Exploration of the abdomen

Observational OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-13 ⓘ

This analysis of 1500 laparotomies finds high rates of alternative or incidental diagnoses, supporting routine complete abdominal exploration during surgery while emphasizing the necessity of careful preoperative investigation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The findings at 1500 consecutive laparotomies are reported. The likelihood of finding an alternative condition to the preoperative diagnosis and of discovering important incidental findings is so high that complete abdominal exploration should be carried out whenever possible at routine abdominal operations. However, laparotomy is no substitute for careful preoperative investigation. Routine preoperative endoscopy is recommended before all operations on the upper gastrointestinal tract. If no cause for symptoms is found at operation no procedure should be carried out; the placebo effect of laparotomy and subsequent assurance often leads to alleviation of the symptoms.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Abdomen Laparotomy Abdomen Diagnostic Errors Esophagoscopy Fiber Optic Technology Gastrointestinal Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Gastroscopy Humans Laparotomy Neoplasms Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T22:00:48.437354+00:00