Is the reported benefit of the Endo-App truly sustained?

Küçük Z
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026 · vol. 313(1) · doi:10.1007/s00404-026-08582-1 · PMID:42825922 · PMC13633360
Other OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-10-13 ⓘ

The provided text contains only authorship and declaration statements, offering no scientific findings or data to summarize regarding the Endo-App.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-13 · read from full text ⓘ

This correspondence evaluates the long-term efficacy of the Endo-App, a digital health tool designed to support patients with endometriosis. The author reviews existing literature and clinical observations to determine whether the initial benefits reported in earlier studies are maintained over time. The text concludes that sustained benefit is not guaranteed and highlights the need for further rigorous longitudinal data to confirm lasting patient outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically addressing the digital management and monitoring tools used by patients with this condition.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 501 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 6 sections · click to expand

Data

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Author

Z.K. conceived the correspondence, reviewed the relevant literature, drafted and critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version.

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Fn Group

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Declarations

The author declares no competing interests.

Associated Data

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:17:07.307244+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0