Methods
A bibliographic review study was performed. For the research, the search platforms
PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were used, with descriptors established through DeCS/MeSH
for the first database and controlled vocabulary query for the other two.
In PubMed, the search strategy assembled was (Endometriosis[MeSH] OR Endometrioses OR
Endometrioma OR Endometriomas) AND (Cannabidiol[MeSH] OR 1,3-Benzenediol,
2-(3-methyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-5-pentyl-, (1R-trans)- OR
Epidiolex OR Cannabi* OR Resorcinols OR Terpenes OR “Dronabinol”[Mesh] OR THC OR
Tetrahydrocannabinol OR “Tetrahydrocannabinol, Trans-Isomer” OR
“Tetrahydrocannabinol, Trans Isomer” OR Marinol) AND (“Therapeutic Uses”[MeSH] OR
“Uses, Therapeutic” OR “Therapeutic Use” OR “Use, Therapeutic” OR “Therapeutic
Effects” OR “Effects, Therapeutic” OR “Therapeutic Effect” OR “Effect,
Therapeutic”), with 103 results obtained.
In Scopus, the research was conducted using (Endometriosis OR Endometrioses OR
Endometrioma OR Endometriomas OR “adenomyosis externa” OR “endometriosis externa”)
AND (Cannabidiol OR Epidiolex OR Cannabi* OR Resorcinols OR Terpenes OR Dronabinol
OR THC OR Tetrahydrocannabinol OR “Tetrahydrocannabinol, Trans-Isomer” OR
“Tetrahydrocannabinol, Trans Isomer” OR Marinol OR adversa OR reduvo OR relivar OR
syndros OR tetranabinex) AND (“Therapeutic Uses” OR “Uses, Therapeutic” OR
“Therapeutic Use” OR “Use, Therapeutic” OR “Therapeutic Effects” OR “Effects,
Therapeutic” OR “Therapeutic Effect” OR “Effect, Therapeutic” OR “drug treatment” OR
“medicament therapy” OR “medicament treatment” OR “medicinal therapy” OR “medicinal
treatment” OR “pharmaceutical therapy” OR “pharmaceutical treatment” OR
“pharmaco-therapy” OR “pharmaco-treatment” OR “pharmacological therapy” OR
“pharmacological treatment” OR pharmacotherapy OR pharmacotreatment OR “therapeutic
uses” OR “therapy, drug” OR “therapy, pharmacological” OR “treatment, drug” OR
“treatment, pharmacological”), with 426 final results.
Finally, in Embase, (‘adenomyosis externa’ OR ‘endometriosis externa’ OR
‘endometriosis’) AND (‘2 (6 isopropenyl 3 methylcyclohex 2 en 1 yl) 5 pentylbenzene
1, 3 diol’ OR ‘2 (6 isopropenyl 3 methylcyclohex 2 enyl) 5 pentylbenzene 1, 3 diol’
OR ‘2 [3 methyl 6 (1 methylethenyl) 2 cyclohexen 1 yl] 5 pentyl 1, 3 benzenediol’ OR
‘2 [3 methyl 6 (prop 1 en 2 yl) cyclohex 2 en 1 yl] 5 pentylbenzene 1, 3 diol’ OR ‘2
para mentha 1, 8 dien 3 yl 5 pentylresorcinol’ OR ‘5` methyl 4 pentyl 2` (prop 1 en
2 yl) 1`, 2`, 3`, 4` tetrahydrobiphenyl 2, 6 diol’ OR ‘a 1002 n5s’ OR ‘a1002n5s’ OR
‘btx 1204’ OR ‘btx 1308’ OR ‘btx 1503’ OR ‘btx 1702’ OR ‘btx 1801’ OR ‘btx1204’ OR
‘btx1308’ OR ‘btx1503’ OR ‘btx1702’ OR ‘btx1801’ OR ‘cardiolrx’ OR ‘epidiolex’ OR
‘epidyolex’ OR ‘gwp 42003’ OR ‘gwp 42003p’ OR ‘gwp42003’ OR ‘gwp42003p’ OR
‘nabidiolex’ OR ‘nantheia’ OR ‘oravexx’ OR ‘rad 011’ OR ‘rad011’ OR ‘trans
cannabidiol’ OR ‘zygel’ OR ‘zyn 002’ OR ‘zyn002’ OR ‘cannabidiol’ OR ‘1 trans delta
9 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘3 pentyl 6, 6, 9 trimethyl 6a, 7, 8, 10a tetrahydro 6h
dibenzo [b, d] pyran 1 ol’ OR ‘6, 6, 9 trimethyl 3 pentyl 6a, 7, 8, 10a
tetrahydrobenzo [c] chromen 1 ol’ OR ‘adversa’ OR ‘bx 1’ OR ‘bx1’ OR ‘delta 1 3, 4
trans tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta 1 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta 1 trans
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta 1, 2 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta 9
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta 9 trans tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta1 3, 4 trans
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta1 cis tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta1
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta1 thc’ OR ‘delta1 trans tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR
‘delta9 tetrahydro cannabinol’ OR ‘delta9 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘delta9 trans
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘ea 1477’ OR ‘ea1477’ OR ‘l delta 9 trans
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘levo delta 1 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘levo delta 9
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘marinol’ OR ‘ppp 002’ OR ‘ppp002’ OR ‘qcd 84924’ OR
‘reduvo’ OR ‘relivar’ OR ‘syndros’ OR ‘tetrahydrocannabinol 1 ene’ OR
‘tetrahydrocannabinol delta1’ OR ‘tetrahydrocannabinol delta9’ OR ‘tetranabinex’ OR
‘trans delta 9 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘u1 tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘u9
tetrahydrocannabinol’ OR ‘dronabinol’) AND (‘drug treatment’ OR ‘medicament therapy’
OR ‘medicament treatment’ OR ‘medication’ OR ‘medicinal therapy’ OR ‘medicinal
treatment’ OR ‘pharmaceutical therapy’ OR ‘pharmaceutical treatment’ OR
‘pharmaco-therapy’ OR ‘pharmaco-treatment’ OR ‘pharmacological therapy’ OR
‘pharmacological treatment’ OR ‘pharmacotherapy’ OR ‘pharmacotreatment’ OR
‘therapeutic uses’ OR ‘therapy, drug’ OR ‘therapy, pharmacological’ OR ‘treatment,
drug’ OR ‘treatment, pharmacological’ OR ‘drug therapy’), pointing to 30
results.
All published articles were included without restrictions on date, species, or
language. After the research, an analysis of all the articles found was conducted.
The selection was made based on the titles and abstracts obtained in the searches. A
total of 9 papers were analyzed and discussed.
Endometriosis is a chronic, inflammatory, and multifactorial disease,
characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity
and very often associated with debilitating symptoms ( Febrasgo, 2021 ). Affecting approximately 10% of women of
reproductive age, it can present with adhesions and fibrosis or even hormonal
and immunological changes, resulting in infertility ( Tanbo & Fedorcsak, 2017 ). Studies indicate the presence
of the disease in 25% to 50% of infertile women, with infertility occurring in
30% to 50% of women with the disease ( Febrasgo,
2021 ).
Although the etiology of endometriosis remains unknown, several theories are
considered on the subject. The primary one is described as the theory of
retrograde menstruation, proposed in 1927 by John A. Sampson, which refers to
the occurrence of menstrual flow in the opposite direction of the natural
process, leading to the consequent intraperitoneal implantation and adhesion of
endometrial cells ( Sampson, 1927 ) ( D’Hooghe & Debrock, 2002 ). It is
understood that there must also be the influence of genetic, hormonal, or
environmental factors ( Nácul &
Spritzer, 2010 ), as well as epigenetic factors ( Chen et al ., 2023 ). Endometriosis is an
estrogen-dependent pathology, aggravated by the presence of the hormone
estradiol leading to increased inflammation, pain, and other signs and symptoms
( Bulun et al .,
2012 ).
The most common symptoms involve chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and
dyspareunia, as well as tenesmus and hematochezia ( Horne & Missmer, 2022 ). Furthermore, the disease can be
classified as peritoneal, ovarian, and deep endometriosis, divisions that are
respectively characterized by the presence of superficial implants on the
peritoneum, superficial implants on the ovary (including cysts and
endometriomas), and lesions of depth equal to or greater than 5 mm in the
retroperitoneal space or on the wall of pelvic organs ( Febrasgo, 2021 ).
One treatment alternative is the surgical removal of endometriotic foci through
laparoscopy, which is also the gold standard for diagnosing the disease, aiming
to identify and remove existing lesions ( Mettler
et al ., 2014 ). Pelvic ultrasound and pelvic
contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging are exams that commonly support the
suspicion of some cases of the disease, sometimes also providing the diagnosis
( Rolla, 2019 ). Several
pharmacological therapies are considered, such as the continuous use of
progestogens (e.g., Dienogest), combined oral contraceptives (COCs), or even
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aiming to treat signs and
symptoms and prevent recurrence after surgical intervention. Drugs act by
reducing the action of estradiol on the endometrium, leading to a decrease in
inflammation and angiogenesis, with possible reduction of endometriotic lesions
and even anovulation. Conversely, combined contraceptives may help by promoting
an increase in progesterone (related to the reduction of ectopic endometriotic
foci) and reducing ovarian estrogen production, in addition to anovulation. The
main concern regarding the off-label use of COCs for endometriosis relates to
the estrogen contained in the pill and its potential contribution to the
progression of the disease. The class of NSAIDs primarily acts by reducing
inflammation and prostaglandin production by inhibiting related enzymes,
potentially influencing pain ( Chen et
al ., 2023 ). Currently, depending on the patient’s
condition and medical approach, opioids may be preferred over NSAIDs, which is
concerning due to the drug class in question becoming a source of addiction,
reinforcing the need for alternative pathways ( Allam et al ., 2022 ).
The choice of treatment varies among patients, depending on their medical history
and the severity of symptoms or even the desire to conceive during the period,
sometimes requiring a combination of surgical and pharmacological intervention.
It is important to note that patients may exhibit progesterone resistance, which
can potentially impact the response to certain medications throughout the
treatment of endometriosis. Factors associated with inflammation, oxidative
stress, epigenetics, disease phenotypes, and congenital characteristics
influence such a response ( Donnez & Dolmans,
2021 ). Moreover, women of childbearing age who desire to conceive
need to discontinue the use of hormonal therapies. Regarding cases requiring
surgical intervention, there is a known risk of adhesions and fibrosis after
surgery, that could lead to infertility due to tubal factor, and the risk of
decreased ovarian reserve in cases of surgical reduction of ovarian endometrioma
( Chen et al ., 2023 ).
There is generally a significant delay in diagnosis, which directly impacts the
quality of life of affected patients ( Horne
& Missmer, 2022 ).
The cannabis plant, according to geographical and evolutionary studies,
originated millions of years ago, and by 4000 BCE, it was already being
exploited as a source of fibers and food, as well as serving medicinal purposes
and in rituals. In the 19th century, the physician William Brooke O’Shaughnessy
conducted the first study demonstrating the pharmacological and toxicological
properties of the plant. He also noticed differences between those cultivated in
India (C. indica ) and Europe (C. sativa ) and
evaluated their use in some of his patients, where he discovered analgesic and
muscle-relaxing properties and explored their application in palliative care.
Subsequently, in the 20th century, there was the discovery of the
endocannabinoid system, its receptors, and the endogenous molecules that act on
it, which renewed scientific interest in the properties of the plant ( O’Shaughnessy, 1839 ) ( Pisanti & Bifulco, 2019 ).
The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is made up of endogenous ligands, G
protein-coupled membrane receptors (GPCRs), and enzymes to degrade the ligands.
To date, two G-protein couplings related to this system have been identified, as
well as two endogenous ligands (arachidonoyl ethanolamide and 2-arachidonoyl
glycerol). The ECS works through a mechanism in which the carrier protein
transports endocannabinoids retrograde from postsynaptic cell membranes to bind
to cannabinoid receptors present on the presynaptic membrane, where they are
degraded by the FAAH or MAGL enzymes. The half-life of endocannabinoids is very
short, as they modulate the release of neurotransmitters by inhibiting the
influx of intracellular calcium and are quickly reabsorbed and catabolized.
Until the latest research, two types of signaling in the ECS were recognized,
phasic signals and tonic signals. The tonic signals are known as basal
signaling, responsible for endocannabinoid tone, while the phasic signals are
responsible for the change in eCBs levels over time ( Silver, 2019 ).
Cannabinoids, substances responsible for activating cannabinoid receptors, can be
derived from the plant (phytocannabinoids), synthetic, or endogenous
(endocannabinoids). The main cannabinoid receptors, known as cannabinoid
receptors 1 and 2 (CB 1 and CB 2 , respectively), are coupled
to G protein, and the tissue distribution of these receptors is related to the
consequent effects of interactions ( Klein,
2005 ). The endocannabinoid system, present in all animals (including
vertebrates and invertebrates, but in different forms), was discovered after the
structural knowledge of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). It is known that
CB 1 and CB 2 receptors are related to various
biological processes such as pain, anxiety, inflammation, immune function,
metabolic regulation, and others. While CB 1 is mainly located in the
central nervous system, CB 2 is found mainly in cells of the immune
system, spleen, and tonsils. In humans, CB 1 receptors are
significantly absent in the brainstem or spinal cord, which ensures safety in
relation to vital functions. It is also known that CB 2 receptors
modulate cytokine release ( Silver,
2019 ).
The Cannabis sativa plant is known worldwide for its medicinal and psychoactive
properties, with more than 500 identified compounds, including cannabinoids,
flavonoids, terpenes, and fatty acids ( Alves
et al ., 2020 ). Among the various cannabinoids
present in the plant, cannabidiol (CBD) and THC ( Urits et al ., 2020 ) are noteworthy. Both have
medicinal properties; however, unlike CBD, THC induces psychoactive effects
( Reich et al .,
1982 ). THC acts as a partial agonist of CB 1 and CB 2
receptors, with activation or blockade of their activity by other cannabinoids
depending on their level of expression and binding efficiency. CBD exhibits
inverse agonism to CB 2 ( Thomas
et al ., 2007 ) and acts as an antagonist to
CB 1 and CB 2 receptor agonists. Although it expresses
low affinity for the receptors, it can interact at low concentrations ( Pertwee, 2008 ). There is also significant
interaction of CBD with transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 and 2 (TRPV1
and TRPV2) receptors, a fact related to the pharmacodynamic properties of the
substance. TRPV2 is associated with analgesia ( Jîtcă et al ., 2023 ).
The THC molecule was identified in 1964 and has well-known therapeutic
properties, with a complex and dose-dependent effect ( Pernoncini & Oliveira, 2014 ). The principal therapeutic
effects are antiepileptic, antiemetic, antispasmodic, analgesic properties, etc.
It can present adverse effects, such as influencing the ability to discriminate
time intervals and memory, as well as inducing disconnected thoughts,
hallucinatory experiences, and others ( Carlini,
2004 ). In contrast, the first studies demonstrating the medicinal
potential of CBD emerged in 1982, where a protective effect against THC-induced
psychoses was demonstrated. Subsequent studies revealed effects such as
anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, antiemetic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant,
immunosuppressive, antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, antiangiogenic, and others
( Pernoncini & Oliveira, 2014 ). In
relation to chronic pain, a symptom that affects about 20% of the population,
CBD is a great candidate for use in treatment, although its analgesic effects
are not yet fully understood ( Urits et
al ., 2020 ).
Dmitrieva et al . (2010)
reported one of the first published articles on the subject, involving the role
of the endocannabinoid system in endometriosis. Through a model using rats, the
expression of CB 1 receptors in the innervation of endometriotic foci
was identified, as well as the reduction of hyperalgesia associated with the
disease by CB 1 receptor agonists. The research group also indicated
that there is higher expression of the CB 1 receptor in endometriotic
lesions compared to the healthy uterus of the same rats, facts that suggest that
treatments aimed at activating these receptors (either directly through
CB 1 agonists or indirectly by increasing endocannabinoid levels)
can be performed with low impact on uterine function ( Dmitrieva et al ., 2010 ).
In the same year, Leconte et al. evaluated the antiproliferative
and antifibrotic effects in vitro and in vivo
of a cannabinoid agonist (WIN 55212-2) in deep endometriosis. The in
vitro model was conducted using primary cultures of endometrial and
deep endometriotic cells extracted from patients with or without the disease,
while the in vivo model was conducted in mice by implanting
deep infiltrating endometriotic nodules removed from human patients. They
evaluated the presence of CB 1 and CB 2 receptors by
comparing eutopic endometrial cell lines and deep endometriotic lesions. The
cell lines were treated with increasing concentrations of the cannabinoid
agonist, and a dose-dependent reduction in cell proliferation was observed.
Additionally, they demonstrated that the treatment did not exhibit cytotoxicity
at the studied concentrations and that there was a reduction in the production
of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Furthermore, the inhibition of smooth muscle
alpha-actin (αSMA) expression is related to the antifibrotic properties
of the tested substance. The results were reproduced in the in
vivo model, and thus, the treatment was considered promising for
further studies ( Leconte et
al ., 2010 ).
Allam et al . (2022)
studied the expression of CB 1 and CB 2 receptors in ovarian
endometriotic lesions. They determined, through immunohistochemistry,
immunoblotting, and gene expression studies, the intense presence mainly in
epithelial cells of such lesions. They also demonstrated increased expression of
these receptors in ovarian endometriotic lesions compared to surrounding stromal
tissues. Finally, the study suggested investigating the use of CB 2
receptor agonists in the treatment of inflammation and pain related to ovarian
endometriosis, given their relationship with cellular processes ( Allam et al. , 2022 ).
A study was conducted on the exposure to THC in female mice with induced
endometriosis, evaluating the effects associated with nociception, cognition,
and emotion. THC treatment reduced hypersensitivity in a dose-dependent manner,
particularly at 2 mg/kg/day, without impairing memory or inducing anxiety-like
behavior. Long-term treatment (32 days) inhibited the development of
endometriotic cysts, with no changes observed in the uterine or eutopic
endometrial areas. The findings suggest that THC may selectively target ectopic
endometrial cells and could have potential therapeutic effects for managing
endometriosis-related pain and inflammation ( Escudero-Lara et al ., 2020 ).
Genovese et al . (2022)
studied the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and analgesic effects of CBD related
to endometriosis through an in vivo model in rats. The animals
were divided into two groups, then classified as donors and recipients. The
donors received intraperitoneal injections of exogenous gonadotropin (PMSG) to
induce estrogen levels and were subsequently euthanized to remove the uterus and
dissect the extrauterine tissue. The recipients, on the other hand, received
intraperitoneal injections with a solution containing the tissue, aiming to
develop the lesion in the region. Among the recipients, they were divided into
three groups, being in order: endometriosis group; endometriosis + CBD group;
and sham group. The first one received vehicle (ethanol/Tween 80/0.9% saline
(3:1:16)), the second group received 10 mg/kg of CBD, and the third group
received an intraperitoneal injection of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) in the
midventral area as a substitute for endometrial tissue. Behavioral,
histological, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and measurements of levels of
various neurosensitizing and pro-inflammatory substances were performed. They
observed anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative effects regarding the size of
the lesion and peritoneal fluids, as well as a decrease in neurogenic
inflammation and neurosensitizing mediators ( Genovese et al ., 2022 ).
Okten et al . (2023) also
studied the effects of CBD in an animal model. The experiments used rats, which
were divided into four groups (saline solution, CBD 5mg/kg, CBD 20mg/kg, and
leuprolide acetate), all undergoing three laparotomies, with intervals of 21
days. The first involved the induction of endometriotic lesions with tissue
transplanted from the animal itself. The second aimed to confirm the formation
of the implants and measure them, allowing injections according to the
previously determined distribution. Finally, the third surgery was performed to
collect samples of peritoneal fluid, in addition to measuring and collecting the
implants, followed by euthanasia of the animals and collection of intracardiac
serum samples. In the group that received CBD at a lower concentration,
significant reductions were observed in the areas of the implanted endometriotic
lesions compared to the group treated with saline, as well as in the levels of
total antioxidant status (TOS), oxidative stress index (OSI), interleukin-6
(IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), along with an increase
in total antioxidant status (TAS) ( Okten
et al ., 2023 ).
In studies involving humans, the prevalence, tolerability, and self-reported
efficacy of Cannabis in women with endometriosis in Australia were evaluated. A
questionnaire was administered to female individuals between 18 and 45 years old
who had a surgically confirmed diagnosis of the disease. Various symptoms were
addressed, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, gastrointestinal problems,
nausea and vomiting, dyspareunia, dysuria, and sleep, in addition to pelvic pain
and its impacts. They also inquired about costs, frequency of use (25% - less
than once a week; 12.5% - once a week; 18.75% - two to three times a week;
43.75% - daily or several times a day), adverse events (10.42% - reported
occurrence; 89.58% - did not report occurrence), and routes of administration
(50% - smoking; 11.9% - vaporization; 11.9% - oral/edible; 2.38% - rectal or
vaginal oil; 23.8% - multiple). Among the participants, 56% of women using the
substance reported a significant reduction in medication use. The main
improvements noted by the participants were related to pelvic pain and sleep,
anxiety, depression, nausea/vomiting, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Reported
adverse events included drowsiness, anxiety, and tachycardia. Participants who
reported the use of medicinal cannabis had higher scores for the impact of
pelvic pain compared to those who did not use it. The proportions of THC/CBD in
the products consumed by the participants were not evaluated, and the reasons
why participants consumed cannabis and/or other treatments were not explored
( Sinclair et al .,
2020 ).
Sinclair et al . (2021)
studied the effects of cannabis ingestion on pelvic pain associated with
endometriosis and other associated symptoms. The study was a retrospective
cohort analysis using electronic records from users of a Canadian app for
monitoring medicinal cannabis use. Statistical analysis of the data was
performed, and self-rated efficacy was defined based on the initial and final
classifications of reported symptoms. Self-reported symptoms were classified as
pain (pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea), gastrointestinal (pain and nausea), and
mood (depression and low libido), while forms of administration were divided
into oral (edible, oil, capsule, spray), topical (transdermal and topical), and
inhaled (vaporized and smoked, puffs). The mean age obtained was 35 years, with
administrations mainly pulmonary (inhaled) and use mainly related to pelvic
pain. The doses used ranged from 9mg/mL to 1mg/mL, as well as the concentrations
of THC and CBD, both according to the chosen route of administration ( Sinclair et al .,
2021 ).
Sinclair et al . (2022)
studied the use of cannabis in the treatment of endometriosis, with a larger
sample of patients. The eligible participants were those who had confirmed
endometriosis and have a history of using cannabis or products based on it for
signs and symptoms control in the preceding three months. They inquired about
the symptoms present at that moment (most of them being fatigue, chronic pelvic
pain, and intestinal symptoms) and the medications/treatments being used at the
time and, also, the access to Cannabis. The cessation or significant reduction
of other medications while using cannabis was reported. The reasons for using
cannabis were since inadequate pain control with other medications, intolerable
side effects of other medications, perception of effects on signs and symptoms
during recreational use, recommendations from colleagues/support groups, medical
recommendation, difficulty accessing other medications, difficulty accessing
surgery, and delayed/canceled surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A
significant number of participants reported that they would continue to use
medicinal cannabis because it provided better effects in terms of pain relief
compared to other current treatments. When questioned about communication and
discussion of the use with healthcare professionals, generally there was no
knowledge about legal access routes and no communication to doctors due to
concerns related to legal and social issues, which poses risks to individuals’
health due to possible pharmacodynamic interactions and systemic effects. The
group considered it a public health issue due to the widespread use of illicit
cannabis, as it does not provide guaranteed quality and standardization of
necessary active cannabinoids for regulation, nor does it provide significant
safety for consistent clinical reproducibility, and it carries risks of
contamination (mold, heavy metals, bacteria, and pesticide residues) ( Sinclair et al .,
2022 ).
Furthermore, there are already some studies in the development phase registered
at the National Library of Medicine, such as NCT05670353 (São Paulo,
Brazil) and NCT04527003 (Pennsylvania, United States of America) ( ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023 ).