The influence of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam on the gut microbiota

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose The administration of antibiotics can induce dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, leading to diseases, e.g., irritable bowel syndrome, metabolic syndrome, and Clostridium difficile infection. However, the specific effects of different β-lactam antibiotics on the dysbiosis of the gut microbiota remain poorly understood, particularly in human studies. Methods This study assessed the impacts of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam on the diversity, composition, and bacterial interactions within the gut microbiota at days 1, 6, and 37 after administration. Results All three antibiotics significantly altered beta diversity of the gut microbiota by day 6, with ceftriaxone showing the most prolonged effects. Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota were more similar between the ceftazidime-avibactam and piperacillin-tazobactam groups and differed markedly from those in the ceftriaxone group. Consistent with beta diversity changes, bacterial interaction networks showed greater and longer-lasting disruptions of bacterial interaction in the gut microbiota in the ceftriaxone group compared to the ceftazidime-avibactam and piperacillin-tazobactam groups. Conclusion These findings highlight distinct patterns of microbiota disruption following ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments and provide insights for mitigating dysbiosis of the gut microbiota during β-lactam therapy.
Full text 1,703 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose The administration of antibiotics can induce dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, leading to diseases, e.g., irritable bowel syndrome, metabolic syndrome, and Clostridium difficile infection. However, the specific effects of different β-lactam antibiotics on the dysbiosis of the gut microbiota remain poorly understood, particularly in human studies.

Methods

This study assessed the impacts of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam on the diversity, composition, and bacterial interactions within the gut microbiota at days 1, 6, and 37 after administration.

Results

All three antibiotics significantly altered beta diversity of the gut microbiota by day 6, with ceftriaxone showing the most prolonged effects. Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota were more similar between the ceftazidime-avibactam and piperacillin-tazobactam groups and differed markedly from those in the ceftriaxone group. Consistent with beta diversity changes, bacterial interaction networks showed greater and longer-lasting disruptions of bacterial interaction in the gut microbiota in the ceftriaxone group compared to the ceftazidime-avibactam and piperacillin-tazobactam groups.

Conclusion

These findings highlight distinct patterns of microbiota disruption following ceftriaxone, ceftazidime-avibactam, and piperacillin-tazobactam treatments and provide insights for mitigating dysbiosis of the gut microbiota during β-lactam therapy. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Data availability Publicly available datasets were downloaded from the NCBI SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) under the BioProject “PRJNA922086”.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00