Frequency analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall in Brazil with multiparameter probability density functions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract For water resources engineering and management, understand the extreme rainfall events it’s essential. Using rainfall frequency analysis, one can fit many Probability Density Functions (PDFs) to the rainfall series and identify the best fit through the goodness-of-fit tests, allowing the estimate of Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall (AMDR) quantiles for different Return Periods (RP). Recommendations regarding the best PDFs for this have been made for some countries, however, in the opposite direction, Brazil has no guidelines or recommendations such as the above mentioned, and Gumbel distribution still is the most used PDF for modeling AMDR, frequently without testing others. That said, we focus in modeling thousands of AMDR series in Brazil, evaluating ten PDF candidates to find the best fit and defining the most indicated to describe AMDR in the country. The methodology consisted of: acquisition, structuration and screening process by temporal and statistical criteria; fit of the 2-, 3- and multiparameter PDFs to the AMDR series based on the L-moments method; quantile estimation; and PDFs performance assessment by Filliben test and the relative absolute error. From the almost 4 thousand AMDR series investigated, we concluded that: Gumbel and Exponential provided the poorest performance (32.1–60.2% of non-satisfactory fits); multiparametric PDFs (Wakeby and Kappa) are the most indicated for modeling AMDR in Brazil; Gumbel had the highest error values for quantile estimate, especially for high RP; novelties and advances on probabilistic modeling of AMDR in Brazil were provided, helping decision makers with accurate and essential technical information for many purposes.
Full text 12,386 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Frequency analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall in Brazil with multiparameter probability density functions | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Frequency analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall in Brazil with multiparameter probability density functions Aryane Araujo Rodrigues, Tamara Leitzke Caldeira Beskow, Tirzah Moreira Siqueira, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract For water resources engineering and management, understand the extreme rainfall events it’s essential. Using rainfall frequency analysis, one can fit many Probability Density Functions (PDFs) to the rainfall series and identify the best fit through the goodness-of-fit tests, allowing the estimate of Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall (AMDR) quantiles for different Return Periods (RP). Recommendations regarding the best PDFs for this have been made for some countries, however, in the opposite direction, Brazil has no guidelines or recommendations such as the above mentioned, and Gumbel distribution still is the most used PDF for modeling AMDR, frequently without testing others. That said, we focus in modeling thousands of AMDR series in Brazil, evaluating ten PDF candidates to find the best fit and defining the most indicated to describe AMDR in the country. The methodology consisted of: acquisition, structuration and screening process by temporal and statistical criteria; fit of the 2-, 3- and multiparameter PDFs to the AMDR series based on the L-moments method; quantile estimation; and PDFs performance assessment by Filliben test and the relative absolute error. From the almost 4 thousand AMDR series investigated, we concluded that: Gumbel and Exponential provided the poorest performance (32.1–60.2% of non-satisfactory fits); multiparametric PDFs (Wakeby and Kappa) are the most indicated for modeling AMDR in Brazil; Gumbel had the highest error values for quantile estimate, especially for high RP; novelties and advances on probabilistic modeling of AMDR in Brazil were provided, helping decision makers with accurate and essential technical information for many purposes. Heavy rainfall Hydrological series Nonparametric trend test Filliben test Wakeby probabilistic distribution Design storm Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4076196","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":278882120,"identity":"f1e557c1-d6e1-4399-b13a-2adcb164a2b9","order_by":0,"name":"Aryane Araujo Rodrigues","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-682X","institution":"Federal University of Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aryane","middleName":"Araujo","lastName":"Rodrigues","suffix":""},{"id":278882121,"identity":"1dc9a76e-9fad-429b-bbeb-58745da4d20b","order_by":1,"name":"Tamara Leitzke Caldeira Beskow","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Federal University of Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tamara","middleName":"Leitzke Caldeira","lastName":"Beskow","suffix":""},{"id":278882122,"identity":"710e7b12-b226-4b21-ae0a-66b997b27f72","order_by":2,"name":"Tirzah Moreira Siqueira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Federal University of Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tirzah","middleName":"Moreira","lastName":"Siqueira","suffix":""},{"id":278882123,"identity":"15ed37ab-7710-41e1-a0a8-11efc98a20b9","order_by":3,"name":"Samuel Beskow","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Federal University of Pelotas: Universidade Federal de Pelotas","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Samuel","middleName":"","lastName":"Beskow","suffix":""},{"id":278882124,"identity":"c8185512-95c1-41e0-979b-9f71fe5eb2ce","order_by":4,"name":"Carlos Rogerio de Mello","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Federal University of Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Carlos","middleName":"Rogerio","lastName":"de Mello","suffix":""},{"id":278882125,"identity":"a5061012-4a16-43ce-90e7-eb64cd253959","order_by":5,"name":"Luis Fernando Coutinho de Oliveira","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Federal University of Lavras: Universidade Federal de Lavras","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Luis","middleName":"Fernando Coutinho","lastName":"de Oliveira","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-11 15:48:17","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":55948811,"identity":"0add617b-ade7-456f-be77-20ea87b05d71","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-05-06 17:31:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1628812,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"article.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4076196/v1_covered_b8da8c78-a8ec-45d4-880a-35604dbf70f5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Frequency analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall in Brazil with multiparameter probability density functions","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Heavy rainfall, Hydrological series, Nonparametric trend test, Filliben test, Wakeby probabilistic distribution, Design storm","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eFor water resources engineering and management, understand the extreme rainfall events it\u0026rsquo;s essential. Using rainfall frequency analysis, one can fit many Probability Density Functions (PDFs) to the rainfall series and identify the best fit through the goodness-of-fit tests, allowing the estimate of Annual Maximum Daily Rainfall (AMDR) quantiles for different Return Periods (RP). Recommendations regarding the best PDFs for this have been made for some countries, however, in the opposite direction, Brazil has no guidelines or recommendations such as the above mentioned, and Gumbel distribution still is the most used PDF for modeling AMDR, frequently without testing others. That said, we focus in modeling thousands of AMDR series in Brazil, evaluating ten PDF candidates to find the best fit and defining the most indicated to describe AMDR in the country. The methodology consisted of: acquisition, structuration and screening process by temporal and statistical criteria; fit of the 2-, 3- and multiparameter PDFs to the AMDR series based on the L-moments method; quantile estimation; and PDFs performance assessment by Filliben test and the relative absolute error. From the almost 4 thousand AMDR series investigated, we concluded that: Gumbel and Exponential provided the poorest performance (32.1\u0026ndash;60.2% of non-satisfactory fits); multiparametric PDFs (Wakeby and Kappa) are the most indicated for modeling AMDR in Brazil; Gumbel had the highest error values for quantile estimate, especially for high RP; novelties and advances on probabilistic modeling of AMDR in Brazil were provided, helping decision makers with accurate and essential technical information for many purposes.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Frequency analysis of annual maximum daily rainfall in Brazil with multiparameter probability density functions","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-14 17:44:51","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4076196/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"2397ee4a-582c-45b8-9956-eaef7d4b7469","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 14th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-05-06T17:23:02+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-14 17:44:51","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4076196","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4076196","identity":"rs-4076196","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0