Exploring Open Science and Research Integrity in the Basic Sciences: Findings from a Qualitative Study

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

New forms of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) and even Research Misconduct (RM) practices are emerging in an open science environment. This work documents this emergence in three very different countries, Brazil, France, and Peru, using semi-structured interviews with researchers working in Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. The significant findings are that the hierarchical structure of academia contributes to the spread of research misconduct, and QRP and open science practices can potentially serve as effective tools for preventing and detecting these issues. Furthermore, it is the hierarchical structure of academia which undermines its effectivity, as behaviours hiding misconducts go unnoticed. The main conclusion is that power relations between different actors in academia are still very present despite the countries' different ethical norms and the researchers' open science practices. The main recommendation is to work on aligning open science policies, and policies on ethics and QRPs.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00