An Eligibility-Aware Pipeline for Robust ITS Diagnostics in Fungi: A Cacao Case Study with Generalizable Rules

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The paper studied how to benchmark and design fungal ITS diagnostic PCR assays using public sequence archives, focusing on errors caused by truncated database records that may be missing the LSU/28S region and thereby confound primer performance with database incompleteness. It developed an open, reproducible “eligibility-aware” pipeline that first checks whether both primer binding sites are present in each sequence, then applies performance rules with a strict penalty for 3’-terminal mismatches, alongside analyses of binding-site conservation and rarefaction-based quality control as databases expand. Using a cacao case study to distinguish the fungal pathogen Moniliophthora from symptomatically similar oomycetes, the authors report a robust, field-ready decision tree under a single touchdown PCR program, while explicitly noting the need to account for heterogeneous record completeness. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate fungal ITS diagnostics rely on public sequence archives, but heterogeneous record lengths, especially frequent truncation before the LSU/28S segment, cause naive in silico benchmarking to conflate primer performance with database incompleteness. To resolve this persistent “denominator error,” we present an open and fully reproducible “eligibility-aware” framework. Our pipeline first establishes eligibility by confirming both primer sites are present before applying bench-realistic performance rules, including a strict penalty for 3’-terminal mismatches. It further provides mechanistic insights by analyzing binding-site conservation and uses a rarefaction-based approach to guide efficient quality control as databases grow. We demonstrate the framework’s utility using the cacao pathosystem, a context where rapid differentiation of the fungal pathogen Moniliophthora from symptomatically similar oomycetes is critical. The result is a robust, field-ready diagnostic decision tree operable under a single touchdown (TD) PCR program. By providing a transparent and barcode-agnostic template, our eligibility-aware approach offers a significant methodological advance for designing and validating molecular assays in mycology and beyond.
Full text 1,339 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Accurate fungal ITS diagnostics rely on public sequence archives, but heterogeneous record lengths, especially frequent truncation before the LSU/28S segment, cause naive in silico benchmarking to conflate primer performance with database incompleteness. To resolve this persistent “denominator error,” we present an open and fully reproducible “eligibility-aware” framework. Our pipeline first establishes eligibility by confirming both primer sites are present before applying bench-realistic performance rules, including a strict penalty for 3’-terminal mismatches. It further provides mechanistic insights by analyzing binding-site conservation and uses a rarefaction-based approach to guide efficient quality control as databases grow. We demonstrate the framework’s utility using the cacao pathosystem, a context where rapid differentiation of the fungal pathogen Moniliophthora from symptomatically similar oomycetes is critical. The result is a robust, field-ready diagnostic decision tree operable under a single touchdown (TD) PCR program. By providing a transparent and barcode-agnostic template, our eligibility-aware approach offers a significant methodological advance for designing and validating molecular assays in mycology and beyond. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00