A Quality of Life Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approaches in Acute Appendicitis: A Randomised Prospective Study

Mehmet Kaplan, B. Salman, Tonguç Utku Yılmaz, Mehmet Oğuz
In: Acta Chirurgica Belgica · 2009 · vol. 109(3) , pp. 356–363 · doi:10.1080/00015458.2009.11680439 · PMID:19943593 · W173301145
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the utility of a laparoscopic approach in the management of patients with right lower abdominal pain and in the quality of life after the operation. METHODS: Patients with suspected appendicitis were included in the study. They were randomly assigned either to treatment with a traditional open approach or with a laparoscopic approach. The patients' data, including demographic data, complications and gastro-intestinal quality of life index scores, were collected at the 6th week and 6th month and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Overall, 83 appendectomies were performed. Other pathologies were ovulation bleeding, ovarian cyst, Meckel's diverticulum, ectopic pregnancy and leiomyoma of the uterus. Negative appendectomy rate was 7%. Severe infection occurred in five of the open group. The advantages of the laparoscopy also showed significantly in hospital stay (55.80 +/- 20.97 hours vs. 75.06 +/- 35.14 hours), the need for narcotics and in visual analog score, as well as in the gastrointestinal quality of life index (85.88 +/- 9.73 vs 101.30 +/- 9.31). The quality of life is still better in the long-term (95.14 +/- 8.45 vs 120.36 +/- 10.25). When the groups were compared according to the subgroups of gastro-intestinal quality of life index, except for disease-specific items, in all categories a significant improvement was seen in the laparoscopically treated patients. This improvement was observed in the follow-up period also. However, the hospital costs (987.50 +/- 77.25 USD vs. 406.27 +/- 100.59 USD) and operative time (56.25 +/- 10.9 vs. 49.41 +/- 11.76 minutes) still continued to be a problem for the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe method, which also has advantages of diagnostic procedure for other pathologies, a better quality of life both in the early and late period, and a short hospital stay. The important advantage is also seen in the late period with better quality of life.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

References (29)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK