Morphological and molecular identification of foliar pathogenic fungi of Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Plantations of Hevea brasiliensis are vulnerable to a wide range of foliar fungal pathogens capable of causing substantial damage throughout the forest rotation cycle. This issue is particularly critical in Costa Rica, where the commercial cultivation of H. brasiliensis is a recent development, and no prior records exist of foliar pathogens affecting this species, thereby limiting timely detection and effective management. The study evaluated the pathogenicity of foliar fungi associated with H. brasiliensis through combined morphological and molecular characterization. Twenty plantation trees (2–4 years old) showing symptoms such as wilting, chlorosis, yellowing, partial to complete necrosis, punctate lesions, and anthracnose were sampled. Fungi were isolated from symptomatic leaves, cultured on potato dextrose agar supplemented with antibiotics, and identified based on colony and conidial morphology, complemented by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS4–ITS5). Pathogenicity was assessed by inoculating healthy detached leaves with mycelial discs from each isolate. A total of 30 isolates were obtained, representing the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae, and Glomerellaceae. Four species were confirmed as pathogenic: Diaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae. All produced necrotic lesions, with F. equiseti and N. sphaerica generating the largest affected areas. Accurate identification of foliar pathogens is crucial for early disease diagnosis, which supports the development of targeted management strategies and safeguards the long-term health and productivity of H. brasiliensis plantations in Costa Rica.
Full text 128,437 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Morphological and molecular identification of foliar pathogenic fungi of Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Morphological and molecular identification of foliar pathogenic fungi of Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica Marian Sánchez-Elizondo, María Rodríguez Solís, Dawa Méndez-Álvarez, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted 6 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Plantations of Hevea brasiliensis are vulnerable to a wide range of foliar fungal pathogens capable of causing substantial damage throughout the forest rotation cycle. This issue is particularly critical in Costa Rica, where the commercial cultivation of H. brasiliensis is a recent development, and no prior records exist of foliar pathogens affecting this species, thereby limiting timely detection and effective management. The study evaluated the pathogenicity of foliar fungi associated with H. brasiliensis through combined morphological and molecular characterization. Twenty plantation trees (2–4 years old) showing symptoms such as wilting, chlorosis, yellowing, partial to complete necrosis, punctate lesions, and anthracnose were sampled. Fungi were isolated from symptomatic leaves, cultured on potato dextrose agar supplemented with antibiotics, and identified based on colony and conidial morphology, complemented by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS4–ITS5). Pathogenicity was assessed by inoculating healthy detached leaves with mycelial discs from each isolate. A total of 30 isolates were obtained, representing the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae, and Glomerellaceae. Four species were confirmed as pathogenic: Diaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti , and Lasiodiplodia theobromae . All produced necrotic lesions, with F. equiseti and N. sphaerica generating the largest affected areas. Accurate identification of foliar pathogens is crucial for early disease diagnosis, which supports the development of targeted management strategies and safeguards the long-term health and productivity of H. brasiliensis plantations in Costa Rica. rubber tree spots phytopathogenic fungi identification forest plantations Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction Hevea brasiliensis (rubber tree) is a deciduous tree species native to the lowland rainforests of the Amazon Basin in South America (Rincón Sepulveda, 1990 , Nair, 2020 ). It naturally occurs in humid tropical environments such as low-altitude moist forests, wetlands, riparian zones, forest gaps, and disturbed areas (Oghenekome, 2004 , Lim, 2011 ). This species serves as the primary source of natural rubber, a renewable material regarded for its remarkable elasticity, tensile strength, and resistance to abrasion and heat (Jacob et al., 1993 , Candau & Maspoch, 2025 ). These qualities make natural rubber a valuable and more sustainable alternative to synthetic rubber, resulting in high demand across various industries, including pneumatic tires (Nair, 2020 ), footwear (Teoh et al., 2011 ), adhesives (Lim, 2011 ), and medical devices (Guerra et al., 2021 ). Due to its global demand, H. brasiliensis has become an economically significant crop cultivated across tropical and subtropical regions worldwide (Priyadarshan et al., 2005 , Souza et al., 2013 ). However, H. brasiliensis is highly susceptible to a broad range of fungal pathogens, particularly those that infect the foliage (Gasparotto et al., 1988 ). Foliar diseases substantially reduce photosynthetic capacity, thereby limiting overall growth and latex production (Sterling & Melgarejo, 2021 ). In juvenile trees, premature defoliation has been associated with increased mortality risk (Vineeth et al., 2024 ). Among the most commonly reported pathogens are Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides , which cause Colletotrichum leaf disease (Manju et al., 2002 ); Corynespora cassiicola , responsible for leaf fall disease (Florence, 2018 ); Phytophthora spp., associated with abnormal leaf fall (Babu et al., 2024 ); and Oidium heveae , the causal agent of powdery mildew (Mohanta & Bae, 2015 ). Additional pathogenic fungi include Fusarium spp., Lasiodiplodia theobromae , Nigrospora spp., and Diaporthe spp., all of which induce symptoms such as necrotic lesions, anthracnose, chlorosis, wilting, and premature leaf drop (Gasparotto et al., 1988 , Florence, 2018 ). Misidentification or failure to detect the causal agents could result in inappropriate control measures, delayed responses, and increased economic losses (Ainusyifa et al., 2024 , Lee, 2003 , Mazlan et al., 2019b ). Traditional identification methods based on morphological traits (e.g., colony appearance, spore structure, and reproductive features) provide an initial taxonomic framework but are often insufficient for species-level resolution due to overlapping phenotypic characteristics among genera (Jain et al., 2019 , Thaochan et al., 2022 ). Consequently, molecular approaches, particularly sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA, have become essential for the accurate identification of phytopathogenic fungi (Lieberei, 2007 , Ainusyifa et al., 2024 ). Therefore, integrating morphological and molecular tools enhances diagnostic precision and enables the differentiation of closely related or cryptic species, thereby supporting the development of evidence-based phytosanitary practices in H. brasiliensis plantations (Thaochan et al., 2022 , Hadi Ismail et al., 2024 ). Understanding the identity and behavior of foliar pathogens is essential for developing effective disease management strategies in tropical regions, where H. brasiliensis cultivation has expanded notably in recent decades (Rincón Sepulveda, 1990 , Lieberei, 2007 ). In Costa Rica, this renewed interest responds to the search for economically viable and environmentally sustainable crops within tropical agroforestry systems (Sell Biasetti, 2021 , Seguin et al., 2003 ). However, the phytopathological knowledge regarding rubber cultivation in the country remains limited. Few formal studies have investigated the presence, distribution, or pathogenicity of fungi affecting H. brasiliensis foliage under local conditions (Robledo D’Angelo, 2016, Zainudin et al., 2023 ). This knowledge gap hinders early detection, timely intervention, and the implementation of integrated control measures by producers (Lee, 2003 ). As H. brasiliensis gains importance as a commercial species in the region, establishing a solid understanding of its foliar pathogens becomes critical to ensure plantation health, sustain productivity, and support long-term viability (Seguin et al., 2003 , Rincón Sepulveda, 1990 ). For these reasons, this study aimed to isolate and identify phytopathogenic fungi associated with foliar symptoms in H. brasiliensis , integrating morphological characterization with molecular analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. In addition, pathogenicity tests were conducted to verify the causal role of the identified fungi in symptom development. By providing accurate identification of key foliar pathogens, the study aims to establish a baseline of knowledge that supports early diagnosis, informs effective disease management strategies, and promotes the long-term health and productivity of H. brasiliensis plantations in Costa Rica. Materials and methods Study area The study site is located near El Cairo city, in the province of Limón, Costa Rica (10°10′06″N, 83°30′19″W), at an average elevation of 99 m. The regional climate is classified as tropical rainforest ( Af ) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification, characterized by high humidity, no defined dry season, and consistently warm temperatures throughout the year (Beck et al., 2018 ). The site has recorded a mean annual temperature of approximately 27°C, with an annual variation of less than 2°C. Annual precipitation ranges from 3,000 to 4,000 mm, with rainfall evenly distributed throughout the year due to the influence of Caribbean trade winds. Solar radiation ranges from 12.5 MJ m⁻² day⁻¹ during the cloudiest months (November-January) to 20.4 MJ m⁻² day⁻¹ during sunnier periods (March-April). Finally, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) varied from 0.3 to 1.2 kPa. The soil is considered moderately undulating terrain (slopes ranging from 15–30%) and is classified as an Inceptisol (Bertsch et al., 2000 ). In terms of physical characteristics, the texture ranges from sandy loam to clay loam, providing favorable conditions for root development and water retention. Chemical properties assessed in the upper 60 cm of the soil profile revealed an average pH of 5.1, an organic matter content of at least 2.5%, and base saturation exceeding 50% (Alvarado et al., 2015 ). Within this depth, nutrient availability was considered adequate for the growth of H. brasiliensis. Sample collection and fungal isolation Sampling was conducted between February and March 2024 by collecting symptomatic leaves from Hevea brasiliensis trees aged 2 to 4 years (n = 20). The selected trees had an average diameter at breast height (DBH) of 10 cm and a total height (TH) of 8 m. The sampled individuals displayed foliar symptoms consistent with fungal infection, including varying degrees of wilting, chlorosis, yellowing, partial to complete necrosis, punctate lesions, and anthracnose. Under laboratory conditions, four segments measuring 1 cm² were extracted from the advancing margins of symptomatic tissue on each diseased leaf. Surface sterilization was carried out by immersing the samples in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 30 seconds, followed by 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 45 seconds, and then rinsing them in three consecutive washes with sterile distilled water. The disinfected segments were placed in Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin (0.2 g L⁻¹). Plates were incubated at 28°C for seven days under a 12-hour light/dark photoperiod. After the incubation period, the most frequently occurring fungal colonies were recorded. Hyphal tips from distinct morphotypes were subcultured onto fresh PDA medium with antibiotics to obtain pure isolates. These isolates were incubated at 28°C for 15 days, and representative colonies were preserved on PDA slants at 5°C, following the protocols of the mycotheque at the Forest Pathology Laboratory, Tecnológico de Costa Rica (Cartago, Costa Rica). Morphological identification The shape, color, and organization of macroscopic fungal structures (such as stroma, pycnidia, and perithecia) were examined using a Nikon C-LEDS stereomicroscope, model SMZ25 (Nikon Corp., Japan) at a magnification range of 10× to 40×. Colony color and structural traits were quantitatively assessed using ImageJ software, version 1.54p (Schneider et al., 2012 ). For each plate, a random subsampling of ten points was performed to evaluate all measured variables, selecting representative areas from the surface and reverse sides, as well as the central and marginal zones of the colony. Microscopic characterization was conducted on fungal structures derived from mycelium and reproductive bodies (perithecia or pycnidia), which were mounted on slides with lactic acid or lactophenol blue to enhance structural visibility. Photomicrographs were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ni optical microscope, model Ni-U (Nikon Corp., Japan), and morphometric measurements were performed with NIS-Elements imaging software. A total of 50 spores or conidia per isolate were measured for length and width. Molecular identification For molecular identification, representative fungal colonies growing uniformly on PDA were selected from the previously described cultures. Genomic DNA was extracted from actively growing mycelial tissue using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, USA), following the manufacturer's protocol (Tafur Salazar, 2017 ). DNA concentration and purity were assessed using a Multiskan SkyHigh spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), while DNA integrity was verified by electrophoresis on a 0.8% w/v agarose gel prepared with 1× TAE buffer, run at 70 V for 60 minutes. Samples showing a 260/280 absorbance ratio between 1.8 and 2.0, and a minimum concentration of 50 ng/µL (Hall, 2013 ), were selected for further processing. Qualified DNA extracts were submitted to the Centro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnológicas (CENIBiot, Costa Rica) for Sanger sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Resulting chromatograms were quality-checked and edited using BioEdit software. Sequences with a base call accuracy ≥ 80% were retained for identification. Taxonomic assignment was conducted using the BLASTn algorithm against the NCBI nucleotide database ( https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi ), retrieving the closest matches with a similarity of 97% or higher. For phylogenetic inference, the three most similar reference sequences for each isolate were selected from the GenBank database. A Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA version 10.1 (Kimura, 1980 ), using Kimura’s two-parameter model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Tamura et al., 2021 ) to assess branch support. The analysis included 11 nucleotide sequences, with ambiguous positions removed using the pairwise deletion method (Robledo D’Angelo, 2016). Pathogenicity testing Pathogenicity assays were conducted using healthy H. brasiliensis leaves collected in September 2024 from the same location where the fungus was isolated. Healthy leaves were randomly selected from five different trees showing no visible disease symptoms. A completely randomized experimental design was employed, with eight replicate leaves per fungal isolate and a negative control treated with sterile PDA (n = 40 leaves). Prior to inoculation, leaves were disinfected by washing with commercial bleach (sodium hypochlorite) and antibacterial soap, rinsed thoroughly with distilled water, and dried with sterile paper towels. Each leaf was superficially wounded with a sterilized needle, and a 5 mm-diameter mycelial disc from an actively growing culture was placed over the wound. Control leaves received only sterile PDA discs. Inoculated leaves were then placed in Petri dishes containing 2%w/v. water-agar (AA) and sealed with adhesive film. The dishes were incubated under darkness for 24 hours to promote infection (Zainudin et al., 2023 ), followed by 12-hour light/dark photoperiod at 24–26°C for eight days. After the incubation period, each leaf was photographed alongside a millimetric ruler. The leaf area and lesion area were quantified using the software ImageJ, version 1.54p (Schneider et al., 2012 ) to calculate the percentage of affected tissue. To confirm the pathogenic role of each isolate, reisolation procedures were carried out from the advancing lesion margins. Small fragments were surface-sterilized and plated on PDA, incubated at 28°C for eight days, and the identity of reisolates was confirmed morphologically, thereby fulfilling Koch’s postulates (Rahman, 1988 ). Statistical analysis The percentage of leaf area affected by each treatment was calculated from lesion measurements obtained in the pathogenicity assay. To evaluate differences in pathogenicity among fungal isolates, a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) was fitted, with fungal treatment as a fixed effect and tree identity as a random effect, to account for potential non-independence among leaves collected from the same individual (Eq. 1 ). $$\:{Y}_{ij}=\mu\:+{\alpha\:}_{i}+{\beta\:}_{j}+{\epsilon\:}_{ij}$$ 1 Where: Y ij ​ is the percentage of lesion area for the i th treatment on the j th tree; µ is the overall mean; α i ​ is the fixed effect of the i th fungal treatment ( i = 1, ..., 5); β j​ is the random effect of the j th tree ( j = 1, ..., 5), assumed to follow b j ∼ N (0,σ 2 β ); and, ε ij​ is the residual error, assumed to follow ε ij ∼N (0,σ 2 ). Model assumptions of normality of residuals and homoscedasticity were evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. Once assumptions were confirmed, Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test was applied for multiple comparisons at a 95% confidence level. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.4.3) (R Core Team, 2024 ). Results A total of 30 fungal isolates belonging to the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae, and Glomerellaceae were obtained from diseased leaves of Hevea brasiliensis. ITS gene sequencing using primers ITS4–ITS5 identified four species: Diaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti , and Lasiodiplodia theobromae . These identifications were consistent with genus-level determinations based on colony and conidial morphology. Diaporthe tulliensis The colony morphology on potato dextrose agar (PDA) showed a slightly cottony mycelium with concentric growth and a distinct black stromatic layer of firm consistency. Initially white (RGB: 211, 205, 245), colonies darkened after 15 days, particularly at the margins with medium gray (RGB: 205, 197, 183) (Figure 1a); The reverse of the colonies showed brownish pigmentation (RGB: 216, 158, 116). On Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis needles, globose black pycnidia (RGB: 195, 151, 128) covered by a thin layer of white mycelium (RGB: 211, 205, 190) were produced (Figure 1b). Microscopic examination revealed hyaline, ellipsoid α-conidia measuring 4.3–5.1 × 1.3–2.2 µm (L × W; n = 50) (Figure 1c). PCR amplification of the ITS region yielded a 503 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865276). BLAST analysis showed 99% sequence identity with D. tulliensis (GenBank accession no. OL353699.1). In the phylogenetic analysis, which incorporated D. tulliensis sequences from multiple geographic origins, our isolate clustered with reference strains with high bootstrap support (Figure 1d). Figure 1 is here. Nigrospora sphaerica Colony morphology on PDA showed white, cottony mycelium with concentric growth rings (RGB: 220, 218, 210) (Figure 2a). On synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA), sporulation was induced, producing a thin mycelial layer (RGB: 203, 202, 198) and abundant spores with black to gray pigmentation (RGB: 207, 184, 142 to 220, 214, 204) (Figure 2b). Conidia were smooth-walled, black (RGB: 203, 202, 198), globose to ellipsoidal, and measured 14.1–16.2 × 14.7–16.7 µm (L × W; n = 50) (Figure 2c). ITS region amplification produced a 476 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865279). BLAST analysis indicated 100% identity with N. sphaerica (GenBank accession no. MZ724895.1). Phylogenetic analysis, incorporating sequences from diverse geographic origins, placed our isolate within the N. sphaerica clade with strong bootstrap support (Figure 2d), corroborating the morphological and DNA identification. Figure 2 is here. Lasiodiplodia theobromae Colony showed abundant aerial mycelium that was light gray on the surface (RGB: 190, 185, 176) and dark gray on the reverse (RGB: 137, 126, 109) (Figure 3a). On P. caribaea var. hondurensis needles, black cone-shaped pycnidia (RGB: 137, 137, 131) covered by gray mycelium (RGB: 121, 121, 113) were produced (Figure 3b). Conidia were hyaline, cylindrical to subovoid, and measured 18.4–21.1 × 9.5–10.3 µm (L × W; n = 50) (Figure 3c). PCR amplification yielded a 360 bp ITS fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865278). BLAST analysis showed 93% identity with L. theobromae (GenBank accession no. MK734053.1). In the phylogenetic analysis, our isolate clustered with L. theobromae sequences from other regions (Figure 3d), reinforcing its identification and supporting the morphological observations. Figure 3 is here. Fusarium equiseti Colony morphology was irregular, with abundant white cottony mycelium (RGB: 208, 196, 174) interspersed with brown aerial patches (RGB: 221, 143, 78), and a caramel-colored reverse (RGB: 157, 93, 70) (Figure 4a). Conidia were elongated, curved, sharp-tipped, septate, hyaline, and measured 20.9–26.1 × 3.5–4.2 µm (L × W; n = 50) (Figure 4b, 4c). PCR amplification of the ITS region produced a 486 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865277). BLAST analysis revealed 100% sequence identity with F. equiseti (GenBank accession no. MT907512.1). Phylogenetic analysis grouped our isolate with F. equiseti sequences from other geographic regions (Figure 4d), confirming its identity and complementing the morphological diagnosis. Figure 4 is here. Pathogenicity tests Analysis of lesion development revealed that Fusarium equiseti, Nigrospora sphaerica, Diaporthe tulliensis, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae produced necrotic areas on H. brasiliensis leaves significantly larger than those in the control treatment ( p <0.05; Figure 5). Lesion size differed significantly among species: F. equiseti and N. sphaerica caused the largest mean necrotic areas (exceeding 2.8 mm²), followed by D. tulliensis and L. theobromae (from 1.9 to 2.7 mm²). The variability within treatments was minimal, as reflected by the narrow standard error bars. In all inoculation trials, the same fungal species were successfully reisolated from symptomatic leaves, thereby fulfilling Koch’s postulates. Control leaves remained symptom-free throughout the assay, confirming the pathogenic role of the tested species. Figure 5 is here. Regarding morphometric comparisons, the conidial dimensions recorded in this study, as summarized in Table 1, generally aligned with those reported in the literature, thereby supporting the species identifications. Minor deviations were noted, including slightly shorter conidia in F. equiseti and a narrower size range in L. theobromae compared with certain published values. Such differences are consistent with intraspecific variability, which can be influenced by factors such as host origin, and incubation conditions. This morphometric evidence complements the molecular analyses, reinforcing the taxonomic assignments of the fungi associated with H. brasiliensis leaf spot in tropical environments. Table 1. Conidial dimensions of fungal species isolated from H. brasiliensis leaves compared with measurements reported in the literature. Species Conidia dimension (µm) Reference Our study Literature D. tulliensis 4.3–5.1 × 1.3–2.2 2.6–5.9 × 1.4–3.9; 3.7–6.5 × 1.0–2.6 (Alves et al., 2008, Pan et al. , 2024) N. sphaerica 14.1–16.2 × 14.7–16.7 11.5–15.7 × 13.3–19.6; 13.3–19.7 × 10.8–17.8 (Villanueva et al., 2023, Bansal et al., 2024) F. equiseti 20.9–26.1 × 3.5–4.2 24.0–40.0 × 4.0–6.0 (Manghwar et al. , 2021, Pérez-Corral et al., 2015) L. theobromae 18.4–21.1 × 9.5–10.3 (19–) 21–31 (–32.5) × (12–) 13–15.5 (–18.5); 20–21.8 × 9.1–10.9 (He et al., 2025, Munirah et al. , 2017) Note: Conidial dimensions are presented as length × width (µm). Ranges in parentheses indicate extreme minimum or maximum values reported in the literature. Values from this study are based on 50 conidia per isolate (n = 50). Discussion Accurate identification of foliar pathogens in Hevea brasiliensis is essential to assess their potential impact on tree health and long-term plantation productivity. In the present study, morphological and molecular analyses confirmed the occurrence of Diaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti , and Lasiodiplodia theobromae associated with symptomatic leaves in Costa Rica. The genus Diaporthe (Ascomycota: Diaporthaceae) is well known to include important plant pathogens, endophytes, and saprobes on a wide range of hosts, including economically valuable agricultural and forestry species (Diogo et al., 2010 ). Consistent with our findings, Diaporthe spp. and Colletotrichum spp. have previously been reported as causal agents of foliar diseases in H. brasiliensis plantations in Asia, particularly in Malaysia and Bangladesh (Hao et al., 2020 , Kee et al., 2019 ). Foliar infections by Diaporthe spp. could lead to premature leaf senescence, reduction of canopy photosynthetic capacity, and, over time, significant declines in growth and natural latex production (Ogunsiji et al., 2020 , Oghenekome, 2004 ). In the case of Nigrospora sphaerica , this species induced necrotic lesions comparable to those previously reported on Chrysanthemum morifolium (Luo et al., 2022 ) and Vigna unguiculata (Deepika et al., 2021 ). Widely distributed across tropical and subtropical regions, N. sphaerica is recognized for its opportunistic infection strategy, which facilitates rapid colonization of wounded or physiologically stressed tissues (Bansal et al., 2024 ). In the context of H. brasiliensis plantations, such infection dynamics indicate that factors such as mechanical injury, foliar stress, or inadequate cultural practices may act as predisposing conditions for disease onset, potentially compromising canopy integrity and long-term plantation productivity (Villanueva et al., 2023 , Seephueak et al., 2010 ). Regarding lesion development, Fusarium equiseti exhibited the most extensive necrotic area formation in the pathogenicity assays, corroborating previous reports of its aggressive behavior in a wide range of hosts, including Triticum aestivum in China (Han et al., 2022 ) and Malus domestica in Mexico (Pérez-Corral et al., 2015 ). This species is recognized for its ability to cause both foliar and root diseases, reflecting a high degree of ecological plasticity and adaptability to varied environmental conditions (Raja et al., 2017 , Jia et al., 2020 ). In H. brasiliensis , this pathogenic versatility raises significant concerns regarding its capacity to impair canopy function and root system health, potentially reducing tree vigor and latex productivity (Roesler et al., 2022 ). The lesion development patterns observed in the present study are consistent with prior descriptions of disease progression, in which small necrotic spots rapidly enlarge and coalesce, culminating in extensive foliar necrosis (Rehman et al., 2023 , Hami et al., 2021 ). Lasiodiplodia theobromae is a cosmopolitan pathogen in tropical and subtropical regions, frequently existing as a latent endophyte until host stress conditions trigger pathogenic development (Wang et al., 2023 ). In the present study, this species caused extensive necrotic lesions on H. brasiliensis leaves, comparable to those documented in plantations in Thailand (He et al., 2025 ) and China (Wang et al., 2023 ). Its wide host range, combined with a marked capacity for adaptation to diverse environmental conditions, underscores the importance of implementing preventive management strategies in both young and mature H. brasiliensis stands to mitigate potential canopy damage and productivity losses (Alves et al., 2008 , Pornsuriya et al., 2023 ). The precise identification of foliar pathogens in H. brasiliensis underscores the importance of integrating morphological and molecular approaches to ensure reliable diagnostic practices in tropical forestry systems (Rincón Sepulveda, 1990 , Sell Biasetti, 2021 ). This study demonstrates strong concordance between colony and conidial morphological traits and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing, reinforcing the utility of this molecular marker as a DNA barcode for fungal identification (Raja et al., 2017 , Pornsuriya et al., 2023 ). Taxonomic placement of the isolates was supported by identity values exceeding 95%, while morphometric measurements (Table 1 ) closely matched published ranges, accounting for intraspecific variation attributable to host origin and environmental conditions (Vineeth et al., 2024 , Alves et al., 2008 ). This integrative approach is particularly valuable in tropical environments, where morphological plasticity frequently obscures species boundaries and hinders timely pathogen detection (Havanapan et al., 2016 , Mazlan et al., 2019a ). Establishing precise pathogen baselines is critical for enabling early diagnosis, informing targeted management strategies, and safeguarding the long-term health and productivity of H. brasiliensis plantations (Zainudin et al., 2023 , Sagaff et al., 2022 ). Anchored in this diagnostic framework, the identification of these pathogens provides a solid foundation for formulating integrated disease management strategies aimed at reducing productivity losses and lowering tree mortality (Mohanta & Bae, 2015 , Ogunsiji et al., 2020 ). Effective management requires the deployment of resistant or tolerant clones from well-defined breeding programs, the enforcement of stringent sanitation protocols, and systematic surveillance to track pathogen prevalence and spread (Syed Sagaff et al., 2022 , Fajarningsih, 2016 ). In the context of climate change adaptive management and the incorporation of resilient genotypes into breeding efforts are increasingly critical (Rubilar et al., 2024 ). The continued expansion of H. brasiliensis cultivation in Costa Rica, proactive exclusion and containment measures are essential to prevent large-scale outbreaks that could compromise canopy integrity and latex yield (Seguin et al., 2003 , Sell Biasetti, 2021 ). Future research should investigate the epidemiology and environmental thresholds for infection by these species, along with their interactions with other foliar pathogens in co-infections, thereby enhancing the resilience and long-term sustainability of tropical H. brasiliensis plantations (Teoh et al., 2011 , Sterling & Melgarejo, 2021 , Mazlan et al., 2019a ). Conclusions This study integrated morphological and molecular approaches to accurately identify foliar fungi associated with Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica. Thirty isolates were obtained from symptomatic leaves belonging to the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae and Glomerellaceae. Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region enabled species-level identification, which was consistent with genus-level determinations based on colony and conidial morphology. Pathogenicity assays demonstrated that Fusarium equiseti , Nigrospora sphaerica , Diaporthe tulliensis , and Lasiodiplodia theobromae are capable of inducing necrotic foliar lesions in H. brasiliensis . Among these, F. equiseti and L. theobromae produced the largest areas of lesion, highlighting their potential as major threats to plantation health. Accurate identification of these pathogens represents the first report of their association with H. brasiliensis in Costa Rica and establishes a baseline reference for disease surveillance. These findings provide critical information for the development of early detection protocols and integrated management strategies, ultimately contributing to the long-term health and productivity of tropical H. brasiliensis plantations. Declarations Funding: This research was funded by the Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Extensión (VIE) of the Tecnológico de Costa Rica through the project " "Commercial cultivation of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A.Juss.) for natural rubber production in rural areas of Costa Rica" " (Code: 140-1122). Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the company Hevea Costa Rica, Desarrollos Agroforestales S.A., for providing the plant material of H. brasiliensis . Also, the Intensive Silviculture Research Group of the Tecnológico de Costa Rica, for providing access to equipment and scientific assistance. Author Contributions: M.S.E: morphological and molecular analysis, inoculation, pathogenicity tests. M.R.S: sample collection, isolation, morphological description of the fungus. D.M.A.: de-scription and analysis of molecular identification and pathogenicity tests. D.A.A: project management, statistical analysis. J.C.V.: writing - original draft preparation. All authors reviewed and editing the manuscript. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Data Availability : Data will be made available on reasonable request. References Ainusyifa, F., Lestari, R. and Yuniati, R. (2024) A Review of Fungal Disease in Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex A. Juss.) Mull. Arg.: From Identification to Scientific Investigation for Control Strategies. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10, 977-987. Alvarado, A., Mata, R. and Kappelle, M. (2015) Soils of Costa Rica: an agroecological approach. Costa Rican Ecosystems , 64-93. Alves, A., Crous, P. W., Correia, A. and Phillips, A. (2008) Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal diversity, 28, 1-13. Babu, S., Reshma, T., Vineeth, V. and Philip, S. (2024) Insights into pathogenicity mechanisms of Phytophthora meadii, the abnormal leaf fall pathogen in rubber tree, through whole genome sequencing and analysis. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 134, 102410. Bansal, N., Juwantha, R. and Pandey, S. (2024) Morphology and ITS-based phylogeny revealed Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf spot and blight disease of Bambusa polymorpha in India. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 132, 102315. Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A. and Wood, E. F. (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific data, 5, 1-12. Bertsch, F., Alvarado, A., Henriquez, C. and Mata, R. (2000) Properties, geographic distribution, and management of major soil orders of Costa Rica. In: Quantifying Sustainable Development. Elsevier, pp. 265-294. Candau, N. and Maspoch, M. L. (2025) Natural rubber: From Hevea brasiliensis to advanced applications—A fundamental overview. In: Rubber Materials. Elsevier, pp. 27-52. Deepika, Y. S., Mahadevakumar, S., Amruthesh, K. N. and Lakshmidevi, N. (2021) First Report of Nigrospora sphaerica Associated with Leaf Spot Disease of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) from India. Plant Disease, 105, 506. Diogo, E. L., Santos, J. M. and Phillips, A. J. (2010) Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal diversity, 44, 107-115. Fajarningsih, N. D. (2016) Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as DNA barcoding to identify fungal species: a review. Squalen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology, 11, 37-44. Florence, U. (2018) Corynespora leaf fall of Hevea brasilensis: Challenges and prospect. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13, 2098-2103. Gasparotto, L., Ferreira, F. and Junqueira, N. (1988) Mancha de Corynespora em folhas de seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis) no Brasil. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 13, 10. Guerra, N. B., Pegorin, G. S. A., Boratto, M. H., de Barros, N. R., de Oliveira Graeff, C. F. and Herculano, R. D. (2021) Biomedical applications of natural rubber latex from the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 126, 112126. Hadi Ismail, M. Z., Mohamad Mahyudin, M., Noran, A. S., Ahmad Zambri, A. M., Maiden, N. A., Atan, S. , et al. (2024) Unravelling fungal diversity in Pestalotiopsis leaf fall disease symptomatic leaves of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia. Journal of Rubber Research, 27, 501-515. Hall, B. G. (2013) Building Phylogenetic Trees from Molecular Data with MEGA. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 1229-1235. Hami, A., Rasool, R. S., Khan, N. A., Mansoor, S., Mir, M. A., Ahmed, N. , et al. (2021) Morpho-molecular identification and first report of Fusarium equiseti in causing chilli wilt from Kashmir (Northern Himalayas). Scientific Reports, 11, 3610. Han, Z., Cui, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, Z., Han, M. , et al. (2022) Effect of Rhizospheric Fungus on Biological Control of Root Rot (Fusarium equiseti) Disease of Saposhnikovia divaricata. Agronomy, 12, 2906. Hao, Y., Aluthmuhandiram, J. V. S., Chethana, K. W. T., Manawasinghe, I. S., Li, X., Liu, M. , et al. (2020) Nigrospora Species Associated with Various Hosts from Shandong Peninsula, China. Mycobiology, 48, 169-183. Havanapan, P.-o., Bourchookarn, A., Ketterman, A. J. and Krittanai, C. (2016) Comparative proteome analysis of rubber latex serum from pathogenic fungi tolerant and susceptible rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Journal of Proteomics, 131, 82-92. He, C., Lin, J., Wu, H., Zheng, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y. , et al. (2025) Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Stem Gummosis Disease in Rubber Trees and Its Chemical Control Strategies. Microorganisms, 13, 1586. Jacob, J.-L., d’Auzac, J. and Prevot, J.-C. (1993) The composition of natural latex from Hevea brasiliensis. Clinical reviews in allergy, 11, 325-337. Jain, A., Sarsaiya, S., Wu, Q., Lu, Y. and Shi, J. (2019) A review of plant leaf fungal diseases and its environment speciation. Bioengineered, 10, 409-424. Jia, C., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Li, S. and Zhang, W. (2020) First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by Fusarium equiseti on Switchgrass in Shandong, China. Plant Disease, 104, 3074. Kee, Y. J., Hafifi, A. B. M., Huda-Shakirah, A. R., Wong, K. L., Jin, X. L., Siti Nordahliawate, M. S. , et al. (2019) First report of reddish brown spot disease of red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) caused by Nigrospora lacticolonia and Nigrospora sphaerica in Malaysia. Crop Protection, 122, 165-170. Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120. Lee, S. (2003) Pathology of tropical hardwood plantations in South-East Asia. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 33, 321-335. Lieberei, R. (2007) South American leaf blight of the rubber tree (Hevea spp.): new steps in plant domestication using physiological features and molecular markers. Annals of botany, 100, 1125-1142. Lim, T. (2011) Hevea brasiliensis. In: Edible Medicinal And Non-Medicinal Plants: Volume 2, Fruits. Springer, pp. 476-483. Luo, X., Xi, Y., Shen, C., Wang, M. and Wang, H. (2022) Occurrence of Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf blight on Chrysanthemum morifolium in China. Crop Protection, 157, 105982. Manghwar, H., Hussain, A., Ali, Q., Saleem, M. H., Abualreesh, M. H., Alatawi, A. , et al. (2021) Disease Severity, Resistance Analysis, and Expression Profiling of Pathogenesis-Related Protein Genes after the Inoculation of Fusarium equiseti in Wheat. Agronomy, 11, 2124. Manju, M., Idicula, S., Jacob, C., Vinod, K. and Prem, E. (2002) Management of Corynespora leaf fall (CLF) disease of rubber with water based fungicide formulations. Plantation Crop Research and Development in the New Millennium , 527-530. Mazlan, S., JAAFAR, N. M., Wahab, A., Rajandas, H. and Zulperi, D. (2019a) Major diseases of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews, 5 . Mazlan, S., Noraini, M., Wahab, A., Sulaiman, Z., Rajandas, H. and Zulperi, D. (2019b) Major Diseases of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews, 5, 10-21. Mohanta, T. K. and Bae, H. (2015) The diversity of fungal genome. Biological Procedures Online, 17, 8. Munirah, M., Azmi, A., Yong, S. and Nur Ain Izzati, M. (2017) Characterization of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and L. pseudotheobromae causing fruit rot on pre-harvest mango in Malaysia. Plant Pathol Quar, 7, 202-213. Nair, K. P. (2020) Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). In: Tree Crops: Harvesting Cash from the World's Important Cash Crops. Springer, pp. 287-332. Oghenekome, U. O. (2004) Natural rubber, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) Müll. Arg, germplasm collection in the Amazon Basin, Brazil: a retrospective. Economic botany, 58, 544-555. Ogunsiji, A. O., Ibrahim, T. O. and Odusanya, F. A. (2020) Management Strategies of Forest Plant Diseases: A Review. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 32, 87-95. Pan, J.-M., Geng, X.-S., Bei, Y.-J., Jiang, Y.-Y., Su, P.-P., Liu, Y. , et al. (2024) First Report of Diaporthe tulliensis Causing Leaf Spot on Millettia speciosa in China. Plant Disease, 108, 3191. Pérez-Corral, D. A., García-González, N. Y., Gallegos-Morales, G., Ruiz-Cisneros, M. F., Berlanga-Reyes, D. I. and Ríos-Velasco, C. (2015) Aislamiento de actinomicetos asociados a rizosfera de árboles de manzano antagónicos a Fusarium equiseti. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, 6, 1629-1638. Pornsuriya, C., Thaochan, N., Chairin, T. and Sunpapao, A. (2023) Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidences Reveal Lasiodiplodia chonburiensis and L. theobromae Associated with Leaf Blight in Hevea brasiliensis in Southern Thailand. Diversity, 15, 961. Priyadarshan, P., Hoa, T., Huasun, H. and De Gonçalves, P. (2005) Yielding potential of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in sub-optimal environments. Journal of crop improvement, 14, 221-247. R Core Team, R. (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Rahman, M. (1988) Diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Bangladesh. Bano Biggyyan Patrika, 17, 73-79. Raja, H. A., Miller, A. N., Pearce, C. J. and Oberlies, N. H. (2017) Fungal identification using molecular tools: a primer for the natural products research community. Journal of natural products, 80, 756-770. Rehman, A. u., Rauf, A., Ali, A., Taimoor Shakeel, M., Hasan Naqvi, S. A., Shahid, M. , et al. (2023) First Report of Fusarium equiseti Causing Leaf Spots of Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia) in Pakistan. Plant Disease, 107, 584. Rincón Sepulveda, O. (1990) El cultivo del caucho (Hevea brasiliensis) . Colombia: Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. Robledo D’Angelo, O. (2016) Enfermedad de marchitamiento fúngico en plántulas de lechuga: un modelo didáctico-experimental para la enseñanza de los postulados de Koch. Roesler, E. A., Balbinott, N., Schroeder, R. G., Yamazaki-Lau, E., Lima, M. I. P. M., Brammer, S. P. , et al. (2022) An efficient protocol for inoculation of Fusarium graminearum in detached leaves of Arabidopsis. Tropical Plant Pathology, 47, 353-361. Rubilar, R. A., Valverde, J. C., Barrientos, G. and Campoe, O. C. (2024) Water and Temperature Ecophysiological Challenges of Forests Plantations under Climate Change. Forests, 15, 654. Sagaff, S., Ali, N. S., Mahyudin, M. M., Wong, M. Y. and Yusop, M. R. (2022) Emerging and existing major leaf diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia. Journal of Current Opinion in Crop Science, 3, 34-47. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. and Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) ImageJ (Version 1.54p) U.S. : National Institutes of Health. Seephueak, P., Petcharat, V. and Phongpaichit, S. (2010) Fungi associated with leaf litter of para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Mycology, 1, 213-227. Seguin, M., Flori, A., Legnaté, H. and Clément-Demange, A. (2003) Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). In: Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. CRC Press, pp. 277-305. Sell Biasetti, L. A. (2021) La extracción de caucho en Costa Rica. Revista Herencia, 34, 65-77. Souza, L. M., Gazaffi, R., Mantello, C. C., Silva, C. C., Garcia, D., Le Guen, V. , et al. (2013) QTL mapping of growth-related traits in a full-sib family of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) evaluated in a sub-tropical climate. PLoS One, 8, e61238. Sterling, A. and Melgarejo, L. M. (2021) Photosynthetic performance of Hevea brasiliensis affected by South American Leaf Blight under field conditions. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 161, 953-967. Syed Sagaff, S. A., Syd Ali, N., Mohmad Mahyudin, M., Wong, M. Y. and Yusop, M. R. (2022) Emerging and Existing Major Leaf Diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia. Journal of Current Opinion in Crop Science, 3, 34-47. Tafur Salazar, D. J. (2017) Estudio de la diversidad genética de la colección de Melina (Gmelina arbórea Roxb) del INIAP, mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeats). Sangolquí, Ecuador: Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38, 3022-3027. Teoh, Y. P., Don, M. M. and Ujang, S. (2011) Assessment of the properties, utilization, and preservation of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis): a case study in Malaysia. Journal of Wood Science, 57, 255-266. Thaochan, N., Pornsuriya, C., Chairin, T., Chomnunti, P. and Sunpapao, A. (2022) Morphological and molecular characterization of Calonectria foliicola associated with leaf blight on rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in Thailand. Journal of Fungi, 8, 986. Villanueva, J., Solpot, T. C. and Tangonan, N. (2023) Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf blight disease of cacao in the Philippines. Indian Phytopathology, 76, 915-922. Vineeth, V., Reshma, T., Babu, S., Philip, S. and Mahadevan, C. (2024) Comprehensive whole-genome sequencing reveals genetic characteristics of Colletotrichum fructicola (Nara gc5) the causative organism of circular leaf spot disease of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Journal of Plant Pathology, 106, 579-591. Wang, S. J., Wang, S. K., Li, M., Huang, G. Q., Su, Y. H. and Ma, H. B. (2023) First Report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Brown Leaf Spot on Bruguiera gymnorrhiza in China. Plant Disease, 107, 2262. Zainudin, N. A. I. M., Azhar, N. a., Rosli, M. N. H. and Nordin, N. A. M. (2023) Identification and Characterization of Fungi Associated with Leaf Spot Disease of Rubber Trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Pahang, Malaysia. Jurnal Proteksi Tanaman (Journal of Plant Protection), 7, 89-102. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Revision Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revisions 06 Oct, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 16 Sep, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 27 Aug, 2025 Editor invited by journal 27 Aug, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 26 Aug, 2025 First submitted to journal 19 Aug, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7401529","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":506486820,"identity":"87bbaebb-5d3a-44d6-be8f-179a744faa72","order_by":0,"name":"Marian Sánchez-Elizondo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marian","middleName":"","lastName":"Sánchez-Elizondo","suffix":""},{"id":506486821,"identity":"089173ee-d4fc-4632-9ec4-23ce4c2aa67f","order_by":1,"name":"María Rodríguez Solís","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-6152","institution":"Instituto Tecnologico de Costa Rica: Tecnologico de Costa Rica","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"María","middleName":"Rodríguez","lastName":"Solís","suffix":""},{"id":506486822,"identity":"13afc866-9b9c-4525-81a1-e6cf37a08966","order_by":2,"name":"Dawa Méndez-Álvarez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dawa","middleName":"","lastName":"Méndez-Álvarez","suffix":""},{"id":506486823,"identity":"7f5b11b9-a2e5-4659-8a13-318a99c0db8e","order_by":3,"name":"Dagoberto Arias-Aguilar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dagoberto","middleName":"","lastName":"Arias-Aguilar","suffix":""},{"id":506486824,"identity":"fd339e21-35fb-499a-a079-b3bda62b3965","order_by":4,"name":"Juan C. Valverde","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Juan","middleName":"C.","lastName":"Valverde","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-18 16:17:29","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":90590441,"identity":"1f95dc8a-2f28-4f00-b39f-2253c7e98c7b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:24:37","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":689397,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMorphological and molecular characterization of \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e. (a) Colony color on surface and reverse of PDA plates. (b) Pycnidia on \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePinus caribaea\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e var. \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ehondurensis \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eneedles. (c) α-conidia. (d) Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of ITS sequences, with \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e as the outgroup (The red bracket marks the accessions grouping with the sequence obtained in this study).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/af80735f46c819dc527783d9.png"},{"id":90590442,"identity":"beb1d255-f9fc-4db4-823a-455de4d8e8f1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:24:37","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":642032,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological and molecular characterization of \u003cem\u003eNigrospora sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e. (a) Colony color on surface and reverse of PDA plates. (b) Mycelium with spores on SNA medium. (c) Conidia and hyaline hyphae. (d) Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of ITS sequences, with \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e as the outgroup (The red bracket marks the accessions grouping with the sequence obtained in this study).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/0381dead3ad32314ccc8a3cd.png"},{"id":90591300,"identity":"026087ea-d067-4d8d-8dfe-888eb32c7638","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:40:37","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":652650,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological and molecular characterization of \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e. (a) Colony color on surface and reverse of PDA plates. (b) Pycnidia on \u003cem\u003ePinus caribaea\u003c/em\u003evar. \u003cem\u003ehondurensis\u003c/em\u003e needles. (c) α-conidia. (d) Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of ITS sequences, with \u003cem\u003eBotryosphaeria dothidea\u003c/em\u003e as the outgroup (The red bracket marks the accessions grouping with the sequence obtained in this study).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/e17ae1dc95fa7873c36c98c1.png"},{"id":90590784,"identity":"e188648e-4834-497a-bad8-14005a36a1a8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:32:37","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":687414,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMorphological and molecular characterization of \u003cem\u003eFusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e. (a) Colony color on surface and reverse of PDA plates. (b) Chlamydospores (red arrow). (c) α-conidia. (d) Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of ITS sequences, with \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e as the outgroup (The red bracket marks the accessions grouping with the sequence obtained in this study).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/2c3a411e4a2ac5f5ac8d98b4.png"},{"id":90590783,"identity":"f20eb7d3-654a-4335-bcfc-fe42728e3974","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:32:37","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":64208,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eBoxplot of the percentage of leaf spot severity on \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaves inoculated with different fungal species during laboratory pathogenicity assays (The horizontal line within each box represents the mean, the box boundaries correspond to the standard error, and the whiskers denote the standard deviation. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05)).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/16a74efd77426f55e0151f9f.png"},{"id":90591396,"identity":"d45715c1-bab4-4f58-9372-01c5e4ab5422","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-04 12:48:44","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":4169958,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7401529/v1/af9c448b-d213-48d0-80f9-bfea96bb1fa8.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Morphological and molecular identification of foliar pathogenic fungi of Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e (rubber tree) is a deciduous tree species native to the lowland rainforests of the Amazon Basin in South America (Rinc\u0026oacute;n Sepulveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e, Nair, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). It naturally occurs in humid tropical environments such as low-altitude moist forests, wetlands, riparian zones, forest gaps, and disturbed areas (Oghenekome, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e, Lim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). This species serves as the primary source of natural rubber, a renewable material regarded for its remarkable elasticity, tensile strength, and resistance to abrasion and heat (Jacob et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e, Candau \u0026amp; Maspoch, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). These qualities make natural rubber a valuable and more sustainable alternative to synthetic rubber, resulting in high demand across various industries, including pneumatic tires (Nair, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), footwear (Teoh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), adhesives (Lim, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), and medical devices (Guerra et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Due to its global demand, \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e has become an economically significant crop cultivated across tropical and subtropical regions worldwide (Priyadarshan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e, Souza et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e is highly susceptible to a broad range of fungal pathogens, particularly those that infect the foliage (Gasparotto et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e). Foliar diseases substantially reduce photosynthetic capacity, thereby limiting overall growth and latex production (Sterling \u0026amp; Melgarejo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). In juvenile trees, premature defoliation has been associated with increased mortality risk (Vineeth et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Among the most commonly reported pathogens are \u003cem\u003eColletotrichum acutatum\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eC. gloeosporioides\u003c/em\u003e, which cause \u003cem\u003eColletotrichum\u003c/em\u003e leaf disease (Manju et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003eCorynespora cassiicola\u003c/em\u003e, responsible for leaf fall disease (Florence, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e); \u003cem\u003ePhytophthora\u003c/em\u003e spp., associated with abnormal leaf fall (Babu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e); and \u003cem\u003eOidium heveae\u003c/em\u003e, the causal agent of powdery mildew (Mohanta \u0026amp; Bae, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Additional pathogenic fungi include \u003cem\u003eFusarium\u003c/em\u003e spp., \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNigrospora\u003c/em\u003e spp., and \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe\u003c/em\u003e spp., all of which induce symptoms such as necrotic lesions, anthracnose, chlorosis, wilting, and premature leaf drop (Gasparotto et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e, Florence, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMisidentification or failure to detect the causal agents could result in inappropriate control measures, delayed responses, and increased economic losses (Ainusyifa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e, Lee, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e, Mazlan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019b\u003c/span\u003e). Traditional identification methods based on morphological traits (e.g., colony appearance, spore structure, and reproductive features) provide an initial taxonomic framework but are often insufficient for species-level resolution due to overlapping phenotypic characteristics among genera (Jain et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e, Thaochan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Consequently, molecular approaches, particularly sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA, have become essential for the accurate identification of phytopathogenic fungi (Lieberei, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e, Ainusyifa et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Therefore, integrating morphological and molecular tools enhances diagnostic precision and enables the differentiation of closely related or cryptic species, thereby supporting the development of evidence-based phytosanitary practices in \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations (Thaochan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e, Hadi Ismail et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUnderstanding the identity and behavior of foliar pathogens is essential for developing effective disease management strategies in tropical regions, where \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e cultivation has expanded notably in recent decades (Rinc\u0026oacute;n Sepulveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e, Lieberei, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). In Costa Rica, this renewed interest responds to the search for economically viable and environmentally sustainable crops within tropical agroforestry systems (Sell Biasetti, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, Seguin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). However, the phytopathological knowledge regarding rubber cultivation in the country remains limited. Few formal studies have investigated the presence, distribution, or pathogenicity of fungi affecting \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e foliage under local conditions (Robledo D\u0026rsquo;Angelo, 2016, Zainudin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). This knowledge gap hinders early detection, timely intervention, and the implementation of integrated control measures by producers (Lee, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). As \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e gains importance as a commercial species in the region, establishing a solid understanding of its foliar pathogens becomes critical to ensure plantation health, sustain productivity, and support long-term viability (Seguin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e, Rinc\u0026oacute;n Sepulveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor these reasons, this study aimed to isolate and identify phytopathogenic fungi associated with foliar symptoms in \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e, integrating morphological characterization with molecular analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. In addition, pathogenicity tests were conducted to verify the causal role of the identified fungi in symptom development. By providing accurate identification of key foliar pathogens, the study aims to establish a baseline of knowledge that supports early diagnosis, informs effective disease management strategies, and promotes the long-term health and productivity of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations in Costa Rica.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStudy area\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study site is located near El Cairo city, in the province of Lim\u0026oacute;n, Costa Rica (10\u0026deg;10\u0026prime;06\u0026Prime;N, 83\u0026deg;30\u0026prime;19\u0026Prime;W), at an average elevation of 99 m. The regional climate is classified as tropical rainforest (\u003cem\u003eAf\u003c/em\u003e) according to the K\u0026ouml;ppen-Geiger classification, characterized by high humidity, no defined dry season, and consistently warm temperatures throughout the year (Beck et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). The site has recorded a mean annual temperature of approximately 27\u0026deg;C, with an annual variation of less than 2\u0026deg;C. Annual precipitation ranges from 3,000 to 4,000 mm, with rainfall evenly distributed throughout the year due to the influence of Caribbean trade winds. Solar radiation ranges from 12.5 MJ m⁻\u0026sup2; day⁻\u0026sup1; during the cloudiest months (November-January) to 20.4 MJ m⁻\u0026sup2; day⁻\u0026sup1; during sunnier periods (March-April). Finally, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) varied from 0.3 to 1.2 kPa.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe soil is considered moderately undulating terrain (slopes ranging from 15\u0026ndash;30%) and is classified as an Inceptisol (Bertsch et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). In terms of physical characteristics, the texture ranges from sandy loam to clay loam, providing favorable conditions for root development and water retention. Chemical properties assessed in the upper 60 cm of the soil profile revealed an average pH of 5.1, an organic matter content of at least 2.5%, and base saturation exceeding 50% (Alvarado et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Within this depth, nutrient availability was considered adequate for the growth of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSample collection and fungal isolation\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSampling was conducted between February and March 2024 by collecting symptomatic leaves from \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e trees aged 2 to 4 years (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;20). The selected trees had an average diameter at breast height (DBH) of 10 cm and a total height (TH) of 8 m. The sampled individuals displayed foliar symptoms consistent with fungal infection, including varying degrees of wilting, chlorosis, yellowing, partial to complete necrosis, punctate lesions, and anthracnose. Under laboratory conditions, four segments measuring 1 cm\u0026sup2; were extracted from the advancing margins of symptomatic tissue on each diseased leaf. Surface sterilization was carried out by immersing the samples in 70% (v/v) ethanol for 30 seconds, followed by 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 45 seconds, and then rinsing them in three consecutive washes with sterile distilled water. The disinfected segments were placed in Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin (0.2 g L⁻\u0026sup1;). Plates were incubated at 28\u0026deg;C for seven days under a 12-hour light/dark photoperiod.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAfter the incubation period, the most frequently occurring fungal colonies were recorded. Hyphal tips from distinct morphotypes were subcultured onto fresh PDA medium with antibiotics to obtain pure isolates. These isolates were incubated at 28\u0026deg;C for 15 days, and representative colonies were preserved on PDA slants at 5\u0026deg;C, following the protocols of the mycotheque at the Forest Pathology Laboratory, Tecnol\u0026oacute;gico de Costa Rica (Cartago, Costa Rica).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMorphological identification\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe shape, color, and organization of macroscopic fungal structures (such as stroma, pycnidia, and perithecia) were examined using a Nikon C-LEDS stereomicroscope, model SMZ25 (Nikon Corp., Japan) at a magnification range of 10\u0026times; to 40\u0026times;. Colony color and structural traits were quantitatively assessed using ImageJ software, version 1.54p (Schneider et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). For each plate, a random subsampling of ten points was performed to evaluate all measured variables, selecting representative areas from the surface and reverse sides, as well as the central and marginal zones of the colony.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMicroscopic characterization was conducted on fungal structures derived from mycelium and reproductive bodies (perithecia or pycnidia), which were mounted on slides with lactic acid or lactophenol blue to enhance structural visibility. Photomicrographs were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ni optical microscope, model Ni-U (Nikon Corp., Japan), and morphometric measurements were performed with NIS-Elements imaging software. A total of 50 spores or conidia per isolate were measured for length and width.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMolecular identification\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor molecular identification, representative fungal colonies growing uniformly on PDA were selected from the previously described cultures. Genomic DNA was extracted from actively growing mycelial tissue using the Wizard\u0026reg; Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, USA), following the manufacturer's protocol (Tafur Salazar, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDNA concentration and purity were assessed using a Multiskan SkyHigh spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), while DNA integrity was verified by electrophoresis on a 0.8% w/v agarose gel prepared with 1\u0026times; TAE buffer, run at 70 V for 60 minutes. Samples showing a 260/280 absorbance ratio between 1.8 and 2.0, and a minimum concentration of 50 ng/\u0026micro;L (Hall, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e), were selected for further processing. Qualified DNA extracts were submitted to the Centro Nacional de Innovaciones Biotecnol\u0026oacute;gicas (CENIBiot, Costa Rica) for Sanger sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eResulting chromatograms were quality-checked and edited using BioEdit software. Sequences with a base call accuracy\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;80% were retained for identification. Taxonomic assignment was conducted using the BLASTn algorithm against the NCBI nucleotide database (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e), retrieving the closest matches with a similarity of 97% or higher.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFor phylogenetic inference, the three most similar reference sequences for each isolate were selected from the GenBank database. A Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA version 10.1 (Kimura, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e), using Kimura\u0026rsquo;s two-parameter model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Tamura et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) to assess branch support. The analysis included 11 nucleotide sequences, with ambiguous positions removed using the pairwise deletion method (Robledo D\u0026rsquo;Angelo, 2016).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePathogenicity testing\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePathogenicity assays were conducted using healthy \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaves collected in September 2024 from the same location where the fungus was isolated. Healthy leaves were randomly selected from five different trees showing no visible disease symptoms. A completely randomized experimental design was employed, with eight replicate leaves per fungal isolate and a negative control treated with sterile PDA (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;40 leaves). Prior to inoculation, leaves were disinfected by washing with commercial bleach (sodium hypochlorite) and antibacterial soap, rinsed thoroughly with distilled water, and dried with sterile paper towels.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEach leaf was superficially wounded with a sterilized needle, and a 5 mm-diameter mycelial disc from an actively growing culture was placed over the wound. Control leaves received only sterile PDA discs. Inoculated leaves were then placed in Petri dishes containing 2%w/v. water-agar (AA) and sealed with adhesive film. The dishes were incubated under darkness for 24 hours to promote infection (Zainudin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), followed by 12-hour light/dark photoperiod at 24\u0026ndash;26\u0026deg;C for eight days.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAfter the incubation period, each leaf was photographed alongside a millimetric ruler. The leaf area and lesion area were quantified using the software ImageJ, version 1.54p (Schneider et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e) to calculate the percentage of affected tissue. To confirm the pathogenic role of each isolate, reisolation procedures were carried out from the advancing lesion margins. Small fragments were surface-sterilized and plated on PDA, incubated at 28\u0026deg;C for eight days, and the identity of reisolates was confirmed morphologically, thereby fulfilling Koch\u0026rsquo;s postulates (Rahman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe percentage of leaf area affected by each treatment was calculated from lesion measurements obtained in the pathogenicity assay. To evaluate differences in pathogenicity among fungal isolates, a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) was fitted, with fungal treatment as a fixed effect and tree identity as a random effect, to account for potential non-independence among leaves collected from the same individual (Eq.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Equ1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003cdiv id=\"Equ1\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equ1\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:{Y}_{ij}=\\mu\\:+{\\alpha\\:}_{i}+{\\beta\\:}_{j}+{\\epsilon\\:}_{ij}$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"EquationNumber\"\u003e1\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhere: \u003cem\u003eY\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eij\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e​\u003c/em\u003e is the percentage of lesion area for the \u003cem\u003ei\u003c/em\u003eth treatment on the \u003cem\u003ej\u003c/em\u003eth tree; \u0026micro; is the overall mean; \u003cem\u003eα\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003ei\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e​\u003c/em\u003e is the fixed effect of the \u003cem\u003ei\u003c/em\u003eth fungal treatment (\u003cem\u003ei\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1, ..., 5); \u003cem\u003eβ\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003ej​\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e is the random effect of the \u003cem\u003ej\u003c/em\u003eth tree (\u003cem\u003ej\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1, ..., 5), assumed to follow \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003ej\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026sim;\u003cem\u003eN\u003c/em\u003e(0,σ\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eβ\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e); and, \u003cem\u003eε\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eij​\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e is the residual error, assumed to follow \u003cem\u003eε\u003c/em\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cem\u003eij\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026sim;N\u003c/em\u003e(0,σ\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eModel assumptions of normality of residuals and homoscedasticity were evaluated using the Shapiro\u0026ndash;Wilk test and Levene\u0026rsquo;s test, respectively. Once assumptions were confirmed, Tukey\u0026rsquo;s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test was applied for multiple comparisons at a 95% confidence level. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.4.3) (R Core Team, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eA total of 30 fungal isolates belonging to the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae, and Glomerellaceae were obtained from diseased leaves of \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis.\u003c/em\u003e ITS gene sequencing using primers ITS4\u0026ndash;ITS5 identified four species: \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e. These identifications were consistent with genus-level determinations based on colony and conidial morphology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe colony morphology on potato dextrose agar (PDA) showed a slightly cottony mycelium with concentric growth and a distinct black stromatic layer of firm consistency. Initially white (RGB: 211, 205, 245), colonies darkened after 15 days, particularly at the margins with medium gray (RGB: 205, 197, 183) (Figure 1a); The reverse of the colonies showed brownish pigmentation (RGB: 216, 158, 116). On \u003cem\u003ePinus caribaea\u003c/em\u003e var. \u003cem\u003ehondurensis\u003c/em\u003e needles, globose black pycnidia (RGB: 195, 151, 128) covered by a thin layer of white mycelium (RGB: 211, 205, 190) were produced (Figure 1b). Microscopic examination revealed hyaline, ellipsoid \u0026alpha;-conidia measuring 4.3\u0026ndash;5.1 \u0026times; 1.3\u0026ndash;2.2 \u0026micro;m (L \u0026times; W; n = 50) (Figure 1c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePCR amplification of the ITS region yielded a 503 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865276). BLAST analysis showed 99% sequence identity with \u003cem\u003eD. tulliensis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(GenBank accession no. OL353699.1). In the phylogenetic analysis, which incorporated \u003cem\u003eD. tulliensis\u003c/em\u003e sequences from multiple geographic origins, our isolate clustered with reference strains with high bootstrap support (Figure 1d).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 1 is here.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003eNigrospora sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eColony morphology on PDA showed white, cottony mycelium with concentric growth rings (RGB: 220, 218, 210) (Figure 2a). On synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA), sporulation was induced, producing a thin mycelial layer (RGB: 203, 202, 198) and abundant spores with black to gray pigmentation (RGB: 207, 184, 142 to 220, 214, 204) (Figure 2b). Conidia were smooth-walled, black (RGB: 203, 202, 198), globose to ellipsoidal, and measured 14.1\u0026ndash;16.2 \u0026times; 14.7\u0026ndash;16.7 \u0026micro;m (L \u0026times; W; n = 50) (Figure 2c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eITS region amplification produced a 476 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865279). BLAST analysis indicated 100% identity with \u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e (GenBank accession no. MZ724895.1). Phylogenetic analysis, incorporating sequences from diverse geographic origins, placed our isolate within the \u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e clade with strong bootstrap support (Figure 2d), corroborating the morphological and DNA identification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 2 is here.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eColony showed abundant aerial mycelium that was light gray on the surface (RGB: 190, 185, 176) and dark gray on the reverse (RGB: 137, 126, 109) (Figure 3a). On \u003cem\u003eP. caribaea\u003c/em\u003e var. \u003cem\u003ehondurensis\u003c/em\u003e needles, black cone-shaped pycnidia (RGB: 137, 137, 131) covered by gray mycelium (RGB: 121, 121, 113) were produced (Figure 3b). Conidia were hyaline, cylindrical to subovoid, and measured 18.4\u0026ndash;21.1 \u0026times; 9.5\u0026ndash;10.3 \u0026micro;m (L \u0026times; W; n = 50) (Figure 3c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePCR amplification yielded a 360 bp ITS fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865278). BLAST analysis showed 93% identity with \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e (GenBank accession no. MK734053.1). In the phylogenetic analysis, our isolate clustered with \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e sequences from other regions (Figure 3d), reinforcing its identification and supporting the morphological observations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 3 is here.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003eFusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eColony morphology was irregular, with abundant white cottony mycelium (RGB: 208, 196, 174) interspersed with brown aerial patches (RGB: 221, 143, 78), and a caramel-colored reverse (RGB: 157, 93, 70) (Figure 4a). Conidia were elongated, curved, sharp-tipped, septate, hyaline, and measured 20.9\u0026ndash;26.1 \u0026times; 3.5\u0026ndash;4.2 \u0026micro;m (L \u0026times; W; n = 50) (Figure 4b, 4c).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePCR amplification of the ITS region produced a 486 bp fragment (GenBank accession no. PV865277). BLAST analysis revealed 100% sequence identity with \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e (GenBank accession no. MT907512.1). Phylogenetic analysis grouped our isolate with \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e sequences from other geographic regions (Figure 4d), confirming its identity and complementing the morphological diagnosis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 4 is here.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003ePathogenicity tests\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnalysis of lesion development revealed that \u003cem\u003eFusarium equiseti, Nigrospora sphaerica, Diaporthe tulliensis, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e produced necrotic areas on \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaves significantly larger than those in the control treatment (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05; Figure 5). Lesion size differed significantly among species: \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e caused the largest mean necrotic areas (exceeding 2.8 mm\u0026sup2;), followed by \u003cem\u003eD. tulliensis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(from 1.9 to 2.7 mm\u0026sup2;). The variability within treatments was minimal, as reflected by the narrow standard error bars. In all inoculation trials, the same fungal species were successfully reisolated from symptomatic leaves, thereby fulfilling Koch\u0026rsquo;s postulates. Control leaves remained symptom-free throughout the assay, confirming the pathogenic role of the tested species.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFigure 5 is here.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRegarding morphometric comparisons, the conidial dimensions recorded in this study, as summarized in Table 1, generally aligned with those reported in the literature, thereby supporting the species identifications. Minor deviations were noted, including slightly shorter conidia in \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand a narrower size range in \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e compared with certain published values. Such differences are consistent with intraspecific variability, which can be influenced by factors such as host origin, and incubation conditions. This morphometric evidence complements the molecular analyses, reinforcing the taxonomic assignments of the fungi associated with \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaf spot in tropical environments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 1.\u003c/strong\u003e Conidial dimensions of fungal species isolated from \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaves compared with measurements reported in the literature.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"654\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSpecies\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" style=\"width: 324px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConidia dimension (\u0026micro;m)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd rowspan=\"2\" style=\"width: 216px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReference\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 132px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOur study\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 192px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLiterature\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eD. tulliensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 132px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.3\u0026ndash;5.1 \u0026times; 1.3\u0026ndash;2.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 192px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.6\u0026ndash;5.9 \u0026times; 1.4\u0026ndash;3.9; 3.7\u0026ndash;6.5 \u0026times; 1.0\u0026ndash;2.6\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 216px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(Alves et al., 2008, Pan\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 132px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14.1\u0026ndash;16.2 \u0026times; 14.7\u0026ndash;16.7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 192px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e11.5\u0026ndash;15.7 \u0026times; 13.3\u0026ndash;19.6; 13.3\u0026ndash;19.7 \u0026times; 10.8\u0026ndash;17.8\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 216px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(Villanueva et al., 2023, Bansal et al., 2024)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 132px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20.9\u0026ndash;26.1 \u0026times; 3.5\u0026ndash;4.2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 192px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e24.0\u0026ndash;40.0 \u0026times; 4.0\u0026ndash;6.0\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 216px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(Manghwar\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2021, P\u0026eacute;rez-Corral et al., 2015)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 114px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 132px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18.4\u0026ndash;21.1 \u0026times; 9.5\u0026ndash;10.3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 192px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(19\u0026ndash;) 21\u0026ndash;31 (\u0026ndash;32.5) \u0026times; (12\u0026ndash;) 13\u0026ndash;15.5 (\u0026ndash;18.5); 20\u0026ndash;21.8 \u0026times; 9.1\u0026ndash;10.9\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd style=\"width: 216px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(He et al., 2025, Munirah\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2017)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNote:\u003c/em\u003e Conidial dimensions are presented as length \u0026times; width (\u0026micro;m). Ranges in parentheses indicate extreme minimum or maximum values reported in the literature. Values from this study are based on 50 conidia per isolate (n = 50).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eAccurate identification of foliar pathogens in \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e is essential to assess their potential impact on tree health and long-term plantation productivity. In the present study, morphological and molecular analyses confirmed the occurrence of \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e associated with symptomatic leaves in Costa Rica. The genus \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe\u003c/em\u003e (Ascomycota: Diaporthaceae) is well known to include important plant pathogens, endophytes, and saprobes on a wide range of hosts, including economically valuable agricultural and forestry species (Diogo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Consistent with our findings, \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe\u003c/em\u003e spp. and \u003cem\u003eColletotrichum\u003c/em\u003e spp. have previously been reported as causal agents of foliar diseases in \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations in Asia, particularly in Malaysia and Bangladesh (Hao et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e, Kee et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Foliar infections by \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe\u003c/em\u003e spp. could lead to premature leaf senescence, reduction of canopy photosynthetic capacity, and, over time, significant declines in growth and natural latex production (Ogunsiji et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e, Oghenekome, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn the case of \u003cem\u003eNigrospora sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e, this species induced necrotic lesions comparable to those previously reported on \u003cem\u003eChrysanthemum morifolium\u003c/em\u003e (Luo et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eVigna unguiculata\u003c/em\u003e (Deepika et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Widely distributed across tropical and subtropical regions, \u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e is recognized for its opportunistic infection strategy, which facilitates rapid colonization of wounded or physiologically stressed tissues (Bansal et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). In the context of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations, such infection dynamics indicate that factors such as mechanical injury, foliar stress, or inadequate cultural practices may act as predisposing conditions for disease onset, potentially compromising canopy integrity and long-term plantation productivity (Villanueva et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, Seephueak et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRegarding lesion development, \u003cem\u003eFusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e exhibited the most extensive necrotic area formation in the pathogenicity assays, corroborating previous reports of its aggressive behavior in a wide range of hosts, including \u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e in China (Han et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) and \u003cem\u003eMalus domestica\u003c/em\u003e in Mexico (P\u0026eacute;rez-Corral et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This species is recognized for its ability to cause both foliar and root diseases, reflecting a high degree of ecological plasticity and adaptability to varied environmental conditions (Raja et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e, Jia et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). In \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e, this pathogenic versatility raises significant concerns regarding its capacity to impair canopy function and root system health, potentially reducing tree vigor and latex productivity (Roesler et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). The lesion development patterns observed in the present study are consistent with prior descriptions of disease progression, in which small necrotic spots rapidly enlarge and coalesce, culminating in extensive foliar necrosis (Rehman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, Hami et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e is a cosmopolitan pathogen in tropical and subtropical regions, frequently existing as a latent endophyte until host stress conditions trigger pathogenic development (Wang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). In the present study, this species caused extensive necrotic lesions on \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e leaves, comparable to those documented in plantations in Thailand (He et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e) and China (Wang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Its wide host range, combined with a marked capacity for adaptation to diverse environmental conditions, underscores the importance of implementing preventive management strategies in both young and mature \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e stands to mitigate potential canopy damage and productivity losses (Alves et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e, Pornsuriya et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe precise identification of foliar pathogens in \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e underscores the importance of integrating morphological and molecular approaches to ensure reliable diagnostic practices in tropical forestry systems (Rinc\u0026oacute;n Sepulveda, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e, Sell Biasetti, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). This study demonstrates strong concordance between colony and conidial morphological traits and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region sequencing, reinforcing the utility of this molecular marker as a DNA barcode for fungal identification (Raja et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e, Pornsuriya et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Taxonomic placement of the isolates was supported by identity values exceeding 95%, while morphometric measurements (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) closely matched published ranges, accounting for intraspecific variation attributable to host origin and environmental conditions (Vineeth et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e, Alves et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). This integrative approach is particularly valuable in tropical environments, where morphological plasticity frequently obscures species boundaries and hinders timely pathogen detection (Havanapan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e, Mazlan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019a\u003c/span\u003e). Establishing precise pathogen baselines is critical for enabling early diagnosis, informing targeted management strategies, and safeguarding the long-term health and productivity of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations (Zainudin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e, Sagaff et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAnchored in this diagnostic framework, the identification of these pathogens provides a solid foundation for formulating integrated disease management strategies aimed at reducing productivity losses and lowering tree mortality (Mohanta \u0026amp; Bae, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e, Ogunsiji et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Effective management requires the deployment of resistant or tolerant clones from well-defined breeding programs, the enforcement of stringent sanitation protocols, and systematic surveillance to track pathogen prevalence and spread (Syed Sagaff et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e, Fajarningsih, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). In the context of climate change adaptive management and the incorporation of resilient genotypes into breeding efforts are increasingly critical (Rubilar et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The continued expansion of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e cultivation in Costa Rica, proactive exclusion and containment measures are essential to prevent large-scale outbreaks that could compromise canopy integrity and latex yield (Seguin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e, Sell Biasetti, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Future research should investigate the epidemiology and environmental thresholds for infection by these species, along with their interactions with other foliar pathogens in co-infections, thereby enhancing the resilience and long-term sustainability of tropical \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations (Teoh et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e, Sterling \u0026amp; Melgarejo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, Mazlan et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019a\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study integrated morphological and molecular approaches to accurately identify foliar fungi associated with \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e in Costa Rica. Thirty isolates were obtained from symptomatic leaves belonging to the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae and Glomerellaceae. Sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region enabled species-level identification, which was consistent with genus-level determinations based on colony and conidial morphology.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePathogenicity assays demonstrated that \u003cem\u003eFusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eNigrospora sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e are capable of inducing necrotic foliar lesions in \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e. Among these, \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eL. theobromae\u003c/em\u003e produced the largest areas of lesion, highlighting their potential as major threats to plantation health. Accurate identification of these pathogens represents the first report of their association with \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e in Costa Rica and establishes a baseline reference for disease surveillance. These findings provide critical information for the development of early detection protocols and integrated management strategies, ultimately contributing to the long-term health and productivity of tropical \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u003c/strong\u003e This research was funded by the Vicerrector\u0026iacute;a de Investigaci\u0026oacute;n y Extensi\u0026oacute;n (VIE) of the Tecnol\u0026oacute;gico de Costa Rica through the project \u0026quot;\u003cem\u003e\u0026quot;Commercial cultivation of Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A.Juss.) for natural rubber production in rural areas of Costa Rica\u0026quot;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026quot; (Code: 140-1122).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors would like to thank the company Hevea Costa Rica, Desarrollos Agroforestales S.A., for providing the plant material of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e. Also, the Intensive Silviculture Research Group of the Tecnol\u0026oacute;gico de Costa Rica, for providing access to equipment and scientific assistance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions:\u003c/strong\u003e M.S.E: morphological and molecular analysis, inoculation, pathogenicity tests. M.R.S: sample collection, isolation, morphological description of the fungus. D.M.A.: de-scription and analysis of molecular identification and pathogenicity tests. D.A.A: project management, statistical analysis. J.C.V.: writing - original draft preparation. All authors reviewed and editing the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of interest:\u003c/strong\u003e The authors declare no conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e: Data will be made available on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAinusyifa, F., Lestari, R. and Yuniati, R. (2024) A Review of Fungal Disease in Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex A. Juss.) Mull. Arg.: From Identification to Scientific Investigation for Control Strategies. \u003cem\u003eJurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e10,\u003c/strong\u003e 977-987.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAlvarado, A., Mata, R. and Kappelle, M. (2015) Soils of Costa Rica: an agroecological approach. \u003cem\u003eCosta Rican Ecosystems\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e 64-93.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eAlves, A., Crous, P. W., Correia, A. and Phillips, A. (2008) Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. \u003cem\u003eFungal diversity,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e28,\u003c/strong\u003e 1-13.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBabu, S., Reshma, T., Vineeth, V. and Philip, S. (2024) Insights into pathogenicity mechanisms of Phytophthora meadii, the abnormal leaf fall pathogen in rubber tree, through whole genome sequencing and analysis. \u003cem\u003ePhysiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e134,\u003c/strong\u003e 102410.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBansal, N., Juwantha, R. and Pandey, S. (2024) Morphology and ITS-based phylogeny revealed Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf spot and blight disease of Bambusa polymorpha in India. \u003cem\u003ePhysiological and Molecular Plant Pathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e132,\u003c/strong\u003e 102315.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBeck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A. and Wood, E. F. (2018) Present and future K\u0026ouml;ppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. \u003cem\u003eScientific data,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e5,\u003c/strong\u003e 1-12.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBertsch, F., Alvarado, A., Henriquez, C. and Mata, R. (2000) Properties, geographic distribution, and management of major soil orders of Costa Rica. In: \u003cem\u003eQuantifying Sustainable Development.\u003c/em\u003e Elsevier, pp. 265-294.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCandau, N. and Maspoch, M. L. (2025) Natural rubber: From Hevea brasiliensis to advanced applications\u0026mdash;A fundamental overview. In: \u003cem\u003eRubber Materials.\u003c/em\u003e Elsevier, pp. 27-52.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDeepika, Y. S., Mahadevakumar, S., Amruthesh, K. N. and Lakshmidevi, N. (2021) First Report of Nigrospora sphaerica Associated with Leaf Spot Disease of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) from India. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e105,\u003c/strong\u003e 506.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDiogo, E. L., Santos, J. M. and Phillips, A. J. (2010) Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. \u003cem\u003eFungal diversity,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e44,\u003c/strong\u003e 107-115.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFajarningsih, N. D. (2016) Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) as DNA barcoding to identify fungal species: a review. \u003cem\u003eSqualen Bulletin of Marine and Fisheries Postharvest and Biotechnology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11,\u003c/strong\u003e 37-44.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFlorence, U. (2018) Corynespora leaf fall of Hevea brasilensis: Challenges and prospect.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13,\u003c/strong\u003e 2098-2103.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGasparotto, L., Ferreira, F. and Junqueira, N. (1988) Mancha de Corynespora em folhas de seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis) no Brasil. \u003cem\u003eFitopatologia Brasileira,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13,\u003c/strong\u003e 10.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGuerra, N. B., Pegorin, G. S. A., Boratto, M. H., de Barros, N. R., de Oliveira Graeff, C. F. and Herculano, R. D. (2021) Biomedical applications of natural rubber latex from the rubber tree Hevea brasiliensis.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMaterials Science and Engineering: C,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e126,\u003c/strong\u003e 112126.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHadi Ismail, M. Z., Mohamad Mahyudin, M., Noran, A. S., Ahmad Zambri, A. M., Maiden, N. A., Atan, S.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) Unravelling fungal diversity in Pestalotiopsis leaf fall disease symptomatic leaves of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Rubber Research,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e27,\u003c/strong\u003e 501-515.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHall, B. G. (2013) Building Phylogenetic Trees from Molecular Data with MEGA. \u003cem\u003eMolecular Biology and Evolution,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e30,\u003c/strong\u003e 1229-1235.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHami, A., Rasool, R. S., Khan, N. A., Mansoor, S., Mir, M. A., Ahmed, N.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) Morpho-molecular identification and first report of Fusarium equiseti in causing chilli wilt from Kashmir (Northern Himalayas). \u003cem\u003eScientific Reports,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11,\u003c/strong\u003e 3610.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHan, Z., Cui, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, Z., Han, M.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) Effect of Rhizospheric Fungus on Biological Control of Root Rot (Fusarium equiseti) Disease of Saposhnikovia divaricata. \u003cem\u003eAgronomy,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e12,\u003c/strong\u003e 2906.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHao, Y., Aluthmuhandiram, J. V. S., Chethana, K. W. T., Manawasinghe, I. S., Li, X., Liu, M.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2020) Nigrospora Species Associated with Various Hosts from Shandong Peninsula, China. \u003cem\u003eMycobiology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e48,\u003c/strong\u003e 169-183.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHavanapan, P.-o., Bourchookarn, A., Ketterman, A. J. and Krittanai, C. (2016) Comparative proteome analysis of rubber latex serum from pathogenic fungi tolerant and susceptible rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). \u003cem\u003eJournal of Proteomics,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e131,\u003c/strong\u003e 82-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHe, C., Lin, J., Wu, H., Zheng, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2025) Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Stem Gummosis Disease in Rubber Trees and Its Chemical Control Strategies. \u003cem\u003eMicroorganisms,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e13,\u003c/strong\u003e 1586.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJacob, J.-L., d\u0026rsquo;Auzac, J. and Prevot, J.-C. (1993) The composition of natural latex from Hevea brasiliensis. \u003cem\u003eClinical reviews in allergy,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11,\u003c/strong\u003e 325-337.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJain, A., Sarsaiya, S., Wu, Q., Lu, Y. and Shi, J. (2019) A review of plant leaf fungal diseases and its environment speciation. \u003cem\u003eBioengineered,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e10,\u003c/strong\u003e 409-424.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJia, C., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Li, S. and Zhang, W. (2020) First Report of Leaf Spot Caused by Fusarium equiseti on Switchgrass in Shandong, China. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e104,\u003c/strong\u003e 3074.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKee, Y. J., Hafifi, A. B. M., Huda-Shakirah, A. R., Wong, K. L., Jin, X. L., Siti Nordahliawate, M. S.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2019) First report of reddish brown spot disease of red-fleshed dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) caused by Nigrospora lacticolonia and Nigrospora sphaerica in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eCrop Protection,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e122,\u003c/strong\u003e 165-170.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Molecular Evolution,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e16,\u003c/strong\u003e 111-120.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLee, S. (2003) Pathology of tropical hardwood plantations in South-East Asia. \u003cem\u003eNew Zealand Journal of Forestry Science,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e33,\u003c/strong\u003e 321-335.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLieberei, R. (2007) South American leaf blight of the rubber tree (Hevea spp.): new steps in plant domestication using physiological features and molecular markers. \u003cem\u003eAnnals of botany,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e100,\u003c/strong\u003e 1125-1142.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLim, T. (2011) Hevea brasiliensis. In: \u003cem\u003eEdible Medicinal And Non-Medicinal Plants: Volume 2, Fruits.\u003c/em\u003e Springer, pp. 476-483.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLuo, X., Xi, Y., Shen, C., Wang, M. and Wang, H. (2022) Occurrence of Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf blight on Chrysanthemum morifolium in China. \u003cem\u003eCrop Protection,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e157,\u003c/strong\u003e 105982.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eManghwar, H., Hussain, A., Ali, Q., Saleem, M. H., Abualreesh, M. H., Alatawi, A.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2021) Disease Severity, Resistance Analysis, and Expression Profiling of Pathogenesis-Related Protein Genes after the Inoculation of Fusarium equiseti in Wheat. \u003cem\u003eAgronomy,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e11,\u003c/strong\u003e 2124.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eManju, M., Idicula, S., Jacob, C., Vinod, K. and Prem, E. (2002) Management of Corynespora leaf fall (CLF) disease of rubber with water based fungicide formulations. \u003cem\u003ePlantation Crop Research and Development in the New Millennium\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e 527-530.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMazlan, S., JAAFAR, N. M., Wahab, A., Rajandas, H. and Zulperi, D. (2019a) Major diseases of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003ePertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e5\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMazlan, S., Noraini, M., Wahab, A., Sulaiman, Z., Rajandas, H. and Zulperi, D. (2019b) Major Diseases of Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003ePertanika Journal of Scholarly Research Reviews,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e5,\u003c/strong\u003e 10-21.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMohanta, T. K. and Bae, H. (2015) The diversity of fungal genome. \u003cem\u003eBiological Procedures Online,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e17,\u003c/strong\u003e 8.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMunirah, M., Azmi, A., Yong, S. and Nur Ain Izzati, M. (2017) Characterization of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and L. pseudotheobromae causing fruit rot on pre-harvest mango in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003ePlant Pathol Quar,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e7,\u003c/strong\u003e 202-213.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNair, K. P. (2020) Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). In: \u003cem\u003eTree Crops: Harvesting Cash from the World\u0026apos;s Important Cash Crops.\u003c/em\u003e Springer, pp. 287-332.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOghenekome, U. O. (2004) Natural rubber, Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex A. Juss.) M\u0026uuml;ll. Arg, germplasm collection in the Amazon Basin, Brazil: a retrospective. \u003cem\u003eEconomic botany,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e58,\u003c/strong\u003e 544-555.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOgunsiji, A. O., Ibrahim, T. O. and Odusanya, F. A. (2020) Management Strategies of Forest Plant Diseases: A Review. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Plant \u0026amp; Soil Science,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e32,\u003c/strong\u003e 87-95.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePan, J.-M., Geng, X.-S., Bei, Y.-J., Jiang, Y.-Y., Su, P.-P., Liu, Y.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2024) First Report of Diaporthe tulliensis Causing Leaf Spot on Millettia speciosa in China.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePlant Disease,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e108,\u003c/strong\u003e 3191.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eP\u0026eacute;rez-Corral, D. A., Garc\u0026iacute;a-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez, N. Y., Gallegos-Morales, G., Ruiz-Cisneros, M. F., Berlanga-Reyes, D. I. and R\u0026iacute;os-Velasco, C. (2015) Aislamiento de actinomicetos asociados a rizosfera de \u0026aacute;rboles de manzano antag\u0026oacute;nicos a Fusarium equiseti.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRevista mexicana de ciencias agr\u0026iacute;colas,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e6,\u003c/strong\u003e 1629-1638.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePornsuriya, C., Thaochan, N., Chairin, T. and Sunpapao, A. (2023) Morphological and Phylogenetic Evidences Reveal Lasiodiplodia chonburiensis and L. theobromae Associated with Leaf Blight in Hevea brasiliensis in Southern Thailand. \u003cem\u003eDiversity,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15,\u003c/strong\u003e 961.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePriyadarshan, P., Hoa, T., Huasun, H. and De Gon\u0026ccedil;alves, P. (2005) Yielding potential of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in sub-optimal environments. \u003cem\u003eJournal of crop improvement,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e14,\u003c/strong\u003e 221-247.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eR Core Team, R. (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRahman, M. (1988) Diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Bangladesh. \u003cem\u003eBano Biggyyan Patrika,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e17,\u003c/strong\u003e 73-79.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRaja, H. A., Miller, A. N., Pearce, C. J. and Oberlies, N. H. (2017) Fungal identification using molecular tools: a primer for the natural products research community. \u003cem\u003eJournal of natural products,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e80,\u003c/strong\u003e 756-770.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRehman, A. u., Rauf, A., Ali, A., Taimoor Shakeel, M., Hasan Naqvi, S. A., Shahid, M.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2023) First Report of Fusarium equiseti Causing Leaf Spots of Bitter Gourd (Momordica charantia) in Pakistan.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePlant Disease,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e107,\u003c/strong\u003e 584.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRinc\u0026oacute;n Sepulveda, O. (1990) \u003cem\u003eEl cultivo del caucho (Hevea brasiliensis)\u003c/em\u003e.\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eColombia: Federaci\u0026oacute;n Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRobledo D\u0026rsquo;Angelo, O. (2016) Enfermedad de marchitamiento f\u0026uacute;ngico en pl\u0026aacute;ntulas de lechuga: un modelo did\u0026aacute;ctico-experimental para la ense\u0026ntilde;anza de los postulados de Koch.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRoesler, E. A., Balbinott, N., Schroeder, R. G., Yamazaki-Lau, E., Lima, M. I. P. M., Brammer, S. P.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2022) An efficient protocol for inoculation of Fusarium graminearum in detached leaves of Arabidopsis. \u003cem\u003eTropical Plant Pathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e47,\u003c/strong\u003e 353-361.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRubilar, R. A., Valverde, J. C., Barrientos, G. and Campoe, O. C. (2024) Water and Temperature Ecophysiological Challenges of Forests Plantations under Climate Change. \u003cem\u003eForests,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e15,\u003c/strong\u003e 654.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSagaff, S., Ali, N. S., Mahyudin, M. M., Wong, M. Y. and Yusop, M. R. (2022) Emerging and existing major leaf diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Current Opinion in Crop Science,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e3,\u003c/strong\u003e 34-47.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSchneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. and Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) ImageJ (Version 1.54p) U.S. : National Institutes of Health.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSeephueak, P., Petcharat, V. and Phongpaichit, S. (2010) Fungi associated with leaf litter of para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). \u003cem\u003eMycology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e1,\u003c/strong\u003e 213-227.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSeguin, M., Flori, A., Legnat\u0026eacute;, H. and Cl\u0026eacute;ment-Demange, A. (2003) Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). In: \u003cem\u003eGenetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants.\u003c/em\u003e CRC Press, pp. 277-305.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSell Biasetti, L. A. (2021) La extracci\u0026oacute;n de caucho en Costa Rica. \u003cem\u003eRevista Herencia,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e34,\u003c/strong\u003e 65-77.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSouza, L. M., Gazaffi, R., Mantello, C. C., Silva, C. C., Garcia, D., Le Guen, V.\u003cem\u003e, et al.\u003c/em\u003e (2013) QTL mapping of growth-related traits in a full-sib family of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) evaluated in a sub-tropical climate. \u003cem\u003ePLoS One,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8,\u003c/strong\u003e e61238.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSterling, A. and Melgarejo, L. M. (2021) Photosynthetic performance of Hevea brasiliensis affected by South American Leaf Blight under field conditions. \u003cem\u003eEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e161,\u003c/strong\u003e 953-967.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSyed Sagaff, S. A., Syd Ali, N., Mohmad Mahyudin, M., Wong, M. Y. and Yusop, M. R. (2022) Emerging and Existing Major Leaf Diseases of Hevea brasiliensis in Malaysia.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eJournal of Current Opinion in Crop Science,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e3,\u003c/strong\u003e 34-47.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTafur Salazar, D. J. (2017) Estudio de la diversidad gen\u0026eacute;tica de la colecci\u0026oacute;n de Melina (Gmelina arb\u0026oacute;rea Roxb) del INIAP, mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeats). Sangolqu\u0026iacute;, Ecuador: Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMolecular Biology and Evolution,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e38,\u003c/strong\u003e 3022-3027.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTeoh, Y. P., Don, M. M. and Ujang, S. (2011) Assessment of the properties, utilization, and preservation of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis): a case study in Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Wood Science,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e57,\u003c/strong\u003e 255-266.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThaochan, N., Pornsuriya, C., Chairin, T., Chomnunti, P. and Sunpapao, A. (2022) Morphological and molecular characterization of Calonectria foliicola associated with leaf blight on rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) in Thailand. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Fungi,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e8,\u003c/strong\u003e 986.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVillanueva, J., Solpot, T. C. and Tangonan, N. (2023) Nigrospora sphaerica causing leaf blight disease of cacao in the Philippines. \u003cem\u003eIndian Phytopathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e76,\u003c/strong\u003e 915-922.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVineeth, V., Reshma, T., Babu, S., Philip, S. and Mahadevan, C. (2024) Comprehensive whole-genome sequencing reveals genetic characteristics of Colletotrichum fructicola (Nara gc5) the causative organism of circular leaf spot disease of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). \u003cem\u003eJournal of Plant Pathology,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e106,\u003c/strong\u003e 579-591.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWang, S. J., Wang, S. K., Li, M., Huang, G. Q., Su, Y. H. and Ma, H. B. (2023) First Report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae Causing Brown Leaf Spot on Bruguiera gymnorrhiza in China. \u003cem\u003ePlant Disease,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e107,\u003c/strong\u003e 2262.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZainudin, N. A. I. M., Azhar, N. a., Rosli, M. N. H. and Nordin, N. A. M. (2023) Identification and Characterization of Fungi Associated with Leaf Spot Disease of Rubber Trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Pahang, Malaysia. \u003cem\u003eJurnal Proteksi Tanaman (Journal of Plant Protection),\u003c/em\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e7,\u003c/strong\u003e 89-102.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"tropical-plant-pathology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"tppa","sideBox":"Learn more about [Tropical Plant Pathology](https://www.springer.com/journal/40858)","snPcode":"40858","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/tppa","title":"Tropical Plant Pathology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"rubber tree, spots, phytopathogenic fungi, identification, forest plantations","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003ePlantations of \u003cem\u003eHevea brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e are vulnerable to a wide range of foliar fungal pathogens capable of causing substantial damage throughout the forest rotation cycle. This issue is particularly critical in Costa Rica, where the commercial cultivation of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e is a recent development, and no prior records exist of foliar pathogens affecting this species, thereby limiting timely detection and effective management. The study evaluated the pathogenicity of foliar fungi associated with \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e through combined morphological and molecular characterization. Twenty plantation trees (2\u0026ndash;4 years old) showing symptoms such as wilting, chlorosis, yellowing, partial to complete necrosis, punctate lesions, and anthracnose were sampled. Fungi were isolated from symptomatic leaves, cultured on potato dextrose agar supplemented with antibiotics, and identified based on colony and conidial morphology, complemented by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS4\u0026ndash;ITS5). Pathogenicity was assessed by inoculating healthy detached leaves with mycelial discs from each isolate. A total of 30 isolates were obtained, representing the families Botryosphaeriaceae, Diaporthaceae, Nectriaceae, Apiosporaceae, and Glomerellaceae. Four species were confirmed as pathogenic: \u003cem\u003eDiaporthe tulliensis, Nigrospora sphaerica, Fusarium equiseti\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eLasiodiplodia theobromae\u003c/em\u003e. All produced necrotic lesions, with \u003cem\u003eF. equiseti\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eN. sphaerica\u003c/em\u003e generating the largest affected areas. Accurate identification of foliar pathogens is crucial for early disease diagnosis, which supports the development of targeted management strategies and safeguards the long-term health and productivity of \u003cem\u003eH. brasiliensis\u003c/em\u003e plantations in Costa Rica.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Morphological and molecular identification of foliar pathogenic fungi of Hevea brasiliensis in Costa Rica","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-04 12:24:32","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7401529/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revisions","date":"2025-10-06T12:16:43+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2025-09-16T12:17:46+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-08-27T16:23:06+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"Tropical Plant Pathology","date":"2025-08-27T09:00:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-08-26T14:36:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Tropical Plant Pathology","date":"2025-08-19T10:35:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"tropical-plant-pathology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"tppa","sideBox":"Learn more about [Tropical Plant Pathology](https://www.springer.com/journal/40858)","snPcode":"40858","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/tppa","title":"Tropical Plant Pathology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5b16222e-d980-4463-8cb7-3fabb9939093","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 4th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"in-revision","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-10-06T16:18:35+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-04 12:24:32","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7401529","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7401529","identity":"rs-7401529","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00