A uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) for reducing canal stenosis after Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure1
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
A uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) successfully maintained the diameter of the cervical canal and reduced stenosis following Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure in 78 women.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACGROUND: Cervical stenoses are one of the main long-term consequences after conization of the uterine cervix. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a uterine cervix supporting device (Con-CapTM) in reducing uterine cervical stenosis after Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP). METHODS: We enrolled 112 patients who underwent LEEP between March 2017 to May 2019. Con-CapTM was inserted into the uterine endocervical canal for 4 weeks after LEEP. Laboratory values and clinical symptoms were evaluated. The presence of uterine cervical narrowing was determined at 2 weeks after removal of the Con-CapTM. Data were analyzed using the two-sample t test and χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 78 women completed the 6-week study period. Thirty-four patients did not complete the study period. The diameter of the uterine cervical canal was significantly greater at postoperative 6 weeks than preoperatively (Hegar dilator No, 2.10 ± 0.56 vs. 3.21 ± 0.71, P< 0.01). The complications were acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Con-CapTM can be used to reduce uterine cervical stenosis safely and effectively after conization of uterine cervix.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (21)
- Complete cervical stenosis after conization: Timing for the minimally invasive reconstructive surgery via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb01811.x via openalex
- doi:10.1590/s1516-31802008000400002 via openalex
- doi:10.1034/j.1600-0412.1999.781012.x via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016348209156537 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13256-016-0831-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00062-3 via openalex
- W64150443 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-011-2148-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1006/gyno.1999.5626 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.10.008 via openalex
- W2435415209 via openalex
- W2976977881 via openalex
- W6602581873 via openalex
- W6768563731 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000293343 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2007.00766.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00245-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00331-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200011000-00003 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00993-5 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T03:30:45.023671+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-29T06:34:56.587159+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK