Statcheck in Canada: What Proportion of CPA Journal Articles Contain Errors in the Reporting of p-Values?
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Using a computer program called “Statcheck,” a 2016 digital survey of several prestigious American and European psychology journals showed that the p-values reported in research articles failed to agree with the corresponding test statistics (e.g., F, t, χ2) at surprisingly high rates: nearly half of all articles contained at least one such error, as did about 10% of all null hypothesis significance tests. We investigated whether this problem was present in Canadian psychology journals and, if so, at what frequency. We discovered similar rates of p-value errors in Canadian journals over the past 30 years. However, we also noticed, a large number of typographical errors in the electronic versions of the articles. When we hand corrected a sample of our articles, the per-article error rate remained about the same, but the per test rate of errors dropped to 6.3%. We recommend that, in future, journals include explicit checks of statistics in their editorial processes.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00