Evolutionary Psychologists can't practice what they don't preach: A response to Gallup (2020)

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

We respond to Gallup’s (2020) opinion piece by indicating that psychologists have yet to agree on an operationalized definition of “intelligence.” We argue that the literature investigating an overall decline in human intelligence is mixed at best; additionally, if a decline in human intelligence was supported, evolutionary scholars are not in a position to change the course of such decline. We clarify what evolutionary psychology is, i.e. the study of human nature by empirical examination of evidence for adaptive design hypotheses, and what it is not, i.e. a privileged position from which to preach the appropriate ways to solve problems associated with evolutionary challenges. Finally, we dispute Gallup’s (2020) suggested prescription for evolutionary psychologists.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00