Molecular, Cellular, and Epigenetic Signatures of Prostaglandin E2 in Endometriosis

In: Current Women s Health Reviews · 2018 · vol. 14(2) , pp. 127–146 · doi:10.2174/1573404814666180108144810 · W2783088106
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24

Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP2 and EP4 signaling promotes endometriotic cell adhesion, invasion, growth, survival, inflammation, pain, and infertility, suggesting their selective inhibition could be a novel therapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

This paper is a comprehensive review focused on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling in endometriosis, emphasizing interactions between the PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 and how these pathways relate to adhesion, invasion, growth, survival, epigenetics, fertility, and pain. It reports that EP2 and EP4 receptor proteins are highly expressed in endometriotic lesions compared with endometrium from women with or without endometriosis, and that inhibiting EP2/EP4 signaling decreases adhesion, invasion, growth, and survival of human endometriotic cells in vitro while also modulating DNA methylation and H3 histone methylation machinery. In a preclinical xenograft mouse model, EP2/EP4 inhibition decreased lesion innervation, pelvic pain, progesterone resistance, and restored endometrial receptivity mechanisms. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically reviews EP2/EP4-mediated PGE2 effects on lesion biology, epigenetic regulation, pain, and fertility-related outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a debilitating and chronic inflammatory gynecological disease of reproductive age women. Two major clinical symptoms of endometriosis are chronic pelvic pain and infertility, which profoundly affect the quality of life in women. Current treatment strategies include surgical intervention, anti-estrogen hormonal therapy, or a combination of both. The existing treatment modalities fail to prevent recurrence of disease and affect reproductive health of women. This suggests a fundamental need to identify potential cell signaling pathways for nonestrogen or nonsteroidal targets for endometriosis. A growing body of evidence indicates that growth factors, cytokines, and prostaglandins promote the establishment and maintenance of endometriosis. Objective: Published literatures related with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling and pathophysiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis are comprehensively reviewed. This review specifically focused on the interaction between PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 signaling and adhesion, invasion, growth, survival, and epigenetics, fertility, and pain in endometriosis. Results: EP2 and EP4 receptor proteins are highly expressed in endometriotic lesions compared to endometrium from women with or without endometriosis. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling decreases adhesion, invasion, growth and survival of human endometriotic cells in vitro through multiple cell signaling pathways. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling modulates DNA methylation and H3 histone methylation machinery in human endometriotic cells in vitro. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling decreases innervation of the endometriotic lesions and decreases pelvic pain and decreases progesterone resistance and restores endometrial receptivity mechanisms in vivo in preclinical xenograft mice model of endometriosis. Conclusion: The advantages of selective inhibition of EP2 and EP4 are to: (i) inhibit of adhesion, invasion, growth and survival of endometriotic cells; (ii) decrease PGE2-inudced inflammation and pain; (iii) decrease estrogen-dominant and progesterone resistant states in endometriotic lesions and endometrium, and (iv) improve endometrial microenvironment to support implantation and pregnancy. These findings suggest that inhibition of EP2 and EP4 receptors could emerge as a potential nonsteroidal therapy for the treatment of endometriosis. Keywords: PGE2, EP2, EP4, endometriosis, epigenetic, fertility.
Full text 1,692 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective: Published literatures related with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling and pathophysiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis are comprehensively reviewed. This review specifically focused on the interaction between PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 signaling and adhesion, invasion, growth, survival, and epigenetics, fertility, and pain in endometriosis.

Results

EP2 and EP4 receptor proteins are highly expressed in endometriotic lesions compared to endometrium from women with or without endometriosis. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling decreases adhesion, invasion, growth and survival of human endometriotic cells in vitro through multiple cell signaling pathways. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling modulates DNA methylation and H3 histone methylation machinery in human endometriotic cells in vitro. Inhibition of EP2 and EP4 signaling decreases innervation of the endometriotic lesions and decreases pelvic pain and decreases progesterone resistance and restores endometrial receptivity mechanisms in vivo in preclinical xenograft mice model of endometriosis.

Conclusion

The advantages of selective inhibition of EP2 and EP4 are to: (i) inhibit of adhesion, invasion, growth and survival of endometriotic cells; (ii) decrease PGE2-inudced inflammation and pain; (iii) decrease estrogen-dominant and progesterone resistant states in endometriotic lesions and endometrium, and (iv) improve endometrial microenvironment to support implantation and pregnancy. These findings suggest that inhibition of EP2 and EP4 receptors could emerge as a potential nonsteroidal therapy for the treatment of endometriosis.

Keywords

PGE2, EP2, EP4, endometriosis, epigenetic, fertility.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paininfertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (3)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK