Retrospective evaluation of the mr#ENZIAN classification's applicability in the pre-operative assessment of complex endometriosis: a compartment-dependent challenge

other OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study found the mr#ENZIAN classification showed variable agreement with surgical findings for endometriosis, particularly challenging for anterior and posterior compartments, and suggests simplification for anterior and posterior compartments.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pelvic MRI is increasingly performed as a second-line investigation in suspected complex cases of endometriosis, to precisely localize lesions and to optimise surgical planning. To facilitate MRI evaluation and inter-disciplinary communication, several standardized structured image analysis and radiologic reporting classification systems have been proposed, including the mr#ENZIAN classification, whose applicability needs further proving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an attempt to further validate the #ENZIAN classification applicability to MRI, we retrospectively evaluated the results of structured and unstructured MRI analysis by #ENZIAN compartment, considering both sole lesion-detection and #ENZIAN grading, using the corresponding op#ENZIAN score as a reference and evaluating inter-rater agreement of structured mr#ENZIAN results. In total, 83 patients with surgically/histopathologically confirmed endometriosis who received a pelvic MRI within 8 months prior to surgery between 2018 and 2022 were included. RESULTS: Concordance of mr#ENZIAN and op#ENZIAN results proved to be highly dependent on #ENZIAN-compartment: almost perfect agreement in locations FU, FI and others (FO); substantial agreement for lesion detection and grading in O, C and P; moderate to substantial agreement in T; moderate agreement in FB; moderate to fair agreement in A and only fair to poor agreement in B and FA. Inter-rater agreement between expert radiologists proved to be almost perfect to substantial for lesion detection and grading in most compartments, with exception of A, B and FA. There were no significant differences between results of structured and unstructured MRI evaluation. CONCLUSION: We recommend a simplification of the mr#ENZIAN classification regarding DE, with clearer rules to differentiate and measure lesions affecting the A and B compartments.
Full text 10,477 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Pelvic MRI is increasingly performed as a second-line investigation in suspected complex cases of endometriosis, to precisely localize lesions and to optimise surgical planning. To facilitate MRI evaluation and inter-disciplinary communication, several standardized structured image analysis and radiologic reporting classification systems have been proposed, including the mr#ENZIAN classification, whose applicability needs further proving.

Materials and methods

In an attempt to further validate the #ENZIAN classification applicability to MRI, we retrospectively evaluated the results of structured and unstructured MRI analysis by #ENZIAN compartment, considering both sole lesion-detection and #ENZIAN grading, using the corresponding op#ENZIAN score as a reference and evaluating inter-rater agreement of structured mr#ENZIAN results. In total, 83 patients with surgically/histopathologically confirmed endometriosis who received a pelvic MRI within 8 months prior to surgery between 2018 and 2022 were included.

Results

Concordance of mr#ENZIAN and op#ENZIAN results proved to be highly dependent on #ENZIAN-compartment: almost perfect agreement in locations FU, FI and others (FO); substantial agreement for lesion detection and grading in O, C and P; moderate to substantial agreement in T; moderate agreement in FB; moderate to fair agreement in A and only fair to poor agreement in B and FA. Inter-rater agreement between expert radiologists proved to be almost perfect to substantial for lesion detection and grading in most compartments, with exception of A, B and FA. There were no significant differences between results of structured and unstructured MRI evaluation.

Conclusion

We recommend a simplification of the mr#ENZIAN classification regarding DE, with clearer rules to differentiate and measure lesions affecting the A and B compartments. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. Abbreviations - AC1: - Gwet’s AC1 coefficient - CI: - Confidence intervals - DE: - Deep endometriosis - ESUR: - European society of urogenital radiology - NPA: - Negative percent agreement - PPA: - Positive percent agreement - R1: - Rater 1 - R2: - Rater 2 - SOP: - Standard operating procedure - TVUS: - Transvaginal ultrasound

References

Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet (London, England) 364:1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5 Lorusso F, Scioscia M, Rubini D, et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging for deep infiltrating endometriosis: current concepts, imaging technique and key findings. Insights Imaging 12:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01054-x Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiogr a Rev Publ Radiol Soc North Am Inc 32:1675–1691. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125518 Jensen JR, Coddington CC 3rd (2010) Evolving spectrum: the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181db7b84 Horne AW, Missmer SA (2022) Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ 379:e070750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070750 Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, et al (2012) Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 27:3412–3416. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des316 Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J (2006) What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86:1296–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054 Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al (2019) Reprint of: Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 112:e137–e152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.082 Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, et al (2005) ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei135 Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, et al (2017) European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 27:2765–2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Pereira RMA, et al (2011) Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiogr a Rev Publ Radiol Soc North Am Inc 31:E77-100. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.314105193 Thalluri AL, Knox S, Nguyen T (2017) MRI findings in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A pictorial essay. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 61:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12680 Feldman MK, VanBuren WM, Barnard H, et al (2020) Systematic interpretation and structured reporting for pelvic magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients with endometriosis: value added for improved patient care. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1608–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02182-1 Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, et al (2005) ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol 127:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836904 Di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, et al (2015) Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol 84:568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.017 Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al (2004) Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 232:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322030762 Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, et al (2021) The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100:1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14099 R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Zec S, Soriani N, Comoretto R, Baldi I (2017) High Agreement and High Prevalence: The Paradox of Cohen’s Kappa. Open Nurs J 11:211–218. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010211 Gwet KL (2008) Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 61:29–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600 KL G (2019) irrCAC: Computing Chance-Corrected Agreement Coefficients (CAC) Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 292:746–750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746 Fendal Tunca A, Iliman DE, Akdogan Gemici A, Kaya C (2023) Predictive value of preoperative MRI using the #ENZIAN classification score in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06451-1 Harth S, Kaya HE, Zeppernick F, et al (2023) Application of the #Enzian classification for endometriosis on MRI: prospective evaluation of inter- and intraobserver agreement. Front Med 10:1303593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1303593 Pausch AM, Filleböck V, Benli M, et al (2024) MRI of pelvic endometriosis: evaluation of the mr#Enzian classification and the importance of adenomyosis subtypes. Abdom Radiol (New York) 49:3241–3250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04359-9 Harth S, Roller FC, Zeppernick F, et al (2023) Deep infiltrating endometriosis: diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with respect to morphological criteria. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101794 Bazot M, Daraï E, Benagiano GP, et al (2022) ENDO_STAGE magnetic resonance imaging: classification to screen endometriosis. J Clin Med https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092443 Manganaro L, Celli V, Dolciami M, et al (2021) Can new ENZIAN score 2020 represent a staging system improving MRI structured report? Int J Environ Res Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199949 Thomassin-Naggara I, Dolciami M, Chamie LP, et al (2025) ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: protocol, lexicon, and compartment-based analysis. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11611-3 Burkett BJ, Cope A, Bartlett DJ, et al (2020) MRI impacts endometriosis management in the setting of image-based multidisciplinary conference: a retrospective analysis. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1829–1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02417-6 Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Garces-Descovich A, et al (2020) Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1623–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02199-6 Maciel C, Ferreira H, Djokovic D, et al (2023) MRI of endometriosis in correlation with the #Enzian classification: applicability and structured report. Insights Imaging 14:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01466-x Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions D.MH.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft & Editing, Visualisation; C.K.: Formal analysis, Writing - Review & Editing; E. JC.: Investigation; M.P.: Investigation; P.S.: Investigation; B.S.: Conceptualisation, Writing - Review & Editing; B.H.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board (Medical University of Innsbruck, protocol-number: EK1298/2024) waiving the need for patient informed consent. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Morell-Hofert, D., Kremser, C., Josip-Caleta, E. et al. Retrospective evaluation of the mr#ENZIAN classification’s applicability in the pre-operative assessment of complex endometriosis: a compartment-dependent challenge. Abdom Radiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05445-w Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05445-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

Enzian

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-18T00:30:19.791150+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine