Differential disease tolerance mediates sex-biased illness severity in sepsis

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,794 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Sepsis in humans, as well as mouse models of infection, demonstrates sex-biased outcomes in which males tend to have a higher incidence, higher severity, and higher mortality compared to females. Despite this important sex-bias in sepsis outcomes, little is known about its mechanistic drivers nor therapeutic implications, as much of the foundational data on sepsis pathogenesis is derived from animal studies that included only male subjects, potentially contributing to the notable paucity of successful mouse-to-human translation of sepsis therapeutics. In this study, we demonstrate that male-biased illness severity and organ dysfunction in mouse models of bacterial sepsis is mediated by impaired disease tolerance in males, involving impaired tolerogenic shifts in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism compared to females. Microbiological analyses and systems immunology characterization of sepsis between males and females revealed that sex-biased disease tolerance was independent of infection resistance mechanisms, as well as canonical immune/inflammatory dysregulation. Therapeutic potentiation of mitochondrial tolerance with doxycycline neutralized sexual dimorphism of illness severity and organ dysfunction through a male-predominant treatment effect. These data reveal that biological sex is a fundamental determinant of illness severity and treatment-responsiveness in sepsis through modulation of disease tolerance, which may be harnessed therapeutically to address sex-biased outcomes in sepsis. One sentence summary Sex-biased illness severity in bacterial sepsis is caused by impaired disease tolerance in males that can be rescued by therapeutic potentiation of mitochondrial tolerance Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00