Feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Southern California

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper studied the feasibility of using coaxial deep borehole heat exchangers (CDBHEs) for heating at the University of California San Diego by combining geophysical data and well logs to build a multilayer thermophysical model. The authors used a finite-element Navier–Stokes fluid-flow and heat-transfer framework, including uncertainty in deeper heat-flow gradients and variations in insulation, flow rate, outer diameter, grout, and borehole depths between 1 and 4 km, and they validated the model with a field test from the literature. They reported that a 4 km CDBHE could yield 600 kW under optimal geological conditions, with deeper layers contributing more to thermal power than shallower ones. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 13,184 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Southern California | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Southern California Haohua Chen, Ingrid Tomac This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in Geothermal Energy → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This paper investigates the feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger (CDBHE) applications to the campus at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). By collecting different geophysical source data for various formations and well logs around the UCSD campus, a multilayered thermophysical model for the ground on the site is established. Circulation of water within a closed coaxial loop system considers the geothermal energy extraction under uncertainity consideration of the unknown deeper layers heat flow gradient as coupled with the variation of pipe insulation properties, flow rates, outer pipe diameter, grout and depths between 1 km and 4 km. A finite-element framework is constituted to model the Navier-Stokes fluid flow and heat transfer in the CDBHE system, and validated with a field test on CDBHE from the literature. It was found that a 4 km CDBHE could produce a thermal power of 600 kW under the optimum geological conditions at the UCSD site. Thermal power shares from different layers indicate that deeper formation layers contribute more to the thermal power than the shallower layers. An inner pipe with an insulated depth of 2 km produces only 1–6% less power than a fully insulated inner pipe for the 4 km CDBHE, and thus a partially insulated VIT-plastic inner pipe is suggested. Furthermore, the CDBHE thermal power increases by 5% when the grout thermal conductivity increases from 1 to 3.65 W/(K∙m), close to the formation thermal conductivity, and then maintains almost the same, and the 4 km CDBHE with flow rates of 2.78–6.94 L/s at the UCSD site can directly supply a low-temperature heating radiator system for room heating. The effects of the investigated factors provide guidelines for future geothermal resource exploitation in southern California. deep borehole heat exchanger renewable energy heat transfer geothermal Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 01 Nov, 2024 Read the published version in Geothermal Energy → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 14 Aug, 2024 Reviews received at journal 14 Aug, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 24 Jul, 2024 Reviews received at journal 17 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 27 Jun, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 27 Jun, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 26 Jun, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 26 Jun, 2024 First submitted to journal 07 Jun, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4546850","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":328674007,"identity":"d18fa5be-2d39-43cd-8ed5-1ba2208cc1b8","order_by":0,"name":"Haohua Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of California San Diego","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Haohua","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":328674008,"identity":"a7a66715-3ed1-4a9e-9470-1bc9ec6f1f61","order_by":1,"name":"Ingrid Tomac","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of California San Diego","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ingrid","middleName":"","lastName":"Tomac","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-06-07 14:56:56","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-024-00319-0","type":"published","date":"2024-11-01T16:12:57+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":68206494,"identity":"6b756644-24f6-4f0f-a8a0-d607693a2aa9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-04 16:32:40","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":808065,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ChenTomacGEENR0.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4546850/v1_covered_a3051d11-40fa-4236-88a4-2832854bd6c1.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Southern California","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"geothermal-energy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"geen","sideBox":"Learn more about [Geothermal Energy](https://geothermal-energy-journal.springeropen.com/about)","snPcode":"40517","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/40517/3","title":"Geothermal Energy","twitterHandle":"@SpringerOpen","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"deep borehole heat exchanger, renewable energy, heat transfer, geothermal","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis paper investigates the feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchanger (CDBHE) applications to the campus at the University of California San Diego (UCSD). By collecting different geophysical source data for various formations and well logs around the UCSD campus, a multilayered thermophysical model for the ground on the site is established. Circulation of water within a closed coaxial loop system considers the geothermal energy extraction under uncertainity consideration of the unknown deeper layers heat flow gradient as coupled with the variation of pipe insulation properties, flow rates, outer pipe diameter, grout and depths between 1 km and 4 km. A finite-element framework is constituted to model the Navier-Stokes fluid flow and heat transfer in the CDBHE system, and validated with a field test on CDBHE from the literature. It was found that a 4 km CDBHE could produce a thermal power of 600 kW under the optimum geological conditions at the UCSD site. Thermal power shares from different layers indicate that deeper formation layers contribute more to the thermal power than the shallower layers. An inner pipe with an insulated depth of 2 km produces only 1\u0026ndash;6% less power than a fully insulated inner pipe for the 4 km CDBHE, and thus a partially insulated VIT-plastic inner pipe is suggested. Furthermore, the CDBHE thermal power increases by 5% when the grout thermal conductivity increases from 1 to 3.65 W/(K∙m), close to the formation thermal conductivity, and then maintains almost the same, and the 4 km CDBHE with flow rates of 2.78\u0026ndash;6.94 L/s at the UCSD site can directly supply a low-temperature heating radiator system for room heating. The effects of the investigated factors provide guidelines for future geothermal resource exploitation in southern California.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Feasibility of Coaxial Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers in Southern California","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-07-19 19:22:26","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4546850/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-08-14T21:51:13+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-08-14T07:03:40+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"255474865543280950238084844454817922572","date":"2024-07-25T01:02:44+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-17T10:11:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"191930137175627461201355932695460042509","date":"2024-06-27T12:54:41+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-06-27T12:17:04+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-06-27T03:55:34+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-06-27T03:54:52+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Geothermal Energy","date":"2024-06-07T14:55:40+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"geothermal-energy","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"geen","sideBox":"Learn more about [Geothermal Energy](https://geothermal-energy-journal.springeropen.com/about)","snPcode":"40517","submissionUrl":"https://submission.springernature.com/new-submission/40517/3","title":"Geothermal Energy","twitterHandle":"@SpringerOpen","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"ab0705c5-836e-4623-b42c-47b69f27e31c","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 19th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-11-04T16:22:02+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4546850","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-024-00319-0","journal":{"identity":"geothermal-energy","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Geothermal Energy"},"publishedOn":"2024-11-01 16:12:57","publishedOnDateReadable":"November 1st, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-07-19 19:22:26","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s40517-024-00319-0","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-024-00319-0","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4546850","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4546850","identity":"rs-4546850","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00