022 . Resistance against broomrapes (Orobanche and Phelipanche spp.) in vegetables: a comprehensive view on classical and innovative breeding efforts . Euphytica 218 , 82 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Dun EA , Brewer PB , Gillam EMJ , Beveridge CA . 2023 . Strigolactones and Shoot Branching: What Is the Real Hormone and How Does It Work? Plant And Cell Physiology 64 , 967 – 983 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Engler C , Youles M , Gruetzner R , Ehnert TM , Werner S , Jones JDG , Patron NJ , Marillonnet S . 2014 . A Golden Gate modular cloning toolbox for plants . ACS Synthetic Biology 3 , 839 – 843 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ezquerro M , Li C , Barja MV , et al. 2022 . Tomato geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase isoform 1 specifically interacts with phytoene synthase isoform 3 to produce strigolactones in tomato roots . bioRxiv , 2022.11.01.514744. ↵ Fernández-Aparicio M , Reboud X , Gibot-Leclerc S . 2016 . Broomrape Weeds. Underground Mechanisms of Parasitism and Associated Strategies for their Control: A Review . Frontiers in Plant Science 7 , 135 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Ferrero M , Pagliarani C , Novák O , Ferrandino A , Cardinale F , Visentin I , Schubert A . 2018 . Exogenous strigolactone interacts with abscisic acid-mediated accumulation of anthocyanins in grapevine berries . Journal of Experimental Botany 69 , 2391 – 2401 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Frick EM , Sapkota M , Pereira L , Wang Y , Hermanns A , Giovannoni JJ , van der Knaap E , Tieman DM , Klee HJ . 2023 . A family of methyl esterases converts methyl salicylate to salicylic acid in ripening tomato fruit . Plant Physiology 191 , 110 – 124 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Gidado MJ , Gunny AAN , Gopinath SCB , Ali A , Wongs-Aree C , Salleh NHM . 2024 . Challenges of postharvest water loss in fruits: Mechanisms, influencing factors, and effective control strategies – A comprehensive review . Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 17 , 101249 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Gulyás Z , Moncsek B , Hamow KÁ , et al. 2022 . D27-LIKE1 isomerase has a preference towards trans/cis and cis/cis conversions of carotenoids in Arabidopsis . The Plant Journal 112 , 1377 – 1395 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Huang W , Wang Y , Li X , Zhang Y . 2020 . Biosynthesis and Regulation of Salicylic Acid and N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid in Plant Immunity . Molecular Plant 13 , 31 – 41 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jibran R , Tahir J , Andre CM , Janssen BJ , Drummond RSM , Albert NW , Zhou Y , Davies KM , Snowden KC . 2024 . DWARF27 and CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE 7 genes regulate release, germination and growth of gemma in Marchantia polymorpha . Frontiers in Plant Science 15 . ↵ Karniel U , Koch A , Bar Nun N , Zamir D , Hirschberg J. 2024 . Tomato Mutants Reveal Root and Shoot Strigolactone Involvement in Branching and Broomrape Resistance . Plants 13 , 1554 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kaur G , Abugu M , Tieman D . 2023 . The dissection of tomato flavor: biochemistry, genetics, and omics . Frontiers in Plant Science 14 , 1144113 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Khoo HE , Prasad KN , Kong KW , Jiang Y , Ismail A . 2011 . Carotenoids and Their Isomers: Color Pigments in Fruits and Vegetables . Molecules 16 , 1710 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kohlen W , Charnikhova T , Lammers M , et al. 2012 . The tomato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase8 (SlCCD8) regulates rhizosphere signaling, plant architecture and affects reproductive development through strigolactone biosynthesis . New Phytologist 196 , 535 – 547 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Kusajima M , Fujita M , Soudthedlath K , Nakamura H , Yoneyama K , Nomura T , Akiyama K , Maruyama-Nakashita A , Asami T , Nakashita H . 2022 . Strigolactones Modulate Salicylic Acid-Mediated Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana . International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022 , Vol. 23 , Page 5246 23, 5246. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ledger SE , Janssen BJ , Karunairetnam S , Wang T , Snowden KC . 2010 . Modified CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 expression correlates with altered branching in kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) . New Phytologist 188 , 803 – 813 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Li M , Li X , Du J , et al. 2024 . Effects of exogenous application of the strigolactone GR24 on quality and flavor components during postharvest storage of celery . Postharvest Biology and Technology 212 , 112900 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Li M , Yang M , Liu X , et al. 2023 . Pre-Harvest Application of Strigolactone (GR24) Accelerates Strawberry Ripening and Improves Fruit Quality . Agronomy 13 , 2699 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Lin H , Wang RX , Qian Q , et al. 2009 . DWARF27, an Iron-Containing Protein Required for the Biosynthesis of Strigolactones, Regulates Rice Tiller Bud Outgrowth . Plant Cell 21 , 1512 – 1525 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Liu H , Ding Y , Zhou Y , Jin W , Xie K , Chen L-L . 2017 . CRISPR-P 2.0: An Improved CRISPR-Cas9 Tool for Genome Editing in Plants . Molecular Plant 10 , 530 – 532 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Liu X , Hu Q , Yan J , et al. 2020 . ζ-Carotene Isomerase Suppresses Tillering in Rice through the Coordinated Biosynthesis of Strigolactone and Abscisic Acid . Molecular Plant 13 , 1784 – 1801 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Liu J , Novero M , Charnikhova T , Ferrandino A , Schubert A , Ruyter-Spira C , Bonfante P , Lovisolo C , Bouwmeester HJ , Cardinale F . 2013 . CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE 7 modulates plant growth, reproduction, senescence, and determinate nodulation in the model legume Lotus japonicus . Journal of Experimental Botany 64 , 1967 – 1981 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Mageroy MH , Tieman DM , Floystad A , Taylor MG , Klee HJ . 2012 . A Solanum lycopersicum catechol-O-methyltransferase involved in synthesis of the flavor molecule guaiacol . The Plant Journal 69 , 1043 – 1051 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Mashiguchi K , Seto Y , Yamaguchi S . 2021 . Strigolactone biosynthesis, transport and perception . The Plant Journal 105 , 335 – 350 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Parisi M , Pentangelo A , D’Alessandro A , Festa G , Francese G , Navarro A , Sanajà VO , Mennella G . 2023 . Grafting effects on bioactive compounds, chemical and agronomic traits of ‘Corbarino’ tomato grown under greenhouse healthy conditions . Horticultural Plant Journal 9 , 273 – 284 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Qiu D , Diretto G , Tavazza R , Giuliano G . 2007 . Improved protocol for Agrobacterium mediated transformation of tomato and production of transgenic plants containing carotenoid biosynthetic gene CsZCD . Scientia Horticulturae 112 , 172 – 175 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Rambla JL , Medina A , Fernández-del-Carmen A , et al. 2017 . Identification, introgression, and validation of fruit volatile QTLs from a red-fruited wild tomato species . Journal of Experimental Botany 68 , 429 – 442 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Rasmussen A , Mason MG , De Cuyper C , et al. 2012 . Strigolactones Suppress Adventitious Rooting in Arabidopsis and Pea . Plant Physiology 158 , 1976 – 1987 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Ron M , Kajala K , Pauluzzi G , et al. 2014 . Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model . Plant Physiology 166 , 455 – 469 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Seto Y , Sado A , Asami K , Hanada A , Umehara M , Akiyama K , Yamaguchi S . 2014 . Carlactone is an endogenous biosynthetic precursor for strigolactones . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 , 1640 – 1645 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tieman D , Zeigler M , Schmelz E , Taylor MG , Rushing S , Jones JB , Klee HJ . 2010 . Functional analysis of a tomato salicylic acid methyl transferase and its role in synthesis of the flavor volatile methyl salicylate . The Plant Journal 62 , 113 – 123 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Tikunov YM , Molthoff J , de Vos RCH , et al. 2013 . NON-SMOKY GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE1 Prevents the Release of Smoky Aroma from Tomato Fruit . The Plant Cell 25 , 3067 – 3078 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Tolnai Z , Sharma H , Soós V . 2023 . D27-like carotenoid isomerases: at the crossroads of strigolactone and abscisic acid biosynthesis . Journal of Experimental Botany doi: 10.1093/JXB/ERAD475 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Visentin I , Ferigolo LF , Russo G , et al. 2024 . Strigolactones promote flowering by inducing the miR319- LA - SFT module in tomato . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 , 1 – 10 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Visentin I , Pagliarani C , Deva E , Caracci A , Turečková V , Novák O , Lovisolo C , Schubert A , Cardinale F . 2020 . A novel strigolactone[miR156 module controls stomatal behaviour during drought recovery . Plant, Cell & Environment 43 , 1613 – 1624 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Vogel JT , Walter MH , Giavalisco P , et al. 2010 . SlCCD7 controls strigolactone biosynthesis, shoot branching and mycorrhiza-induced apocarotenoid formation in tomato . Plant Journal 61 , 300 – 311 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ de Vos RC , Moco S , Lommen A , Keurentjes JJ , Bino RJ , Hall RD . 2007 . Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry . Nature Protocols 2 , 778 – 791 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Vurro M , Boari A , Thiombiano B , Bouwmeester H . 2019 . Strigolactones and Parasitic Plants. Strigolactones - Biology and Applications . Cham : Springer International Publishing , 89 – 120 . ↵ Wakabayashi T , Hamana M , Mori A , et al. 2019 . Direct conversion of carlactonoic acid to orobanchol by cytochrome P450 CYP722C in strigolactone biosynthesis . Science Advances 5 , 1 – 11 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wakabayashi T , Moriyama D , Miyamoto A , Okamura H , Shiotani N , Shimizu N , Mizutani M , Takikawa H , Sugimoto Y . 2022 . Identification of novel canonical strigolactones produced by tomato . Frontiers in Plant Science 13 , 1064378 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wang Y , Durairaj J , Suárez Duran HG , et al. 2022 . The tomato cytochrome P450 CYP712G1 catalyses the double oxidation of orobanchol en route to the rhizosphere signalling strigolactone, solanacol . New Phytologist 235 , 1884 – 1899 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Waters MT , Brewer PB , Bussell JD , Smith SM , Beveridge CA . 2012 . The Arabidopsis Ortholog of Rice DWARF27 Acts Upstream of MAX1 in the Control of Plant Development by Strigolactones . Plant Physiology 159 , 1073 – 1085 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Wu H , Li H , Chen H , Qi Q , Ding Q , Xue J , Ding J , Jiang X , Hou X , Li Y . 2019 . Identification and expression analysis of strigolactone biosynthetic and signaling genes reveal strigolactones are involved in fruit development of the woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) . BMC Plant Biology 19 , 1 – 19 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yang Y , Abuauf H , Song S , et al. 2023 . The Arabidopsis D27[LIKE1 is a cis / cis / trans [β[carotene isomerase that contributes to Strigolactone biosynthesis and negatively impacts ABA level . The Plant Journal 113 , 986 – 1003 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ye F , Fang H , Feng L , Shi M , Yang R , Liao W . 2024 . Hydrogen-rich water enhanced salt tolerance in tomato seedlings by regulating strigolactone biosynthesis genes SlMAX1 and SlD27 . Plant and Soil , 1 – 19 . ↵ Yıldırım K , Kavas M , Akın M , Küçük İS . 2024 . Genome Editing-Based Strategies Used to Enhance Crop Resistance to Parasitic Weeds . A Roadmap for Plant Genome Editing . Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland , 411 – 422 . ↵ Yoneyama K , Xie X , Nomura T , Yoneyama K , Bennett T . 2022 . Supra-organismal regulation of strigolactone exudation and plant development in response to rhizospheric cues in rice . Current Biology 32 , 3601 – 3608 .e3. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Yoneyama K , Yoneyama K , Takeuchi Y , Sekimoto H . 2007 . Phosphorus deficiency in red clover promotes exudation of orobanchol, the signal for mycorrhizal symbionts and germination stimulant for root parasites . Planta 225 , 1031 – 1038 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Zhang Y , Cheng X , Wang Y , Díez-Simón C , Flokova K , Bimbo A , Bouwmeester HJ , Ruyter-Spira C . 2018 . The tomato MAX1 homolog, SlMAX1, is involved in the biosynthesis of tomato strigolactones from carlactone . New Phytologist 219 , 297 – 309 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Zhou F , Last RL , Pichersky E . 2021 . Degradation of salicylic acid to catechol in Solanaceae by SA 1-hydroxylase . Plant Physiology 185 , 876 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted February 06, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance A. Nicoliaa , A. Cuccurullo , K. Tamada , K. Yoneyama , J.L. Rambla , A. Granell , F. Camerlengo , G. Festa , G. Francese , F. Contaldi , A. D’Alessandro , M.M. Rigano , L. Principio , N. D’Agostino , T. Cardi bioRxiv 2025.02.01.636032; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636032 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Editing strigolactone biosynthesis genes in tomato reveals novel phenotypic effects and highlights D27 as a key target for parasitic weed resistance A. Nicoliaa , A. Cuccurullo , K. Tamada , K. Yoneyama , J.L. Rambla , A. Granell , F. Camerlengo , G. Festa , G. Francese , F. Contaldi , A. D’Alessandro , M.M. Rigano , L. Principio , N. D’Agostino , T. Cardi bioRxiv 2025.02.01.636032; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.01.636032 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genetics Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7622) Biochemistry (17648) Bioengineering (13871) Bioinformatics (41880) Biophysics (21423) Cancer Biology (18561) Cell Biology (25461) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13364) Ecology (19866) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24290) Genetics (15590) Genomics (22475) Immunology (17713) Microbiology (40328) Molecular Biology (17148) Neuroscience (88473) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2827) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4816) Physiology (7635) Plant Biology (15114) Scientific Communication and Education (2044) Synthetic Biology (4286) Systems Biology (9815) Zoology (2268)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00