Abstract
Purpose
Pelvic MRI is increasingly performed as a second-line investigation in suspected complex cases of endometriosis, to precisely localize lesions and to optimise surgical planning. To facilitate MRI evaluation and inter-disciplinary communication, several standardized structured image analysis and radiologic reporting classification systems have been proposed, including the mr#ENZIAN classification, whose applicability needs further proving.
Materials and methods
In an attempt to further validate the #ENZIAN classification applicability to MRI, we retrospectively evaluated the results of structured and unstructured MRI analysis by #ENZIAN compartment, considering both sole lesion-detection and #ENZIAN grading, using the corresponding op#ENZIAN score as a reference and evaluating inter-rater agreement of structured mr#ENZIAN results. In total, 83 patients with surgically/histopathologically confirmed endometriosis who received a pelvic MRI within 8 months prior to surgery between 2018 and 2022 were included.
Results
Concordance of mr#ENZIAN and op#ENZIAN results proved to be highly dependent on #ENZIAN-compartment: almost perfect agreement in locations FU, FI and others (FO); substantial agreement for lesion detection and grading in O, C and P; moderate to substantial agreement in T; moderate agreement in FB; moderate to fair agreement in A and only fair to poor agreement in B and FA. Inter-rater agreement between expert radiologists proved to be almost perfect to substantial for lesion detection and grading in most compartments, with exception of A, B and FA. There were no significant differences between results of structured and unstructured MRI evaluation.
Conclusion
We recommend a simplification of the mr#ENZIAN classification regarding DE, with clearer rules to differentiate and measure lesions affecting the A and B compartments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.
Abbreviations
- AC1:
-
Gwet’s AC1 coefficient
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
- DE:
-
Deep endometriosis
- ESUR:
-
European society of urogenital radiology
- NPA:
-
Negative percent agreement
- PPA:
-
Positive percent agreement
- R1:
-
Rater 1
- R2:
-
Rater 2
- SOP:
-
Standard operating procedure
- TVUS:
-
Transvaginal ultrasound
References
Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet (London, England) 364:1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5
Lorusso F, Scioscia M, Rubini D, et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging for deep infiltrating endometriosis: current concepts, imaging technique and key findings. Insights Imaging 12:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01054-x
Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiogr a Rev Publ Radiol Soc North Am Inc 32:1675–1691. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125518
Jensen JR, Coddington CC 3rd (2010) Evolving spectrum: the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181db7b84
Horne AW, Missmer SA (2022) Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ 379:e070750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070750
Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, et al (2012) Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 27:3412–3416. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des316
Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J (2006) What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 86:1296–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054
Nnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al (2019) Reprint of: Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril 112:e137–e152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.082
Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, et al (2005) ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei135
Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, et al (2017) European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol 27:2765–2775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z
Chamié LP, Blasbalg R, Pereira RMA, et al (2011) Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiogr a Rev Publ Radiol Soc North Am Inc 31:E77-100. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.314105193
Thalluri AL, Knox S, Nguyen T (2017) MRI findings in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A pictorial essay. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 61:767–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12680
Feldman MK, VanBuren WM, Barnard H, et al (2020) Systematic interpretation and structured reporting for pelvic magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients with endometriosis: value added for improved patient care. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1608–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02182-1
Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, et al (2005) ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol 127:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836904
Di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, et al (2015) Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol 84:568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.017
Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, et al (2004) Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 232:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322030762
Keckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, et al (2021) The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 100:1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14099
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Zec S, Soriani N, Comoretto R, Baldi I (2017) High Agreement and High Prevalence: The Paradox of Cohen’s Kappa. Open Nurs J 11:211–218. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010211
Gwet KL (2008) Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol 61:29–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600
KL G (2019) irrCAC: Computing Chance-Corrected Agreement Coefficients (CAC)
Gardner MJ, Altman DG (1986) Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. BMJ 292:746–750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746
Fendal Tunca A, Iliman DE, Akdogan Gemici A, Kaya C (2023) Predictive value of preoperative MRI using the #ENZIAN classification score in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06451-1
Harth S, Kaya HE, Zeppernick F, et al (2023) Application of the #Enzian classification for endometriosis on MRI: prospective evaluation of inter- and intraobserver agreement. Front Med 10:1303593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1303593
Pausch AM, Filleböck V, Benli M, et al (2024) MRI of pelvic endometriosis: evaluation of the mr#Enzian classification and the importance of adenomyosis subtypes. Abdom Radiol (New York) 49:3241–3250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04359-9
Harth S, Roller FC, Zeppernick F, et al (2023) Deep infiltrating endometriosis: diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with respect to morphological criteria. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13101794
Bazot M, Daraï E, Benagiano GP, et al (2022) ENDO_STAGE magnetic resonance imaging: classification to screen endometriosis. J Clin Med https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092443
Manganaro L, Celli V, Dolciami M, et al (2021) Can new ENZIAN score 2020 represent a staging system improving MRI structured report? Int J Environ Res Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199949
Thomassin-Naggara I, Dolciami M, Chamie LP, et al (2025) ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: protocol, lexicon, and compartment-based analysis. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11611-3
Burkett BJ, Cope A, Bartlett DJ, et al (2020) MRI impacts endometriosis management in the setting of image-based multidisciplinary conference: a retrospective analysis. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1829–1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02417-6
Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Garces-Descovich A, et al (2020) Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise. Abdom Radiol (New York) 45:1623–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02199-6
Maciel C, Ferreira H, Djokovic D, et al (2023) MRI of endometriosis in correlation with the #Enzian classification: applicability and structured report. Insights Imaging 14:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01466-x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.MH.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft & Editing, Visualisation; C.K.: Formal analysis, Writing - Review & Editing; E. JC.: Investigation; M.P.: Investigation; P.S.: Investigation; B.S.: Conceptualisation, Writing - Review & Editing; B.H.: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board (Medical University of Innsbruck, protocol-number: EK1298/2024) waiving the need for patient informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Morell-Hofert, D., Kremser, C., Josip-Caleta, E. et al. Retrospective evaluation of the mr#ENZIAN classification’s applicability in the pre-operative assessment of complex endometriosis: a compartment-dependent challenge. Abdom Radiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05445-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05445-w