[Therapeutic education and alternative medicine]

review OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

This review found lifestyle interventions, diet, and some supplements beneficial for chronic pelvic pain, while acupuncture had limited support and homeopathy/mesotherapy lacked evidence.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the most common Complementary and Alternative Medical (CAM) therapies described for chronic pelvic pain care and to analyze their results as reported in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of articles and consensus conferences published on this subject in the Medline (PubMed) database, selected according to their scientific relevance. RESULTS: Lifestyle interventions have a positive impact on patients' self-management of their chronic pain. Positive outcomes are associated with well-balanced diet, dietary changes and certain dietary supplementations for bladder pain syndrome and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Limited data exist supporting the use of acupuncture for chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis, bladder pain syndrome and urethral pain syndrome. There is no evidence for homeopathy and mesotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Published data on many CAM therapies suggest their potential as complementary treatment options of chronic pelvic pain. As conventional treatments, CAM therapies warrant further studies to assist in their validation as permanent treatment options for this patient population.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_painendometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Complementary Therapies Patient Education as Topic Pelvic Pain Chronic Disease Humans Pelvic Pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:54.825375+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine