From Lab Coats to Public Forums: Crafting a Science Communication Curriculum for Nigerian Medical Researchers

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This preprint studied the development and pilot testing of a structured science communication curriculum tailored for Nigerian biomedical researchers, using a three-phase mixed-methods design. An electronic survey assessed participants’ existing competencies and needs (phase 1), collaborative virtual meetings and iterative feedback were used to develop the curriculum (phase 2), and a 3-day in-person workshop in Enugu with 18 faculty members implemented and evaluated it (phase 3) using pre- and post-training surveys across four competency domains plus focus groups analyzed thematically in NVivo. Post-workshop evaluations reported statistically significant improvements in visualization understanding and effective communication understanding, and also in writing-for-publication proficiency, while one competency domain showed no significant change; participants reported increased motivation and plans to apply concepts and visual tools. A major limitation explicitly acknowledged is the need for future studies to examine long-term impacts, broaden participant inclusion, and add practical assessments, and the work is not peer reviewed. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Background Effective science communication is critical for bridging the gap between biomedical research and its application in clinical practice and policy. In Nigeria, science communication remains underdeveloped, with researchers often lacking the skills and incentives to disseminate their findings to non-specialist audiences. To address this gap, a structured science communication curriculum tailored for biomedical researchers, was developed and pilot tested. Objective To co-design a comprehensive science communication curriculum and pilot its implementation among a cohort of Nigerian biomedical researchers. Methods A three-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. For phase 1, an electronic survey assessed participants’ existing competencies and needs in science communication. In Phase 2, the curriculum was developed through collaborative virtual meetings and iterative feedback. And in Phase 3, the curriculum was piloted at a 3-day in-person workshop in Enugu, Nigeria. Quantitative data were collected using pre- and post-training surveys to assess four competency domains. Guided by the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, participants’ experiences were explored through focus group discussions, and the qualitative data obtained were analyzed using thematic content analysis in NVivo. Results Eighteen faculty members participated in the in-person training and subsequent survey data were analyzed. Post-workshop evaluations showed improvements in all four assessed competencies: understanding visualization techniques (mean difference [MD] = 1.50, p = 0.003), clear understanding of effective communication (MD = 1.66, p = 0.003), writing for publication proficiency (MD =, p = 0.011), and applying science communication concepts (MD =, p = 0.285). Participants expressed increased motivation, enhanced understanding of science communication, and plans for practical application, including curriculum integration and use of visual tools. Conclusion The science communication curriculum appears to have enhanced knowledge and confidence among participating researchers, particularly in visualization and public-facing communication. While promising, future interventions should examine long-term impacts, broader participant inclusion, and integration of practical assessments.
Full text 16,760 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
From Lab Coats to Public Forums: Crafting a Science Communication Curriculum for Nigerian Medical Researchers | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article From Lab Coats to Public Forums: Crafting a Science Communication Curriculum for Nigerian Medical Researchers Tonia Onyeka, James Dearing, Bernard Appiah, Kelechi Uwa-Robinson, and 5 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 8 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Effective science communication is critical for bridging the gap between biomedical research and its application in clinical practice and policy. In Nigeria, science communication remains underdeveloped, with researchers often lacking the skills and incentives to disseminate their findings to non-specialist audiences. To address this gap, a structured science communication curriculum tailored for biomedical researchers, was developed and pilot tested. Objective To co-design a comprehensive science communication curriculum and pilot its implementation among a cohort of Nigerian biomedical researchers. Methods A three-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. For phase 1, an electronic survey assessed participants’ existing competencies and needs in science communication. In Phase 2, the curriculum was developed through collaborative virtual meetings and iterative feedback. And in Phase 3, the curriculum was piloted at a 3-day in-person workshop in Enugu, Nigeria. Quantitative data were collected using pre- and post-training surveys to assess four competency domains. Guided by the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, participants’ experiences were explored through focus group discussions, and the qualitative data obtained were analyzed using thematic content analysis in NVivo. Results Eighteen faculty members participated in the in-person training and subsequent survey data were analyzed. Post-workshop evaluations showed improvements in all four assessed competencies: understanding visualization techniques (mean difference [MD] = 1.50, p = 0.003), clear understanding of effective communication (MD = 1.66, p = 0.003), writing for publication proficiency (MD =, p = 0.011), and applying science communication concepts (MD =, p = 0.285). Participants expressed increased motivation, enhanced understanding of science communication, and plans for practical application, including curriculum integration and use of visual tools. Conclusion The science communication curriculum appears to have enhanced knowledge and confidence among participating researchers, particularly in visualization and public-facing communication. While promising, future interventions should examine long-term impacts, broader participant inclusion, and integration of practical assessments. Science Communication Biomedical Researchers Curriculum Development Research Translation Public Engagement Capacity Building Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files QuantitativeinstumentReadinessandNeedsAssessmentSurvey.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviews received at journal 04 May, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 10 Apr, 2026 Reviewers agreed at journal 04 Apr, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 02 Apr, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 31 Mar, 2026 Editor invited by journal 09 Mar, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 06 Mar, 2026 First submitted to journal 06 Mar, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8935348","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":617595933,"identity":"3c7d5047-491d-49db-8297-7cb2ce6a9c99","order_by":0,"name":"Tonia Onyeka","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nigeria","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tonia","middleName":"","lastName":"Onyeka","suffix":""},{"id":617595934,"identity":"c60bdf59-46e3-4cc6-8a37-550b357d5d8b","order_by":1,"name":"James Dearing","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Michigan State University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"James","middleName":"","lastName":"Dearing","suffix":""},{"id":617595935,"identity":"4e941bd7-8c9e-4b8f-9d3f-ec5e5434ac80","order_by":2,"name":"Bernard Appiah","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Syracuse University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bernard","middleName":"","lastName":"Appiah","suffix":""},{"id":617595936,"identity":"560675a4-d2d5-43ea-ad39-430aac923590","order_by":3,"name":"Kelechi Uwa-Robinson","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IVAN Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kelechi","middleName":"","lastName":"Uwa-Robinson","suffix":""},{"id":617595938,"identity":"f1e1be4c-58c2-49d9-87de-fa9422229837","order_by":4,"name":"Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nigeria","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ijeoma","middleName":"Uchenna","lastName":"Itanyi","suffix":""},{"id":617595940,"identity":"c4a4776f-e37a-4d9f-b567-7a559e06a4c7","order_by":5,"name":"John Olawepo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Northeastern University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"John","middleName":"","lastName":"Olawepo","suffix":""},{"id":617595942,"identity":"23a6e156-f3a6-46cb-994a-10b84381171c","order_by":6,"name":"Babayemi Olakunde","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of North Texas Health Science Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Babayemi","middleName":"","lastName":"Olakunde","suffix":""},{"id":617595943,"identity":"54a1ec2c-4b83-4c14-9773-313f8c93bb92","order_by":7,"name":"Ngozi Idemili-Aronu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Nigeria","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ngozi","middleName":"","lastName":"Idemili-Aronu","suffix":""},{"id":617595944,"identity":"ba2c3d87-3866-4c1e-bc48-19322db27d70","order_by":8,"name":"Echezona Ezeanolue","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"IVAN Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Echezona","middleName":"","lastName":"Ezeanolue","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-21 19:23:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":106458026,"identity":"d6dead9b-9e16-4309-a5e2-82c8174ee9bc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 18:40:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":482925,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptBMCMedRevised.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8935348/v1_covered_1cfa8a94-d9b5-4e72-b273-8c7a5857f43c.pdf"},{"id":106458016,"identity":"e41963db-fea5-4263-bf7e-b9950a3c3e04","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-04-08 18:40:09","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":22656,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"QuantitativeinstumentReadinessandNeedsAssessmentSurvey.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8935348/v1/6ea00127c12a3ad715540128.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"From Lab Coats to Public Forums: Crafting a Science Communication Curriculum for Nigerian Medical Researchers","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-education","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"meed","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Education](http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/meed/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Education","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Science Communication, Biomedical Researchers, Curriculum Development, Research Translation, Public Engagement, Capacity Building","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffective science communication is critical for bridging the gap between biomedical research and its application in clinical practice and policy. In Nigeria, science communication remains underdeveloped, with researchers often lacking the skills and incentives to disseminate their findings to non-specialist audiences. To address this gap, a structured science communication curriculum tailored for biomedical researchers, was developed and pilot tested.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eObjective\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo co-design a comprehensive science communication curriculum and pilot its implementation among a cohort of Nigerian biomedical researchers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA three-phase mixed-methods study was conducted. For phase 1, an electronic survey assessed participants\u0026rsquo; existing competencies and needs in science communication. In Phase 2, the curriculum was developed through collaborative virtual meetings and iterative feedback. And in Phase 3, the curriculum was piloted at a 3-day in-person workshop in Enugu, Nigeria. Quantitative data were collected using pre- and post-training surveys to assess four competency domains. Guided by the Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation, participants\u0026rsquo; experiences were explored through focus group discussions, and the qualitative data obtained were analyzed using thematic content analysis in NVivo.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEighteen faculty members participated in the in-person training and subsequent survey data were analyzed. Post-workshop evaluations showed improvements in all four assessed competencies: understanding visualization techniques (mean difference [MD]\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.50, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.003), clear understanding of effective communication (MD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.66, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.003), writing for publication proficiency (MD =, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.011), and applying science communication concepts (MD =, p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.285). Participants expressed increased motivation, enhanced understanding of science communication, and plans for practical application, including curriculum integration and use of visual tools.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe science communication curriculum appears to have enhanced knowledge and confidence among participating researchers, particularly in visualization and public-facing communication. While promising, future interventions should examine long-term impacts, broader participant inclusion, and integration of practical assessments.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"From Lab Coats to Public Forums: Crafting a Science Communication Curriculum for Nigerian Medical Researchers","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-04-08 18:39:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8935348/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-05-04T14:44:36+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"80876326743225858034649998065316909659","date":"2026-04-10T07:23:40+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"204496388861057986640561775428249370476","date":"2026-04-04T16:13:53+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-02T09:41:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-03-31T07:13:01+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2026-03-09T05:25:44+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-03-07T04:25:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Medical Education","date":"2026-03-07T04:20:41+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-medical-education","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"meed","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Medical Education](http://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/meed/default.aspx","title":"BMC Medical Education","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"f212474f-1ab5-48ed-9704-0320a8b3f52e","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 8th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2026-05-04T14:44:36+00:00","index":61,"fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-04-08T18:39:32+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-04-08 18:39:32","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8935348","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8935348","identity":"rs-8935348","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00