Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile

Anna Stepniewska, Paolo Verrazzo, L. Savelli, Giamberto Trivella, Chiara Signori, Roberto Clarizia, Massimo Guerriero, Antonio Mollo, Giuseppe De Placido, Marcello Ceccaroni
In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2020 · vol. 28(1) , pp. 63–74 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.03.003 · PMID:32197993 · W3011501301
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This study compared virtual ultrasonographic hysteroscopy to conventional hysteroscopy for evaluating infertile patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (31)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK