A Comparative Study on Endometriosis Automatic Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound

In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies · 2025 · pp. 125–134 · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8598-8_12 · W4406447230
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-12

This review synthesizes research on AI-enhanced MRI and ultrasound for automatic endometriosis detection, focusing on improved accuracy and efficiency through fusion imaging.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This paper synthesizes findings across studies on automatic detection of endometriosis using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound, enhanced by artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning methods. It emphasizes that combining the complementary strengths of MRI and ultrasound through fusion imaging improves diagnostic accuracy as well as sensitivity and specificity, aiming for more efficient characterization and earlier detection. The major limitation noted is that the work is a synthesis of prior research rather than a new primary diagnostic study, so performance depends on the included studies and their designs. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — focusing on comparative, AI-enabled automatic diagnosis using MRI, ultrasound, and fusion imaging.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 9,564 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis, a prevalent yet challenging condition to diagnose, affects a significant number of women worldwide, often leading to delayed treatment and management. Traditional diagnostic methods, while effective, have limitations in terms of accuracy and invasiveness. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence and medical imaging technologies offer new possibilities for improving the diagnosis of this complex condition. The study synthesizes findings from various research works that have explored the individual and combined capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound enhanced by artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning techniques, for the automatic detection of endometriosis. It particularly focuses on the enhanced diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity achieved through the integration of artificial intelligence AI algorithms. The paper examines the results of fusion imaging, where the complementary nature of magnetic resonance and ultrasound is leveraged, providing a more comprehensive diagnostic tool. The findings suggest that their synergistic use leads to improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This integrated approach not only aids in early detection and better characterization of endometriosis but also provides valuable insights for effective treatment planning. The paper concludes with a discussion on the potential of this combined approach in revolutionizing the diagnosis and management of endometriosis, highlighting future directions and implications for clinical practice. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Avery, J., Deslandes, A., Freger, S., Leonardi, M., Lo, G., Carneiro, G., Condous, G., Hull, M.: The Imagendo Study Group, Non-invasive Diagnostic Imaging for Endometriosis Part 1: A Systematic review of recent developments in Ultrasound, Combination Imaging and Artificial Intelligence. Fertil. Steril. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.008 Avery, J., Knox, S., Deslandes, A., Leonardi, M., Lo. G., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Holdsworth-Carson, S., Nguyen, T., Condous, G., Carneiro, G., Hull, M.: The imagendo study group, noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis Part 2: A Systematic review of recent developments in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Computed Tomography, Fertility and Sterility (2024), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017 Bakhtiyarov, K., Strogonova, V.: Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostics of endometriosis. Georgian Medical News (2019) Bazot, M., Bharwani, N., Huchon, C., Kinkel, K., Cunha, T.M., Guerra, A., Manganaro, L., Buñesch, L., Kido, A., Togashi, K., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Rockall, A.G.: European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur. Radiol. 27(7), 2765–2775 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4673-z Bianek-Bodzak, A., Szurowska, E., Sawicki, S., Liro, M.: The importance and perspective of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis. BioMed Res. Int. (2013) 10.1155%2F2013%2F436589 Carbognin, G., Girardi, V., Pinali, L., Raffaelli, R., Bergamini, V., Pozzi Mucelli, R.:. Assessment of pelvic endometriosis: correlation of US and MRI with laparoscopic findings. La radiologia medica (2006) Chassang, M., Novellas, S., Bloch-Marcotte, C., Delotte, J., Toullalan, O., Bongain, A., Chevallier, P.: Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur. Radiol. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1627-8 Craig, E.V., Shannon, L.M., Andreotti, R.: The complementary role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of endometriosis: a review. Ultrasound Q. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/ruq.0000000000000458 Foti, P., Farina, R., Palmucci, S., Vizzini, I., Libertini, N., Coronella, M., Spadola, S., Caltabiano, R., Iraci, M., Basile, A., Milone, P., Cianci, A., Ettorre, G.: Endometriosis: clinical features, MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Insights into Imaging, (2018). 10.1007%2Fs13244-017-0591-0 Gerges, B., Li, W., Leonardi, M., Mol, B., Condous, G.: Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis. Human Reproduction Open (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab041 Guerriero, S., Spiga, S., Ajossa, S., Peddes, C., Perniciano, M., Soggiu, B., De Cecco, C. D., Laghi, A., Melis, G., Saba, L.: Role of imaging in the management of endometriosis. Minerva ginecologica (2013) Hacihaliloglu, I., Balica, A.: A Method of Improving Representation of Endometriosis Ultrasound Data By Using Local Phase Tissue Signatures. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.176 Hernández Gutiérrez, A., Spagnolo, E., Hidalgo, P., López, A., Zapardiel, I., Rodríguez, R.: Magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasound for complete survey of the pelvic compartments among patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12894 Ibrahim, N., Elsaeed, H.H.: The role of MRI in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2012.09.005 Indrielle-Kelly, T., Frühauf, F., Fanta, M., Burgetová, A., Lavu, D., Dundr, P., Cibula, D., Fischerová, D.: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in the mapping of deep pelvic endometriosis using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus. Biomed. Res. Int. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3583989 Kinkel, K., Frei, K., Balleyguier, C., Chapron, C.: Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review. Eur. Radiol. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2882-y Kulakov, V.I., Adamian, L.V., Volobuev, A.I., Demidov, V.N., Panov, V.O., Gavrilova, T.I., Kulabukhova, E.N., Panova, M.M., Stashuk, G.A.: Magnitno-resonansnaia tomografiia v diagnostike razlichnykh form éndometriozov [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of different forms of endometriosis]. Vestn. Rentgenol. Radiol. 4, 45–59 (2003) Manganaro, L., Anastasi, E., Vinci, V., Saldari, M., Bernardo, S., Sollazzo, P., Ballesio, L., Fuggetta, E., Giancotti, A., Porpora, M.: Endometriosis: 10 Keys Points for MRI. J. Endometr. Pelvic Pain Disord. (2015). https://doi.org/10.5301/je.5000209 Millischer, A., Salomon, L., Santulli, P., Borghese, B., Dousset, B., Chapron, C.: Fusion imaging for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: feasibility and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14712 Moro, F., Leombroni, M., Testa, A.: Ultrasound Imaging in Endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.07.004 Saarelainen, S., Kööbi, L., Järvenpää, R., Laurila, M., Mäenpää, J.: The preoperative assessment of deep myometrial invasion by three-dimensional ultrasound versus MRI in endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01439.x Scutelnicu, L.A., Maftei, R., Luca, M.: An overview on diagnosis of endometriosis disease based on machine learning methods. In: 9th International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (ICICT 2024), accepted for publication in proceedings by Springer LNNS. ISSN: 2367–3370 (2024) Stratton, P., Winkel, C., Premkumar, A., Chow, C., Wilson, J., Hearns-Stokes, R., Heo, S., Merino, M., Nieman, L.: Diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic examination for the detection of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00155-9 Thalluri, A.L., Knox, S., Nguyen, T.: MRI findings in deep infiltrating endometriosis: A pictorial essay. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 61, 767–773 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12680 Yiyang, L., Qin, Z., Boyuan, P., Jingjing, J., Li, F., Weihao, W., Wenwen, W., Shixuan, W., Xin, Z.: Automatic Measurement of Endometrial Thickness From Transvaginal Ultrasound Images, in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, (2022). 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.853845 Yue, W., Xiaokun, L., Niya, W., Yuanxi, L., Xinting, L., Ruijie, S., Chan, H., Bin, Y., Huifang, W.: Automated measurement of endometrial peristalsis in cine transvaginal ultrasound images, in Frontiers in Physiology, (2022) 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.983177 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. About this paper Cite this paper Scutelnicu, LA., Luca, M., Maftei, R. (2025). A Comparative Study on Endometriosis Automatic Diagnosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound. In: Zimmermann, A., Schmidt, R., Jain, L.C., Howlett, R.J. (eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. KES-HCIS 2024. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 414. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8598-8_12 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8598-8_12 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore Print ISBN: 978-981-97-8597-1 Online ISBN: 978-981-97-8598-8 eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings excluding Computer Science

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK