p53 in Endometriosis

In: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2002 · vol. 21(1) , pp. 93 · doi:10.1097/00004347-200201000-00020 · W1968595655
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

This study confirmed the specificity of p53 staining in endometriosis by using negative controls and blocking endogenous biotin activity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-24 · read from full text

This brief correspondence addresses a methodological concern regarding the specificity of p53 immunostaining in endometriosis tissue samples. The author confirms that parallel sections stained with normal mouse serum served as negative controls and showed no staining, thereby validating the absence of non-specific binding. Furthermore, preincubation with streptavidin did not reduce positive signals, ruling out interference from endogenous biotin activity and supporting the conclusion that the observed p53 staining is specific to the target antigen. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically addressing technical validation of p53 detection methods in endometriotic lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

I thank Dr. Mittal for indicating a very important point. We stained parallel sections using normal mouse serum (instead of anti-p53 antibody) as a negative control, and no staining was observed in the sections that showed positive p53 staining. We further examined the possibility of endogenous biotin activity by preincubating the sections with streptavidin (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Because the positive p53 staining was not reduced or lost even after this blocking test, we believe that the positive p53 staining is specific and not due to endogenous biotin activity. Toshihiko Toki, M.D.
Full text 776 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
I thank Dr. Mittal for indicating a very important point. We stained parallel sections using normal mouse serum (instead of anti-p53 antibody) as a negative control, and no staining was observed in the sections that showed positive p53 staining. We further examined the possibility of endogenous biotin activity by preincubating the sections with streptavidin (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Because the positive p53 staining was not reduced or lost even after this blocking test, we believe that the positive p53 staining is specific and not due to endogenous biotin activity. Toshihiko Toki, M.D.Letter To The Editor p53 in Endometriosis - Toshihiko Toki International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 21(1):p 93, January 2002. Copyright © 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-19T06:31:22.526400+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK