Impact on Ovarian Reserve According to the Type of Ovarian Endometrioma Excision: CO2 Fiber Laser Vaporization (AcuPulse DUO, Lumenis) versus Conventional Excision. Interim Analysis

Mariona Rius, Jordina Munrós, M-A. Martinez-Zamora, Cristina Ros, Francisco Carmona
In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2016 · vol. 23(7) , pp. S182 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.624 · W2530773971
OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 ⓘ

This interim analysis compares the impact on ovarian reserve between CO2 fiber laser vaporization and conventional excision for treating ovarian endometriomas.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK