Sex differentiation, divergence, and introgression in the leishmaniasis vector Lutzomyia longipalpis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,933 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT An estimated one billion people are at risk of acquiring the disease leishmaniasis annually. This disease, among others, is transmitted to humans via sandfly vectors of the family Psychodidae. In the Neotropics, Lutzomyia longipalpis is one of the most common vectors of leishmaniasis, but little is known about its genetics and population structure, hampering control efforts. We generated sex-specific genome assemblies of Lu. longipalpis from Colombia, and examined population genomics of this species. We found that sex accounts for ∼11% of genome-wide variation, primarily driven by differentiation between the sexes in an XY sex chromosome. Analyses of transposable elements indicate that the size difference in the sex chromosome is driven by more transposable elements in the male chromosome. Further, we examined population genomics and structure across the South American continent. We identified significant genetic divergence between Colombian and Brazilian sandflies and population structure within Lu. longipalpis sensu lato samples collected from the same sites in Brazil. These results strongly suggest the presence of multiple, sympatric species within a cryptic species complex, concordant with other published phenotypic evidence. SIGNIFICANCE Leishmaniasis has emerged as an important public health issue. Transmission occurs exclusively through Phlebotomine sandflies of the genera Lutzomyia and Phlebotomus, yet our ability to prevent its spread is constrained by limited knowledge of the biological and ecological factors that make these insects effective vectors. In this manuscript, we leverage whole-genome sequencing to investigate the evolutionary forces shaping genetic diversity in Lutzomyia longipalpis, a key vector of leishmaniasis. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes This version of the manuscript shows an amended version of the methods

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00