Spatially distinct cellular and molecular landscapes define prognosis in triple negative breast cancer

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Triple-negative breast cancer is a prevalent breast cancer subtype with the lowest 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to its treatment response, but the inherent molecular and cellular tumor heterogeneity are increasingly acknowledged as crucial determinants. Methods Spatial transcriptomic profiling was performed on FFPE tissues from a retrospective, treatment-naive group of women with differential prognoses (17 with >15 years survival-good prognosis (GPx) and 15 with <3 years survival-poor prognosis (PPx)) using GeoMX ® Digital Spatial Profiler. Regions of interest were segmented on pan-cytokeratin and analyzed for tumor and stromal components, probed using GeoMx human whole transcriptome atlas (WTA) panel. Data quality control, normalization, and differential analysis was performed in R using GeomxTools and linear mixed models. Additional analyses including cell-type deconvolution, spatial entropy, functional enrichment, TF-target / ligand-receptor analysis and convolution neural networks were employed to identify significant gene signatures contributing to differential prognosis. Results Here we report on the spatial and molecular heterogeneity underlying differential prognosis. We observe that the state of the epithelia and its microenvironment (TME) are transcriptionally distinct between the two groups. Invasive epithelia in GPx show a significant increase in immune transcripts with the TME exhibiting increased immune cell presence (via IF), while in PPx they are more metabolically and translationally active, with the TME being more mesenchymal/fibrotic. Specifically, pre-cancerous epithelia in PPx display a prescience of aggressiveness as evidenced by increased EMT-signaling. We identify distinct epithelial gene signatures for PPx and GPx, that can, with high accuracy, classify samples at the time of diagnosis and likely inform therapy. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to leverage spatial transcriptomics for an in-depth delineation of the cellular and molecular underpinnings of differential prognosis in TNBC. Our study highlights the potential of spatial transcriptomics to not only uncover the molecular drivers of differential prognosis in TNBC but also to pave the way for precision diagnostics and tailored therapeutic strategies, transforming the clinical landscape for this aggressive breast cancer subtype.
Full text 3,043 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Triple-negative breast cancer is a prevalent breast cancer subtype with the lowest 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to its treatment response, but the inherent molecular and cellular tumor heterogeneity are increasingly acknowledged as crucial determinants.

Methods

Spatial transcriptomic profiling was performed on FFPE tissues from a retrospective, treatment-naive group of women with differential prognoses (17 with >15 years survival-good prognosis (GPx) and 15 with <3 years survival-poor prognosis (PPx)) using GeoMX® Digital Spatial Profiler. Regions of interest were segmented on pan-cytokeratin and analyzed for tumor and stromal components, probed using GeoMx human whole transcriptome atlas (WTA) panel. Data quality control, normalization, and differential analysis was performed in R using GeomxTools and linear mixed models. Additional analyses including cell-type deconvolution, spatial entropy, functional enrichment, TF-target / ligand-receptor analysis and convolution neural networks were employed to identify significant gene signatures contributing to differential prognosis.

Results

Here we report on the spatial and molecular heterogeneity underlying differential prognosis. We observe that the state of the epithelia and its microenvironment (TME) are transcriptionally distinct between the two groups. Invasive epithelia in GPx show a significant increase in immune transcripts with the TME exhibiting increased immune cell presence (via IF), while in PPx they are more metabolically and translationally active, with the TME being more mesenchymal/fibrotic. Specifically, pre-cancerous epithelia in PPx display a prescience of aggressiveness as evidenced by increased EMT-signaling. We identify distinct epithelial gene signatures for PPx and GPx, that can, with high accuracy, classify samples at the time of diagnosis and likely inform therapy.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to leverage spatial transcriptomics for an in-depth delineation of the cellular and molecular underpinnings of differential prognosis in TNBC. Our study highlights the potential of spatial transcriptomics to not only uncover the molecular drivers of differential prognosis in TNBC but also to pave the way for precision diagnostics and tailored therapeutic strategies, transforming the clinical landscape for this aggressive breast cancer subtype. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Data and materials availability The 1440 DCC files generated and utilized in the study are available to reviewers at www.tnbcworkbench.org/tnbc_respository.php. Due to the nature of the data, this is currently controlled access and will be made open source after peer review. All other additional material necessary to recapitulate the results are provided in the supplementary materials attached. The code generated in this study largely follows the open-source vignettes associated with each R/BioC library but can be made available upon request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0