Evolution of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 during the pandemic: mutation-limited or selection-limited?

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has witnessed the emergence of various virus variants. While the phenomenon of immunity-evading variants is known in other viruses like influenza, there is limited understanding of the ecological and evolutionary processes involved in this succession. Due to the availability of large-scale epidemiological data collected and shared publicly during the Covid-19 pandemic, it becomes possible to explore evolutionary questions that also have implications for public health. We propose multiple alternative hypotheses regarding the origin and spread of these variants and evaluate them based on epidemiological data. Our analysis indicates that the invasion of novel variants is primarily limited by selection rather than mutation. Moreover, the repeated waves observed during the pandemic are not solely caused by the emergence of new variants. Instead, there is a significant overlap between conditions that lead to a wave and those that favor the selection of partially immune-evading variants. This association may contribute to the rise of a new wave alongside the invasion of a new variant. However, the association is not strong enough to support a causal role of the new variant. The dynamic interplay between epidemiological processes and selection on viral variants carries important implications for public health and can guide future policies aimed at effectively controlling infectious epidemics.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00