Comparison of the effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and dienogest treatment on systemic inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, SII) and anemia parameters in patients with adenomyosis at 6 months

other OA: closed public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09

This study found that levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUS) improved hemoglobin more than dienogest in adenomyosis patients after 6 months, with neither treatment altering systemic inflammatory markers.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study evaluated 162 women with adenomyosis treated with either a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (89 patients) or dienogest 2 mg/day (73 patients), comparing changes from baseline to 6 months in systemic inflammatory markers (NLR, PLR, SII) and anemia parameters. At 6 months, hemoglobin increased significantly more with the LNG-IUS group than with dienogest, while neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet counts and the inflammatory indices NLR, PLR, and SII showed no significant between-group or within-group differences after treatment. The key limitation is the study design (retrospective, observational, and single-center) and the authors’ limited reporting on data sharing, which may constrain causal interpretation. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it directly compares LNG-IUS versus dienogest effects on systemic inflammatory markers and anemia parameters at 6 months.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) on systemic inflammatory markers and anemia parameters in patients with adenomyosis after 6 months of treatment. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study included 162 women diagnosed with adenomyosis at İzmir Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital between 2020 and 2025. A total of 89 patients received LNG-IUS (Mirena), and 73 were treated with DNG 2 mg/day. Hemoglobin (Hb), neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts were obtained before treatment (baseline) and at 6 months to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0, with P  0.05). At 6 months, hemoglobin levels increased significantly more in the LNG-IUS group compared with the DNG group (2.29 ± 3.61 vs. 0.84 ± 4.82; P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed between groups in neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet counts, or inflammatory indices (NLR, PLR, SII) before and after treatment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both LNG-IUS and DNG are safe and effective medical options for adenomyosis management. LNG-IUS provided superior improvement in hemoglobin levels and bleeding control, while neither treatment significantly altered systemic inflammatory indices. These findings suggest that inflammation in adenomyosis is largely confined to the local uterine environment and that hematologic markers such as NLR, PLR, and SII may have limited sensitivity in reflecting short-term therapeutic response.
Full text 2,157 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and dienogest (DNG) on systemic inflammatory markers and anemia parameters in patients with adenomyosis after 6 months of treatment.

Methods

This retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study included 162 women diagnosed with adenomyosis at İzmir Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Training and Research Hospital between 2020 and 2025. A total of 89 patients received LNG-IUS (Mirena), and 73 were treated with DNG 2 mg/day. Hemoglobin (Hb), neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts were obtained before treatment (baseline) and at 6 months to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Baseline demographic and obstetric characteristics were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months, hemoglobin levels increased significantly more in the LNG-IUS group compared with the DNG group (2.29 ± 3.61 vs. 0.84 ± 4.82; P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed between groups in neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet counts, or inflammatory indices (NLR, PLR, SII) before and after treatment (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both LNG-IUS and DNG are safe and effective medical options for adenomyosis management. LNG-IUS provided superior improvement in hemoglobin levels and bleeding control, while neither treatment significantly altered systemic inflammatory indices. These findings suggest that inflammation in adenomyosis is largely confined to the local uterine environment and that hematologic markers such as NLR, PLR, and SII may have limited sensitivity in reflecting short-term therapeutic response. CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Research data are not shared.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 4
levonorgestrel dienogest levonorgestrel dienogest

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:10:56.557307+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-03T06:06:27.511730+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-07-26T09:53:43.985191+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine